A novel physical colonoscopy simulator based on analysis of data from computed tomography colonography



Laparoscopic surgery is now practiced widely because of its lower postoperative morbidity. As flexible endoscopy during laparoscopic surgery minimizes surgical trauma further, training in endoscopy will become more important for surgeons. Thus, we designed a physical simulator, the Noda–Kitada–Suzuki (NKS) model, which could provide the more realistic insertion of a colonoscope.


We designed a colonoscopy simulator, based on information from computed tomography colonography scans of the anatomy and kinetic properties of the colon and rectum.


The transparent skeleton body of the NKS model provides instant visual feedback to the operator and the trainer. Our novel colonoscopy simulator replicates the realistic and reproducible insertion of a colonoscope from the rectum to cecum, providing authentic views of the Houston’s valves, the flexures, and mucosal folds. This was verified through an objective questionnaire, with 14 of 16 colonoscopists preferring the NKS model over the previous CM15 model for training purposes. Moreover, the Modified Colonoscopy Simulator Realism Questionnaire analysis confirmed that the NKS model was significantly more realistic than the CM15 for 7 (21.2%) of the 33 items when assessed by 12 colonoscopists.


The NKS model provides a realistic training platform and may improve the quality of training in colonoscopy.


Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery has become widely used for the treatment of colorectal cancer and inflammatory bowel disease [1,2,3]. To further minimize the surgical trauma and postoperative complications [4], single incision laparoscopic surgery and transanal total mesorectal excision have been developed, and procedures combining flexible endoscopy and laparoscopic surgery, such as natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), are also receiving attention [5]. To utilise flexible endoscopy effectively during advanced and complicated laparoscopy, the surgeon must be skilled in performing conventional flexible endoscopy. However, the skills required to become proficient at performing colonoscopy can be difficult to teach and learn [6,7,8,9,10].

The efficiency of colonoscopy training can be enhanced through practice with simulators, including simple physical models [9,10,11,12,13], physical models with interactive sensors [8], and computer-based virtual simulators [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. These models are equally effective for acquiring basic colonoscopy skills [9,10,11, 13]. However, colonoscopy simulators are only moderately realistic compared with real colonoscopy [6, 7, 10, 11]. Thus, we designed a simulator that could offer more realistic insertion of the colonoscope. A novel physical model was developed to provide a training platform that was relatively affordable and accessible. The final product, the Noda–Kitada–Suzuki (NKS) model (Table 1), is an evolution model of an established simulator, CM15, the Colonoscope Training Model (manufactured by Kyoto Kagaku Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan; Fig. 1), which has already been validated as a credible simulator [9,10,11,12].

Table 1 Main features of the Noda–Kitada–Suzuki (NKS) colonoscopy simulator
Fig. 1

Overview of the Noda–Kitada–Suzuki (NKS) model and CM15 colonoscopy simulators. The NKS model is relatively light and has been designed to fit into a suitcase compact enough to be carried as hand luggage on aircrafts


Development of the NKS model

CT colonography (CTC) images

We assessed the CTC scans of patients who underwent CTC imaging at Kawanish City Hospital for abdominal pain or altered bowel habits between June, 1 and December, 31, 2012, in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Colonic distension for CTC was achieved with the automated continuous delivery of carbon dioxide. An 80-MDCT scanner (TSX-302A, Aquilion PRIME, Toshiba Med. Sys. Corp. Japan, Tochigi, Japan) was used for the CT images after standard bowel preparation. MDCT data were analyzed by a 3D image volume analyzer to obtain CTC images (VINCENT Ver3.3, FUJIFILM Med. Sys. Corp. Japan, Tokyo, Japan).

Silicone rectal unit

The simulator was developed at Kyoko Kagaku Co., Ltd. (Kyoto, Japan).

