Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Failure to metformin and insulin secretagogue monotherapy: an observational cohort study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Diabetologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present cohort study is the assessment of treatment failure rates in patients on monotherapy with metformin or insulin secretagogues, observed in a routine clinical setting. A cohort of patients without any pharmacological treatment was also observed. A retrospective observational cohort study was performed on a consecutive series of 2,020 type 2 diabetic patients receiving monotherapy with an oral agent (metformin or insulin secretagogue, n = 1,126) or drug-naive (n = 894). HbA1c and prescribed hypoglycemic therapy were recorded yearly. Patients were followed until death, change of residence, failure to treatment, or up to 48 months. The mean duration of follow up was 34.8 ± 18.0 months. In a Cox regression analysis, metformin was associated with a significant reduction, and insulin secretagogues with a significant increase, in the risk of failure to therapy during follow up. When duration of diabetes and baseline BMI were added to the model, insulin secretagogues, but not metformin, were still associated with increased risk of failure. In conclusion, insulin secretagogues are associated with increased failure rate in comparison with metformin. This difference could be due to detrimental effect of secretagogues, rather than to a beneficial action of metformin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352(9131):837–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel A, MacMahon S, Chalmers J et al (2008) Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358(24):2560–2572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 352(9131):854–865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abraira C, Duckworth WC, Moritz T (2008) Glycaemic separation and risk factor control in the Veterans affairs diabetes trial: an interim report. Diabetes Obes Metab 11:150–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerstein HC, Miller ME, Byington RP et al (2008) Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 358(24):2545–2559

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR, UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1999) Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA 281(21):2005–2012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA et al (2006) Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 355(23):2427–2443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matthews DR, Cull CA, Stratton IM, Holman RR, Turner RC, UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) UKPDS 26: sulphonylurea failure in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients over 6 years. Diabet Med 15(4):297–303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G et al (1999) 1999 World Health Organization-international society of hypertension guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines sub-committee of the World Health Organization. Clin Exp Hypertens 21(5–6):1009–1060

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Young M, Breddy J, Veves A, Boulton A (1994) The prediction of diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration using vibration perception thresholds: a prospective study. Diabetes Care 17:557–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Blackburn H (1969) Classification of the elettrocardiogram for population studies: Minnesota code. J Elettrocardiol 2:305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Charlson M, Szatrowski T, Peterson T, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eurich DT, Simpson SH, Majumdar SR, Johnson JA (2005) Secondary failure rates associated with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy 25(6):810–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riedel AA, Heien H, Wogen J, Plauschinat CA (2007) Loss of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were receiving initial metformin, sulfonylurea, or thiazolidinedione monotherapy. Pharmacotherapy 27(8):1102–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Del Guerra S, Marselli L, Lupi R et al (2005) Effects of prolonged in vitro exposure to sulphonylureas on the function and survival of human islets. J Diabetes Complicat 19(1):60–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lupi R, Del GS, Marselli L et al (2004) Rosiglitazone prevents the impairment of human islet function induced by fatty acids: evidence for a role of PPARgamma2 in the modulation of insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286(4):E560–E567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Del Prato S, Bianchi C, Marchetti P (2007) β-cell function and anti-diabetic pharmacotherapy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 23:518–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Viberti G, Kahn SE, Greene DA et al (2002) A diabetes outcome progression trial (ADOPT): an international multicenter study of the comparative efficacy of rosiglitazone, glyburide, and metformin in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 25(10):1737–1743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo Mannucci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pala, L., Monami, M., Lamanna, C. et al. Failure to metformin and insulin secretagogue monotherapy: an observational cohort study. Acta Diabetol 47 (Suppl 1), 7–11 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-009-0104-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-009-0104-9

Keywords

Navigation