Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of Fracture Orientation Distributions from a Sampling Window Based on Geometric Probabilistic Method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accurate orientation distributions are crucial to generating a reliable discrete fracture network (DFN) model for rock mass, while conventional one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) observation data have significant sampling bias. The study proposes a complete analytical method for estimating the orientation distributions of three-dimensional (3D) fractures in rock mass in conjunction with trace statistics in a sampling window, which is suitable for most continuous distributions by reducing the sampling bias. Traces are divided into three categories to derive the geometric probabilistic relationships between 2D trace statistics and 3D fracture orientation distributions. The moment estimation, number estimation, and normalization error functions are derived, and the distribution parameters are determined by minimizing the total error function. The proposed method is compared with the Terzaghi family methods and validated by multiple sets of stochastic fracture networks with different orientation distributions and sampling windows generated by the Monte Carlo method. The results indicate that the estimated continuous orientation distributions subjected to the error functions from a large single sampling window are well matched with the true distributions after removing the number estimation error functions of trace samples fewer than 20. Daxiagu tunnel is selected as a case study and the distributions estimated by the proposed method are more coincident with the field observation than those fitted by the orientations of the rock outcrops on the excavation face.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

\(\vec{n}\) :

Unit normal vector of the preferred fracture in Oxyz

\(\vec{n}_{yz}\) :

Projection of \(\vec{n}\) on yOz coordinate plane

\(\vec{n}_{xy}\) :

Projection of \(\vec{n}\) on xOy coordinate plane

\(\vec{l}\) :

Direction vector of the trace in yOz

\(\gamma\) :

Angle between \(\vec{n}\) and positive z-axis

\(\varphi\) :

Angle between \(\vec{n}_{xy}\) and positive y-axis

\(\theta\) :

Dip angle between the trace and positive y-axis

\(x\) :

Diameter of the preferred fracture

\(G(\theta )\) :

Cumulative distribution function of \(\theta\)

\(G_{\gamma } (\gamma )\) :

Cumulative distribution function of \(\gamma\)

\(G_{\varphi } (\varphi )\) :

Cumulative distribution function of \(\varphi\)

\(D(x)\) :

Cumulative distribution function of x

\(g_{\gamma } (\gamma )\) :

Probability density function of \(\gamma\)

\(\xi\) :

Unknown parameters of \(g_{\gamma } (\gamma )\) and \(g_{\varphi } (\varphi )\)

\(u_{\gamma }\) :

Expected value of \(\gamma\)

\(u_{\varphi }\) :

Expected value of \(\varphi\)

\(\sigma_{\gamma }\) :

Standard deviation of \(\gamma\)

\(\sigma_{\varphi }\) :

Standard deviation of \(\varphi\)

\(E(\theta )\) :

Expected value of \(\theta\)

\(a_{k}\) :

kth-order expected original moment of \(\theta\)

\(b_{k}\) :

kth-order expected central moment of \(\theta\)

\(\hat{a}_{k}\) :

kth-order estimated original moment of \(\theta\)

\(\hat{b}_{k}\) :

kth-order estimated central moment of \(\theta\)

\(\hat{N}\) :

Number of trace samples intersecting the window

\(\hat{\theta }_{i}\) :

ith dip angle of trace samples

\(\overline{\theta }\) :

Sample mean of trace dip angles

\(h\) :

Height of the rectangular infinitesimal in \(wO^{\prime}h\)

\(dw\) :

Width of the rectangular infinitesimal in \(wO^{\prime}h\)

\(W\) :

Projection width of the sampling window on w-axis

w 1 :

Lower limit of the sampling window on w-axis

w 2 :

Upper limit of the sampling window on w-axis

\(D\) :

Diameter of the circular sampling window

\(\rho_{V}\) :

Volume density of fracture centers

\(\rho_{S}\) :

Trace density

\(\alpha\) :

Angle between the fracture plane and the excavation face

\(\beta\) :

Angle between the fracture unit normal vector \(\vec{n}\) and the excavation face

\(dH\) :

Height on the bottom surface of the distribution region of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal

\(dS_{T}\) :

Bottom area of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both censored ends

\(dS_{D}\) :

Bottom area of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end

\(dS_{C}\) :

Bottom area of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends

\(dV_{T}\) :

Volume of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both censored ends

\(dV_{D}\) :

Volume of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end

\(dV_{C}\) :

Volume of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends

\(dn_{FT}\) :

Number of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both censored ends

\(dn_{FD}\) :

Number of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end

\(dn_{FC}\) :

Number of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends

\(n_{FT}\) :

Number of fractures intersecting the whole sampling window with both censored ends

\(n_{FD}\) :

Number of fractures intersecting the whole sampling window with one censored end and one observable end

\(n_{FC}\) :

