Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Histopathologic changes inside the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve obtained from patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica

  • Original Article - Peripheral Nerves
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica, a neurectomy of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) can be performed to alleviate pain symptoms. The neurectomy procedure can be performed either as a primary procedure or after failure of a previously performed neurolysis or decompression of the LFNC (secondary neurectomy). The goal of the present study was to quantify the histopathologic changes inside the LFCN obtained from patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica, and specifically to compare to what extend these changes are present after primary versus secondary neurectomy.

Methods

A total of 39 consecutive cases were analyzed microscopically: in 29 cases, the neurectomy had been performed as primary procedure, in 10 cases, after failed neurolysis. Intraneural changes were quantified for the (1) thickening of perineurium, (2) deposition of mucoid, and (3) percentage of collagen. Analysis was performed at three levels: proximal to, at, and distal to the previous site of compression. In addition, correlations were investigated for the duration of symptoms and the body mass index (BMI) of the patient.

Results

Intraneural changes were found consistently in all cases. There was no significant difference for the primary and secondary neurectomy groups. There was also no relation with the previous site of compression. There was a weak correlation between the occurrence of intraneural changes and the duration of symptoms, although this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Histopathological changes in this study were found in all patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica regardless of a previously performed neurolysis procedure. This finding suggests that the intraneural changes that occur in persistent meralgia paresthetica are largely irreversible and support the surgical strategy of neurectomy as an alternative to neurolysis, also for primary surgical treatment and not only after failure of neurolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We are currently investigating the effectiveness of the neurolysis and neurectomy procedures in a randomized controlled trial, named the STOMP trial (Surgical Treatment Options for Meralgia Paresthetica).

References

  1. Aszmann OC, Dellon ES, Dellon AL (1997) Anatomical course of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and its susceptibility to compression and injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:600–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berini SE, Spinner RJ, Jentoft ME, Engelstad JK, Staff NP, Suanprasert N, Dyck PJ, Klein CJ (2014) Chronic meralgia paresthetica and neurectomy: a clinical pathologic study. Neurology 82:1551–1555. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000367

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. de Ruiter GC, Kloet A (2015) Comparison of effectiveness of different surgical treatments for meralgia paresthetica: results of a prospective observational study and protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 134:7–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Ruiter GCW, Kloet F (2018) Anatomical considerations on transposition of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Clin Anat. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23057

  5. de Ruiter GC, Wurzer JA, Kloet A (2012) Decision making in the surgical treatment of meralgia paresthetica: neurolysis versus neurectomy. Acta Neurochir 154:1765–1772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1431-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Ruiter GC, Wurzer JA, Kloet A (2015) Recurrence of meralgia paresthetica years after a neurexeresis procedure: a case report. Br J Neurosurg 29:885–887. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2015.1054358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanna AS (2017) Lateral femoral cutaneous nerve transposition: renaissance of an old concept in the light of new anatomy. Clin Anat 30:409–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keegan JJ, Holyoke EA (1962) Meralgia paresthetica. An anatomical and surgical study. J Neurosurg 19:341–345. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1962.19.4.0341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Payne R, Seaman S, Sieg E, Langan S, Harbaugh K, Rizk E (2017) Evaluating the evidence: is neurolysis or neurectomy a better treatment for meralgia paresthetica? Acta Neurochir 159:931–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3136-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwaiger K, Panzenbeck P, Purschke M, Russe E, Kaplan R, Heinrich K, Mandal P, Wechselberger G (2018) Surgical decompression of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) for meralgia paresthetica treatment: experimental or state of the art? A single-center outcome analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e11914. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000011914

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Maartje Kunen, medical artist, for the illustrations presented in Fig. 5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Godard C. W. de Ruiter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (name of institute/committee) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. No ethical approval was required for the retrospective part of the study. For the STOMP trial, ethical approval was obtained before start of the study (Dutch trial registry: NTR4530).

Additional information

Comments

This study correlates histopathological changes in the lateral femoral cutaneous nerves of patients who underwent either a primary neurolysis followed by a neurectomy due to persistence of symptoms and those who underwent a primary neurectomy. Most of the pathological changes seen in the nerves were similar in the two groups and also did not correlate with either duration of symptoms (although this can be somewhat difficult to assess as the authors point out) or BMI of the patient. These findings are important to report because they are not what one would necessarily expect or predict a priori and have important implications about treatment and further studies that need to be done.

Michel Kliot,

CA, USA

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Peripheral Nerves

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Ruiter, G.C.W., Lim, J., Thomassen, B.J.W. et al. Histopathologic changes inside the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve obtained from patients with persistent symptoms of meralgia paresthetica. Acta Neurochir 161, 263–269 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3773-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3773-8

Keywords

Navigation