Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between periprosthetic osteolysis around the talar component and the amount of talar component subsidence after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA).
Methods
This study included forty patients who underwent TAA with a mean follow-up of 67.5 ± 17.0 months. The patients were divided into two groups based on the amount of osteolysis around the talar component, as measured by computed tomography at the latest clinic visit: none to 2 mm (N group, n = 20) and greater than or equal to 2 mm (O group, n = 20). The average amount of talar component subsidence, clinical outcomes, and complications were compared between the two groups. In the O group, the correlation between osteolysis and talar component subsidence was evaluated.
Results
The average talar component subsidence was significantly different between the N (0.22 ± 0.94 mm) and O groups (2.12 ± 2.28 mm). Five out of 20 ankles in the O group required revision surgery owing to talar component subsidence. The Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scores in the N and O groups were significantly different: 93.5 ± 7.7 and 85.3 ± 15.4, respectively. In the O group, we found that osteolysis tended to develop on the lateral side, and the amount of osteolysis was positively correlated with the talar component subsidence (r = 0.59, P = .007).
Conclusion
In the O group, a positive correlation between osteolysis and talar component subsidence was found, and five patients required revision surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Total ankle arthroplasty(TAA) was first introduced in the 1970s as an alternative to ankle fusion (AF) to treat end-stage ankle arthritis [1]. AF was the preferred procedure for decades, as initial trials of TAA had high failure rates in the first- and second-generation models [2]. In the last decade, however, the number of TAA procedures has increased with implant design and survivorship improvements, and the complication rates have decreased compared with AF [3, 4]. One of the reasons for TAA failure is component subsidence, especially on the talar side. Multiple factors induced component subsidence as follows, aseptic loosening, malalignment of the components, disruption of the extraosseous or intra-osseous blood supply of the talus, avascular necrosis of the talus, and nonanatomic component design [5]. The osteolysis developing around the component was considered the principal cause of aseptic loosening. Previous studies reported that the rate of periprosthetic osteolysis ranged from 35 to 37% at the 3- to 4-year follow-up [6,7,8]. However, which osteolytic lesion could induce component subsidence is not clear. Early detection of such lesions may provide a clinical opportunity for limited revision surgery in ankles with impending prosthesis failure [6, 7]. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between the amount of osteolysis in the talus and the amount of talar component subsidence. We hypothesized that a more significant osteolytic lesion would induce talar component subsidence and occasionally result in TAA revision.
Methods
Study design
This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent TAA between May 2012 and March 2018 at our hospital. All patients received a detailed explanation and consented to participate. The ethical committee of the Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine approved this study. The TAA was indicated for patients in a sedentary lifestyle, with symptomatic end-stage ankle osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The TNK ankle (Kyocera Medical, Kyoto, Japan), consisting of two aluminium ceramic components and a polyethylene surface, was used for all cases [9]. Forty-one patients underwent TAA during this period. Among these 41 patients, this study included the 40 patients who were followed up for more than 6 months postoperatively. One patient was excluded owing to death within 6 months. One experienced surgeon (N.K.) performed all procedures (Supplemental Fig. 1). Three weeks after surgery, the patients were discharged from the hospital and followed up every three months in the first year after surgery and every six months thereafter.
Clinical outcomes
The Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot scale (JSSF scale) was used for clinical outcome evaluation [10]. Higher points indicated better outcomes. Dorsiflexion and plantarflexion were assessed using a goniometer at every clinic visit after surgery. Complications during the follow-up period were recorded as well.
Radiographic measurements
Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) images were obtained at the latest clinic visit. The talar component subsidence was measured on a sagittal plane radiograph, as shown in Fig. 1.
a Measurement of talar component subsidence using a sagittal plane radiograph. Line A was matched up with the talar component axis. Line B connected the dorsal aspect of the talar head and the tip of the posterior talar process. Line D was drawn perpendicular to Line B such that it meets Line A at its centre. The difference in the lengths of line D immediately after surgery and at the final follow-up was defined as talar component subsidence. b The zoning protocol for detecting locations of osteolysis. On the coronal plane radiograph, the talus was divided along the centre of the talar component, and the lateral and medial parts were assigned zones 1 and 2, respectively. c On the sagittal plane radiograph, the talar component was split into three parts vertically and the anterior, middle, and posterior regions were assigned zones 3, 4, and 5, respectively
CT detected each osteolytic lesion in the talus, and lesions larger than 2 mm were defined as positive, following the threshold reported by Rodriguez et al. [6]. In this study, 20 cases that had either no lesions or osteolytic lesions smaller than 2 mm were assigned to the N group, and the other 20 cases that had osteolytic lesions equal to or larger than 2 mm were assigned to the O group. The location of each osteolytic lesion was assigned to each zone based on the modified zoning protocol reported by Besse et al. (Fig. 1) [11]. In case the osteolytic lesion was extensive, and beyond the border, that lesion was assigned to the zone where a more significant part of the lesion existed. The correlations between the size of osteolysis measured by CT scan and the distance of subsidence of talar component were statistically evaluated.
