Abstract
Background
A 54-year-old female was referred to our clinic with a lesion of the lower fourth ventricle extending to the median aperture. Here, we report the use a minimally invasive sub-occipital approach (MISA) as a safe and effective surgical management.
Method
We performed a MISA using a short midline incision and a 1-cm sub-occipital craniectomy. Dissection of the lesion was performed, and “en bloc” resection could be achieved. The lesion was confirmed to be a grade I sub-ependymoma.
Conclusion
MISA can be safely used when confronted to a lesion of the lower fourth ventricle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Relevant surgical anatomy
The anatomy of the fourth ventricle and its surroundings is shown in Fig. 1. The specific surgical anatomy is shown in Fig. 2. The midline skin incision starts 2 to 3 cm below the external occipital protuberance and should extend circa 4 cm inferiorly. Attention should be paid to stay on the midline, i.e., into the nuchal ligament, since it is an avascular plane. Image intensifier control or navigation may be used to avoid unnecessary detachment of the posterior spinal muscles [1,2,3,4,5,6].
The superficial muscle layers consist of the trapezius (superficially) and splenius capitis (deep) muscles. The intermediate muscle layer consists of semispinalis capitis muscle; the deep muscle layer consists of rectus capitis major (lateral) and minor (medial) muscles.
The vertebral artery turns around the lateral mass of the atlas from lateral to medial and enters into the foramen magnum through the atlanto-occipital membrane. The midline of the atlanto-occipital membrane has to be identified before the foramen magnum is carefully drilled. After opening the dura, the cisterna magna is seen. The foramen Magendie and obex are identified, in between the two cerebellar tonsils. The distal floor of the fourth ventricle may be seen (Fig. 3).
Description of the technique
A park-bench positioning was used. The head was flexed and slightly rotated towards the floor, using a Mayfield head clamp. To avoid shifting during the surgical approach, the surgeon has to stay on the linea nuchalis: to facilitate orientation, the surgeon can mark the midline before turning the patient head, at the very beginning of the positioning. The head is rotated to maximize exposition and improve ergonomics. The skin was prepped and draped. Neuromonitoring bilaterally of cranial nerves IX to XII, as well as MEP and SSEP, was performed. A midline, linear incision of 4 cm was performed below the inion. The subcutaneous tissue was incised using the monopolar. Attention was paid to stay on the midline, to avoid unnecessary bleeding.
The occipital bone above the foramen magnum and the posterior atlanto-occipital membrane were exposed. Using a 5-mm sharp drill, a small craniectomy of circa 10 by 10 mm was performed. Careful hemostasis using bone wax was done. The atlanto-occipital membrane was then incised.
The dura was carefully exposed and opened in a linear fashion to facilitate a rapid and watertight closure. The dura was suspended unilaterally and the cisterna magna opened. Subsequent CSF drainage was observed. The inferior aspect of the lesion was visible in the foramen of Magendie. A thorough inspection of the inferior surface of the tumor and its surroundings was undertaken using a micro-dissector.
The tumor was slowly detached from the floor of the ventricle, with the aid of ultra-fine-tipped Zhora® forceps. Further dissection using the natural plane between the tumor and the underlying parenchyma was performed using micro-dissectors. Whenever necessary, a micro-blade knife was used to detach the tumor from the floor of the fourth ventricle. Eventually, en bloc resection was achieved.
Cottonoids and gentle compression were used to control a venous bleeding, avoiding direct coagulation. After careful hemostasis, a water-tight closure of the dura was achieved, using a PDS® 5-0 running suture.
Careful soft tissue closure was achieved using a running Monocryl® 3-0 in the muscle fascia and subcutaneous planes and a running Prolene® 4-0 for the skin closure. The postoperative MRI showed no residual tumor, with minimal stigma of the surgery (Fig. 4). The postoperative histo-pathology confirmed the diagnosis of WHO grade I sub-ependymoma.
The patient had no neurological deficits and an uneventful recovery.
Indications
Minimally invasive sub-occipital approach (MISA) is suitable for midline lesions of the foramen magnum, as well as the lower half of the fourth ventricle. More specifically, MISA can be performed for tumoral lesions such as sub-ependymomas of the fourth ventricle of midline, infratentorial metastasis, as well as lesions of the lower vermis and cavernomas of the lower trunk, for example. The size of the craniotomy can be adjusted to the lesion.
Limitations
Lesions with extensions to the upper half of the fourth ventricle are not candidates for MISA, since the control of the upper pole of the lesion and surroundings cannot be achieved safely. Patients with cervical arthrosis may have reduced cervical mobility, preventing proper neck flexion. Careful radiological assessment of the space between the posterior edge of the foramen magnum and the upper aspect of the posterior arch of C1 is mandatory.
