Abstract
Purpose
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the correlation between anthropometric measurements and graft size in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Methods
A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted for observational studies published until March 2023 that reported the relationship between anthropometric data [height, weight, body mass index (BMI), age, gender, thigh length, and circumference] and ACL graft size. Correlation coefficients (COR) and their associated 95% confidence intervals were used as the primary effect size. This review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines.
Results
A total of 42 observational studies involving 7110 patients were included, with a mean age of 29.8 years. Statistically significant, moderately positive correlations were found between graft size and height (COR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.41–0.57; p-value: < 0.001), weight (COR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.31–0.44; p-value: < 0.001), thigh circumference (COR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19–0.58; p-value: < 0.001), and thigh length (COR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18–0.50; p-value: < 0.001). However, age and gender were insignificantly correlated with graft size (p-value: NS). A subanalysis based on graft type showed a significant positive correlation between height and graft diameter, which was more significant in the peroneus tendon than in hamstring grafts (COR: 0.76 vs. 0.45; p-value: 0.020).
Conclusion
This study demonstrated a moderate positive correlation between anthropometric measurements (height, weight, thigh circumference, and length) and ACL graft size, along with a weak positive correlation with BMI. Age and gender showed no significant correlation. These findings support the predictability and selection of ACL graft size based on pre-operative patient anthropometric data.
Level of evidence
Level of Evidence: IV.
PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023416044.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is a common knee injury with an incidence of up to 78 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Surgical treatment is often required to restore knee biomechanics and function. Several autograft options are available for ACL reconstruction, such as bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), hamstring tendon (HT), quadriceps tendon (QUAD) and peroneal tendon (PLT) [2, 3], while the popularity of hamstring tendon grafts has risen due to their biomechanical stability, low donor-site morbidity and improved fixation methods [4, 5]; however, the success of the surgery is closely related to graft size, and inadequate graft size is associated with high failure and re-rupture rates.
Consequently, identifying patients with inadequate graft size has become essential for appropriate pre-operative decision-making and arrangement of alternative grafts source. Anthropometric measurements related to demographic and radiological parameters have been proposed to predict hamstring tendon graft size [6,7,8,9]. Several studies investigated the correlation between these measurements and graft size, but the results have been inconsistent [10,11,12].
Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesise the best available evidence and comprehensively review the relationship between various anthropometric measures and graft size in ACL reconstruction surgery. This study also aimed to identify the most reliable predictors of tendon graft size to improve pre-operative planning and enhance patient outcomes.
Methods
This systematic review was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [13]. A protocol registration was completed in advance on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with the registration number: CRD42023416044.
Search strategy
Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception until March 2023 with the following keywords and their derivatives: Anterior cruciate ligament, ACL, anthropometric measurements, height, weight, body mass index, age, gender, thigh length, and circumference. Search results were screened against the eligibility criteria by two authors independently based on the title and/or abstract. Conflicts were resolved via a discrepancy meeting with a third senior author, if needed.
Outcomes of interest
Correlation between height and graft size was the primary outcome. Correlation between graft size and other anthropometric measures including weight, BMI, gender, thigh length and circumference, and graft types were used as secondary outcomes of interest. Moreover, correlation is described as a measure of association between variables either in the same (positive correlation) or in the opposite (negative correlation) direction and range between − 1 and + 1 [14].
Eligibility criteria
Studies were considered eligible if they satisfied the following criteria: (1) all original observational studies reporting correlation between anthropometric measurements (height, weight, BMI, gender, age, thigh circumference, and length) and actual intraoperative graft size in adult population, (2) all types of ACL grafts (Hamstrings, Peroneus longus, BPB, and Quadriceps,), and (3) published in the English language.
Exclusion criteria included (1) studies not correlating anthropometric measurements with actual intraoperative graft size, (2) studies correlating anthropometric measurements or graft size with MRI or other means, (3) studies with incomplete or unextractable data for review, and (4) review articles, preclinical, cadaveric and anatomical studies, and case reports.
Data extraction and items
Two independent reviewers used a pre-designed data collection sheet in Microsoft Excel to extract data. The extracted demographic data included the first authors’ surnames, study year, design and country, number of participants and knees, population type (adult vs paediatrics), graft type, the mean age of patients, gender, mean height, weight, BMI, thigh length and circumference, level of activity, correlations reported for each variable, statistical tests, and conclusions.
