Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanics of Actuated Disc Cutting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the mechanics of an actuated disc cutter with the objective of determining the average forces acting on the disc as a function of the parameters characterizing its motion. The specific problem considered is that of a disc cutter revolving off-centrically at constant angular velocity around a secondary axis rigidly attached to a cartridge, which is moving at constant velocity and undercutting rock at a constant depth. This model represents an idealization of a technology that has been implemented in a number of hard rock mechanical excavators with the goal of reducing the average thrust force to be provided by the excavation equipment. By assuming perfect conformance of the rock with the actuated disc as well as a prescribed motion of the disc (perfectly rigid machine), the evolution of the contact surface between the disc and the rock during one actuation of the disc can be computed. Coupled with simple cutter/rock interaction models that embody either a ductile or a brittle mode of fragmentation, these kinematical considerations lead to an estimate of the average force on the cartridge and of the partitioning of the energy imparted by the disc to the rock between the actuation mechanism of the disc and the translation of the cartridge on which the actuated disc is attached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Cutter radius

e :

Eccentricity

d :

Depth of cut

f :

Projection of F on (XY) plane

\(x,\,y\) :

Scaled coordinates

t :

Time variable

v :

Velocity variable

\(R,\,L\) :

Start and end of contact segment

\(\varphi\) :

Angular position of contact

\(\dot{p}\) :

Penetration rate

\(A,\,\mathcal {A}\) :

Volume of rock removed over an actuation

\(\mathcal {F}\) :

Scaled force

F :

Total force

\(F^{c}\) :

Cutting force

\(F^{f}\) :

Friction force

\(K_{Ic}\) :

Mode I fracture toughness

P :

Power

\(\bar{P}_{a}\) :

Power to actuate the disc

\(\bar{P}_{t}\) :

Power to translate the cartridge

\(Q,\,\mathcal {Q}\) :

Rate of rock removal

V :

Linear velocity

\(X,\,Y,\,Z\) :

Cartesian coordinates

\(\epsilon\) :

Geometric factor

\(\varepsilon\) :

Intrinsic specific energy in ductile mode

\(\psi\) :

Half contact angle

\(\gamma\) :

Orientation of contact segment

\(\eta\) :

Actuation efficiency

\(\kappa\) :

Specific energy factor in brittle mode

\(\lambda\) :

Characteristic length

\(\sigma _{c}\) :

Uniaxial compressive strength

\(\omega ,\,\varOmega\) :

Angular velocity

\(\theta\) :

Angular position of disc centre

\(\upsilon\) :

Actuation number

\(\varXi\) :

Specific energy

References

  • Admin (2014) Continuous hard rock cutting trials a success. Int Min Mag. http://immining.com/2014/01/31/continuous-hard-rock-cutting-trials-a-success/

  • CRCMining (2015) Oscillating disk cutter. http://www.crcmining.com.au/breakthrough-solutions/oscillating-disk-cutter/

  • de Andrade A, Veldman C, Möller A, de Sousa J, Skea T (2011) Mining machine with driven disc cutters. US Patent 7,934,776

  • Detournay E, Defourny P (1992) A phenomenological model for the drilling action of drag bits. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 29(1):13–23. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(92)91041-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans I, Pomeroy C (1966) Strength, fracture and workability of coal. Oergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood M, Roxborough F, Salamonm M (1998) A review of concept for selective mechanical mining of hard rock. Society of Mining Engineers (SME), Orlando, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood M, Alehossein H (2000) A development in rock cutting technology. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:297–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood M, Guan Z, Tiryaki N, Li X, Karekal S (2005) The benefits of oscillating disc cutting. In: Australian Mining Technology Conference, pp 267–275

  • Huang H, Detournay E (2008) Intrinsic length scales in tool-rock interaction. ASCE Int J Geomech 8(1):39–44. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2008)8:1(23)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karekal S (2013) Oscillating disc cutting technique for hard rock excavation. In: 47th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association

  • Kovalyshen Y (2015) Analytical model of oscillatory disc cutting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 7:378–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishimatsu Y (1972) The mechanics of rock cutting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 9(2):261–270. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(72)90027-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering R, Ebner B (2002) Hard rock cutting and the development of a continuous mining machine for narrow platinum reefs. J South African Inst Min Metall 19–24

  • Pickering R, Smit A, Moxham K (2006) Mining by rock cutting in narrow reefs. In: International platinum conference ‘platinum surges ahead’, The Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy

  • Ramezanzadeh A, Hood M (2010) A state-of-the-art review of mechanical rock excavation technologies. Int J Min Environ Issues 1(1):29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard T (1999) Determination of rock strength from cutting tests. Master of Science thesis, Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

  • Richard T, Dagrain F, Poyol E, Detournay E (2012) Rock strength determination from scratch tests. Eng Geol 147–148:91–100. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard T, Detournay E, Drescher A, Nicodeme P, Fourmaintraux D (1998) The scratch test as a means to measure strength of sedimentary rocks. In: SPE/ISRM Eurock 98, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Trondheim, Norway, SPE 47196, pp 1–8. doi: 10.2118/47196-MS

