Skip to main content
Log in

The prognostic significance of chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer patients: A single-institution experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The significance of aggressive chemotherapy for stage IV gastric carcinoma was retrospectively examined.

Methods

This study analyzed 94 stage IV gastric cancer patients who underwent surgery with or without subsequent chemotherapeutic treatment. There were 29 potentially curative patients classified as Curability B and 65 noncurative patients classified as Curability C. These patients were divided into three groups chronologically according to the primary type of drugs administered as the 1st (1989–1998), the 2nd (1999–2002), and the 3rd term (2003–2005).

Results

There was no significant difference in the survival time among the three groups (n = 94). The survival time of the patients classified as Curability C (n = 65) in the 3rd-term group (n = 17) was longer than that of the other two groups (P < 0.05). Similarly, the survival time in patients who were given new drugs and regimens (n = 22) was longer than that in those who were not (n = 43) in Curability C (P < 0.05). A multivariate analysis proved that the administrations of new drugs and regimens were independent factors for the prolongation of survival times for patients undergoing noncurative surgery (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

These findings suggested that the administration of new anticancer drugs might bring about a favorable outcome for stage IV gastric cancer patients, especially in those with evidence of a residual tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Nishiyama M. Chemotherapy for gastric cancer in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2008;13:191–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yagi Y, Seshimo A, Kameoka S. Prognostic factors in stage IV gastric cancer: univariate and multivariate analyses. Gastric Cancer 2000;3:71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshida Y, Yamaguchi K, Osada S, Kawaguchi Y, Takahashi T, Sakashita F, et al. Challenge for a better combination with basic evidence. Int J Clin Oncol 2008;13:212–219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maehara Y. S-1 in gastric cancer: a comprehensive review. Gastric Cancer 2003;6:2–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Emi Y, Yamamoto M, Takahashi I, Orita H, Kakeji Y, Kohnoe S, et al. Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel by one-hour infusion for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Today 2008;38:1013–1020.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nishiyama M, Wada S. Docetaxel: its role in current and future treatments for advanced gastric cancer. Review article. Gastric Cancer 2009;12:132–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cutsem E, Haller D, Ohtsu A. The role of chemotherapy in the current treatment of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2002;5suppl 1:17–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma, 2nd English ed. Gastric Cancer 1998;1:10–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakajima T, Kinoshita T, Nashimoto A, Sairenji M, Yamaguchi T, Sakamoto J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant uraciltegafur versus surgery alone for serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2007;94:1468–1476.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 2008;357:1810–1820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pyrhönen S, Kuitunen T, Nyandoto P, Kouri M. Randomized comparison of 5-fluorouracil, epidoxorubicin, and methotrexate (FEMTX) plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with non-resectable gastric cancer. J Br Cancer 1995;71:587–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boku N. Chemotherapy for metastatic disease: Review from JCOG trials. Int J Clin Oncol 2008;13:196–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:215–221.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nashimoto A, Yabusaki H, Nakagawa S, Takii Y, Tsuchiya Y, Tanaka O. Preoperative chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin for highly advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2009;29:4689–4696.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fujii M, Kochi M, Takayama T. Recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer in Japan. Surg Today 2010;40:295–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okuyama, T., Korenaga, D., Koushi, K. et al. The prognostic significance of chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer patients: A single-institution experience. Surg Today 41, 935–940 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4403-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-010-4403-0

Key words

Navigation