Skip to main content
Log in

How to grow it? Strategies of mathematical development presented by the example of enumerating certain set partitions

  • Mathematik in der Lehre
  • Published:
Mathematische Semesterberichte Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe in the form of a dialogue a development of various reflections on the combinatorics of set partitions; among the topics we pursue are the number of ways of partitioning a finite set into a fixed number \(d\) of subsets of odd or even size, into \(a\) parts of odd and \(b\) parts of even size, and into \(d\) parts, each of which has a size in a certain congruence class modulo some natural number \(m\). To this end, pattern guessing, recursion and induction, combinatorial interpretation and generating functions are employed. The participants of the dialogue represent different perspectives on and approaches to mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The controversy between ‘tricky’ and ‘systematic’ mathematics has a long history. See e.g. [5], p. 64, on the correspondence between Serre and Grothendieck: “Serre was the more open-minded of the two; any proof of a good theorem, whatever the style, was liable to enchant him, whereas obtaining even good results ‘the wrong way’ – using clever tricks to get around deep theoretical obstacles – could infuriate Grothendieck.”

  2. This notation for the set of all positive integers up to \(m\) will be used throughout.

  3. The book is [2]. It provides a good overview of identities for the Stirling numbers of the second kind.

  4. THE ON-LINE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF INTEGER SEQUENCES: https://oeis.org.

  5. See e.g. [1], p. 47.

References

  1. de Mier, A.: Lecture notes for ‘Enumerative Combinatorics’. University of Oxford (2004). https://math.dartmouth.edu/archive/m68f07/public_html/lectec.pdf. Accessed: 21 Nov 2019

    Google Scholar 

  2. Graham, R.L., Knuth, D.E., Patashnik, O.: Concrete mathematics, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, New York (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Lakatos, I.: Proofs and refutations. In: Worrall, J., Zahar, E. (eds.) The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Polya, G.: Induction and analogy in mathematics. Mathematics and plausible reasoning, vol. 1. Birkhaeuser, Basel (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneps, L.: Book review (Grothendieck-serre correspondence). The Mathematical Intelligencer 30, 60 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985758

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Schmitz.

Additional information

Probably, most of the combinatorial results developed here are already known. For instance, the generating functions for the number of partitions of a finite set into a fixed number of odd or even blocks are mentioned in [1]. As the emphasis of this article lies mainly on reflecting different ways of developing mathematics we do not discuss the issue of our results’ novelty in detail.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carl, M., Schmitz, M. How to grow it? Strategies of mathematical development presented by the example of enumerating certain set partitions. Math Semesterber 67, 237–261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00591-019-00267-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00591-019-00267-y

Keywords

MSC-Classification

Navigation