  • Sandvik-Mining (2012) Sandvik reef miner mn220. www.miningandconstruction.sandvik.com

  • Sudgen D (1971) Vibrator systems and rock cutter type utilization mechanisms. US Patent 3,554,604

  • Sudgen D (2005) Innovation through design. Aust J Mech Eng 2(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden D (2000) Cutting device. WO Patent App. PCT/AU2000/000,066

  • Sugden D (2003) Cutting device with rotating disc. US Patent 6,561,590

  • Teale R (1965) The concept of specific energy in rock drilling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 2(1):57–73. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(65)90022-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Y, Detournay E (2014) Analysis of the contact forces on a blunt pdc bit. In: 48th US Rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium held in Minneapolis, MN, ARMA 14-7351, pp 1–4

  • Zhou Y, Lin J (2013) On the critical failure mode transition depth for rock cutting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 62:131–137. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.05.004

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank CRCMining and Prof Paul Lever for providing the test data used for evaluating the model predictions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sevda Dehkhoda.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Calculation of Angular Position of Left end of Contact Segment

The angle \(\varphi _{L}(\theta )\), which identifies the left extremity of the contact arc, and thus, the contact angle \(\psi (\theta )=\frac{1}{2}(\varphi _{L}(\theta )-\varphi _{R}(\theta ))\) can be determined from geometric and trigonometric considerations. Point L is the intersection of the disc perimeter and the cutting front at the end of the previous actuation.

By reference to Fig. 19, it can be observed that \(\varphi _{\tilde{R}}(\tilde{\theta })\) is the angular position of point L in terms of the angle \(\tilde{\theta }\) identifying the position of the disc centre at the previous iteration. In other words, \(\tilde{\theta }\) is the position of the disc centre at the previous actuation cycle when the right extremity of the contact arc was at the current point L.

Fig. 19
figure 19

Contact length of disc cutter with rock

Fig. 20
figure 20

Schematics of determining the boundaries of ADC/rock interaction

The angle \(\varphi _{L}(\theta )\) can be determined by solving a system of three equations involving the two auxiliary unknown \(\tilde{\theta }\), \(\varphi \tilde{_{R}}\) that are themselves functions of \(\theta\):

$$\begin{aligned}&\epsilon \left( \cos \theta -\cos \tilde{\theta }\right) +\cos \varphi _{L}-\cos \varphi _{\tilde{R}}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(33)
$$\begin{aligned}&\epsilon \left( \sin \theta -\sin \tilde{\theta }\right) +\sin \varphi _{L}-\sin \varphi _{\tilde{R}}+\epsilon \upsilon (\theta -\tilde{\theta })=0 \end{aligned}$$
(34)
$$\begin{aligned}&\tan \varphi _{\tilde{R}}=\frac{\sin \tilde{\theta }}{\cos \tilde{\theta }+\upsilon } \end{aligned}$$
(35)

Equations (33) and (34) are obtained by projecting the vectors \(\overrightarrow{\tilde{S}S}\), \(\overrightarrow{\tilde{S}\tilde{O}}\), \(\overrightarrow{\tilde{O}L}\), \(\overrightarrow{SO}\), \(\overrightarrow{OL}\) on the x- and the y-axis, respectively, while enforcing that

$$\begin{aligned} \overrightarrow{\tilde{S}S}+\overrightarrow{SO}+\overrightarrow{OL}=\overrightarrow{\tilde{S}\tilde{O}}+\overrightarrow{\tilde{O}L} \end{aligned}$$
(36)

and noting that \(|\tilde{S}S|=\upsilon (\theta -\tilde{\theta })\). Equation (35) simply expresses that point L is on the cutting front at the previous actuation.

Expressing \(\cos \varphi _{\tilde{R}}\) and \(\sin \varphi _{\tilde{R}}\) in terms of \(\tan \varphi _{\tilde{R}}\) given by (35) yields

$$\begin{aligned} \cos \varphi _{\tilde{R}}=\frac{\cos \tilde{\theta }+\upsilon }{\sqrt{1+2\upsilon \cos \tilde{\theta }+\upsilon ^{2}}},\quad \sin \varphi _{\tilde{R}}=\frac{\sin \tilde{\theta }}{\sqrt{1+2\upsilon \cos \tilde{\theta }+\upsilon ^{2}}} \end{aligned}$$
(37)

Substituting the above expressions (37) in (33) and (34) and writing that \(\cos ^{2}\varphi _{L}+\sin ^{2}\varphi _{L}=1\) lead to an implicit equation in \(\tilde{\theta }\), which can be numerically solved to give \(\tilde{\theta }=\tilde{\theta }(\theta ;\epsilon ,\upsilon )\). Finally, \(\varphi _{L}(\theta ;\epsilon ,\upsilon )\) is deduced from (33) and (34) by expressing \(\tan \varphi _{L}\) as

$$\begin{aligned} \tan \varphi _{L}=\frac{\sin \varphi _{\tilde{R}}-\epsilon \left( \sin \theta -\sin \tilde{\theta }\right) -\epsilon \upsilon (\theta -\tilde{\theta })}{\cos \varphi _{\tilde{R}}-\epsilon \left( \cos \theta -\cos \theta ^{'}\right) } \end{aligned}$$
(38)

where the right-hand side of (38) is now a function of the form \(f(\theta ;\epsilon ,\upsilon )\) and can be evaluated numerically for every selected values of \(\theta\), \(\epsilon\) and \(\upsilon\).

