Abstract
Objective
Neuroendoscopic procedures inside the ventricular system always bear the risk for an unexpected intraoperative hemorrhage with potentially devastating consequences. The authors present here their experience, and a stage-to-stage guide for the endoscopic management of intraoperative hemorrhages.
Methods
A step-by-step guide for the management to gain control of and stop the bleeding is described including a grading system. More advanced techniques are presented in cases examples.
Conclusion
Most of intraoperative hemorrhages can be controlled by constant irrigation and coagulation. More advanced techniques can be applied quickly and easily to ensure control of the hemorrhages and avoid the need for a microsurgical conversion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Background
The acceptance and knowledge about intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedures have spread over the last decades. Procedures like endoscopic ventriculostomy have become standard in many departments [5, 7, 8], but also, more sophisticated endoscopic procedures such as tumor resection or cyst wall fenestration are more frequently performed due to comparably low complication rates [2]. One of the most feared potentially live threatening complications is an intraoperative hemorrhage. The “red out” leads to an instant loss of vision and orientation of the surgeon. This might cause damage to the surrounding tissue and might result in an abortion of the procedure or a conversion to a microsurgical technique [9]. Although the reports and rates of intraoperative hemorrhage differ in the literature regarding the bleeding rates and severity, the intraoperative managing of this complication is mandatory to every neuroendoscopist [1, 4]. Therefore, the authors present a grading system for intraoperative hemorrhage during endoscopic procedures and a step-by-step escalation of the available surgical techniques to regain intraoperative orientation and to control and stop the hemorrhage.
Relevant surgical anatomy
The endoscopic anatomy of the ventricular system has been described in detail many times [10]. Some anatomical structures should be considered for a higher risk for an intraoperative hemorrhage (Fig. 1). The major artery, that is associated with the ventricular system, is the basilar artery. It is under potential risk at the floor of the third ventricle e.g. in case of an ETV. A less common procedure might be the fenestration of the lamina terminals, where the anterior cerebral arteries can be exposed. Certain draining veins should be kept in mind, too. The thalamostriate, the superior choroidal and septal veins meet at the foramen of Monro to form the internal cerebral vein. Any manipulation around these veins such as entering the third ventricle through the foramen of Monro or performing a septostomy can harm these vessels. The chorioid plexus is a well-vascularized structure; it is present in the lateral ventricles, the roof of the third ventricle and as well in the fourth ventricle. Finally, every intra- or paraventricular tumor or tumor like lesion might be well vascularized and can bear the risk of an intraoperative hemorrhage. Tumors and cyst might be stiff or adhesive to adjacent tissue or vessels. This can result in major bleedings during the removal e.g. in colloid cyst removal at the roof of the third ventricle. Therefore, a detailed preoperative imaging including contrast agent MRI and a detailed surgical planning are strongly recommended.
Hemorrhage grading
The intraoperative bleeding in our department is defined by a so far unpublished grading system (Fig. 2). Grade 0 means no kind of hemorrhage. A grade I bleeding is present, when the intraventricular vision is affected by small amounts of blood. A blurry vision occurs that can be easily managed by irrigation. A grade II hemorrhage is defined as a hemorrhage with quickly expanding blood that causes a blurry vision. Blood streaks are identified. The anatomy of the ventricle is still identifiable and the vision can be cleared by irrigation. The grade III hemorrhage is already a major bleeding which significantly affects the endoscopic vision. Anatomical structures can be rarely visualized although constant irrigation is applied. A grade IV hemorrhage describes the so-called red out with complete loss of vision. No anatomical structures can be identified with constant irrigation.
Perioperative management of intraventricular endoscopic procedures
General recommendation for the save performance of an intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedure have been described manifold in the literature. The equipment depends on the intended procedure and may vary from flexible endoscopes to work sheath based rigid endoscopes. In general speaking, an ideal trajectory planning, anatomical knowledge, and the availability of a neuronavigation system are recommended. All patients should be scheduled for an intensive care unit surveillance. A perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is mandatory. All patients should receive a postoperative CT scan after 24 h or in case of new neurological deficits. Fever might occur within 48 h after plentiful irrigation. A CSF diagnostic and antibiotic therapy should be initiated if an infection could be assumed. The need for an additional shunt therapy in the follow-up should be kept in mind.