Statistical analysis
The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 9.0; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). The differences between the parametric numbers of the N and O groups were analysed using Student's t-test. Proportional data were analysed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Significance was set at P < 0.01. The correlations between the size of osteolysis and the talar component subsidence were evaluated using Pearson correlation tests.
Results
In this study, the N group consisted of four males and 16 females, and the O group consisted of five males and 15 females (P = 0.705). The average body mass index (BMI) was 23.8 ± 2.7 kg/m2 in the N group and 22.8 ± 2.2 kg/m2 in the O group (P = 0.4315). The mean age at surgery of each group was 74.1 ± 4.7 years old in the N group and 69.8 ± 4.8 years old in the O group (P = 0.9763). The mean follow-up period of each group was 64.0 ± 17.6 months in the N group and 70.9 ± 15.1 months in the O group (P = 0.0812). The average amount of talar component subsidence of the N and O groups at the final follow-up were 0.55 ± 0.57 (range, 0–1.9) mm and 2.61 ± 1.95 (range, 0.7–8.5) mm, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.0001, Table 1).
The Takakura-Tanaka [12] classification was adopted to evaluate the stage of OA in each ankle. Among the 20 patients in the N group, two had RA and the rest had OA: two with stage 3a, 10 with stage 3b, and six with stage 4 OA. The 20 patients in the O group included: two of RA; two with stage 3a, 11 with stage 3b, and five with stage 4 OA. The distribution of patients in the two groups did not show a significant difference (P = 0.986, Table 2).
In terms of complications, delayed wound healing was observed in four ankles in the N group and two ankles in the O group. Fractures related to the surgical procedure occurred in five ankles: in the N group, one talar posterior process fracture and two medial malleolar fractures, and in the O group one lateral malleolar fracture and one medial malleolar fracture. In the O group, five female patients required revision surgery during the follow-up period owing to talar component subsidence, while the N group had no revision cases. The radiographic images of a patient in the N group and a patient in the O group who received revision surgery due to talar component subsidence induced by large osteolysis were displayed in Fig. 2. Five of revision cases consisted of one RA ankle, and four 3b OA ankles (Table 2).
a A case of the N group. A-P and lateral X-ray images of osteoarthritis patient which were classified as Takakura/Tanaka classification stage 4. b Coronal and sagittal CT images revealed that joint space was almost disappeared and existence of bone cyst in medial malleolar(white arrow). c A-P and lateral X-ray images were taken immediately after TAA. Black lines were drawn to evaluate talar component subsidence, as described in Fig. 1. d A-P and lateral X-ray images were taken five years after surgery. Talar component subsided only 0.4 mm and the patient showed high JSSF score. e CT images revealed a few small osteolysis lesions. f A case of the O group who required revision surgery due to talar component subsidence. A-P and lateral X-ray images were classified as Takakura/Tanaka classification stage 3b. g Coronal and sagittal CT images revealed that joint space was narrowing and there was no large bone cyst in talus before surgery. h A-P and lateral X-ray images were taken immediately after TAA. Black lines were drawn to evaluate talar component subsidence. i A-P and lateral X-ray images were taken two years after surgery. Osteolysis development was not evident on X-ray, but the talar component subsided into the talus 2.3 mm deep. j CT images revealed some sizable periprosthetic osteolysis lesions (≥ 2 mm) developed in the talus. The patient received revision surgery due to an unstable and painful ankle
The average JSSF scale scores at the latest clinic visit for the N and O groups were 93.5 ± 7.7 and 85.3 ± 15.4, respectively, and there was a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.0042, Fig. 3). The average dorsiflexion angles of the N and O groups were 13.5 ± 4.8 degrees and 11.5 ± 5.5 degrees, respectively. The average plantarflexion angles of the N and O groups were 38.5 ± 13.8 degrees and 37.1 ± 9.6 degrees, respectively (Fig. 4). With the numbers available, No significant difference was detected in the ROM between the N and O groups with the numbers available.
