Abstract
Purpose
Since 2002, the Japan Surgical Society has established a board certification system for surgeons to be certified for a specialty. Surgery remains a male-dominated field in Japan. This study aimed to clarify if the Japanese surgical residency training system is equally suitable for female and male residents.
Methods
The Japan Surgical Society conducted the first questionnaire survey regarding the system of surgical training for the residents in 2016. The questionnaire included the degree of satisfaction with 7 aspects of the training system, including the number and variety of cases experienced and duration and quality of instruction, and the learning level for 31 procedures. The degree of satisfaction and level of learning were compared between female and male residents.
Results
The degree of satisfaction was similar for all items between female and male residents. Female residents chose breast surgery as their subspecialty more frequently than male residents and were more confident in breast surgery procedures than male residents. Conversely, fewer female residents chose gastrointestinal surgery and were less confident in gastrointestinal surgery procedures than male residents.
Conclusion
Female residents were as satisfied with the current surgical training system as male residents. However, there may be room for improvement in the surgical system, considering that fewer applications for gastrointestinal surgery come from female residents than from males.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
. Japan surgical society. Japan surgical society. https://www.jssoc.or.jp/aboutus/society/enkaku.html. Accessed 6 Jun 2021.
. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/ishi/18/index.html. Accessed 4 Mar 2022.
McNally S. Surgical training: still highly competitive but still very male. Bull R Coll Surg Engl. 2012;94:53–5.
Buyske J. Women in surgery: the same, yet different. Arch Surg. 2005;140:241–4.
Gargiulo DA, Hyman NH, Hebert JC. Women in surgery: do we really understand the deterrents? Arch Surg. 2006;141:405–7.
Taylor KS, Lambert TW, Goldacre MJ. Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: postal questionnaire surveys. BMJ. 2009;338:b1735.
Organ CH. Toward a more complete society. Arch Surg. 1993;128:617.
McLemore EC, Ramamoorthy S, Peterson CY, Bass BL. Women in surgery: bright, sharp, brave, and temperate. Perm J. 2012;16:54–9.
Wirtzfeld DA. The history of women in surgery. Can J Surg. 2009;52:317–20.
Hesse AA. Women in surgery. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2017;7:x–xiv.
Kawase K, Kwong A, Yorozuya K, Tomizawa Y, Numann PJ, Sanfey H. The attitude and perceptions of work-life balance: a comparison among women surgeons in Japan, USA, and Hong Kong China. World J Surg. 2013;37:2–11.
Kawase K, Nomura K, Tominaga R, Iwase H, Ogawa T, Shibasaki I, et al. Analysis of gender-based differences among surgeons in Japan: results of a survey conducted by the Japan Surgical Society. Part. 1: Working style. Surg Today. 2018;48:33–43.
Kawase K, Nomura K, Tominaga R, Iwase H, Ogawa T, Shibasaki I, et al. Analysis of gender-based differences among surgeons in Japan: results of a survey conducted by the Japan Surgical Society. Part. 2: personal life. Surg Today. 2018;48:308–19.
Kono E, Isozumi U, Nomura S, Okoshi K, Yamamoto H, Miyata H, et al. Surgical experience disparity between male and female surgeons in Japan. JAMA Surg. 2022;157:e222938.
Poudel S, Hirano S, Kurashima Y, Stefanidis D, Akiyama H, Eguchi S, et al. A snapshot of surgical resident training in Japan: results of a national-level needs assessment survey. Surg Today. 2019;49:870–6.
Poudel S, Hirano S, Kurashima Y, Stefanidis D, Akiyama H, Eguchi S, et al. Are graduating residents sufficiently competent? Results of a national gap analysis survey of program directors and graduating residents in Japan. Surg Today. 2020;50:995–1001.
Hashimoto D, Poudel S, Hirano S, Kurashima Y, Akiyama H, Eguchi S, et al. Is there disparity between regions and facilities in surgical resident training in Japan? Insights from a national survey. Surg Today. 2020;50:1585–93.
DaRosa DA, Zwischenberger JB, Meyerson SL, George BC, Teitelbaum EN, Soper NJ, et al. A theory-based model for teaching and assessing residents in the operating room. J Surg Educ. 2013;70:24–30.
Nomura K, Yano E, Fukui T. Gender differences in clinical confidence: a nationwide survey of resident physicians in Japan. Acad Med. 2010;85:647–53.
Koike S, Shimizu A, Matsumoto M, Ide H, Atarashi H, Yasunaga H. Career pathways of board-certified surgeons in Japan. Surg Today. 2016;46:661–7.
Hoshino N, Hida K, Sakai Y, Osada S, Idani H, Sato T, et al. Nomogram for predicting anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018;33:411–8.
Xepoleas MD, Munabi NCO, Auslander A, Magee WP, Yao CA. The experiences of female surgeons around the world: a scoping review. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18:80.
Bellini MI, Graham Y, Hayes C, Zakeri R, Parks R, Papalois V. A woman’s place is in theatre: women’s perceptions and experiences of working in surgery from the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland women in surgery working group. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024349.
Yeo HL, Abelson JS, Symer MM, Mao J, Michelassi F, Bell R, et al. Association of time to attrition in surgical residency with individual resident and programmatic factors. JAMA Surg. 2018;153:511–7.
Lambert T, Surman G, Goldacre M. UK doctors and equal opportunities in the NHS: national questionnaire surveys of views on gender, ethnicity and disability. J R Soc Med. 2014;107:398–408.
Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2017;359:j4366.
Okoshi K, Endo H, Nomura S, Kono E, Fujita Y, Yasufuku I, et al. Comparison of short term surgical outcomes of male and female gastrointestinal surgeons in Japan: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2022;378:e070568.
. Japan Association of Women Surgeons. Japan Association of Women Surgeons. http://jaws.umin.jp/English.html Accessed 6 Jun 2021.
. Association for Empowerment of Women Gastrointestinal Surgeons. Association for Empowerment of Women Gastrointestinal Surgeons. https://www.aegis-women.jp/english.html. Accessed 6 Jun 2021.
Yorozuya K, Kawase K, Akashi-Tanaka S, Kanbayashi C, Nomura S, Tomizawa Y. Mentorship as experienced by women surgeons in Japan. World J Surg. 2016;40:38–44.
Tomizawa Y. Role modeling for female surgeons in Japan. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2019;248:151–8.
Yutzie JD, Shellito JL, Helmer SD, Chang FC. Gender differences in general surgical careers: results of a post-residency survey. Am J Surg. 2005;190:955–9.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Nobuaki Hoshino (Kyoto University Hospital) for drafting this manuscript and creating the tables and figures, Dr. Kae Okoshi (Japan Baptist Hospital) for providing critical review and comments, and all of the residents who participated in this study. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for the English language editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hida, K., Hirano, S., Poudel, S. et al. The degree of satisfaction and level of learning in male and female surgical residents: a nationwide questionnaire survey of graduating residents in Japan. Surg Today 53, 1275–1285 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02683-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02683-z