The rectal unit of the NKS model is made of silicone and is an exact replica of the rectum of a patient, having taken dicom data from CTC images to create an acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene resin cast with a 3D printer (Fortus 360Lmc-L, Stratasys, USA). The stiffness of the silicone in the current model reliably offers more realistic endoscopic views of the Houston’s valves and the recto-sigmoid junction than does the CM15 (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2

Novel silicone rectal unit designed with the aid of computed tomography colonography (CTC) images provides more realistic endoscopic views of the Houston’s valves than the CM15 model. All endoscopic views of the rectum were taken with these simulators and a patient in the left-lateral position. The photos in the upper panels are from the NKS colonoscopy simulator, the middle panels from the patient, and the lower panels from the CM15 model using identical insertion procedure. 1st HV first Houston’s valve; 2nd HV second Houston’s valve; 3rd HV third Houston’s valve

Morphology of the sigmoid colon

The morphology of the sigmoid colon was assessed by analyzing the CTCs of 105 consecutive patients. Intriguingly, we found that the morphology of the sigmoid colon in the vast majority of the patients conformed to any of three morphological patterns: short alpha loops (15.2%), long alpha loops (24.8%), or N loops (53.3%) (Fig. 3). Based on these findings, the NKS model was designed, so that the sigmoid colon could be pre-set to take up any one of the three commonest morphologies. This was achieved by providing sufficient width and depth to the pelvis, as well as optimizing the suspensory and restrictive attachments to the sigmoid colon, which in turn allowed the sigmoid colon to move more naturally during colonoscopy.

Fig. 3

Three commonest morphological features of the sigmoid colon encountered on CTC. Short alpha loops, 15.2% (n = 16); long alpha loops, 24.8% (n = 26); N loops, 53.3% (n = 56); unclassified loops, 6.7% (n = 7)

The setting of the morphology could be interchanged easily by sliding the colon through its attachments, and then bending or twisting the colon into the desired position (Online Resource 1). As with real colonoscopy, the operators are unlikely to accomplish cecal intubation by merely using a continuous push technique, and must instead resolve loops that form and pass over the mucosal folds and flexures realistically (video recording, Online Resource 2).

Attachments of the colon

CTCs from 20 of 105 patients who underwent imaging in the supine and left-lateral positions were analyzed to establish how the shape of the colon differed in different postures. There was relative loosening of the sigmoid-descending colon junction and hepatic flexure in the left lateral vs. the supine postures, but overall, the position of the colon did not change remarkably (Fig. 4; Online Resource 3). Suspensory supports for the transverse and sigmoid colon were, therefore, introduced, which together with the abdominal membrane, prevented major colonic movements with changes to the posture in the NKS model (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4

CTC images from a patient in the supine and left-lateral positions. The position of the colon changed minimally with the change in posture when assessed from the front in all 20 patients. On the contrary, as shown representatively in Case 1, the sigmoid-descending colon junction and hepatic flexure were loosened by the postural changes from the supine to the left-lateral position by forward-shift movements of the transverse and sigmoid colon

Fig. 5

Introduction of new transverse and sigmoid colon suspensory attachments to reduce redundancy of the colon tube. The new suspensory attachments (star) and (double star), to the sigmoid and the transverse colon respectively, together with the transparent abdominal membrane, reduce excessive movement of the colon in any posture

Transparent body and model components

Guided by the CTC images, the vertebral body of the NKS model was made to project more into the abdominal cavity, resulting in realistic endoscopic intubation through the recto-sigmoid junction and hepatic flexures. The skeleton body, abdominal membrane, and colon tube attachments are all transparent (Online Resource 4), which enables the operator to directly observe the intubation process and appreciate the forces delivered to the colon by the colonoscope (Fig. 6; Online Resource 2).