Appendix 2: Determination of Transition Angles \(\theta _{\mathrm{I}}\), \(\theta _{\mathrm{II}}\), and \(\theta _{\mathrm{III}}\)

The angular boundaries between the start \(\theta _{\mathrm{I}}\) and end \(\theta _{\mathrm{III}}\) of cutter/rock interaction can be determined based on the kinematics of the cutter. As described in the main text, phase I commences as soon as the edge of the disc makes contact with the cutting trace from previous actuation cycle. This is when the locus of disc centre intersects with its path as illustrated in Fig. 5a. The interaction is, hence, initiated with a discrete point of contact at L, and the boundary point \(\theta _{\mathrm{I}}\) can then be determined based on the coordinates of the intersection point and by solving equation below for \(\theta _{\mathrm{I}}\in [-\pi ,0]\):

$$\begin{aligned} \sin \theta _{\mathrm{I}}+\upsilon \left( \theta _{\mathrm{I}}-\pi \right) =0 \end{aligned}$$
(39)

Phase II commences at the moment at which points R and \(R'\) catch up, which is when \(x_{R}=x_{R'},\,y_{R}=y_{R'}\) (Fig. 20a). With OR and \(\tilde{O}R\) being of equal lengths (radius of the disc) in the isosceles triangle \(O\tilde{O}R\), it can be written that \(\varphi =2\pi -\tilde{\varphi }\). Replacing this expression in \(x_{R}=x_{R'}\) yields \(\epsilon \left( \cos \theta -\cos \tilde{\theta }\right) +\cos \varphi -\cos \tilde{\varphi }=0\) and simplifying this equation leads to \(\cos \theta =\cos \tilde{\theta }\) and \(\theta =2\pi -\tilde{\theta }\). Similarly, substituting \(\varphi =2\pi -\tilde{\varphi }\) and \(\theta =2\pi -\tilde{\theta }\) in the equation for \(y_{R}=y_{R'}\) and simplifying it yields

$$\begin{aligned} \frac{1}{\epsilon }\sin \tilde{\varphi }+\sin \tilde{\theta }+\upsilon \left( \tilde{\theta }-\pi \right) =0 \end{aligned}$$
(40)

Using Eq. 37, \(\sin \tilde{\varphi }\) can be rewritten as \(\epsilon \sin \tilde{\theta }/v_{O}\), where \(v_{O}=\epsilon \sqrt{1+2\upsilon \cos \tilde{\theta }+\upsilon ^{2}}\). Substituting this expression for \(\sin \tilde{\varphi }\) and replacing \(\tilde{\theta }=2\pi -\theta\) in (40) yields the equation to be solved for \(\theta _{\mathrm{II}}\in \left[ -\pi ,0\right]\):

$$\begin{aligned} \sin \theta _{\mathrm{II}}+\upsilon \left( \theta _{\mathrm{II}}-\pi \right) +\frac{\sin \theta _{\mathrm{II}}}{v_{O}}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(41)

Similarly, as shown in Fig. 20b, the interaction between the disc and the rock ceases when points \(L\equiv R\) . In isosceles triangle \(RO\tilde{O}\), \(OR=O\tilde{R}\) so it can be concluded that \(\varphi =2\pi -\tilde{\varphi }\). Replacing this in the equation for \(x_{R}=x_{L}\) gives \(\cos \theta =\cos \tilde{\theta }\). The acceptable solution is \(\theta =4\pi -\tilde{\theta }\), considering Fig. 20b. Replacing \(\theta\) and \(\varphi\) in the equation for \(y_{R}=y_{L}\) and substituting \(\sin \tilde{\varphi }\) by \(\epsilon \sin \tilde{\theta }/v_{O}\) and \(\tilde{\theta }\) by \(4\pi -\theta _{\mathrm{III}}\) yields the equation to be solved for \(\theta _{\mathrm{III}}\):

$$\begin{aligned} \sin \theta _{\mathrm{III}}+\upsilon \left( \theta _{\mathrm{III}}-2\pi \right) +\frac{\sin \theta _{\mathrm{III}}}{v_{O}}=0 \end{aligned}$$
(42)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dehkhoda, S., Detournay, E. Mechanics of Actuated Disc Cutting. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50, 465–483 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1121-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-016-1121-y

Keywords

Navigation