Number of fractures intersecting the whole sampling window with both observable ends

\(N_{FT}\) :

Number of fractures of arbitrary size and orientation intersecting the whole sampling window with both censored ends

\(N_{FD}\) :

Number of fractures of arbitrary size and orientation intersecting the whole sampling window with one censored end and one observable end

\(N_{FC}\) :

Number of fractures of arbitrary size and orientation, intersecting the whole sampling window with both observable ends

\(N_{TT}\) :

Expected number of transecting traces

\(N_{TD}\) :

Expected number of dissecting traces

\(N_{TC}\) :

Expected number of contained traces

\(\hat{N}_{TT}\) :

Estimated number of transecting traces

\(\hat{N}_{TD}\) :

Estimated number of dissecting traces

\(\hat{N}_{TC}\) :

Estimated number of contained traces

\(r_{i}\) :

ith error function, \(i{ = 1,}...{,10}\)

\(n\) :

Number of realizations in a group of simulation

\(X_{i}\) :

ith estimator in a group of simulation

\(\overline{X}\) :

Average of estimators in a group of simulation

\(\mu\) :

Expected value of \(\overline{X}\)

References

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support. This work was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972277, 41602300, and 41831281), Special Fund for Basic Research on Scientific Instruments of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (4182780021), and Sichuan Railway Investment Group Co., Ltd. (SRIG2019GG0004).

Funding

This work was supported partially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972277, 41602300, and 41831281), Special Fund for Basic Research on Scientific Instruments of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (4182780021), and Sichuan Railway Investment Group Co., Ltd. (SRIG2019GG0004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaojun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

No conflict of interest exits in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix A

Number of Dissecting Traces

The bottom area of the distribution space of the centers of fractures with \(x \in (x,\;x + dx)\), \(\gamma \in (\gamma ,\;\gamma + d\gamma )\), and \(\varphi \in (\varphi ,\;\varphi + d\varphi )\), intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end, is the shadow area surrounded by the red line in Fig. 

Fig. 17
figure 17

On the \(uO^{\prime\prime}v\) coordinate plane, the distribution region of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end. Note that the solid and hollow circles represent the centers of fractures of the above type and the others, respectively. a \(x < h(w)\). b \(x \ge h(w)\)

17. According to the relationship between the fracture diameter x and the height of the rectangular infinitesimal h(w), the bottom area is determined according to the following two situations.

(a) When \(x < h(w)\), the shadow region boundary in the positive v-axis satisfies the following function in Fig. 17a.

$$v = \left\{ \begin{aligned}& \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } ,{\text{ }} - \frac{x}{2} \le u < \frac{x}{2} \hfill \\ & 0,{\text{ }}\frac{x}{2} \le u < h(w) - \frac{x}{2} \hfill \\& \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } ,{\text{ }}h(w) - \frac{x}{2} \le u \le h(w) + \frac{x}{2} \hfill \\ \end{aligned} \right.$$
(43)

The bottom area \(dS_{D1}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures, intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end, is expressed as:

$$\begin{aligned} dS_{{D1}} =&\, 2\int_{{u = - x/2}}^{{u = h(w) + x/2}} {vdu} \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \hfill \\ &\,= 2\left\{ {\int_{{u = - x/2}}^{{u = x/2}} {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } } du + \int_{{u = h(w) - x/2}}^{{u = h(w) + x/2}} {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } } du} \right\} \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \hfill \\ = &\,\frac{\pi }{2}x^{2} \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \hfill \\ \end{aligned}$$
(44)

b) When \(x \ge h(w)\), the shadow region boundary in the positive v-axis in Fig. 17b satisfies the following equation.

$$v = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } , \, - \frac{x}{2} \le u < h(w) - \frac{x}{2}} \\ {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } , \, h(w) - \frac{x}{2} \le u < \frac{h(w)}{2}} \\ {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } , \, \frac{h(w)}{2} \le u < \frac{x}{2}} \\ {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } , \, \frac{x}{2} \le u \le h(w) + \frac{x}{2}.} \\ \end{array} } \right.$$
(45)

The bottom area \(dS_{D2}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures, intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end, is expressed as:

$$\begin{aligned} dS_{D2} &= 2\int_{u = - x/2}^{u = h(w) + x/2} {vdu} \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \\& = 2\left\{ {\int_{u = - x/2}^{u = h(w) - x/2} {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } du} + \int_{u = h(w) - x/2}^{u = h(w)/2} {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } du} } \right. \\ &\quad\, \left. { + \int_{u = x/2}^{u = h(w) + x/2} {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } du} + \int_{u = h(w)/2}^{u = x/2} {\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } du} } \right\} \\& \quad\, \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \\ &= \left[ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - h^{2} (w)} + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{h(w)}{x}} \right] \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ). \\ \end{aligned}$$
(46)

