Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for outlet obstruction after laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Outlet obstruction is defined as bowel obstruction at the stoma opening. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors for outlet obstruction in patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy.

Methods

Among consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic curative resection for primary rectal cancer between 2013 and 2015, 261 patients with diverting ileostomy were included in the analysis. The thickness of the abdominal wall, including the thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle, was measured using preoperative computed tomography. The clinicopathological factors were compared between the patients with and without outlet obstruction.

Results

Fourteen (5.4%) patients were diagnosed with outlet obstruction, but reoperation was not required. The rectus abdominis muscle was significantly thicker in male patients with outlet obstruction compared to those without outlet obstruction, but not in females. In a multivariate analysis, a rectus abdominis muscle thickness of 10 mm or more was determined to be an independent risk factor for outlet obstruction (odds ratio, 7.0482; p = 0.0061).

Conclusions

The thickness of the rectus abdominis muscle may be used to predict the occurrence of outlet obstruction in male patients with rectal cancer who undergo laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, et al. Factors affecting the difficulty of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with double stapling technique anastomosis for low rectal cancer. Surgery. 2009;146(3):483–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011;202(3):259–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jorgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(1):37–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Michel P, Saric J, Parneix M. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after resection of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1998;85(3):355–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Graffner H, Fredlund P, Olsson SA, Oscarson J, Petersson BG. Protective colostomy in low anterior resection of the rectum using the EEA stapling instrument. A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26(2):87–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2):207–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55(86–87):1562–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rullier E, Le Toux N, Laurent C, Garrelon JL, Parneix M, Saric J. Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy for defunctioning low anastomoses during rectal cancer surgery. World J Surg. 2001;25(3):274–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klink CD, Lioupis K, Binnebosel M, Kaemmer D, Kozubek I, Grommes J, et al. Diversion stoma after colorectal surgery: loop colostomy or ileostomy? Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001;26(4):431–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Law WL, Chu KW, Choi HK. Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):704–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gooszen AW, Geelkerken RH, Hermans J, Lagaay MB, Gooszen HG. Temporary decompression after colorectal surgery: randomized comparison of loop ileostomy and loop colostomy. Br J Surg. 1998;85(1):76–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Okada S, Hata K, Emoto S, Murono K, Kaneko M, Sasaki K, et al. Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Today. 2018;48(12):1060–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tamura K, Matsuda K, Yokoyama S, Iwamoto H, Mizumoto Y, Murakami D, et al. Defunctioning loop ileostomy for rectal anastomoses: predictors of stoma outlet obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019;34(6):1141–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohira G, Miyauchi H, Hayano K, Kagaya A, Imanishi S, Tochigi T, et al. Incidence and risk factor of outlet obstruction after construction of ileostomy. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2018;2(1):25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Okita Y, Araki T, Kondo S, Fujikawa H, Yoshiyama S, Hiro J, et al. Clinical characteristics of stoma-related obstruction after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(3):554–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fujii T, Morita H, Sutoh T, Yajima R, Tsutsumi S, Asao T, et al. Outlet obstruction of temporary loop diverting ileostomy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015;62(139):602–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Ueno M, Fujimoto Y, Yamaguchi T, Muto T. Standardized technique of laparoscopic intracorporeal rectal transection and anastomosis for low anterior resection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(2):557–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Konishi T, Fukuda M, Fujimoto Y, et al. Safety of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer with preoperative chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(3):521–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nagasaki T, Akiyoshi T, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy might improve the prognosis of patients with locally advanced low rectal cancer and lateral pelvic lymph node metastases. World J Surg. 2017;41(3):876–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Konishi T, Shinozaki E, Murofushi K, Taguchi S, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, et al. Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and laparoscopic surgery with selective lateral node dissection for poor-risk low rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(8):2507–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dolejs S, Kennedy G, Heise CP. Small bowel obstruction following restorative proctocolectomy: affected by a laparoscopic approach? J Surg Res. 2011;170(2):202–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Krishnamurty DM, Blatnik J, Mutch M. Stoma complications. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2017;30(3):193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(10):958–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeda M, Takahashi H, Haraguchi N, Miyoshi N, Hata T, Yamamoto H, et al. Factors predictive of high-output ileostomy: a retrospective single-center comparative study. Surg Today. 2019;49(6):482–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Baker ML, Williams RN, Nightingale JM. Causes and management of a high-output stoma. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13(2):191–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen FC, Mackay JR, Woods RJ. Ileostomy dysfunction with adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal carcinoma requiring in-hospital management: a cause for concern. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996;66(9):641–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Robertson JP, Wells CI, Vather R, Bissett IP. Effect of diversion ileostomy on the occurrence and consequences of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(3):194–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. De Nardi P, Salandini M, Chiari D, Pecorelli N, Cristel G, Damascelli A et al. Changes in body composition during neoadjuvant therapy can affect prognosis in rectal cancer patients: An exploratory study. Curr Probl Cancer. 2019 [Epub ahead of print]

  31. Levolger S, van Vledder MG, Alberda WJ, Verhoef C, de Bruin RWF, Ijermans JNM, et al. Muscle wasting and survival following pre-operative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Clin Nutr. 2018;37(5):1728–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Prado CM, Sawyer MB, Ghosh S, Lieffers JR, Esfandiari N, Antoun S, et al. Central tenet of cancer cachexia therapy: do patients with advanced cancer have exploitable anabolic potential? Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;98(4):1012–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS, YF, and TN mainly designed the study. All coauthors substantially contributed to this study and fulfilled the requirements for authorship as per the guidelines of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiya Nagasaki.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest or ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sasaki, S., Nagasaki, T., Oba, K. et al. Risk factors for outlet obstruction after laparoscopic surgery and diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer. Surg Today 51, 366–373 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02096-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02096-2

Keywords

Navigation