Skip to main content
Log in

Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients over 70 years: Boon or bane?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The surgical management of intertrochanter femur fracture in elderly patient is still under debate. Various implants can be utilised but prosthetic replacement is gaining popularity. This study was performed to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of cemented bipolar arthroplasty as a primary treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients (> 70 years).

Materials and methods

Thirty-seven patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patient (> 70 years) who underwent cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Intra-operative and post-operative complications were noted; functional outcomes were assessed using Harris hip score (HHS). All patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months.

Results

Overall 90% of patients has some minor or major intra or post-operative complication. One year mortality rate was 16% (6/37). Cardiopulmonary events were the most common life threatening incident. Mean fall in Haemoglobin was 1.6 gm/dL. The average time for full weight bearing mobilisation with the help of walker was 2.8 ± 1.2 days (1–8 days). The average duration of surgery was 58 ± 6 min (44–96 min) with an average blood loss of 126 ± 24 mL (90–380 mL). HHS at the end of 12 months was 77.

Conclusions

The use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in senile patient with unstable hemiarthroplasty gives an advantage of early weight bearing. However, it is associated with risk of significant intra or post-operative morbidity due to intra-operative trauma, surgical time and blood loss during the surgery. Although hemiarthroplasty can be a single-time solution to the complexities of intertrochanter fracture in elderly patients but should be performed in selected patients only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsuboi M, Hasegawa Y, Suzuki S, Wingstrand H, Thorngren K-G (2007) Mortality and mobility after hip fracture in Japan: a ten-year follow-up. JBJS 89(4):461–466

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Song Q-C, Dang S-J, Zhao Y, Wei L, Duan D-P, Wei W-B (2022) Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of elderly unstable comminuted intertrochanteric fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):628

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim S-Y, Kim Y-G, Hwang J-K (2005) Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective, randomized study. JBJS 87(10):2186–2192

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sinno K, Sakr M, Girard J, Khatib H (2010) The effectiveness of primary bipolar arthroplasty in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. N Am J Med Sci 2(12):561–568. https://doi.org/10.4297/najms.2010.2561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mansukhani SA, Tuteja SV, Kasodekar VB, Mukhi SR (2017) A comparative study of the dynamic hip screw, the cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty and the proximal femoral nail for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. J Clin Diagn Res 11(4):RC14

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnell O, Melton L, Nilsson J (1998) Are annual fluctuations in hip fracture incidence dependent upon the underlying mortality rate? Osteoporos Int 8:192–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Martinho T, Stoffel K (2021) Treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures with hip arthroplasty in older patients: a narrative review of indications and outcomes. Medicina 57(8):763. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57080763

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan K, Miyamoto R, Levine BR, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD (2008) Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16(11):665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Patra SR, Panigrahi NK, Manoj M, Samant S, Bamidi HK, Das KC, Mohanty SS (2020) Cemented hemi-arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: a retrospective study. Int J Res Orthop 6(6):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tajima K, Yoshida M, Murakami D, Nishimura T, Hirakawa A, Uenishi N, Iwata M (2020) Primary bipolar hemiarthroplasty as a treatment option for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Fujita med J 6(4):122–127. https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2019-022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng Y-x, Sheng X (2020) Optimal surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fracture: a Bayesian network meta-analysis based on 36 randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 15:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tucker A, Donnelly KJ, Rowan C, McDonald S, Foster AP (2018) Is the best plate a nail? A review of 3230 unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur. J Orthop trauma 32(2):53–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000001038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF (2006) Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty: treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. JBJS 88(2):249–260. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.e.00215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton M, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk P (2014) Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J 96(8):1029–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haidukewych GJ, Israel TA, Berry DJ (2001) Reverse obliquity fractures of the intertrochanteric region of the femur. JBJS 83(5):643–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Erez O, Dougherty PJ (2012) Early complications associated with cephalomedullary nail for intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72(2):E101–E105. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31821c2ef2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Papasimos S, Koutsojannis C, Panagopoulos A, Megas P, Lambiris E (2005) A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:462–468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Christian B (2003) The proximal femoral nail (PFN)-a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand 74(1):53–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jb Ju, Px Z, Bg J (2019) Hip replacement as alternative to intramedullary nail in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop surg 11(5):745–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Andriollo L, Sangaletti R, Are L, Perticarini L, Benazzo F, Rossi SMP (2023) Uncemented hemiarthroplasty may have a role in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patient. A survival complications and functional outcomes analysis. Int J Burn Trauma 13(3):126–135