Step-by-step management of hemorrhages
The irrigation system should be checked and is absolutely vital during the procedure. Irrigation is performed with 35° warm Ringer solution in general. The irrigation outflow at the endoscope should be checked routinely to avoid an unintended ICP increase during the procedure. A clear communication between all involved medical staff in the OR should be obtained. This ensures a short reaction time, and irrigation will be applied as the neurosurgeon intends.
The first step, that is mandatory during an unintended bleeding event, is to obtain the recent position with the endoscope. It is absolute important to fix the recent position independently from the use of a holding system or application of the free hand technique. Otherwise, the orientation within the ventricular system can be lost due to the worsening view. Moving the endoscope without clear visualization and orientation may harm the adjacent tissue and even increase the bleeding.
The second step is to ensure irrigation by the assistant or by an automated device. In grade I or grade II bleedings, the vision should normalize and the bleeding source can be identified. Smaller bleedings can stop spontaneously under constant irrigation. Irrigation can also help to improve the vision in a grade III hemorrhage to identify the anatomic structures again and to find the bleeding source.
The next step should be the coagulation of the bleeding source, if the hemorrhage does not stop under irrigation. This can be performed with bipolar coagulation electrodes or lasers. In the case of a stoma-associated bleeding, a mild dilation of the balloon catheter may stop the bleeding by compression (Fig. 3). The potential thermic damage to the surrounding tissue must keep in mind.
A further escalation is necessary, if these steps are not sufficient enough to control the hemorrhage and the vision is still insufficient. There are different techniques that could be applied. A slight increase in ICP by closing the outflow channel of the endoscope might stop venous bleedings. This technique has described from experts and requires a detailed monitoring of the patient. However, this technique is not applied in our institute.
Another method is the so-called small chamber technique, which was described by Manwaring et al. first [6]. Trocar-based endoscopes allow a retreat of the endoscope within the working sheath. This creates a small chamber, which can be constantly irrigated and ensures clear vision in a limited area. The endoscope can be placed over the bleeding source and coagulation can be performed under clear vision (Fig. 4).
The more often used technique in our department is the so-called dry field technique [9]. In this technique, the CSF is carefully sucked out using a pediatric sucking tube from the anesthesiologists. This creates an air environment, which has two positive effects. The vision is cleared so the bleeding source and orientation is granted. The gravity and air support the clot formation and supports the hemorrhage management. The ventricles are refilled with ringer solution afterwards. This technique can also be performed in a partial DFT. This means that, if the target of the surgery is placed on the highest position, only parts of the CSF have to be sucked out (Fig. 5).
When the hemorrhage is under control, certain considerations should be kept in mind after the end of the procedure. The third ventricle and aqueduct should be inspected to ensure no blockade by any clot formation. In case of a not removable clot, an ETV is recommended. Alternatively, an EVD should be placed [3, 9].
Limitations
A potential side effect of the DFT might be the ventricle collapse or a postoperative subdural hematoma or hygroma. In our own case series, none of these effects occurred; however, slow CSF aspiration is mandatory [9]. Uncontrollable bleedings that are not manageable with endoscopic techniques require the conversion to a microsurgical approach [3]. The surgeon and staff should always be prepared for this option, although it might cause further damage to the brain.
Specific patient information
In general, tumor-associated intraventricular endoscopic procedures have a risk for procedure associated morbidity and mortality of around 10% and 1% respectively [1]. Intraoperative hemorrhage occurred in more than 80% of our own cases; most of them were of grade I and II. Therefore, we advise to inform patients about the common observation of intraoperative hemorrhage prior to surgery. However, most of them can be managed with endoscopic techniques. The rate of conversation to a microsurgical approach is less than 5%. An additional EVD might be necessary. Postoperative fever is a common symptom after intraventricular endoscopy especially under extended irrigation. All patients should be informed that a secondary shunt dependency could occur. This might happened due to the tumor progress, ETV failure, or malresorptive hydrocephalus. The shunt dependency rate in our case series was 11% due to different reasons.
