Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with serious comorbidities

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the results of mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy (MAE), performed for esophageal cancer patients with comorbidities, versus those of thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TSE), performed for esophageal patients with or without comorbidities.

Methods

Among 153 patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery at our hospital, 17 (11.1%) underwent MAE and 37 (24.2%) underwent TSE.

Results

Many of the MAE group patients had pulmonary (P < 0.001), cardiovascular (P = 0.031), or hepatic (P = 0.0029) diseases preoperatively, and these comorbidities frequently overlapped (P < 0.0001). The %VC and FEV1/FVC were lower (P = 0.0099 and P = 0.0057, respectively), and the ICG-R15 and serum level of HbA1c were higher (P = 0.0014 and P = 0.043, respectively) in the MAE group. There were no differences in postoperative complications or in the modified Clavien classification between the groups. There was no mortality in either group. After MAE, 5 (29.4%) patients died of other diseases. The 5-year overall survival rate after MAE was poorer than that after TSE (56.1 vs. 71.8%), but the 5-year cause-specific survival rates were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

MAE is feasible for esophageal cancer patients with serious comorbidities and may decrease morbidity and mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994;220:364–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morita M, Yoshida R, Ikeda K, Egashira A, Oki E, Sadanaga N, et al. Advances in esophageal cancer surgery in Japan: an analysis of 1000 consecutive patients treated at a single institute. Surgery (St. Louis). 2008;143:499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Yasunaga H, Matsuyama Y, Ohe K, Japan Surgical Society. Effects of hospital and surgeon case-volumes on postoperative complications and length of stay after esophagectomy in Japan. Surg Today. 2009;39:566–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg. 2003;238:486–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taguchi S, Osugi H, Higashino M, Tokuhara T, Tanaka N, Takemura M, et al. Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1445–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery (St. Louis). 1997;122:8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, Esterman AJ, Bessell JR, Thompson SK, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;87:911–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettori MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg. 1999;230:392–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bumm R, Holscher AH, Feussner, Tachibana M, Bartels H, Siewert JR. Endodissection of the thoracic esophagus: technique and clinical results in transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 1993;218:97–104.

  11. Buess G, Kaiser J, Manncke K, Walter DH, Bessell JR, Becker HD. Endoscopic microsurgical dissection of the esophagus (EMDE). Int Surg. 1997;82:109–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Koide N, Hiraguri M, Nishio A, Igarashi J, Watanabe H, Adachi W, et al. Three elderly patients with lower esophageal cancer successfully treated by transhiatal esophagectomy assisted by mediastinoscopy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000;10:391–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koide N, Sato T, Saito H, Nishikawa A, Sugiyama A, Miyagawa S. Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer after right thoracotomy for lung cancer: report of two cases. Esophagus. 2005;2:139–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikeda Y, Niimi M, Kan S, Takami H, Kodaira S. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy combined with mediastinoscopy via the neck. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:1329–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tangoku A, Yoshino S, Abe T, Hayashi H, Satou S, Ueno T, et al. Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:383–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pop D, Venissac N, Mouroux J. Video-assisted mediastinoscopy improved radical resection for cancer in transhiatal esophagectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:267–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lerut T, Moons J, Coosemans W, Van Raemdonck D, De Leyn P, Decaluwe H, et al. Postoperative complications after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction are correlated with early cancer recurrence: role of systematic grading of complications using the modified Clavien classification. Ann Surg. 2009;250:798–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, editors. International Union Against Cancer. TNM classification of malignant tumours, 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Blackwell; 2002.

  19. Poon RTP, Law SYK, Chu KM, Branicki FJ, Wong J. Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly. Results of current surgical management. Ann Surg. 1998;227:357–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bumm R, Feussner H, Bartels H, Stein H, Dittler HJ, Hofler H, et al. Radical transhiatal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and endodissection for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma. World J Surg. 1997;21:822–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, Alexandrou A, Wong J. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg. 2001;233:338–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Avendao CE, Flume PA, Silvestri GA, King LB, Reed CE. Pulmonary complication after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:922–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferguson MK, Durkin AE. Preoperative prediction of the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:661–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Low S, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Chu KM, Wong J. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240:791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiao WJ, Wang TY, Gong M, Pan H, Liu YB, Liu ZH. Pulmonary complications in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases following transthoracic esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:2505–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tilanus HW, Hop WC, Langenhorst BL, van Lanschot JJ. Esophagectomy with or without thoracotomy: is there any difference? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:898–903.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chang AC, Ji H, Birkmeyer NJ, Orringer MB, Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes after transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE Jr. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Arch Surg. 2000;135:920–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Braghetto I, Csendes A, Cardemil G, Burdiles P, Korn O, Valladares H. Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of mortality, morbidity and survival. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:1681–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Matsubara T, Ueda M, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Nishi M. Surgical treatment of the thoracic esophagus in association with a major pulmonary operation. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:52–4.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fekete F, Belghiti J, Cherqui D, Langonnet F, Gayet B. Results of esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. Ann Surg. 1987;206:74–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tachibana M, Kotoh T, Kinugasa S, Dhar DK, Shibakita M, Ohno S, et al. Esophageal cancer patients with cirrhosis of the liver: results of esophagectomy in 18 consecutive patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:758–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Lu MS, Liu YH, Wu YC, Kao CL, Liu HP, Hsieh MJ. Is it safe to perform esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients combined with liver cirrhosis? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4:423–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagawa H, Kobori O, Muto T. Prediction of pulmonary complications after transthoracic oesophagectomy. Br J Surg. 1994;81:860–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Avital S, Zundel N, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg. 2005;190:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bonavina L, Incarbone R, Bona D, Peracchia A. Esophagectomy via laparoscopy and transmediastinal endodissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. 2004;14:13–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naohiko Koide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koide, N., Takeuchi, D., Suzuki, A. et al. Mediastinoscopy-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with serious comorbidities. Surg Today 42, 127–134 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0042-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0042-3

Keywords

Navigation