Abstract
Purpose
To compare nonmydriatic montage widefield images with dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy for determining diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity.
Materials and methods
In this prospective, observational, cross-sectional study, patients with a previous diagnosis of diabetes and without history of diabetes-associated ocular disease were screened for DR. Montage widefield imaging was obtained with a system that combines confocal technology with white-light emitting diode (LED) illumination (DRSplus, Centervue, Padua, Italy). Dilated fundus examination was performed by a retina specialist.
Results
Thirty-seven eyes (20 patients, 8 females) were finally included in the analysis. Mean age of the patients enrolled was 58.0 ± 11.6 years [range 31–80 years]. The level of DR identified on montage widefield images agreed exactly with indirect ophthalmoscopy in 97.3% (36) of eyes and was within 1 step in 100% (37) of eyes. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was 0.96, this suggesting an almost perfect agreement between the two modalities in DR screening. Nonmydriatic montage widefield imaging acquisition time was significantly shorter than that of dilated clinical examination (p = 0.010).
Conclusion
Nonmydriatic montage widefield images were compared favorably with dilated fundus examination in defining DR severity; however, they are acquired more rapidly.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Querques G (2019) Eye complications of diabetes. Acta Diabetol 56(9):971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-019-01377-8
American Diabetes Association AD (2010) Standards of medical care in diabetes–2010. Diabetes Care 33(1):S11–61. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-S011
Standards of medical care in diabetes-2014 (2014) Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-S014
NICE NG28 (2015) Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. Natl Inst Heal Care Excell
Canadian Diabetes Association (2013) Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1499-2671(13)00192-5
Calvo-Maroto AM, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Domínguez-Vicent A, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Cerviño A (2016) Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy versus modified conventional fundus camera for fundus autofluorescence. Expert Rev Med Devices. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2016.1236678
(1991) Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: ETDRS report number 9. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(13)38011-7
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Hutchinson A, McIntosh A, Peters J et al (2000) Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy—a systematic review. Diabet Med. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00250.x
Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald HR (2004) Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.004
Goh JKH, Cheung CY, Sim SS, Tan PC, Tan GSW, Wong TY (2016) Retinal imaging techniques for diabetic retinopathy screening. J Diabetes Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816629491
Moussa NB, Georges A, Capuano V, Merle B, Souied EH, Querques G (2015) MultiColor imaging in the evaluation of geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 99(6):842–847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305643
Graham KW, Chakravarthy U, Hogg RE, Muldrew KA, Young IS, Kee F (2018) Identifying features of early and late age-related macular degeneration: a comparison of multicolor versus traditional color fundus photography. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001777
Borrelli E, Lei J, Balasubramanian S et al (2017) Green emission fluorophores in eyes with atrophic age-related macular degeneration: a color fundus autofluorescence pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310881
Borrelli E, Nittala MG, Abdelfattah NS et al (2018) Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy. Br J Ophthalmol 103(5):610–616
Sarao V, Veritti D, Borrelli E, Sadda SVR, Poletti E, Lanzetta P (2019) A comparison between a white LED confocal imaging system and a conventional flash fundus camera using chromaticity analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1241-8
Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP (2012) Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.019
Wilson PJ, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Ellingford A, Talbot J, Leese GP (2010) Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmologica. https://doi.org/10.1159/000284351
Bartsch D-U, Freeman WR, Lopez AM (2019) A false use of “true color”. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill 1960). 2002;120(5):675–676. Author reply 676. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12003634. Accessed 28 Dec 2019.
Funding
The authors have no funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
E. Borrelli: Recipient—Centervue (Italy); Zeiss (Dublin, USA). R. Sacconi: Recipient—Zeiss (Dublin, USA). Francesco Bandello: Recipient—Alcon (Fort Worth,Texas,USA), Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, Georgia, USA), Allergan Inc (Irvine, California,USA), Farmila-Thea (Clermont-Ferrand, France), Bayer Shering-Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Bausch And Lomb (Rochester, New York, USA), Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Hoffmann-La-Roche (Basel, Switzerland), NovagaliPharma (Évry, France), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sanofi-Aventis (Paris, France), Thrombogenics (Heverlee,Belgium), Zeiss (Dublin, USA). Giuseppe Querques: Recipient—Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, Georgia, USA), Allergan Inc (Irvine, California, USA), Amgen (Thousand Oaks,USA), Bayer Shering-Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Centervue (Italy); Heidelberg (Germany), KBH (Chengdu; China), LEH Pharma (London, UK), Lumithera (Poulsbo; USA), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sandoz (Berlin, Germany), Sifi (Catania, Italy), Sooft-Fidea (Abano, Italy), Zeiss (Dublin, USA). Other authors: none.
Ethical statement
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to enrollment in the study.
Additional information
Managed By Massimo Federici.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borrelli, E., Querques, L., Lattanzio, R. et al. Nonmydriatic widefield retinal imaging with an automatic white LED confocal imaging system compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol 57, 1043–1047 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01520-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01520-w