Summary
-
1)
The endoscopic technique can be a helpful tool in selected cases of intraventricular tumors. Particularly in cases selected for biopsy in intraventricular tumors and in cases located mainly in the third ventricle with difficult access the endoscopic technique might offer distinct advantages.
-
2)
The technique can be combined with other endoscopic intraventricular procedures like an ETV. A careful trajectory planning is mandatory.
-
3)
Intraoperative hemorrhages are a frequent problem in tumor surgery. Almost in all cases, an intraoperative blurring of vision occurs. The surgeon should be prepared for this circumstance.
-
4)
The position of the endoscope should remain stationary, when the bleeding occurs and a constant irrigation should be ensured all the time.
-
5)
The management of intraoperative hemorrhage should be performed in an escalating technique starting with constant irrigation. The next steps should include coagulation, the option of mild compression, SCT and in the last consequence the application of the DFT.
-
6)
Most of the hemorrhages can be stopped by constant irrigation.
-
7)
The correct application of the DFT does not bear a high risk for ventricle collapse or postoperative subdural hematoma.
-
8)
Postoperative surveillance on an intensive care unit is mandatory. An additional EVD could be placed.
-
9)
Severe postoperative complications are rare. Fever is a common symptom after extensive irrigation.
-
10)
The conversation rate to a microsurgical approach remains below 5% in our case series.
Abbreviations
- CSF:
-
Cerebral spine fluid
- ETV:
-
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy
- ICP:
-
Intracranial pressure
- EVD:
-
External ventricular drainage
- DFT:
-
Dry field technique; SCT: small chamber technique
References
Barber SM, Rangel-Castilla L, Baskin D (2013) Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis. Minim Invasive Surg 2013:898753. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/898753
Beems T, Grotenhuis JA (2004) Long-term complications and definition of failure of neuroendoscopic procedures. Childs Nerv Syst 20:868–877
Cinalli G, Spennato P, Ruggiero C, Aliberti F, Trischitta V, Buonocore MC, Cianciulli E, Maggi G (2007) Complications following endoscopic intracranial procedures in children. Childs Nerv Syst 23(6):633–644
Constantini S, Mohanty A, Zymberg S, Cavalheiro S, Mallucci C, Hellwig D et al (2013) Safety and diagnostic accuracy of neuroendoscopic biopsies: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:704–709
Di Vincenzo J, Keiner D, Gaab MR, Schroeder HW, Oertel JM (2014) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: preoperative considerations and intraoperative strategy based on 300 procedures. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 75(1):20–30
Manwaring JC, El Damaty A, Baldauf J, Schroeder HW (2014) The small-chamber irrigation technique (SCIT): a simple maneuver for managing intraoperative hemorrhage during endoscopic intraventricular surgery. Neurosurgery 10:375–379
Oertel JM, Baldauf J, Schroeder HW, Gaab MR (2009) Endoscopic options in children: experience with 134 procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3(2):81–89
Oertel J, Linsler S, Emmerich C, Keiner D, Gaab M, Schroeder H, Senger S (2017) Results of combined intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedures in 130 Cases with Special Focus on Fornix Contusions. World Neurosurg 108:817–825
Oertel J, Linsler S, Csokonay A, Schroeder HWS, Senger S (2018) Management of severe intraoperative hemorrhage during intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedures: the dry field technique. J Neurosurg 131(3):931–935
Torres-Corzo JG, Rangel-Castilla L, Nakaji P (2016) Neuroendoscopic Surgery, Thieme Publishers Stuttgart, Germany ISBN 978-1-62623-161-0
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with human participants. It is an anonymous retrospective evaluation.
Competing interests
Joachim Oertel was a former consultant of Karl Storz Company, Tuttlingen, Germany. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgical technique evaluation
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 (MP4 433983 kb) Video. Examples of the various intraoperative hemorrhage types are demonstrated. Subsequently, the techniques to reobtain hemostasis such as compression, small chamber irrigation, and dry field are presented.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Oertel, J., Linsler, S., Strohm, L. et al. Management of severe intraoperative hemorrhage during intraventricular neuroendoscopic procedures: the dry field technique. Acta Neurochir 164, 2551–2557 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05207-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05207-9