Skip to main content
Log in

Study on Excavation Sequence of Pilot Tunnels for a Rectangular Tunnel Using Numerical Simulation and Field Monitoring Method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cross diaphragm (CRD) method divides the tunnel into multiple pilot tunnels to reduce the span of a single excavation, which is beneficial to reduce the disturbance of excavation construction to surrounding rocks. In this method, the excavation sequence of pilot tunnels is a key factor affecting the excavation disturbance. In this study, two schemes of excavation sequence of pilot tunnels were simulated by numerical method, based on a newly built shallow buried rectangular tunnel using CRD method. By comparing and analyzing the vertical displacements of tunnel surrounding rocks, ground surface settlements, crown settlements and bending moment of the primary support structure, the surrounding rock deformation characteristics and trends of the tunnel were revealed, which determined the more reasonable excavation sequence scheme for the construction of the rectangular tunnel. By comparing with the field monitoring data, the numerical simulation results were verified to a certain extent. In addition, the comparison of calculation results obtained from the Mohr–Coulomb (MC) and the hardening soil small (HSS) constitutive models were discussed. The investigation results show that: (1) the displacement of surrounding rock and bending moment of the primary support structure are closely related to the excavation sequence of the pilot tunnels; (2) the deformation trends revealed by the numerical results are similar to those from the field data; (3) according to the field construction process, the asymmetric excavation sequence of "left upper pilot tunnel—left lower pilot tunnel—right-upper pilot tunnel—right lower pilot tunnel" is safe and reliable for the rectangular tunnel construction.

Highlights

  • Two different excavation sequences of a rectangular tunnel with CRD method were systematically compared and analyzed, and the recommended excavation sequence was proposed.

  • The displacement of surrounding rock and bending moment of primary support structure were closely related to the excavation sequences of pilot tunnels.

  • The details of the excavation and construction process of a rectangular tunnel using CRD method were shown by pictures.

  • Compared with the HSS model, the Mohr Coulomb (MC) model may lead to larger deformation in significant unloading / reloading problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benz T (2007) Small-strain stiffness of soils and its numerical consequences. University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz T, Vermeer PA, Schwab R (2009) A small-strain overlay model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 33:25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakeri H, Ünver B (2013) A new equation for estimating the maximum surface settlement above tunnels excavated in soft ground. Environ Earth Sci 71:3195–3210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Fuente M, Sulem J, Taherzadeh R, Subrin D (2020) Tunneling in squeezing ground: effect of the excavation method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53:601–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng XW, Fu HL, Wang HT, Peng WX (2019) Analysis and comparison of disturbance effect of shallow buried excavation tunnel construction method. Electron J Geotech Eng 24:225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindarloo SR, Siami-Irdemoosa E (2015) Maximum surface settlement based classification of shallow tunnels in soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 49:320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt E (2012) The Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:981–988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Q, Liu X, Zhang DL, Lou HC (2017) Shallow tunnel construction with irregular surface topography using cross diaphragm method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 68:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GB50157 (2013) Code for design of metro (in Chiness). The Professional Standards Compilation Group of People’s Republic of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang AN, Li P, Shi HT (2011) Shallow depth of the tunnel excavation response research based on CRD method. Procedia Eng 15:4852–4856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao PF, Xiao Z, Li XZ, Jiang B, Liu BH, Zhang HJ (2018) Optimization analysis of construction scheme for large-span highway tunnel under complex conditions. Arch Civ Eng 64:55–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakus M, Fowell RJ (2003) Effects of different tunnel face advance excavation on the settlement by FEM. Tunnell Undergr Space Technol Incorp Trench Technol Res 18:513–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong XX, Xia CC, Qiu YL, Zhang LY, Gong JW (2011) Study of construction mechanical behavior of parallel-small spacing metro tunnels excavated by shield method and cross diaphragm (CRD) method in loess region (in Chinese). Rock Soil Mech 32:516–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Labuz JF, Zang A (2012) Mohr–Coulomb failure criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 45:975–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee CJ, Wu BR, Chen HT, Chiang KH (2006) Tunnel stability and arching effects during tunneling in soft clayey soil. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 21:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XL, Chen SJ, Zhang QM, Gao X, Feng F (2021) Research on theory, simulation and measurement of stress behavior under regenerated roof condition. Geomech Eng 26(1):49–61. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2021.26.1.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Zhong YJ, Feng ZH, Xu W, Song FT, Li CH (2020) New construction technology of a shallow tunnel in Boulder-Cobble mixed grounds. Adv Civ Eng 2020:1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5686042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma GW, Zheng HB, Li PF (2018) Displacement characteristics for a “pi” shaped double cross-duct excavated by cross diaphragm (CRD) method. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 77:204–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naseem A, Schotte K, De Pauw B, De Backer H (2019) Ground settlements due to construction of triplet tunnels with different construction arrangements. Adv Civ Eng 2019:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nghia Quoc T, Holmoy KH, Wiig HE (2021) Challenging infrastructure project assisted by monitoring and numerical modelling as the follo line tunnels were excavated below existing tunnels. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54:1671–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto F, Whittle AJ (2014) Ground movements due to shallow tunnels in soft ground. I: analytical solutions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto F, Zymnis DM, Whittle AJ (2014) Ground movements due to shallow tunnels in soft ground. II: analytical interpretation and prediction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schanz T, Vermeer A, Bonnier PG (1999) The hardening soil model: formulation and verification. Beyond 2000. Comput Geotech. 1999:281–296. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315138206-27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifzadeh M, Daraei R, Broojerdi MS (2012) Design of sequential excavation tunneling in weak rocks through findings obtained from displacements based back analysis. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 28:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifzadeh M, Kolivand F, Ghorbani M, Yasrobi S (2013) Design of sequential excavation method for large span urban tunnelsin soft ground—Niayesh tunnel. Tunnell Undergr Space Technol Incorp Trench Technol Res 35:178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Wang H, Xu Z (2012) Experimental study of parameters of hardening soil model for numerical analysis of excavations of foundation pits. Rock Soil Mech 33:2283–2290

