Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moment Tensor Inversion and Coseismic Stress Characteristics of Mining-Induced Seismicity in Coal Pillar Area

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coal pillars are often set up to protect roadways from rockburst hazards in the working face; however, the presence of coal pillars is a “double-edged sword” because unreasonable settings can increase the risk of coal mining. In this study, we used the 73upper11 working face in the Baodian coal mine as the engineering background to explore the instability characteristics of coal–rock mass in coal pillar areas. The failure types and focal mechanisms of 21 events (ML ≥ 1.2) in coal pillars were investigated using the moment tensor inversion method. Considering the limitation that moment tensor inversion assumes a point source, we inverted the stress field of the remnant coal pillar area on both sides of the working face to find the dominant controlling factor of seismicity. These inversion results were then used as input terms for a static Coulomb stress simulation to identify the characteristics of the coseismic stress caused by induced seismicity clusters and the influencing mechanism of subsequent seismic activities. Our results indicate that (1) the 21 high-energy (HE) seismic events were primarily compression failures, generally distributed on the floor, and the focal mechanisms of these events were primarily characterised by normal fault slips, whilst a few high-position events were reverse fault slips. Furthermore, (2) the stress field of the coal pillars differed from that of the in situ stress measurement; therefore, we inferred that these events were induced by mining, with their dominant control factor being the maximum compressive stress (σ1) extrusion with a high plunge. Lastly, (3) the locations of 37 microseismic (MS) events on August 1 and August 2, 2022 confirm that the mining-induced events triggered subsequent MS activities at a rate as high as 81%. Notably, 20 (54%) of these MS events were close to the isolines zero of the Coulomb stress changes.

Highlights

  • Stability optimization of moment tensor inversion is proposed to analyze the focal mechanism of the coal pillar.

  • Stress filed inversion reveals the main controlling factor and real fault plane information of the coal pillar rupture.

  • The calculation of static Coulomb stress has excellent potential for predicting coal mine high-energy (HE) seismic events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data analyzed during this work are included in this published paper and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, Sausalito

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez-Gómez JA (2019) FMC—Earthquake focal mechanisms data management cluster and classification. SoftwareX 9:299–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2019.03.008

  • Backus G, Mulcahy M (1976a) Moment tensors and other phenomenological descriptions of seismic sources—I. Continuous displacements. Geophys J Int 46:341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Backus G, Mulcahy M (1976b) Moment tensors and other phenomenological descriptions of seismic sources—II. Discontinuous displacements. Geophys J Int 47:301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd O, Dreger D, Hellweg M, Lombard P, Ford S, Taira T, Taggart J, Weldon T (2011) Full moment tensor analysis using first motion data at the Geysers geothermal field. Geophys. Un

  • Caputa A, Rudziński Ł, Cesca S (2021) How to assess the moment tensor inversion resolution for mining induced seismicity: a case study for the Rudna Mine Poland. Front Earth Sci 600:671207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesca S, Grigoli F (2015) Full waveform seismological advances for microseismic monitoring. Adv Geophys 56:169–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesca S, Dahm T, Juretzek C, Kühn D (2011) Rupture process of the 2001 May 7 Mw 4.3 Ekofisk induced earthquake. Geophys J Int 187:407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Do Nascimento AF, Lunn RJ, Cowie PA (2005) Modeling the heterogeneous hydraulic properties of faults using constraints from reservoir-induced seismicity. J Geophys Res 110:B09201

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong L, Luo Q (2022) Investigations and new insights on earthquake mechanics from fault slip experiments. Earth Sci Rev 228:104019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dost B, Zednik J, Havskov J, Willemann R, Bormann P (2009) Seismic data formats, archival and exchange. New manual of seismological observatory practice (NMSOP). Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, Potsdam, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM, University City

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich C (1992) Triangle diagrams: ternary graphs to display similarity and diversity of earthquake focal mechanisms. Phys Earth Planet Inter 75:193–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris RA (1998) Introduction to special section: stress triggers, stress shadows, and implications for seismic hazard. J Geophys Res 103:24347–24358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa HS, Wetmiller RJ, Gendzwill DJ (1989) Induced seismicity in mines in Canada—an overview. Pure Appl Geophys 129:423–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson J, Pearce R, Rogers R (1989) Source type plot for inversion of the moment tensor. J Geophys Res 94:765–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng 9:90–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jechumtálová Z, Eisner L (2008) Seismic source mechanism inversion from a linear array of receivers reveals non-double-couple seismic events induced by hydraulic fracturing in sedimentary formation. Tectonophysics 460:124–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian BR, Miller AD, Foulger G (1998) Non-double-couple earthquakes 1. Theory Rev Geophys 36:525–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kühn D, Heimann S, Isken MP, Ruigrok E, Dost B (2020) Probabilistic moment tensor inversion for hydrocarbon-induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, the Netherlands, part 1: testing. Bull Seismol Soc Am 110:2095–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J, Stein RS (2004) Stress triggering in thrust and subduction earthquakes and stress interaction between the southern San Andreas and nearby thrust and strike-slip faults. J Geophys Res 109(B2)

