Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Many diabetologists in Germany and other European countries have the impression that the age of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes has dropped, due to an increasing diabetes incidence in younger age groups [1]. On the other hand, health care changes during the COVID-19 pandemic may have led to decreased type 2 diabetes diagnoses [1].
The aim was to estimate the sex-specific age at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in adults in Germany in 2014, 2019 and 2020. Estimates in 2020 could be influenced by decreased health consultations due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this cross-sectional study, we used nationwide claims data of outpatient diagnoses of all statutory health insured individuals with at least one contact to a physician in the respective year (N ≈ 50 million aged 20 years and over). Individuals with diabetes diagnoses during the previous 3 years were excluded. Incident type 2 diabetes was defined using ICD-10 codes (E11-E14; confirmed diagnoses). To reduce false positive diagnoses, there had to be ≥ 1 specific diabetes coding in one of three subsequent quarters. Incident type 2 diabetes and population at risk were aggregated in 5-year age groups (age 20–24 years to ≥ 95 years) [1]. Sex-specific mean age (standard deviation, SD) at type 2 diabetes diagnosis was estimated using the midpoints of 5-year age-groups. Type 2 diabetes incidences (per 1000 persons) were estimated in three age groups (20–39, 40–59, ≥ 60 years) as the ratio of the numbers of cases and persons at risk. Analyses were carried out using R, v. 4.1.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
There were 477,532 persons with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes in 2014 (2020: n = 422,756) (Table 1). Average age (SD) at diagnosis was 63.1 (14.4) years in 2014 (men: 61.8 (13.3) years; women: 64.4 (15.3) years). Mean age at type 2 diagnosis decreased from 2014 to 2019 in both sexes, with a further decrease in 2020 (Table 1). 5-year differences (2014–2019) were larger in women (− 1.4 years) than in men (− 1.0 years) and further enlarged in 2020.
In the age group ≥ 60 years, type 2 diabetes incidence decreased from 2014 to 2019 (Table 1). In middle-aged persons (40–59 years) incidence rates were stable over this period. In people aged 20–39 years, type 2 diabetes incidence increased from 2014 to 2019. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, incidences decreased in the middle-aged and older population compared to 2019, whereas no change was observed in the youngest age group (Table 1).
The novel study finding of this study is a decrease in age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis from 2014 to 2020. Age-specific type 2 diabetes incidence rates showed an opposing tendency, with a decrease in the age group ≥ 60 years and an increase in people aged 20–39 years. However, changes in the age at diagnoses are not necessarily caused by changes in incidence rates. Changes in the age distribution of the population at risk can also cause variation in age at diagnoses. Although mean age at diabetes diagnoses is relevant for clinical practice and prevention, it should not be used alone to evaluate epidemiology of type 2 diabetes.
Although the data provide information about the vast majority (90%) of the German population, they are not representative of patients with private health insurance, who account for about 10%. Furthermore, the study population only included patients, who had actually consulted a physician at least once a year. For a complete epidemiological investigation of secular trends in diabetes prevalence, undiagnosed cases must also be included, which were not available. Finally, the data depend on the coding behaviour of the physicians and medical staff.
The present study adds important data to the still limited epidemiological evidence for type 2 diabetes in Europe. Several factors associated with the development of type 2 diabetes are most likely underlying the observed changes in type 2 diabetes incidence. First, the current report of the German Nutrition Society shows an increased consumption of vegetables (tomatoes, carrots, pulses) [2]. Meat consumption remains high, but fortunately the consumption of red meat (pork) is decreasing [2]. Likewise, total alcohol consumption is decreasing, with beer showing the highest decline [2]. Coffee consumption, on the other hand, is on the rise. Furthermore, the prevalence of active smokers among women has fallen by almost 30% since 2003 (2003: 30%; 2015: 22%) [3]. In men, the prevalence decreased by 28% (2003: 39%; 2015: 28%) [3]. Finally, diabetes incidence inclined by 36% in Denmark after introducing HbA1c for diagnosis (2012), mainly by a reduction in the number of persons with acute hyperglycemia with an HbA1c below the threshold of 6.5% [4]. In Germany, HbA1c-based diagnosis may also have lowered diabetes detection rates.
On the other hand, the prevalence of obesity has hardly changed in the last decades. According to the German Nutrition Report, 21% of men and 19% of women are currently obese among seniors over 65 years of age [2]. In the 18–29 years age group, obesity prevalence increased from 5.5% to 9.7% in women and from 5.4% to 8.9% in men from 2010 to 2014/2015 [5]. In line with this finding, the present study found an increased diabetes incidence (age 20–39 years; 2014–2019).
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed health care utilization. A lower number of consultations could have deteriorated diabetes detection. Therefore, the number of persons with newly diagnosed diabetes in primary care may have decreased in 2020 compared to 2019. Thus, the decreasing case numbers of type 2 diabetes from 2019 to 2020 in our study are most likely due to a lower disease detection rate. Since the data only include information on the number of incident cases and the population at risk over a 1-year period, detailed analyses of the pandemic's impact on the number of healthcare contacts were not possible. Therefore, both changes in risk factors and health care influence diabetes incidence.
In conclusion, the present analysis of a large health insurance sample in Germany indicated a trend of a decreasing age at type 2 diabetes onset, which was further lowered during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Data availability
Due to data protection legislation in Germany statutory health insurance data on the study subjects cannot be released.
References
Tönnies T, Hoyer A, Brinks R, Kuss O, Hering R, Schulz M (2023) Spatio-temporal trends in the incidence of type 2 diabetes in Germany-analysis of the claims data of 63 million persons with statutory health insurance from 2014 to 2019. Dtsch Arztebl Int. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0405
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung (2019) 14. DGE-Ernährungsbericht. Bonn (in German)
Zeiher J, Finger JD, Kuntz B, Hoebel J, Lampert T, Starker A (2018) Trends in smoking among adults in Germany: evidence from seven population-based health surveys from 1991–2015. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 61(11):1365–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-018-2817-9. (in German)
Knudsen JS, Knudsen SS, Hulman A, Witte DR, Gregg EW, Lauritzen T et al (2022) Changes in type 2 diabetes incidence and mortality associated with introduction of HbA1c as diagnostic option: A Danish 24-year population-based study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 14:100291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100291
Schienkiewitz A, Kuhnert R, Blume M, Mensink GBM (2022) Overweight and obesity among adults in Germany - results from GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS. J Health Monit 7(3):21–28. https://doi.org/10.25646/10293
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The German Diabetes Center is funded by the German Federal Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia, and grants from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD). The funding source had no role in the design of the study, analysis of the results, writing of the manuscript, or decision to submit for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
WR and TT planned the study. TT performed the statistical analyses. WR was responsible for drafting the manuscript. ESJ, RH, MS, and AH were responsible for revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors approved the version to be published. TT is the guarantor of this work, and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
WR reports the receipt of consulting fees for attending educational sessions or advisory boards run by AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and NovoNordisk and institutional research grants from NovoNordisk outside of the topic of the current review. TT, AH, ESJ, RH and MS report no conflict of interest.
Informed consent
As this study is based on data from anonymized health insurance data, informed consent statements for patient enrollment is not applicable.
Additional information
Managed by Massimo Federici.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rathmann, W., Seidel-Jacobs, E., Hering, R. et al. Age at type 2 diabetes diagnosis among adults in Germany in 2014, 2019 and 2020. Acta Diabetol 60, 1591–1593 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02162-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-023-02162-4