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dung TT, Hieu ND, Son LM, Dinh TC, Dinh TC (2019) Primary cementless bipolar long stem hemiarthroplasty for unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly patients. Maced J Med Sci 7(24):4342–4346. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2019.388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Venkataraman DP, Kumar PM, Raj P (2020) Comparative study of PFN A2 vs bipolar hemiarthroplasty in unstable senile intertrochanteric fractures. International Journal of Orthopaedics. 6(1):312–6

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joshi N, Mankar S, Deshkmukh S, Harkare VV (2023) Outcomes of osteosynthesis versus hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with arbeitsgemeinschaft fur osteosynthesefragen-orthopedic trauma association (AO-OTA) 31A2 hip fractures. Cureus 15(5):e39795. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.39795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sahoo SK, Samal S, Dhotkar KS (2020) Hip arthroplasty in unstable trochanteric fractures in elderly. Int J Orthop 6:1176–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Madhuchandra P, Shrinidhi I (2017) Analysis of outcome of unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated by proximal femoral nail—A prospective and retrospective study. Int J Orthop 3(4):556–561

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou X, Shen X (2022) A comparative study of hip arthroplasty and closed reduction proximal femur nail in the treatment of elderly patients with hip fractures. Front Surg 9:904928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.904928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Luo X, He S, Zeng D, Lin L, Li Q (2017) Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of senile intertrochanteric fractures: case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 38:37–42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hongku N, Woratanarat P, Nitiwarangkul L, Rattanasiri S, Thakkinstian A (2022) Fracture fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 108(1):102838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Siwach R, Jain H, Singh R, Sangwan K (2012) Role of hemiarthroplasty in intertrochanteric fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients: a case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22:467–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang Z, Gu F, Xu S, Yue Y, Sun K, Nie W (2022) Intramedullary nail or primary arthroplasty? A system review and meta-analysis on the prognosis of intertrochanteric femoral fractures based on randomized controlled trials. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 30(13):21514593221118212. https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593221118212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Park B-J, Cho H-M, Min W-B (2015) A comparison of internal fixation and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of reverse oblique intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients. Hip pelvis 27(3):152–163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Desteli EE, İmren Y, Erdoğan M, Aydagün Ö (2015) Quality of life following treatment of trochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly. Clin Invest Med 38(2):E63–E72. https://doi.org/10.25011/cim.v38i1.22577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bilsel K, Erdil M, Gulabi D, Elmadag M, Cengiz O, Sen C (2013) Factors affecting mortality after hip fracture surgery: a retrospective analysis of 578 patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumato 23(8):895–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1104-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Canbeyli İD, Çırpar M, Oktaş B, Çoban M (2021) Analysis of factors among 30-day and 1-year mortality rates in patients with borderline stable-unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 55(1):16–21. https://doi.org/10.5152/j.aott.2021.20071

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Ekinci Y, Gürbüz K, Batın S, Kahraman M, Doğar F, Erten ZK (2020) A multicenter intertrochanteric fracture study in the elderly: hemiarthroplasty versus proximal femoral nailing. Jt Dis Relat Surg 31(2):209–217. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2020.72421

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Gölge UH, Pazarci O, Kılınç S, Nusran G, Kaymaz B, Göksel F, Kömürcü E, Bulut O (2016) The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures comparison of PFN and hemiarthroplasty 3-year mortality study. Acta Orthop Belg 82(3):508–515

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tang P, Hu F, Shen J, Zhang L, Zhang L (2012) Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: a study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Injury 43(6):876–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Camurcu Y, Cobden A, Sofu H, Saklavci N, Kis M (2017) What are the determinants of mortality after cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients? J Arthroplast 32(10):3038–3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen WH, Guo WX, Gao SH, Wei QS, Li ZQ, He W (2021) Arthroplasty versus proximal femoral nails for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 9(32):9878–9888. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i32.9878

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anil Kapoor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Institutional ethical committee approval was received for this study. The procedure performed in the study was in accordance with ethical standard of institute.

Informed consent

Written and informed consent was received from all the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harna, B., Kapoor, A., Verma, T. et al. Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients over 70 years: Boon or bane?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34, 1449–1456 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03819-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03819-0

Keywords

Navigation