References
Bahaaddini M, Hagan PC, Mitra R, Hebblewhite BK (2014) Scale effect on the shear behaviour of rock joints based on a numerical study. Eng Geol 181:212–223
Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20:249–268
Barton N, Bandis S, Bakhtar K (1985) Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:121–140
Beeler NM, Hickman SH (2001) A note on contact stress and closure in models of rock joints and faults. Geophys Res Lett 28:607–610
Brown SR, Scholz CH (1985) Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 90:5531–5545
Chen X, Li JC, Cai MF, Zou Y, Zhao J (2015) Experimental study on wave propagation across a rock joint with rough surface. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48:2225–2234
Ciavarella M, Delfine V, Demelio G (2006) A “re-vitalized” Greenwood and Williamson model of elastic contact between fractal surfaces. J Mech Phys Solids 54:2569–2591
Cook NGW (1992) Natural joints in rock: mechanical, hydraulic and seismic behaviour and properties under normal stress. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 29:198–223
Goodman RE (1976) Methods of geological engineering in discontinuous rock. West, New York
Grasselli G, Egger P (2003) Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on three-dimensional surface parameters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:25–40
Greenwood JA (1984) A unified theory of surface roughness. Proc R Soc Lond 393:133–157
Greenwood JA (2006) A simplified elliptic model of rough surface contact. Wear 261:191–200
Greenwood JA, Williamson JBP (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond 295:300–319
Greenwood JA, Wu JJ (2001) Surface roughness and contact: an apology. Meccanica 36:617–630
Han D, Zhu JB, Leung YF (2020) Deformation of healed rock joints under tension: experimental study and empirical model. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02103-5
Hopkins DL (2000) The implications of joint deformation in analyzing the properties and behavior of fractured rock masses, underground excavations, and faults. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:175–202
International Society for Rock Mechanics (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:319–368
International Society for Rock Mechanics (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. Suggested Methods Prepared by the Commission on Testing Methods, International Society for Rock Mechanics, Compilation Arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group, Ankara, Turkey
Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kulhawy FH (1975) Stress deformation properties of rock and rock discontinuities. Eng Geol 9:327–350
Lanaro F, Stephansson O (2003) A unified model for characterisation and mechanical behaviour of rock fractures. Pure Appl Geophys 160:989–998
Li JC, Li HB, Jiao YY, Liu YQ, Xia X, Yu C (2014a) Analysis for oblique wave propagation across filled joints based on thin-layer interface model. J Appl Geophys 102:39–46
Li JC, Li HB, Zhao J (2014b) Study on wave propagation across a single rough fracture by the modified thin-layer interface model. J Appl Geophys 110:106–114
Li JC, Li NN, Li HB, Zhao J (2017) An SHPB test study on wave propagation across rock masses with different contact area ratios of joint. Int J Impact Eng 105:109–116
Li H, Zhou T, Deng J, Yin J, Zhu J (2020) An excess stress model for capturing rate-dependent compressive behavior of rock joint and its validation and applications. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 128:104267
Malama B, Kulatilake PHSW (2003) Models for normal fracture deformation under compressive loading. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:893–901
Matsuki K, Wang EQ, Giwelli AA, Sakaguchi K (2008) Estimation of closure of a fracture under normal stress based on aperture data. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 45:194–209
Misra A (1999) Micromechanical model for anisotropic rock joints. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 104:23175–23187
Nemoto K, Watanabe N, Hirano N, Tsuchiya N (2009) Direct measurement of contact area and stress dependence of anisotropic flow through rock fracture with heterogeneous aperture distribution. Earth Planet Sci Lett 281:81–87
Sevostianov I, Kachanov M (2008) Normal and tangential compliances of interface of rough surfaces with contacts of elliptic shape. Int J Solids Struct 45:2723–2736
Sun Z, Gerrard C, Stephansson O (1985) Rock joint compliance tests for compression and shear loads. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:197–213
Swan G (1983) Determination of stiffness and other joint properties from roughness measurements. Rock Mech Rock Eng 16:19–38
Tang ZC, Zhang Y (2020) Temperature-dependent peak shear-strength criterion for granite fractures. Eng Geol 269:105552
Tang ZC, Liu QS, Xia CC, Song YL, Huang JH, Wang CB (2014) Mechanical model for predicting closure behavior of rock joints under normal stress. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:2287–2298
Tang ZC, Jiao YY, Wong LNY (2017) Theoretical model with multi-asperity interaction for the closure behavior of rock joint. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 97:15–23
Xia CC, Yue ZQ, Tham LG, Lee CF, Sun ZQ (2003) Quantifying topography and closure deformation of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 40:197–220
Xu Y, Jackson RL, Marghitu DB (2014) Statistical model of nearly complete elastic rough surface contact. Int J Solids Struct 51:1075–1088
Yamada K, Takeda N, Kagami J, Naci T (1978) Mechanisms of elastic contact and friction between rough surfaces. Wear 48(1):15–34
Zhu JB, Li H, Deng JH (2019) A one-dimensional elastoplastic model for capturing the nonlinear shear behaviour of joints with triangular asperities based on direct shear tests. Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1671–1687
Zou L, Li B, Mo Y, Cvetkovic V (2019) A high-resolution contact analysis of rough-walled crystalline rock fractures subject to normal stress. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-02034-w
Acknowledgements
The author gratefully acknowledges the support from the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 41672302 and 41977227), and the Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Geohazards of Zhejiang Province (no. ZJRMG-2019-08).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Composite Morphology
As shown in Fig. 8a, contacts are not only formed near the tips of the asperities on single surface, but also between any two points on the surfaces. If the two surfaces are forced to be closer together, new contacts will appear due to the deformation of the existing contacts. Under the un-deformed state, we define two parallel reference planes, which are separated at a distance d0. From these planes we measure the height of each surface z1 and z2. Summing the heights at each point along the surface, we obtain the function \( z_{\text{c}} (x) = z_{\text{upper}} (x) + z_{\text{lower}} (x) \) as shown in Fig. 8b, where, \( z(x) \) is the xth measured topographical height, \( z_{\text{c}} (x) \) is the xth topographical height of composite topography, \( z_{\text{upper}} (x) \) and \( z_{\text{lower}} (x) \) are the topographical heights of the upper and lower surfaces of a joint, respectively.
Appendix 2: Asperity Spatial Features
The asperity peaks randomly distributed on a rock joint should be first identified when adopting Hertz-based theoretical models to predict the closure process. For three-dimensional rock joint, the peak is defined as a point with height greater than its four closest points (Greenwood 1984), as shown in Fig. 9. Equation (13) is the criterion to identify the asperity peaks on a rough rock joint. The equivalent radius of each identified peak can then be calculated based on the five points using the least-square method. The mean peak density is determined by the ratio of the number of asperity peaks to the nominal area of rock joint; the mean peak radius is determined by the ratio of the sum of all the peaks’ equivalent radii to the peak number; and the mean peak height is determined by the ratio of the sum of all the peaks’ height to the peak number:
where, \( Z_{i,j} \) is the asperity peak height at the point (i, j) in 3D domain; \( i \) and \( j \) are integers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, Z.C., Zhang, Q.Z. Elliptical Hertz-Based General Closure Model for Rock Joints. Rock Mech Rock Eng 54, 477–486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02275-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02275-0