Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Medicosurgical management of deep wound infections after thoracolumbar instrumentation: risk factors of poor outcomes

  • Original Article -Spine - Other
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) after thoracolumbar osteosynthesis is a common complication. Its management relies on surgical revision and antibiotic therapy, but treatment failure is not uncommon. The aim of our study was to assess the frequency of SSI management failure and its risk factors.

Methods

A retrospective study of patients hospitalized from 2011 to 2019 at the University Hospital of Caen was carried out. The infection rate and the time to onset of failure were assessed over a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Treatment failure was defined as the occurrence of a new intervention in the spine in the year following the end of antibiotic therapy, the establishment of long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, or death from any cause within 1 year of the end of antibiotic therapy. We compared the treatment failure group with the treatment success group to determine risk factors for treatment failure.

Results

A total of 2881 patients underwent surgery during the study period, and 92 developed an SSI, corresponding to an SSI rate of 3.19%. Thirty-six percent of the patients with an SSI presented treatment failure. The median time to failure was 31 days. On multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus was identified as a risk factor for treatment failure, whereas prolonged postoperative drainage for 4 to 5 days was a protective factor.

Conclusions

The number of failures was significant, and failure occurred mainly during the early phase. To decrease the risk of treatment failure, prolonged duration of postoperative drainage seems to be helpful. Additionally, as diabetes is a risk factor for treatment failure, good control of glycemia in these patients might impact their outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

BMI:

Body mass index

MDR:

Multiresistant bacteria

DAIR:

Debridement, antibiotic, irrigation, and implant retention

IS/RS interval:

Initial surgery/revision surgery interval

MetiR:

Methicillin resistant

SSI:

Surgical site infection

References

  1. Andrés-Cano P, Cerván A, Rodríguez-Solera M, Antonio Ortega J, Rebollo N, Guerado E (2018) Surgical infection after posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis: CT analysis of spinal fusion: SSI after posterolateral lumbar spine arthrodesis. Orthop Surg 10(2):89–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12371

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Barbanti-Brodano G, Griffoni C, Halme J et al (2020) Spinal surgery complications: an unsolved problem—is the World Health Organization Safety Surgical Checklist an useful tool to reduce them? Eur Spine J 29(5):927–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06203-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrey C, Launay O, Freitas E, Michel F, Laurent F, Chidiac C, Perrin G, Ferry T (2013) The follow-up of patients with postoperative infection of the spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(S1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1243-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benito N, Mur I, Ribera A et al (2019) The different microbial etiology of prosthetic joint infections according to route of acquisition and time after prosthesis implantation, including the role of multidrug-resistant organisms. J Clin Med 8(5):673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8050673

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Betz M, Uçkay I, Schüpbach R, Gröber T, Botter SM, Burkhard J, Holy D, Achermann Y, Farshad M (2020) Short postsurgical antibiotic therapy for spinal infections: protocol of prospective, randomized, unblinded, noninferiority trials (SASI trials). Trials 21(1):144. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4047-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Carl HM, Ahmed AK, Abu-Bonsrah N et al (2018) Risk factors for wound-related reoperations in patients with metastatic spine tumor. J Neurosurg Spine 28(6):663–668. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.10.SPINE1765

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen S-H, Lee C-H, Huang K-C, Hsieh P-H, Tsai S-Y (2015) Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes. Eur Spine J 24(3):561–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3636-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng H, Chan AK, Ammanuel SG et al (2020) Risk factors for deep surgical site infection following thoracolumbar spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 32(2):292–301. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.8.SPINE19479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubee V, Lenoir T, Leflon-Guibout V, Briere-Bellier C, Guigui P, Fantin B (2012) Three-month antibiotic therapy for early-onset postoperative spinal implant infections. Clin Infect Dis 55(11):1481–1487. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. European Spine Study Group, Haddad S, Núñez-Pereira S et al (2018) The impact of deep surgical site infection on surgical outcomes after posterior adult spinal deformity surgery: a matched control study. Eur Spine J 27(10):2518–2528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5583-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hegde V, Meredith DS, Kepler CK, Huang RC (2018) Management of postoperative spinal infections. World J Orthop 3(11):182–189. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v3.i11.182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. de la Hera B, Sánchez-Mariscal F, Gómez-Rice A, Vázquez-Vecilla I, Zúñiga L, Ruano-Soriano E (2021) Deep surgical-site infection following thoracolumbar instrumented spinal surgery: the experience of 25 years. Int J Spine Surg 15(1):144–152. https://doi.org/10.14444/8019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Janssen DMC, van Kuijk SMJ, d’Aumerie B, Willems P (2019) A prediction model of surgical site infection after instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery in adults. Eur Spine J 28(4):775–782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-05877-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JI, Suh KT, Kim S-J, Lee JS (2010) Implant removal for the management of infection after instrumented spinal fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 23(4):258–265. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a9452c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB (2009) Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control 37(5):387–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Manet R, Ferry T, Castelain J-E, Bracho GP, Freitas-Olim E, Grando J, Barrey C (2018) Relevance of modified debridement-irrigation, antibiotic therapy and implant retention protocol for the management of surgical site infections: a series of 1694 instrumented spinal surgery. J Bone Jt Infect 3(5):266–272. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.28765