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang HN, Utili S, Jiang MJ (2014) An analytical approach for the sequential excavation of axisymmetric lined tunnels in viscoelastic rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 68:85–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Yao WJ, Cai YQ, Xu B, Fu Y, Wei G (2019) Analysis of ground surface settlement induced by the construction of a large-diameter shallow-buried twin-tunnel in soft ground. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 83:520–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Li J, Zhao XB, Liang Y (2022) Propagation characteristics and prediction of blast-induced vibration on closely spaced rock tunnels. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 123:104416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2022.104416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen-Feng XU, Feng Z, Jian-Ping C (2009) Optimization study on CRD method for a large-span loess tunnel. J Disaster Prev Mitig Eng 29:572–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng XL, Sun YF, Yan BH, Niu HS, Lin ROG, Zhou SQ (2020) Centrifuge testing and numerical modeling of tunnel face stability considering longitudinal slope angle and steady state seepage in soft clay. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 101:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong S, Jiasheng Z, Baochen L (2015) A study of the construction sequences of a large-section shallow-buried unsymmetrical loading tunnel by the CRD method. Mod Tunnell Technol 52:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue FC, Ma JL, Yan L, Zhao YM (2010) Three-dimension FEM analysis of large cross-section tunnel in collapsible loess constructed by CRD method. GeoFlorida 2010, Florida.

  • Yang BB, He MM, Zhang ZQ, Zhu JW, Chen YS (2022) A new criterion of strain rockburst in consideration of the plastic zone of tunnel surrounding rock. Rock Mech Rock Eng 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02725-3

  • Yao X, Wang M (2006) Statistic analysis of guideposts for ground settlement induced by shallow tunnel construction. Yanshilixue Yu Gongcheng Xuebao Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25:2030–2035

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Yao W, Duan K, Liu X, Zhu Y (2020) Experimental study and discrete element method modeling of compression and permeability behaviors of weakly anisotropic sandstones. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 134:104437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarei H, Moarefvand P, Salmi EF (2019) Numerical modeling of umbrella arch technique to reduce tunnelling induced ground movements. Environ Earth Sci 78:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Shadabfar M, Zhang D, Chen J, Huang H (2021) Deep learning-based classification and instance segmentation of leakage-area and scaling images of shield tunnel linings. Struct Control Health Monit 2021:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.2732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2008) A generalized three-dimensional Hoek–Brown strength criterion. Rock Mech Rock Eng 41:893–915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YG, Tang J, Cheng Y, Huang L, Guo F, Yin X, Li N (2022) Prediction of landslide displacement with dynamic features using intelligent approaches. Int J Min SCI Techno 2022:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.02.004

  • Zhu Z, Li Y, Xie J, Liu B (2015) The effect of principal stress orientation on tunnel stability. Tunnell Undergr Space Technol Incorp Trench Technol Res 49:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Major projects of Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC No. 52090083). The authors gratefully acknowledge its financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yonggang Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Zhang, Y., Cao, M. et al. Study on Excavation Sequence of Pilot Tunnels for a Rectangular Tunnel Using Numerical Simulation and Field Monitoring Method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 55, 3507–3523 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02814-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02814-x

Keywords

Navigation