Fig. 6

Time lapse photos of colonoscopy with the NKS colonoscopy simulator. This figure illustrates colonoscopy insertion in a sigmoid colon with a long alpha loop in the left-lateral position. The distal tip is maneuvered to pass over the splenic flexure into the left transverse colon by gentle pushing along with bending the scope tip upward (56). While maintaining the scope tip in the fully upward bending position, the long alpha loop is resolved by applying a clockwise torque with delicate retraction of the scope shaft (68). After the loop is resolved, the scope tip is released back to the neutral bending position. Then the distal tip of the colonoscope is intentionally retracted to the descending colon to ensure the scope shaft is freely mobile, using gentle pushing and retraction repeatedly (9). Thereafter, the colonoscope is inserted into the cecum (Online Resource 2)

Maintenance and transportation

The NKS model was designed to be entirely water-resistant, so that it can be cleaned and maintained easily. The model is relatively light and fits into a suitcase that is compact enough to be carried as hand luggage on aircrafts (Fig. 1).

Evaluation of the NKS model

The usefulness of the NKS model for training purposes was compared with that of the CM15 model, the most utilised physical simulator for colonoscopy training, by 16 colonoscopists from five district general hospitals, one university hospital, two private hospitals, and two endoscopic clinics, who completed a signed questionnaire. Fourteen of the colonoscopists were certified by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) and 2 were residents. The 16 colonoscopists included 5 very experienced colonoscopists with a record of 25,000–12,000 colonoscopies, 9 experienced colonoscopists (6000–1000 colonoscopies), and 2 less experienced colonoscopists (fewer than 300 colonoscopies). None of the participants declared a financial relationship with any company that manufactures or distributes colonoscopy training equipment. The recruitment and testing were conducted between March 19 and May 12, 2016. The colonoscopists evaluated the models with the sigmoid colon set in all three morphologies, including the short alpha loop, long alpha loop, and N loop.

Overall evaluations

Overall evaluations were based on the results of a questionnaire comprised of three simple questions; namely:

  1. 1.

    “Which would be more ideal for learning if you were an observer?”

  2. 2.

    “Which would be more helpful for learning to overcome the difficulties with the insertion of the colonoscope?

  3. 3.

    “If you have the opportunity, which one would you prefer to use?”

The colonoscopists were asked to choose their answers from the NKS model, the CM15, both, or neither.

Evaluation of colonoscopy simulator realism to real colonoscopy

Both simulators were evaluated for their realism using the Modified Colonoscopy Simulator Realism Questionnaire (M-CSRQ; Table 2), which consists of 33 items divided into seven prior subscales. The original CSRQ consists of 58 items divided into ten prior subscales, to compare specific aspects of the colonoscopy simulators [10]. Twenty-one items from the original CSRQ were not applicable and excluded, because they were designed for the evaluation of other forms of colonoscopy simulators, such as physical models with interactive sensors and computer-based virtual simulators equipped with/without a simulator colonoscope. Four of the items were excluded from the “Visual” subscale, since both the simulators were equipped with an identical colon tube, excluding rectum. All 33 items were rated from 1 (“extremely poor”) to 6 (“extremely well done”). Four colonoscopists from the original 16 were excluded from M-CSRQ analysis, because they did not answer large parts of the questionnaire.

Table 2 Modified Colonoscopy Simulator Realism Questionnaire (M-CSRQ) Analysis

Statistical analyses

Each subscale score for both simulators was statistically analyzed for mean and standard deviation. Finally, the difference in evaluation for both simulators to each item was statistically analyzed by a pairwise Mann–Whitney U test (StatMate V 5.01, ATMS, Tokyo, Japan). P < 0.05 was considered significant.


Overall evaluations

According to the responses to the questions 1, 2, and 3, all the colonoscopists favored the NKS model, with the exception of one experienced doctor who answered “both”, and another experienced doctor who answered “neither” to the question 2.