  • Lund B, Slunga R (1999) Stress tensor inversion using detailed microearthquake information and stability constraints: application to Ölfus in southwest Iceland. J Geophys Res 104:14947–14964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Dong L, Zhao G, Li X (2018) Discrimination of seismic sources in an underground mine using full waveform inversion. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 106:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Dong L, Zhao G, Li X (2019) Focal mechanism of mining-induced seismicity in fault zones: a case study of yongshaba mine in China. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:3341–3352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsan D, Bean CJ, Steacy S, Mccloskey J (1999) Spatio-temporal analysis of stress diffusion in a mining-induced seismicity system. Geophys Res Lett 26:3697–3700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Garzón P, Kwiatek G, Ickrath M, Bohnhoff M (2014) MSATSI: a MATLAB package for stress inversion combining solid classic methodology, a new simplified user-handling, and a visualization tool. Seismol Res Lett 85:896–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendecki MJ, Szczygieł J, Lizurek G, Teper L (2020) Mining-triggered seismicity governed by a fold hinge zone: the Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. Eng Geol 274:105728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michael AJ (1984) Determination of stress from slip data: faults and folds. J Geophys Res 89:11517–11526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo PG, Aki K (1987) Fractal geometry of the San Andreas fault system. J Geophys Res 92:345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlecka-Sikora B (2010) The role of static stress transfer in mining induced seismic events occurrence, a case study of the Rudna mine in the Legnica-Glogow Copper District in Poland. Geophys J Int 182:1087–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlecka-Sikora B, Lasocki S, Lizurek G, Rudziński U (2012) Response of seismic activity in mines to the stress changes due to mining induced strong seismic events. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 53:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen AT, Cesca S, Bischoff M, Meier T, Dahm T (2013) Automated full moment tensor inversion of coal mining-induced seismicity. Geophys J Int 195:1267–1281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Si G, Cai W, Wang S, Li X (2020) Prediction of relatively high-energy seismic events using spatial–temporal parametrisation of mining-induced seismicity. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:5111–5132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song C-H, Lu C-P, Zhang X-F, Wang C, Xie H-D, Yan X-Y, Yang H-W (2022) Moment tensor inversion and stress evolution of coal pillar failure mechanism. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55:2371–2383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein RS, King GC, Lin J (1994) Stress triggering of the 1994 M= 6.7 Northridge, California, earthquake by its predecessors. Science 265:1432–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toda S, Stein RS, Richards-Dinger K, Bozkurt SB (2005) Forecasting the evolution of seismicity in southern California: animations built on earthquake stress transfer. J Geophys Res 110(B5)

  • Vavryčuk V (2014) Iterative joint inversion for stress and fault orientations from focal mechanisms. Geophys J Int 199:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavryčuk V (2015) Moment tensor decompositions revisited. J Seismolog 19:231–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang R (1999) A simple orthonormalization method for stable and efficient computation of Green’s functions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:733–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WH (1998) New, improved version of generic mapping tools released. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 79:579–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson M, Foulger G, Gluyas J, Davies R, Julian B (2017) HiQuake: the human-induced earthquake database. Seismol Res Lett 88:1560–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wojtecki Ł, Kurzeja J, Knopik M (2021) The influence of mining factors on seismic activity during longwall mining of a coal seam. Int J Min Sci Technol 31:429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Grzegorz Lizurek, Beata Orlecka-Sikora, and T.C. Sunilkumar for providing coding programming and constructive comments. We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive suggestions, which lead us to improve this paper significantly. This study was funded by the Graduate Innovation Program of the China University of Mining and Technology (2023WLKXJ024) for Chun-Hui Song, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574225), and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu High Education Institutions (PAPD) for Cai-Ping Lu. Figures were prepared using GMT (Wessel and Smith 1998) and the Python library Matplotlib (Hunter 2007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Deep Coal Resource Mining (Ministry of Education), School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China

    Chun-Hui Song, Cai-Ping Lu, Jie-Fang Song & Yang Liu

  2. Centre of Rockburst Prevention Research, Shandong Energy Group, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Xiu-Feng Zhang

  3. Shandong Energy Group, Qiwu Coal Mine, Weishan, 277606, Shandong, People’s Republic of China

    Yi-Qing Wang

Authors
  1. Chun-Hui Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cai-Ping Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiu-Feng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi-Qing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jie-Fang Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yang Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cai-Ping Lu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 46 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, CH., Lu, CP., Zhang, XF. et al. Moment Tensor Inversion and Coseismic Stress Characteristics of Mining-Induced Seismicity in Coal Pillar Area. Rock Mech Rock Eng 56, 6285–6298 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03405-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03405-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation