Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nonmydriatic widefield retinal imaging with an automatic white LED confocal imaging system compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy in screening for diabetic retinopathy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare nonmydriatic montage widefield images with dilated fundus ophthalmoscopy for determining diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity.

Materials and methods

In this prospective, observational, cross-sectional study, patients with a previous diagnosis of diabetes and without history of diabetes-associated ocular disease were screened for DR. Montage widefield imaging was obtained with a system that combines confocal technology with white-light emitting diode (LED) illumination (DRSplus, Centervue, Padua, Italy). Dilated fundus examination was performed by a retina specialist.

Results

Thirty-seven eyes (20 patients, 8 females) were finally included in the analysis. Mean age of the patients enrolled was 58.0 ± 11.6 years [range 31–80 years]. The level of DR identified on montage widefield images agreed exactly with indirect ophthalmoscopy in 97.3% (36) of eyes and was within 1 step in 100% (37) of eyes. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was 0.96, this suggesting an almost perfect agreement between the two modalities in DR screening. Nonmydriatic montage widefield imaging acquisition time was significantly shorter than that of dilated clinical examination (p = 0.010).

Conclusion

Nonmydriatic montage widefield images were compared favorably with dilated fundus examination in defining DR severity; however, they are acquired more rapidly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Querques G (2019) Eye complications of diabetes. Acta Diabetol 56(9):971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-019-01377-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. American Diabetes Association AD (2010) Standards of medical care in diabetes–2010. Diabetes Care 33(1):S11–61. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-S011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2014 (2014) Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-S014

  4. NICE NG28 (2015) Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. Natl Inst Heal Care Excell

  5. Canadian Diabetes Association (2013) Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1499-2671(13)00192-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Calvo-Maroto AM, Esteve-Taboada JJ, Domínguez-Vicent A, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ, Cerviño A (2016) Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy versus modified conventional fundus camera for fundus autofluorescence. Expert Rev Med Devices. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2016.1236678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. (1991) Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: ETDRS report number 9. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(13)38011-7

  8. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hutchinson A, McIntosh A, Peters J et al (2000) Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy—a systematic review. Diabet Med. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-5491.2000.00250.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams GA, Scott IU, Haller JA, Maguire AM, Marcus D, McDonald HR (2004) Single-field fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy screening: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goh JKH, Cheung CY, Sim SS, Tan PC, Tan GSW, Wong TY (2016) Retinal imaging techniques for diabetic retinopathy screening. J Diabetes Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816629491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Moussa NB, Georges A, Capuano V, Merle B, Souied EH, Querques G (2015) MultiColor imaging in the evaluation of geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration. Br J Ophthalmol 99(6):842–847. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham KW, Chakravarthy U, Hogg RE, Muldrew KA, Young IS, Kee F (2018) Identifying features of early and late age-related macular degeneration: a comparison of multicolor versus traditional color fundus photography. Retina. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001777

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Borrelli E, Lei J, Balasubramanian S et al (2017) Green emission fluorophores in eyes with atrophic age-related macular degeneration: a color fundus autofluorescence pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Borrelli E, Nittala MG, Abdelfattah NS et al (2018) Comparison of short-wavelength blue-light autofluorescence and conventional blue-light autofluorescence in geographic atrophy. Br J Ophthalmol 103(5):610–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarao V, Veritti D, Borrelli E, Sadda SVR, Poletti E, Lanzetta P (2019) A comparison between a white LED confocal imaging system and a conventional flash fundus camera using chromaticity analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1241-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Sun JK, Noble J, Aiello LM, Aiello LP (2012) Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2012.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilson PJ, Ellis JD, MacEwen CJ, Ellingford A, Talbot J, Leese GP (2010) Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative trial of photography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmologica. https://doi.org/10.1159/000284351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bartsch D-U, Freeman WR, Lopez AM (2019) A false use of “true color”. Arch Ophthalmol (Chicago, Ill 1960). 2002;120(5):675–676. Author reply 676. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12003634. Accessed 28 Dec 2019.

Download references

Funding

The authors have no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Querques.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

E. Borrelli: Recipient—Centervue (Italy); Zeiss (Dublin, USA). R. Sacconi: Recipient—Zeiss (Dublin, USA). Francesco Bandello: Recipient—Alcon (Fort Worth,Texas,USA), Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, Georgia, USA), Allergan Inc (Irvine, California,USA), Farmila-Thea (Clermont-Ferrand, France), Bayer Shering-Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Bausch And Lomb (Rochester, New York, USA), Genentech (San Francisco, California, USA), Hoffmann-La-Roche (Basel, Switzerland), NovagaliPharma (Évry, France), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sanofi-Aventis (Paris, France), Thrombogenics (Heverlee,Belgium), Zeiss (Dublin, USA). Giuseppe Querques: Recipient—Alimera Sciences (Alpharetta, Georgia, USA), Allergan Inc (Irvine, California, USA), Amgen (Thousand Oaks,USA), Bayer Shering-Pharma (Berlin, Germany), Centervue (Italy); Heidelberg (Germany), KBH (Chengdu; China), LEH Pharma (London, UK), Lumithera (Poulsbo; USA), Novartis (Basel, Switzerland), Sandoz (Berlin, Germany), Sifi (Catania, Italy), Sooft-Fidea (Abano, Italy), Zeiss (Dublin, USA). Other authors: none.

Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects prior to enrollment in the study.

Additional information

Managed By Massimo Federici.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borrelli, E., Querques, L., Lattanzio, R. et al. Nonmydriatic widefield retinal imaging with an automatic white LED confocal imaging system compared with dilated ophthalmoscopy in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol 57, 1043–1047 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01520-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01520-w

Keywords

Navigation