Evaluation of colonoscopy simulator realism to real colonoscopy

Both simulators were evaluated for realism using the Modified Colonoscopy Simulator Realism Questionnaire (M-CSRQ; Table 2). In 7 of the 33 items (21.2%), NKS was evaluated as significantly more realistic than the CM15 model, and as equivocal in the remaining 26 items. From the “Anatomical Structure” subscale, the degree of angulation at the “rectosigmoid junction” and “hepatic flexure” was evaluated as significantly more realistic in the NKS model (P = 0.003329 and P = 0.03536, respectively). From the “Visual” subscale, “the appearance of the rectum” was evaluated as significantly more realistic in the NKS model (P = 0.029249). From the “Visual Response” subscale, “the response of the visual image to steering maneuvers” was evaluated as significantly more realistic in the NKS model (P = 0.03657). From the “Haptic Response” subscale, “the amount of “torque” (clockwise or counter-clockwise rotational force) required” was evaluated as significantly more realistic in the NKS model (P = 0.00685). Finally, from the “Looping” subscale, “the response of the simulator to loop reduction with typical techniques” and “the simulation of looping during insertion” were evaluated as significantly more realistic in the NKS model (P = 0.0282, for both; Table 2).


There is a growing need for competent colonoscopists globally, and colonoscopy training is enhanced by the use of simulators [17,18,19,20,21]. It is envisaged that minimally invasive surgery will evolve to incorporate flexible endoscopy, which will require colorectal surgeons who are proficient at performing colonoscopy. Given that the existing simulators are considered only moderately realistic [6, 7, 10, 11], we were prompted to design a novel simulator to enhance colonoscopy training further. We took great care to make the current model as realistic as possible in terms of the loop formation at the sigmoid colon. The questionnaire survey confirmed that the NKS model was significantly more realistic than the CM15 model concerning “the response of the simulator to loop reduction with typical techniques” and “the simulation of looping during insertion”. These are important features of colonoscopy simulators, given that many, including ourselves, have emphasized the importance of resolving loop formations of the colonoscope prior to advancing the distal tip of the colonoscope much beyond the splenic flexure, to facilitate the rest of the intubation to the cecum being successful as well as comfortable for the patient [6, 7, 22,23,24]. With this novel rectal unit, an anatomically representative skeleton body and the arrangements of the suspensory and restrictive attachments of the colon, a simulator has been created to offer more realistic and reproducible intubation from the rectum to cecum as well as account for postural changes and application of abdominal pressure. Indeed, these accumulated refinements have resulted in a significantly more realistic anatomical angulation at the rectosigmoid junction as well as the hepatic flexure, and visual appearance of the rectum, as evidenced in the questionnaire evaluation. Although both simulators share the same colon tubes, excluding the rectal unit, these changes gave the NKS model significant advantages over the CM15, in terms of the response of the visual image to steering maneuvers and the amount of “torque” required for the haptic response (Table 2). The sigmoid colon can be set to any of the three commonest morphologies quickly and with ease, allowing the operator to spend more time on colonoscopy training (Online Resource 1).

The transparent body and supportive components of the simulator are unique among physical models, offering a simple yet effective means of feeding back real-time information to both the trainee and trainer to enhance the learning experience. The transparent abdominal cover of the NKS model also allows for visualization of the colon during practice in all positions, unlike the former CM15 model, which required removal of the opaque cover to obtain visual feedback, and was only possible in the supine position, since the other positions lead to extravasation of the colon during practice (Fig. 1; Online Resource 4). Footage of the colonoscopy being performed can also be stored for viewing later or transmitted live to an instructor in another location, or be used as part of an assessment (Online Resource 2).

The preference for the NKS model over the CM15 model for training purposes was confirmed by the results of an objective assessment by doctors with a wide range of experience, which may reflect the usefulness of the current simulator for learning the basic techniques and refining expert techniques. To at least partially overcome the risk of bias from conducting the present study using a small number of raters, we asked doctors from a number of institutions to evaluate these colonoscopy models. The current simulator also permits mild deflation of the rectum, but it does not allow full deflation given that it is made of stiff silicone. However, this did not seem to be an issue for the colonoscopists who evaluated the models and deemed both to be equivocal regarding “Insufflation and Deflation” during colonoscopy (Table 2). Although we cannot be certain that the morphology of the sigmoid colon we observed would be similar in a different population, it is consistent with the type of loops commonly encountered during colonoscopy [22,23,24].

Taken together, the NKS colonoscopy simulator may enhance a better understanding of the complex procedures of colonoscopy insertion, resolve the problems of the current colonoscopy training models, and improve the training for colonoscopy remarkably.


The NKS model, which was developed based on our analysis of data from computed tomography colonography, provides a realistic training platform, and may improve the quality of training in colonoscopy significantly and cost-effectively. All these features are important for surgeons to acquire the necessary skills for performing colonoscopy proficiently.




CM15 model:

Colonoscope Training Model (manufactured by Kyoto Kagaku Co., Ltd. and distributed by Olympus Medical Systems Co., Ltd)


Computed tomography colonography


Houston’s valve

SD junction:

Sigmoid-descending colon junction


Upper rectum (above the peritoneal reflection)


Lower rectum (below the peritoneal reflection)




  1. 1.

    Hata K, Kazama S, Nozawa H, Kawai K, Kiyomatsu T, Tanaka J, et al. Laparoscopic surgery for ulcerative colitis: a review on the literature. Surg Today. 2015;45:933–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Numata M, Hasuo K, Hara K, Maezawa Y, Kazama K, Inari H, et al. A propensity score-matching analysis comparing the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with Stage I/II colon and upper rectal cancers. Surg Today. 2015;45:700–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Mizushima T, Nakajima K, Takeyama H, Naito A, Osawa H, Uemura M, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for stricturing and penetrating Crohn’s disease. Surg Today. 2016;46:203–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, et al. Extended Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today. 2016;46:668–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hasegawa S, Takahashi R, Hida K, Kawada K, Sakai Y. Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Today. 2016;46:641–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Thomas-Gibson S, Williams CB. Colonoscopy Training-New Approaches, Old Problems. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;15:813–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Parent R, Gerson LB. Realistic simulation of diagnostic endoscopy. Tech Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;13:161–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Choi JH, Ravindra K, Robert R, Drozek D. Preliminary development of the Active Colonoscopy Training Model. Med Dev Evid Res. 2011;4:59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS, Cresp ASG, Watson MO, Ooi SY, et al. Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:144–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hill A, Horswill MS, Plooy AM, Watson MO, Karamatic R, Basit TA, et al. Assessing the realism of colonoscopy simulation: the development of an instrument and systematic comparison of 4 simulators. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:631–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gomez PP, Willis RE, Sickle KV. Evaluation of Two Flexible Colonoscopy Simulators and Transfer of Skills into Clinical Practice. J Surg Educ. 2015;72:220–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nerup N, Preisler L, Svendsen MBS, Svendsen LB, Konge L. Assessment of colonoscopy by use of magnetic endoscopic imaging: design and validation of an automated tool. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:548–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Buscaglia JM, Fakhoury J, Loyal J, Denoya PI, Kazi E, Stein SA, et al. Simulated colonoscopy training using a low-cost physical model improves responsiveness of surgery interns. Colorectal Dis. 2014;17:530–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Validation of a computer-based colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:214–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Haycock AV, Bassett P, Bladen J, Thomas-Gibson S. Validation of the second-generation Olympus colonoscopy simulator for skills assessment. Endoscopy. 2009;41:952–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kruglikova I, Grantcharov TP, Drewes AM, Funch-Jensen P. The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity virtual-reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2010;59:181–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Computer Simulator Training Enhances the Competency of Gastroenterology Fellows at Colonoscopy: Results of a Pilot Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:33–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ahlberg G, Hultcrantz R, Jaramillo E, Lindblom A, Arvidsson D. Virtual Reality Colonoscopy Simulation: A Compulsory Practice for the Future Colonoscopist? Endoscopy. 2005;37:1198–204.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Park J, MacRae H, Musselman LJ, Rossos P, Hamstra SJ, Wolman S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients. Am J Surg. 2007;194:205–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Haycock A, Koch AD, Familiari P, Delft FV, Dekker E, Petruzziello L, et al. Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trail of simulator versus bedside training. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:298–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Koch AD, Ekkelenkamp VE, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, Man RA, Kuipers EJ. Simulated colonoscopy training leads to improved performance during patient-based assessment. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:630–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Suzuki Y. Total Colonoscopy: Insertion Methods Guided by Monitor Images and Manual Senses, 2nd ed., Nankodo, Tokyo, 2012 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brookers JC, Williams CB. Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:1–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Eickhoff A, Pickhardt PJ, Hartmann D, Riemann JF. Colon anatomy based on CT colonography and fluoroscopy: impact on looping, straightening and ancillary manoeuvres in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42:291–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. Seiichi Himeno, of the Department of Gastroenterology, Kawanishi City Hospital; Dr. Tsutomu Nishida, Chief of the Department of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital; Dr. Masato Komori, Director of the Endoscopy Division, Osaka Rosai Hospital; Dr. Nobuyuki Hida, the Department of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Hyogo College of Medicine; Dr. Koji Nakamichi, Head of the Department of Gastroenterological Medicine, Fukuoka Tokushukai Hospital; Dr. Satoshi Murata, Head director of Murata Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Clinic; Dr. Toyomi Fukushima, Assistant Director of the Department of Digestive Diseases, Kobe Adventist Hospital; Dr. Naoki Kawai, Head director of Kawai Clinic; Dr. Masakazu Nishishita, Head director of Nishishita Gastrointestinal Hospital; Dr. Yasukazu Gotoh, Chief of the Department of Gastroenterology and Director of the Endoscopy Division, Iseikai Hospital; and Dr. Kouhei Tominaga, the Department of Gastroenterology, Itami City Hospital; for many fruitful discussions and professional advice. We also thank Natsuko Uehara, Kyoto Kagaku Co., Ltd., for her help with the preparation of the figures and a video clip, Yusuke Nakae and Kenta Ishimori, Kyoto Kagaku Co., Ltd., for assisting us with the development of the NKS colonoscopy simulator. Finally, we thank Hidenobu Katayama, President of Kyoto Kagaku Co., Ltd., for encouraging and supporting this project.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuhisa Noda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Katsuhisa Noda, Takatoshi Kitada, and Yasumoto Suzuki contributed equally to the development of the Noda–Kitada–Suzuki (NKS) colonoscopy simulator and the preparation of this manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.


Online Resource 1. The sigmoid colon can be set to the three most commonly encountered morphological features. The morphology of the sigmoid colon can be interchanged with ease, by sliding the colon into the position marked by colored labels, and then bending or twisting it into the desired conformation (TIF 920 KB).

Online Resource 2. Video recording of Fig. 6. The 1st HV, 2nd HV, and 3rd HV, the first, the second, and the third Houston’s valve, respectively; Rb, lower rectum (below the peritoneal reflection); Ra, upper rectum (above the peritoneal reflection); RS, recto-sigmoid; SD junction, sigmoid-descending colon junction (MPG 40767 KB).


Online Resource 3. Additional representations of CTC images from two patients in the supine and left-lateral positions. The position of the colon changed minimally with the change in posture when assessed from the front in all 20 cases. Two additional cases are shown representatively in this figure (supplementary figure for Fig. 4) (TIF 975 KB).


Online Resource 4. The NKS colonoscopy simulator. The transparent body and abdominal membrane provide a unique opportunity to understand and observe the forces caused by the colonoscope on the colon. The operator can also comprehend the proper application of abdominal pressure and postural change to augment intubation in difficult cases. Views from the (a) front, (b) back, (c) cephalad, (d) caudal, and (e) right (TIF 1629 KB).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noda, K., Kitada, T., Suzuki, Y. et al. A novel physical colonoscopy simulator based on analysis of data from computed tomography colonography. Surg Today 47, 1153–1162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-017-1517-7

Download citation


  • Colonoscopy simulator
  • Computed tomography colonography (CTC)
  • Colonoscopy insertion method
  • Education and training