Equation (44) and Eq. (46) can be expressed by the unified formula. The bottom area \(dS_{D}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures, intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end, is expressed as:

$$\begin{aligned} dS_{D} &= \left\{ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\} \\&\quad \, \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ). \\ \end{aligned}$$
(47)

The volume \(dV_{D}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures, intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end, is determined by multiplying Eq. (18) and Eq. (47).

$$\begin{aligned} dV_{D} &= dS_{D} \cdot dH \\ &= \left\{ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\} \\ &\, \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dw. \\ \end{aligned}$$
(48)

\(dn_{FD}\) is the number of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with one censored end and one observable end. According to the definition, \(dn_{FD}\) is determined by multiplying the volume of the distribution space and the volume density of fracture centers.

$$\begin{aligned} dn_{FD} =&\, \rho_{V} dV_{D} \\ = &\,\rho_{V} \left\{ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\} \\ &\, \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dw. \\ \end{aligned}$$
(49)

The number \(n_{FD}\) of fractures, intersecting the whole sampling window with one censored end and one observable end, is derived by integrating Eq. (49) over \(w \in (0,\;D)\).

$$\begin{aligned} n_{FD} &= \int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {dn_{FD} } \\ &= \rho_{V} \int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left\{ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\}dw} \\& \quad\cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ). \\ \end{aligned}$$
(50)

The number \(N_{FD}\) of fractures of arbitrary size and orientation, intersecting the whole sampling window with one censored end and one observable end, is derived by integrating Eq. (50) over \(x \in (x,\;x + dx)\), \(\gamma \in (\gamma ,\;\gamma + d\gamma )\), and \(\varphi \in (\varphi ,\;\varphi + d\varphi )\).

$$\begin{aligned} N_{FD} &= \int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {n_{FD} } } } \\& = \int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {\rho_{V} \int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left\{ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\}} dw} } } \\& \, \cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \\ &= \rho_{V} \int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {\left\{ {\int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left\{ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\}} dw} \right\}dD(x)} \\ &\quad\, \cdot \int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi )} } . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(51)

The number of fractures intersecting with one censored end and one observable end is equal to that of dissecting traces because of the one-to-one correspondence between fractures and traces. \(N_{TD}\) is the expected number of dissecting traces in the sampling window, and Eq. (51) can be rewritten as:

$$\begin{aligned} N_{TD} = &\,\rho_{V} \int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {\left\{ {\int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left[ {h(w)\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } + x^{2} \arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),x} \right]}}{x}} \right]} dw} \right\}dD(x)} \\ &\, \cdot \int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi )} } . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(52)

Number of contained traces

The bottom area of the distribution space of the centers of fractures with \(x \in (x,\;x + dx)\), \(\gamma \in (\gamma ,\;\gamma + d\gamma )\), and \(\varphi \in (\varphi ,\;\varphi + d\varphi )\), intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends, is the shadow area surrounded by the red line in Fig. 

Fig. 18
figure 18

On the \(uO^{\prime\prime}v\) coordinate plane, the distribution region of the centers of fractures is intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends. Note that the solid and hollow circles represent the centers of fractures of the above type and the others, respectively. a \(x < h(w)\). b \(x \ge h(w)\)

18. According to the relationship between the fracture diameter x and the height of the rectangular infinitesimal h(w), the bottom area is determined according to the following two situations.

(a) When \(x < h(w)\), the shadow region boundary in the positive v-axis in Fig. 18a satisfies the following equation.

$$v = \left\{ \begin{gathered} \frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } ,{\text{ }}0 \le u < \frac{x}{2} \hfill \\ \frac{x}{2},{\text{ }}\frac{x}{2} \le u < h(w) - \frac{x}{2} \hfill \\ \frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } ,{\text{ }}h(w) - \frac{x}{2} \le u \le h(w) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(53)

The bottom area \(dS_{C1}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures is intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends.

$$\begin{aligned} dS_{C1} = &\,2\int_{u = 0}^{u = h(w)} {vdu} \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \\ =&\, 2\left\{ {\int_{u = 0}^{u = x/2} {\left[ {\frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } } \right]du} + \int_{{u = \frac{x}{2}}}^{u = h(w) - x/2} {\frac{x}{2}du} + \int_{u = h(w) - x/2}^{u = h(w)} {\left\{ {\frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } } \right\}du} } \right\} \\& \, \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \\ = &\,\left[ {xh(w) - \frac{\pi }{4}x^{2} } \right] \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ). \\ \end{aligned}$$
(54)

b) When \(x \ge h(w)\), the shadow region boundary in the positive v-axis in Fig. 18b satisfies the following equation.