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mok JM, Guillaume TJ, Talu U, Berven SH, Deviren V, Kroeber M, Bradford DS, Hu SS (2009) Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a matched cohort analysis. Spine 34(6):578–583. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819a827c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ogihara S, Yamazaki T, Shiibashi M et al (2020) Risk factor analysis of deep surgical site infection after posterior instrumented fusion surgery for spinal trauma: a multicenter observational study. World Neurosurg 134:e524–e529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. On behalf of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS), Pesenti S, Pannu T et al (2018) What are the risk factors for surgical site infection after spinal fusion? A meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27(10):2469–2480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5733-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of Americaa. Clin Infect Dis 56(1):e1–e25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quraishi NA, Ahmed MS, Arealis G, Boszczyk BM, Edwards KL (2019) Does surgical site infection influence neurological outcome and survival in patients undergoing surgery for metastatic spinal cord compression? Eur Spine J 28(4):792–797. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5797-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwarz EM, Parvizi J, Gehrke T et al (2019) 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions. J Orthop Res 37(5):997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wille H, Dauchy F-A, Desclaux A, Dutronc H, Vareil M-O, Dubois V, Vital J-M, Dupon M (2017) Efficacy of debridement, antibiotic therapy and implant retention within three months during postoperative instrumented spine infections. Infect Dis 49(4):261–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/23744235.2016.1255351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou J, Wang R, Huo X, Xiong W, Kang L, Xue Y (2020) Incidence of surgical site infection after spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine 45(3):208–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zimlichman E, Henderson D, Tamir O, Franz C, Song P, Yamin CK, Keohane C, Denham CR, Bates DW (2013) Health care–associated infections: a meta-analysis of costs and financial impact on the US Health Care System. JAMA Intern Med 173(22):2039. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

PF and TG designed the study. PF, JM, AB, and FL made the data recording. PF and AF made the statistical analysis. PF and TG wrote the manuscript. TG, EE, RV, JM, AB, and AF corrected the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Frechon.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional ethics committee of the Caen Normandie University Hospital (n 1099) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine - Other

Appendix

Appendix

Deep incisional SSI

Must meet the following criteria

The date of event occurs within 30 or 90 days after the NHSN operative procedure (where day 1 = the procedure date) according to the list in Table 2

AND

involves deep soft tissues of the incision (for example, fascial and muscle layers)

AND

patient has at least one of the following:

  a. purulent drainage from the deep incision

  b. a deep incision that spontaneously dehisces, or is deliberately opened or aspirated by a surgeon, physician*·or physician designee

      AND

      organism(s) identified from the deep soft tissues of the incision by a culture or non-culture based microbiologic testing method which is performed for purposes of clinical diagnosis or treatment (for example, not Active Surveillance Culture/Testing (ASC/AST)) or culture or non­culture based microbiologic testing method is not performed. A culture or non-culture based test from the deep soft tissues of the incision that has a negative finding does not meet this criterion

     AND

     patient has at least one of the following signs or symptoms: fever (> 38 °C); localized pain or tenderness

  c. an abscess or other evidence of infection involving the deep incision that is detected on gross anatomical or histopathologic exam, or imaging test

*The term physician for the purpose of application of the NHSN SSI criteria may be interpreted to mean a surgeon, infectious disease physician, emergency physician, other physician on the case, or physi cian’s designee (nurse practitioner or physician’s assistant)

  1. Definition of a deep SSI-Center for Disease Control-2021

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frechon, P., Michon, J., Baldolli, A. et al. Medicosurgical management of deep wound infections after thoracolumbar instrumentation: risk factors of poor outcomes. Acta Neurochir 164, 881–890 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05128-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-022-05128-7

Keywords

Navigation