Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Examination of colorectal cancer cases with metal allergy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report our initiatives and treatment results for patients with colorectal cancer with metal allergy.

Methods

A total of 27 patients (2.6%) with a history of metal contact dermatitis were identified among 1027 patients who underwent curative resection of colorectal cancer from 2014 to 2020. The results of the patch test, perioperative results, and postoperative colonoscopy findings were also investigated.

Results

The patch test for metal allergens and staples was performed in 21 patients (77.8%), and 13 of them (61.9%) tested positive for at least one metal allergen. Ni (38.1%), Co (28.6%), and Pd (19.0%) showed higher positive rates than other metals, and 1 patient (4.8%) tested positive for staples. Stapled anastomosis/suturing was performed as planned in 15 of 27 patients. In 10 patients, the anastomosis method was changed from stapled to hand-sewn according to the no-patch test results (60%), positivity for multiple metals (20%), positivity for staples (10%), and surgeon’s judgment (10%). No complications and abnormal colonoscopy findings were found to be associated with stapled anastomosis/suturing.

Conclusion

The patch test is useful for selecting an optimal anastomosis method for patients with suspected metal allergy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Foussereau J, Laugier P. Allergic eczemas from metallic foreign bodies. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc. 1966;52:220–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergschmidt P, Bader R, Mittelmeier W. Metal hypersensitivity in total knee arthroplasty: revision surgery using a ceramic femoral component - a case report. Knee. 2012;19:144–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Post ZD, Orozco FR, Ong AC. Metal sensitivity after TKA presenting with systemic dermatitis and hair loss. Orthopedics. 2013;36:e525–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Song H, Yin W, Ma Q. Allergic palmoplantar pustulosis caused by cobalt in cast dental crowns: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:e8-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buyukozturk S, Gelincik A, Demirtürk M, Erdoğdu D, Pur L, Colakoğlu B, et al. Nickel dental alloys can induce laryngeal edema attacks: a case report. J Dermatol. 2013;40:740–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosoki M, Nishigawa K, Miyamoto Y, Ohe G, Matsuka Y. Allergic contact dermatitis caused by titanium screws and dental implants. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60:213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yan H, Afroz S, Dalanon J, Goto N, Hosoki M, Matsuka Y. Metal allergy patient treated by titanium implant denture: a case report with at least 4-year follow-up. Clin Case Rep. 2018;6:1972–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wahlberg JE, Lindberg M. Patch testing. In: Frosch PJ, Menne T, Lepoittevin J-P, editors. Contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Germany: Springer; 2005. p. 366–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sato S, Lrisawa A, Lmamura H, Suzuki R, Shibukawa G, Takagi T, et al. Allergy to metallic stent in a patient with pancreatic carcinoma: case report (in Japanese with English abstract). Tando (J Jpn Bilia Assoc). 2010;24:213–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pacheco KA. Allergy to surgical implants. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:72–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nihon-Yanagi Y, Ishiwatari T, Otsuka Y, Okubo Y, Tochigi N, Wakayama M, et al. A case of postoperative hepatic granuloma presumptively caused by surgical staples/clipping materials. Diagn Pathol. 2015;10:90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakuraya M, Ikeda A, Shimada T, Ikeda K, Okusawa S, Watanabe M. Laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer patient with metal allergy. J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg. 2017;22:661–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Christensen TJ, Samant SA, Shin AY. Making sense of metal allergy and hypersensitivity to metallic implants in relation to hand surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42:737–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hallab N, Merritt K, Jacobs JJ. Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2001;83:428–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Merritt K, Rodrigo JJ. Immune response to synthetic materials. Sensitization of patients receiving orthopaedic implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;326:71–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Basko-Plluska JL, Thyssen JP, Schalock PC. Cutaneous and systemic hypersensitivity reactions to metallic implants. Dermatitis. 2011;22:65–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hallab NJ, Jacobs JJ. Biologic effects of implant debris. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67:182–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fonacier LS, Dreskin SC, Leung DY. Allergic skin diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125:S138–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thyssen JP, Menné T, Schalock PC, Taylor JS, Maibach HI. Pragmatic approach to the clinical work-up of patients with putative allergic disease to metallic orthopaedic implants before and after surgery. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164:473–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato N, Kinbara M, Kuroishi T, Kimura K, Iwakura Y, Ohtsu H, et al. Lipopolysaccharide promotes and augments metal allergies in mice, dependent on innate immunity and histidine decarboxylase. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007;37:743–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitagawa M, Murakami S, Akashi Y, Oka H, Shintani T, Ogawa I, et al. Current status of dental metal allergy in Japan. J Prosthodont Res. 2019;63:309–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G, Arregui I, Guisasola C, Ruiz E, et al. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:823–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hosoki M, Nishigawa K, Tajima T, Ueda M, Matsuka Y. Cross-sectional observational study exploring clinical risk of titanium allergy caused by dental implants. J Prosthodont Res. 2018;62:426–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Siddiqi A, Payne AGT, De Silva RK, Duncan WJ. Titanium allergy: could it affect dental implant integration? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22:673–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Javed F, Al-Hezaimi K, Almas K, Romanos GE. Is titanium sensitivity associated with allergic reactions in patients with dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15:47–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Enago, the editing brand of Crimson Interactive Pvt. Ltd under Advance Editing B2CDrs, for editing our manuscript for English language, grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kosuke Mizukoshi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in association with the present study.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Hospital Ethics Committee of Juntendo University Hospital (19-213) and conforms to the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mizukoshi, K., Okazawa, Y., Amemiya, K. et al. Examination of colorectal cancer cases with metal allergy. Surg Today 53, 753–761 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02643-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02643-7

Keywords

Navigation