$$v = \left\{ \begin{gathered} \frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } ,{\text{ }}0 \le u < \frac{{h(w)}}{2} \hfill \\ \frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } ,{\text{ }}\frac{{h(w)}}{2} \le u \le h(w) \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(55)

The bottom area \(dS_{C2}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends, and is expressed as:

$$\begin{aligned} dS_{{C2}} =&\, 2\int_{{u = 0}}^{{u = h(w)}} {vdu} \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \hfill \\ =&\, 2\left\{ {\int_{{u = 0}}^{{u = h(w)/2}} {\left[ {\frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - u^{2} } } \right]du} + \int_{{u = h(w)/2}}^{{u = h(w)}} {\left\{ {\frac{x}{2} - \sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \left[ {u - h(w)} \right]^{2} } } \right\}du} } \right\} \hfill \\ &\cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \hfill \\ =&\, \left[ {xh(w) - h(w)\sqrt {\frac{{x^{2} }}{4} - \frac{{h^{2} (w)}}{4}} - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{h(w)}}{x}} \right] \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \hfill \\ \end{aligned}$$
(56)

Equation (54) and Eq. (56) can be expressed by the unified formula. The bottom area \(dS_{C}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends is expressed as:

$$\begin{aligned} dS_{C} =& \,\left\{ {xh(w) - \frac{h(w)}{2}\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\} \\ &\, \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ). \\ \end{aligned}$$
(57)

The volume \(dV_{C}\) of the distribution space of the centers of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends is determined by multiplying Eq. (18) and Eq. (57).

$$\begin{aligned} dV_{C} =&\, dS_{C} \cdot dH \\ =& \left\{ {xh(w) - \frac{h(w)}{2}\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\} \\ \, &\cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dw. \\ \end{aligned}$$
(58)

\(dn_{FC}\) is the number of fractures intersecting the rectangular infinitesimal with both observable ends. According to the definition, \(dn_{FC}\) is determined by multiplying the volume of the distribution space and the volume density of fracture centers.

$$\begin{aligned} dn_{FC} = &\,\rho_{V} dV \\ = &\,\rho_{V} \left\{ {xh(w) - \frac{h(w)}{2}\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\} \\ &\, \cdot dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dw. \\ \end{aligned}$$
(59)

The number \(n_{FC}\) of fractures intersecting the whole sampling window with both observable ends is derived by integrating Eq. (59) over \(w \in (0,\;D)\).

$$\begin{aligned} n_{FC} = &\int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {dn_{FC} } \\ = &\rho_{V} \int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left\{ {xh(w) - \frac{h(w)}{2}\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\}} dw \\ &\cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ). \\ \end{aligned}$$
(60)

The number \(N_{FC}\) of fractures of arbitrary size and orientation intersecting the whole sampling window with both observable ends is derived by integrating Eq. (60) over \(x \in (x,\;x + dx)\), \(\gamma \in (\gamma ,\;\gamma + d\gamma )\), and \(\varphi \in (\varphi ,\;\varphi + d\varphi )\).

$$\begin{aligned} N_{FC} = &\,\int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {n_{FC} } } } \\ =&\, \int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {\rho_{V} \int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left\{ {xh(w) - \frac{h(w)}{2}\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\}dw} } } } \\& \, \cdot \sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dD(x)dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi ) \\ =&\, \rho_{V} \int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {\left\{ {\int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left\{ {xh(w) - \frac{h(w)}{2}\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),x} \right]}}{x}} \right\}} dw} \right\}dD(x)} \\& \, \cdot \int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi )} } . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(61)

The number of fractures intersecting with both observable ends is equal to that of contained traces because of the one-to-one correspondence between fractures and traces. \(N_{TC}\) is the expected number of contained traces in the sampling window, and Eq. (61) can be rewritten as:

$$\begin{aligned} N_{TC} = &\rho_{V} \int_{x = 0}^{x = \infty } {\left\{ {\int_{{w = w_{1} }}^{{w = w_{2} }} {\left\{ {xh(w) - \frac{h(w)}{2}\sqrt {x^{2} - \left\{ {\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]} \right\}^{2} } - \frac{{x^{2} }}{2}\arcsin \frac{{\min \left[ {h(w),\;x} \right]}}{x}} \right\}dw} } \right\}dD(x)} \\ &\, \cdot \int_{\varphi = 0}^{\varphi = 2\pi } {\int_{\gamma = 0}^{\gamma = \pi /2} {\sqrt {1 - \sin^{2} \gamma \sin^{2} \varphi } dG_{\gamma } (\gamma )dG_{\varphi } (\varphi )} } . \\ \end{aligned}$$
(62)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Wang, X., He, L. et al. Estimation of Fracture Orientation Distributions from a Sampling Window Based on Geometric Probabilistic Method. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 3051–3075 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02431-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-021-02431-0

Keywords

Navigation