How to avoid complications
Adequate neck flexion is key to proper access to the posterior atlanto-occipital corridor (POAC). Navigation or image intensifier may be used.
During the dissection, ensure to stay on the midline to avoid bleeding. Skewing to the lateral part of the foramen magnum exposes to the risk of vertebral artery injury and related venous plexus injury.
Do not manipulate the obex and do not coagulate floor of the 4th ventricle, even if bleeding is encountered. Gentle pressure using cottonoids as well as rinsing are sufficient. The manipulation of the floor of the fourth ventricle must be avoided, since it may cause lower cranial nerves deficit (mostly swallowing disorders, eventually requiring tracheostomy).
Water-tight closure is mandatory, to prevent postoperative CSF leaks. The deep, intermediate, and superficial muscle layers, as well as the subcutaneous planes, should be closed properly.
MISA should be performed by a trained surgeon, experienced in the classic sub-occipital telovelotonsillar approach, since MISA is actually a variation of the regular telovelar approach. The minimal invasive craniectomy allows less muscle retraction (resulting in less postoperative pain) and reduces perioperative bleeding as well as the risk for postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leakage. However, working in a narrow space with limited maneuverability may result in higher risks of intra-operative bleeding or overlooking a piece of tumor, especially when performed by inexperienced surgeons.
Specific perioperative considerations
It is important to assess the neck mobility of the patient prior to surgery. Similarly, the POAC should be accurately measured on the preoperative MRI. Patients with limited POAC may not be candidates for MISA. However, excessive flexion should be avoided, since it may impede proper venous outflow.
Propofol® is used for general anesthesia because of the postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. Postoperatively, the patient should be monitored for 24 h in a proper intermediate care unit.
Specific information to give to the patient about surgery and potential risks
Patients should be warned about general risks of the surgery, e.g., hematoma, postoperative infection, CSF leaks, and pseudo-meningocele. Unrecognized skewing towards the lateral foramen magnum may lead to vertebral artery injury, requiring endovascular occlusion.
Conclusion
As a variation of the regular telovelar approach, the MISA can be safely used when confronted to a lesion of the lower 4th ventricle. Careful preoperative assessment of the POAC and proper patient positioning are key to achieve complete resection with the MISA.
References
Bi Z, Ren X, Zhang J, Jia W (2015) Clinical, radiological, and pathological features in 43 cases of intracranial subependymoma. J Neurosurg 122:49–60. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.9.JNS14155
Matsushima T, Rhoton AL Jr, Lenkey C (1982) Microsurgery of the fourth ventricle: part I-microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 11:631–667. https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198211000-00008
Matsushima T, Rhoton AL Jr, De Oliveira E, Peace D (1983) Microsurgical anatomy of the veins of the posterior fossa. J Neurosurg 59:63–105. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.1.0063
Mussi A, Rhoton AL Jr (2000) Telovelar approach to the fourth ventricle: microsurgical anatomy. J Neurosurg 92:812–823. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.5.0812
Ragel BT, Osborn AG, Whang K, Townsend JJ, Jensen RL, Couldwell WT (2006) Subependymomas: an analysis of clinical and imaging features. Neurosurgery 58:881–890; discussion 881-890. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000209928.04532.09
Spoto GP, Press GA, Hesselink JR, Solomon M (1990) Intracranial ependymoma and subependymoma: MR manifestations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 11:83–91
Submission statement
The present abstract and related video are original and have not been submitted elsewhere in part or whole.
Funding
Open access funding provided by University of Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Key Points
1. MISA should be considered when confronted with lesions in the lower half of the 4th ventricle (i.e., typically below the striae medullares).
2. MISA should only be performed by surgeons familiar with the standard sub-occipital approach.
3. Provide proper neck flexion during patient positioning.
4. Even during the muscular dissection, the use of a microscope is preferable.
5. It is of paramount importance to stay on the midline during the posterior muscular dissection, in order to reduce the risks of vertebral artery injury.
6. The dura should be incised linearly and suspended.
7. The obex and the floor of the 4th ventricle should not be manipulated; direct coagulation on the parenchyma is prohibited.
8. Even though en bloc resection is ideal, it should not be targeted at all costs.
9. Inspect the fourth ventricle after tumor resection. If necessary, apply gentle pressure using a cottonoids.
10. Watertight dural closure under the microscope using a running monofilament 5-0 suture and careful, multiplane closure with running monofilament suture in the muscle and subcutaneous fascia layers should be achieved. Leave no drain.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Tumor - Other
Electronic supplementary material
(MP4 457684 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Corniola, M.V., Meling, T.R. How I do it: minimally invasive resection of a sub-ependymoma of the fourth ventricle. Acta Neurochir 164, 767–770 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04601-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04601-5