Qualitative assessment (risk of bias)
Two authors assessed the methodological quality of the included studies using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) assessment tool, which comprise eight key items, with a global ideal score of 16 for non-comparative studies [15]. A higher overall score indicates a lower risk of bias; a score of 8 or less corresponds to a high risk of bias.
Statistical analysis
A meta-analysis of the eligible studies using R (version 4.0.2, R Core Team, Vienna, Austria, 2020) was conducted using the meta package (i.e. forest_meta and metacor). Correlation coefficients (COR) and their associated 95% confidence intervals were presented as the main effect size. For studies that reported beta regression values instead of Pearson’s r, the latter was estimated using the equation r = 0.98ß + 0.5λ published by Peterson and Brown [16]. Strength of the resultant effect sizes was interpreted per the criteria set by Cohen (x < 0.1, weak; 0.3 < x < 0.5, moderate; x > 0.5, strong) [17]. Heterogeneity among effect sizes was evaluated using the I-squared statistic. Definitions for heterogeneity were adapted from the Cochrane handbook (< 25%, mild; 25–50%, moderate; > 50%, severe). Due to the high heterogeneity for the dichotomous variables, a random-effects model was utilised. Both a funnel plot and Egger’s test of asymmetry were utilised to assess publication bias.
Results
Study selection
Searching the databases yielded 859 articles, and after removing 271 duplicates, 588 records were screened by title and abstracts, of which 514 were excluded. A total of 74 papers were eligible for a full-text review. As a result, 42 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The PRISMA flowchart is displayed in Fig. 1.
Quality assessment [risk of bias and level of evidence (LoE)]
Based on the OCEBM criteria [18], 21 studies were level 2, 15 were level 3, and 6 were level 4 (Table 1), with an overall grade B of recommendation assigned to the review [19]. The MINORS criteria scores of all 42 observational studies ranged from 10 to 15, with an average of 12.71 ± 1.29 (Out of 16), indicating a low overall risk of bias. A summary of the qualitative assessment, according to the MINORS criteria, is shown in the Supplementary material.
Pooled study characteristics
A total of 42 studies satisfied the study’s eligibility criteria. Included reports spanned the years between 2007 and 2022. The majority of studies originated from India (27.9%) and USA (16.3%). Pooled number of participants for all studies was 7110 patients ranging from 20 to 1681 with a mean age of 29.8 years (24.2–45.8). Mean pooled height and weight for included participants were 172.7 (165.6–179.17) cm and 76.1 (63.5–84.9) kgs, respectively. Additionally, mean pooled BMI was 25.4 (22.7–28.4) kg/m2. Of the studies that reported gender stratifications, the majority were predominated by male patients (94.8%) with 6 studies including a cohort of only males (15.4%). Mean pooled thigh length and circumference were 49.4 (38.8–52.7) cm and 48.4 (44.2–51.0) cm, respectively. Hamstring grafts were the most prevalent among included studies (86.1%), followed by PLT (9.3%), QUAD (2.3%), and BTB (2.3%). Furthermore, mean pooled graft length and diameter for hamstring grafts were 261.5 (124.3–318.7) mm and 7.8 (4.7–9.0) mm, respectively. The graft length and diameter for the only study utilising QUAD grafts were 277 mm and 8.4 mm, respectively. Length and diameters for studies using the PLT and BTB grafts were not reported.
Correlations between graft diameter and anthropometric measures
A total of 26 studies reported on the correlations between age and graft diameter. The pooled correlation between age and graft diameter was extremely small and insignificant (COR: 0.02; 95% CI: − 0.03–0.06; p-value: 0.462) (Fig. 2). With respect to gender and graft size, an insignificant weak negative (i.e. favouring males) correlation was observed (COR: − 0.17; 95% CI: − 0.36–− 0.03; p-value: 0.096) (Fig. 3). Height and weight correlated moderately with graft size (COR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.41–0.57; p-value: < 0.001) and (COR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.31–0.44; p-value: < 0.001), respectively (Figs. 4 and 5). Moreover, BMI correlated weakly yet positively with graft size (COR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.11–0.23; p-value: < 0.001) (Fig. 6). Additionally, thigh length and circumference were moderately correlated with graft diameter (COR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.18–0.50; p-value: < 0.001) and (COR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.19–0.58; p-value: < 0.001), respectively (Figs. 7 and 8). A summary of the main correlation analysis is shown in Table 1.
Subgroup analysis per graft type and region
When stratified by graft type, the correlation between age and graft diameter did not significantly differ between hamstring- and PLT-using studies (COR: 0.01 vs. 0.02; p-value: 0.580). Conversely, height was significantly more strongly correlated with graft diameter within PLT-using studies than their hamstring counterparts (COR: 0.76 vs. 0.45; p-value: 0.020). PLT-using studies demonstrated a strong correlation between weight and graft diameter compared to their hamstring-using counterparts; however, such difference was insignificant (COR: 0.64 vs. 0.35; p-value: 0.09). Similarly, differences in BMI correlation with graft diameter were statistically insignificant between PLT- and hamstring-using studies (COR: 0.32 vs. 0.15; p-value: 0.140). Stratification of correlations between anthropomorphic measures and graft diameter across different nations and graft types is provided in Tables 2 and 3.
Heterogeneity and publication bias
Significant heterogeneity was present across all pooled correlations ranging from 32.0 to 94.0%. Egger’s test indicated funnel plot asymmetry for only the studies reporting on correlation between height and graft diameter (p = 0.004). Funnel plots for all pooled correlations are included within the supplementary material (Table 4).
Discussion
This systematic review and meta-analysis represents the first large-scale quantitative analysis of anthropometric data in relation to ACLR. It may represent a starting point for evidence-based decisions relating to patient selection, graft size, and subsequent clinical outcome.
Correlations between graft diameter and anthropomorphic measures
The correlation between age and graft diameter was deemed statistically insignificant. Clinically, this would be supported by evaluating the patient demographic undergoing ACLR. This would generally include the active adult population, in which muscular conditioning, development, and thus graft size would generally be considered comparable [20, 21]. Where this correlation may be clinically significant would be in the elderly population, where ACLR may not be so readily performed due to poor-quality graft availability as a result of age-related sarcopenia [22, 23].
The weak insignificant correlation favouring an association between male gender and graft size should be treated with caution within the context of this review. This is partly due to the significant male predominance of the patients included in this review. Similarly, the literature on ACLR is still predominantly related to the male gender; however, this is shifting rapidly, and the considerations of female ACLR should be considered high on the agenda for future research priorities in soft tissue knee surgery [24,25,26].
Height, weight, thigh length and circumference all demonstrated a moderately positive correlation with graft size within this review. Such anthropomorphic measurements can be considered surrogate markers for muscular development, both in relation to cross-sectional area and axial muscular length and thus can be considered more relevant markers to base potential graft size upon. On the other hand, BMI demonstrated a weak correlation with graft size, supporting the notion that lean body mass calculation should be used in favour of BMI when considering eventual graft size, as reported in studies by Abatsi et al. [22, 27].
Graft subgroup analysis
PLT-using studies demonstrated a strong correlation with height, weight, and graft diameter in comparison to hamstring-using studies. The reasons for this have not been born out in the literature but may support the notion that utilising the PLT as a graft of choice may have more reproducible and reliable clinical results if the treating clinician relies on anthropomorphic measurements in the pre-operative phase. However, to further validate these clinical conclusions, standardised methods of graft sizing and reporting would be required, and heterogeneity in their reporting within the context of this study may discredit any conclusions that can be drawn relating to the utility of different graft types.
Limitations
Anthropometric data should be used contextually, with generalisability not applicable between differing populations. For example, specific data relating to graft thickness in Caucasian populations may not correlate with recommendations for patients in South East Asia due to genetic differences in musculoskeletal structure between different populations[28]. This review included data from various populations with subanalysis performed based on various regions; however, the skew was towards the Indian and American populations. Further work should generalise the analysis with equal representations from different populations.
This review predominantly focused on ACLR in the male population, with 94.8% of included patients male. Within ACLR, female patients experience high rates of graft–tunnel mismatch, laxity and re-rupture than male patients [29]. This furthers the notion that future research into the female population is critical, with research into graft choice and reasons for failure high on the agenda for practising clinicians. Work to address the limitations of this systematic review may be best addressed by considering the routine and widespread implementation of registries for ACLR. This should focus on standardised sizing criteria for grafts and utilising comparable outcome measurements. By facilitating access to outcome information for ACLR, evidenced-based decisions relating to suitability for surgery, graft choice, and the outcome would ultimately improve patient outcomes.
As surgeons gain more confidence in selecting appropriate graft types and planning surgeries based on anthropometric measurements, it could lead to better surgical outcomes. This, in turn, could contribute to reduced reoperation rates and healthcare costs, which may have implications for public health resource allocation. Also, improved pre-operative planning and graft size selection could potentially lead to fewer post-operative complications and revisions. This could alleviate the burden on the healthcare system, allowing resources to be directed towards other pressing health issues.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated a significant moderately positive correlation between anthropometric measurements (height, weight, thigh circumference, and length) and ACL graft size, a significant weak positive correlation with BMI, and an insignificant correlation for age and gender. Height was more strongly correlated with graft diameter in the peroneus longus tendon than hamstring grafts. These findings can assist in selecting the appropriate graft size for ACL reconstruction based on patient anthropometric data.
Data availability
Available upon request.
References
Ganz PA, Goodwin PJ (2015) Breast cancer survivorship: Where are we today? Adv Exp Med Biol 862:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16366-6_1
Widner M, Dunleavy M, Lynch S (2019) Outcomes following ACL reconstruction based on graft type: are all grafts equivalent? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12(4):460–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09588-w
Lin KM, Boyle C, Marom N, Marx RG (2020) Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 28(2):41–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/jsa.0000000000000265
Challa S, Satyaprasad J (2013) Hamstring graft size and anthropometry in south Indian population. J Clin Orthop Trauma 4(3):135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2013.09.005
Treme G, Diduch DR, Billante MJ, Miller MD, Hart JM (2008) Hamstring graft size prediction: a prospective clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 36(11):2204–2209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546508319901
Brown JA, Brophy RH, Franco J, Marquand A, Solomon TC, Watanabe D, Mandelbaum BR (2007) Avoiding allograft length mismatch during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patient height as an indicator of appropriate graft length. Am J Sports Med 35(6):986–989
Tuman JM, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ, Baumfeld JA, Nguyen HS, Hart JM (2007) Predictors for hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1945–1949
Moghamis I, Abuodeh Y, Darwiche A, Ibrahim T, Dosari AAA, Ahmed G (2019) Anthropometric correlation with hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction among males. Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-019-04452-5
Thomas S, Bhattacharya R, Saltikov JB, Kramer DJ (2013) Influence of anthropometric features on graft diameter in ACL reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(2):215–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1648-7
Schwartzberg RS (2014) Prediction of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon lengths and diameters for double bundle ACL reconstruction. Am J Orthop 43(1):E1-6
Pereira RN, Karam FC, Schwanke RL, Millman R, Foletto ZM, Schwanke CH (2016) Correlation between anthropometric data and length and thickness of the tendons of the semitendinosus and gracilis muscles used for grafts in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Rev 51(2):175–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2016.01.011
Leiter J, Elkurbo M, McRae S, Chiu J, Froese W, MacDonald P (2017) Using pre-operative MRI to predict intraoperative hamstring graft size for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(1):229–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4205-z
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):1006–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA (2018) Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 126(5):1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000002864
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73(9):712–716. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x
Peterson RA, Brown SP (2005) On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 90(1):175–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. L. Erlbaum Associates, New York, NY
OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group (2011) The oxford levels of evidence 2. https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence Accessed 10 Apr 2022
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650):924–926. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD
Hewett TE, Myer GD, Ford KR, Paterno MV, Quatman CE (2016) Mechanisms, prediction, and prevention of ACL injuries: cut risk with three sharpened and validated tools. J Orthop Res 34(11):1843–1855. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23414
Bram JT, Pascual-Leone N, Patel NM, DeFrancesco CJ, Talathi NS, Ganley TJ (2020) Do pediatric patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears have a higher rate of familial anterior cruciate ligament injury? Orthop J Sports Med 8(10):2325967120959665. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120959665
Cinque ME, Chahla J, Moatshe G, DePhillipo NN, Kennedy NI, Godin JA, LaPrade RF (2017) Outcomes and complication rates after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are similar in younger and older patients. Orthop J Sports Med 5(10):2325967117729659. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117729659
Murthy SK, Ramkumar M, Raghavn NM, Pooja B, Sundaram S (2021) Role of anthropometric data inassessing hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Pharm ResInt 33(48A):1–9
Sutton KM, Bullock JM (2013) Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: differences between males and females. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-21-01-41
Tomassini S, Abbasciano R, Murphy GJ (2021) Interventions to prevent and treat sarcopenia in a surgical population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zraa069
Khayambashi K, Ghoddosi N, Straub RK, Powers CM (2016) Hip muscle strength predicts noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury in male and female athletes: a prospective study. Am J Sports Med 44(2):355–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515616237
Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Benjaminse A, Collins M, Ford K, Kulas AS (2015) ACL research retreat VII: an update on anterior cruciate ligament injury risk factor identification, screening, and prevention. J Athl Train 50(10):1076–1093. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-50.10.06
Bergman S (2007) Public health perspective—how to improve the musculoskeletal health of the population. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 21(1):191–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2006.08.012
Campbell AL, Caldwell JE, Yalamanchili D, Sepanek L, Youssefzadeh K, Uquillas CA, Limpisvasti O (2021) Effect of patient height and sex on the patellar tendon and anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med 9(5):23259671211003244. https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671211003244
Chan KW, Kaplan K, Ong CC, Walsh MG, Schweitzer ME, Sherman OH (2012) Using magnetic resonance imaging to determine preoperative autograft sizes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 70(4):241–245
Reboonlap N, Nakornchai C, Charakorn K (2012) Correlation between the length of gracilis and semitendinosus tendon and physical parameters in Thai males. J Med Assoc Thai 95(Suppl 10):S142-146
Papastergiou SG, Konstantinidis GA, Natsis K, Papathanasiou E, Koukoulias N, Papadopoulos AG (2012) Adequacy of semitendinosus tendon alone for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft and prediction of hamstring graft size by evaluating simple anthropometric parameters. Anat Res Int 2012:424158. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/424158
Xie G, Huangfu X, Zhao J (2012) Prediction of the graft size of 4-stranded semitendinosus tendon and 4-stranded gracilis tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Chinese Han patient study. Am J Sports Med 40(5):1161–1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546511435627
Celiktafi M, Golpinar A, Kose O, Sutoluk Z, Celebi K, Sarpel Y (2013) Prediction of the quadruple hamstring autograft thickness in ACL reconstruction using anthropometric measures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 47(1):14–18. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2013.2814
Park SY, Oh H, Park S, Lee JH, Lee SH, Yoon KH (2013) Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(5):1111–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2085-4
Nuelle CW, Cook JL, Gallizzi MA, Smith PA (2015) Posterior single-incision semitendinosus harvest for a quadrupled anterior cruciate ligament graft construct: determination of graft length and diameter based on patient sex, height, weight, and body mass index. Arthroscopy 31(4):684–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2014.10.013
Asif N, Ranjan R, Ahmed S, Sabir AB, Jilani LZ, Qureshi OA (2016) Prediction of quadruple hamstring graft diameter for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by anthropometric measurements. Indian J 50(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.173521
Atbasi Z, Ercin E, Erdem Y, Emre TY, Atilla HA, Parlak A (2016) Correlation between body mass index and quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft size in ACL reconstruction. Joints 4(4):198–201. https://doi.org/10.11138/jts/2016.4.4.198
Goyal S, Matias N, Pandey V, Acharya K (2016) Are pre-operative anthropometric parameters helpful in predicting length and thickness of quadrupled hamstring graft for ACL reconstruction in adults? A prospective study and literature review. Int Orthop 40(1):173–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2818-3
Ho SW, Tan TJ, Lee KT (2016) Role of anthropometric data in the prediction of 4-stranded hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Acta Orthop Belg 82(1):72–77
Mardani-Kivi M, Karimi-Mobarakeh M, Mirbolook A, Keyhani S, Saheb-Ekhtiari K, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Porteghali P (2016) Predicting the hamstring tendon diameter using anthropometric parameters. Arch 4(4):314–317
Sundararajan SR, Rajagopalakrishnan R, Rajasekaran S (2016) Is height the best predictor for adequacy of semitendinosus-alone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A study of hamstring graft dimensions and anthropometric measurements. Int Orthop 40(5):1025–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2882-8
Chiba D, Tsuda E, Sasaki S, Liu X, Ishibashi Y (2017) Anthropometric and skeletal parameters predict 2-strand semitendinosus tendon size in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 5(8):2325967117720148. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967117720148
Gupta R, Malhotra A, Masih GD, Khanna T (2017) Equation-based precise prediction of length of hamstring tendons and quadrupled graft diameter by various anthropometric variables for knee ligament reconstruction in Indian population. J Orthop Surg 25(1):2309499017690997. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499017690997
An VVG, Scholes C, Mhaskar VA, Parker DA, Fritsch BA (2017) Regression modelling combining MRI measurements and patient anthropometry for patient screening and prediction of graft diameter in hamstring autograft arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 8:24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2017.02.001
Ramkumar PN, Hadley MD, Jones MH, Farrow LD (2018) Hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction: A 13-Year predictive analysis of anthropometric factors and surgeon trends relating to graft size. Orthop J Sports Med 6(6):2325967118779788. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118779788
Song X, Li Q, Wu Z, Xu Q, Chen D, Jiang Q (2018) Predicting the graft diameter of the peroneus longus tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Medicine (Baltimore) 97(44):e12672. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012672
Heijboer WMP, Suijkerbuijk MAM, van Meer BL, Bakker EWP, Meuffels DE (2019) Predictive factors for hamstring autograft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1700495
Sakti M, Yurianto H, Pasallo P, Hidayatullah S, Faisal A, Subagio ES (2019) Anthropometric parameters measurement to predict 4-strand hamstring autograft size in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of South Sulawesi population. Int J Surg Open 21:58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2019.11.005
Ro DH, Lee S, Cho Y, Lee YM, Lee MC, Kim SH (2020) Factors that predicts the size of autologous hamstring tendon graft for double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Indian J 54(4):444–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-019-00014-4
Goyal T, Paul S, Das L, Choudhury AK (2020) Correlation between anthropometric measurements and activity level on length and diameter of semitendinosus tendon autograft in knee ligament surgery: A prospective observational study. Sicot-J 6:23. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020007
Jagadeesh DN, Vishwanath MSD, Dhawan DT, Mandri DA (2020) Correlation of measurements of hamstring graft used in ACL reconstruction with preoperative anthropometric measures among Indian males—a prospective study. J Arthrosc Jt Surg 7(4):200–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jajs.2020.09.008
Sakti M, Biakto KT, Usman MA, Tedjajuwana MJ, Pasallo P, Subagio ES (2020) Predicting the peroneus longus tendon autograft size in ACL reconstruction by using anthropometric parameters: a study in South Sulawesi population. J Orthop 22:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2020.03.011
Thwin L, Ho SW, Tan TJL, Lim WY, Lee KT (2020) Pre-operative MRI measurements versus anthropometric data: Which is more accurate in predicting 4-stranded hamstring graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 22:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2020.05.004
Ertilav D (2021) Relation of peroneus longus autograft dimensions with anthropometric parameters in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Importance of the distal leg diameter. Jt Dis Relat Surg 32(1):137–143. https://doi.org/10.5606/ehc.2021.79580
Khan MJ, Asif N, Firoz D, Khan AQ, Sabir AB, Siddiqui YS (2021) Prediction of peroneus longus graft diameter for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by inframalleolar harvest and from anthropometric data. Int J Burns Trauma 11(5):377–384
Kumar S, Kumar H, Singh PP, Sharma P, Rai Sharma AK, Singh MK, Kumar R (2021) Quadrupled Hamstring Graft Diameter Adequacy in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patient Anthropometry: A Prospective Cohort Study in Indian Males. Cureus 13(6):e15920. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15920
Singhal D, Kanodia N, Singh R, Singh SK, Agrawal S (2021) Predicting quadruple semitendinosus graft size for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by patient anthropometric variables: a cohort study of 280 cases. Malays Orthop J 15(3):71–77. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2111.011
Harshith P, Krishnagopal, (2022) Prediction of length and diameter of semitendinosus graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using anthropometric parameters, age, gender and physical activities. Eur J Mol Clin Med 9(4):1585–1593
Huang XL, Zheng HY, Yang HH, Shi ZF, Zhang B, Lan B, Wang H, Tan RX (2022) Application of human data to predict hamstring tendon autograft diameter in Zhuang population. Int J Rheum Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.14545
Mishra P, Goyal A, Gupta H, Bhavani P, Lal H, Kumar S (2022) Correlation between height and semitendinosus tendon length, prediction of minimum semitendinosus tendon length based on height-an easy and accurate method. J Clin Orthop Trauma 31:101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101918
Movahedinia M, Movahedinia S, Hosseini S, Motevallizadeh A, Salehi B, Shekarchi B, Shahrezaee M (2023) Prediction of hamstring tendon autograft diameter using preoperative measurements with different cut-offs between genders. J Exp Orthop 10(1):4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00569-0
Acknowledgements
With thanks to Camila Garces-Bovett, Senior Information Specialist, the Royal College of Surgeons of England Library and Archives Team, for conducting the literature searches.
Funding
Open Access funding provided by the Qatar National Library. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, literature review, data collection, and quality assessment were performed by LAS, ISM, MMA, ATH, and HK. Statistical analysis was performed by AA. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LAS, HK, and ATH, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval
No ethical approval is required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Salman, L.A., Moghamis, I.S., Hatnouly, A.T. et al. Correlation between anthropometric measurements and graft size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 34, 97–112 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03712-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03712-w