Correction to: Microchimica Acta

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-3047-4

The published version of this article, unfortunately, contains an error in that Fig. 2 shows the same plots as Fig. 3. The correct Fig. 2 is shown below.

Fig. 2
figure 1

Photocurrent response of PMS/Nf/FTO (a), CdTe QDs/Nf/FTO (b), TiO2-PMS/Nf/FTO (c) and TiO2-PMS/CdTe QDs/FTO (d) in the absence (red lines) and presence (black lines) of 700 μmol L−1 TA. Experiments carried in 0.1 mol L−1 PB (pH 7.0). Eapp = +0.4 V vs Ag/AgCl