Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: its clinical and angiographic perspectives

  • Original Article - Vascular
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To assess the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs), the authors retrospectively reviewed our 7-year experience. We evaluated the obliteration rate, improvement in clinical symptoms, and complications.

Methods

Thirty patients with DAVF underwent SRS using a Gamma Knife between 2009 and 2015. Twenty-three patients were treated with SRS alone, and seven patients underwent SRS for residual or recurrent DAVFs after embolization or surgery. Chemosis, diplopia, and pulsating tinnitus were the most common symptoms. Median target volume was 2.9 cm3 (range, 0.8–13.6 cm3), and median radiation dose to the target was 17 Gy (range, 12–20 Gy). Median follow-up period was 33 months (range, 6–82 months).

Results

At the last neuroimaging follow-up, DAVFs were totally obliterated in 23 patients (77%) and subtotally in 7 (23%). At the last clinical follow-up, 21 patients (70%) showed complete recovery, and 9 (30%) showed incomplete recovery in symptoms or signs. None experienced worsening symptoms or signs. Asymptomatic perilesional edema after SRS occurred in one patient (3%). Total obliteration rates after SRS were 43% at 1 year, 79% at 2 years, and 95% at 5 years. Improvement rates of neurological function after SRS were 12% at 1 month, 52% at 2 months, 72% at 3 months, and 96% at 6 months. A multivariate analysis revealed that Borden type 1 (p = 0.019, hazard ratio, 3.254, 95% confidence interval, 1.216–8.707) was significantly associated with symptom improvement.

Conclusions

SRS for intracranial DAVFs provided a high obliteration rate and a relatively low risk of radiation-induced complications. In selected benign cases without cortical venous drainage, SRS is a safe and effective treatment for symptom relief and fistula obliteration, even though the time course of improvement is longer than those of embolization and surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrow DL, Spector RH, Braun IF, Landman JA, Tindall SC, Tindall GT (1985) Classification and treatment of spontaneous carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas. J Neurosurg 62:248–256

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Borden JA, Wu JK, Shucart WA (1995) A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 82:166–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen CJ, Lee CC, Ding D, Starke RM, Chivukula S, Yen CP, Moosa S, Xu Z, Pan DH, Sheehan JP (2015) Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: a systematic review. J Neurosurg 122:353–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung SJ, Kim JS, Kim JC, Lee SK, Kwon SU, Lee MC, Suh DC (2002) Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: analysis of 60 patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 13:79–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cifarelli CP, Kaptain G, Yen CP, Schlesinger D, Sheehan JP (2010) Gamma Knife radiosurgery for dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery 67:1230–1235

  6. Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, Bailly AL, Houdart E, Casasco A, Chiras J, Merland JJ (1995) Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 194:671–680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hanakita S, Koga T, Shin M, Shojima M, Igaki H, Saito N (2012) Role of gamma knife surgery in the treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 117(Suppl):158–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Yang HC, Flannery TJ, Awan NR, Niranjan A, Novotny J Jr, Lunsford LD (2012) Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, part 3: outcome predictors and risks after repeat radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 116:21–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon BJ, Han MH, Kang HS, Chang KH (2005) MR imaging findings of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: relations with venous drainage patterns. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2500–2507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Landman JA, Braun IF (1985) Spontaneous closure of a dural arteriovenous fistula associated with acute hearing loss. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 6:448–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Loumiotis I, Lanzino G, Daniels D, Sheehan J, Link M (2011) Radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs): a review. Neurosurg Rev 34:305–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Macdonald JH, Millar JS, Barker CS (2010) Endovascular treatment of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: a single-centre, 14-year experience and the impact of Onyx on local practise. Neuroradiology 52:387–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Natarajan SK, Ghodke B, Kim LJ, Hallam DK, Britz GW, Sekhar LN (2010) Multimodality treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas in the Onyx era: a single center experience. World Neurosurg 73:365–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Onizuka M, Mori K, Takahashi N, Kawahara I, Hiu T, Toda K, Baba H, Yonekura M (2003) Gamma knife surgery for the treatment of spontaneous dural carotid-cavernous fistulas. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 43:477–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pan DH, Chung WY, Guo WY, Wu HM, Liu KD, Shiau CY, Wang LW (2002) Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of dural arteriovenous fistulas involving the transverse-sigmoid sinus. J Neurosurg 96:823–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park SH, Hwang SK (2009) Transcranial Doppler study of cerebral arteriovenous malformations after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. J Clin Neurosci 16:378–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pollock BE, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Patel AK, Bissonette DJ, Lunsford LD (1996) Magnetic resonance imaging: an accurate method to evaluate arteriovenous malformations after stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 85:1044–1049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pollock BE, Nichols DA, Garrity JA, Gorman DA, Stafford SL (1999) Stereotactic radiosurgery and particulate embolization for cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulae. Neurosurgery 45:459–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M (2010) Curative embolization with Onyx of dural arteriovenous fistulas with cortical venous drainage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1516–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang HC, Kano H, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Horowitz MB, Lunsford LD (2010) Stereotactic radiosurgery with or without embolization for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. Neurosurgery 67:1276–1283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seong-Hyun Park.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

No funding was received for this research. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Comments

The article prepresents typical results after stereotactic radiosurgery of DAVFs and provides evidence against the opinion that, due to their specific flow characteristics, DAVFs cannot be treated radiosurgically. Furthermore it is interesting that patients experienced rather early symptom relief, even independent of the obliteration. Both the symptom relief and obliteration rate were particularly reliable in cavernous DAVFs with 94% of patients with ocular symptoms showing improvement within 6 months and for pulsatile tinnitus this obviously improved in all patients within 5 months.

Bodo Lippitz

Hamburg, Germany

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, SH., Park, KS., Kang, DH. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: its clinical and angiographic perspectives. Acta Neurochir 159, 1093–1103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3177-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3177-1

Keywords

Navigation