In the O group, CT revealed the location of each osteolytic lesion. All 20 of the ankles in the O group had 22 osteolytic lesions equal to 2 mm or larger. Fourteen osteolysis lesions developed in zone 1 (lateral region), and eight lesions developed in zone 2 (medial region) on the coronal plane. Seven lesions were in zone 3 (anterior part), four lesions in zone 4 (middle part), and nine lesions in zone 5 (posterior part) on the sagittal plane (Table 3).
The relationship between the amount of osteolysis and subsidence showed a moderate, positive, linear correlation that was significant (r = 0.59, P = 0.007). The black dots on the scattergram represent revision cases in the O group (Fig. 5).
The correlation between the amount of osteolysis and talar component subsidence. A Pearson correlation test showed a moderate, positive, linear correlation that was significant between the amount of osteolysis and component subsidence (r = 0.59, P = .007). The black dots on the scattergram indicate revision cases in the O group
Discussion
This study indicated that the talar component subsidence correlates with the amount of osteolysis. Notably, no cases showed more than 2 mm of subsidence in patients with small or no periprosthetic osteolysis (< 2 mm; N group), while the average subsidence was 2.61 mm in patients with sizeable periprosthetic osteolysis (≥ 2 mm; O group). This finding suggests a strong relationship between osteolysis and subsidence.
In our patients using the TNK ankle, five ankles in the O group required revision owing to talar component subsidence in an average 67.5 months follow up. The implant survival rate in our department was 88%, which was comparable to the reported mid-term results using Salto Talaris (Integra LifeScience, Plainsboro, NJ, USA), STAR (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), and Agility (DePuy Orthopaedics, Warsaw, IN, USA) [13,14,15]. As previous papers reported higher revision rates in females after TAA, all five patients were female in this study [16]. The five revision cases consisted of a RA ankle and four of stage 3b OA ankle. Stage 3b OA ankles were characterised by partial subchondral bone contact with the inclined tibia-talar joint. Correcting severe coronal alignment deformity (> 20°) to neutral alignment through TAA was found to be associated with higher failure rates [2, 12, 17]. Coronal alignment deformity combined with large osteolysis may increase the risk of TAA failure, as observed in our cases.
The pathology of osteolysis development has been reported as following; polyethylene liner wear, high contact forces, implant incongruency, and micromotion of the implant [18]. Related to the contact force, poor bone quality, such as the talus low bone mineral density (BMD), could be another risk factor for osteolysis development and component subsidence. Lee et al. reported the relationship between BMD and osteolysis development after TAA by comparing the preoperative bone density of talus using Hounsfield units value in patients with and without periprosthetic osteolysis following TAA. The results showed no significant difference between patients with periprosthetic osteolysis and non-osteolysis, and the authors concluded that low bone density around the ankle joint might not be associated with development of osteolysis [19]. Furthermore, another paper reported that the bone density of the talus in patients with ankle OA undergoing TAA and those without OA did not significantly differ [20]. The contribution of bone quality of talus on osteolysis development was still unclear.
Generally, osteolysis tends to enlarge after TAA with time, and the average follow-up period of the O and N groups was 70.9 months and 64 months, respectively, which were not enough long. We anticipated that osteolysis might develop even in the N group at a later period.
The average age of the N and O groups at surgery was 71.4 and 69.8 years, respectively, and there was no significant difference. Lee et al. compared clinical outcomes between patients younger than 55 and older who underwent TAA.They concluded that the complication rates, including component subsidence and revision, did not significantly differ between the two age groups [21]. The impact of age at the surgery on implant survivorship was not clear.
In this study, CT scans revealed osteolysis in the talus after TAA tended to develop on the lateral side. Increasing mechanical stress on the lateral side due to varus malalignment correction by TAA procedure has been reported to cause osteolysis [22]. Najefi et al. [23] reported that 78% of patients had a bone cyst outside the resection area prior to undergoing surgery in their series of 120 cases. Some osteolytic lesions in this study might have existed before surgery and remained after bone resection. A large subchondral bone cyst should be detected before surgery to reduce the risk of talar component subsidence.
TNK, the implant used in this study, is a fixed-bearing implant, and the selection of fixed-or mobile-bearing affects the development of osteolysis after TAA. Recently, Nunley et al. [24] reported comparing mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing TAA in a randomized control trial. According to their results, talar cyst formation and component subsidence occurred at more than ten times higher rates in mobile-bearing TAA.
TAA procedure showed excellent clinical outcomes in pain reduction and patient satisfaction [2, 25]. In this study, the ROM after TAA showed no significant difference between the two groups; however, the JFFS score was significantly lower in the O group owing to the pain sub-score of five patients who required revision. Most osteolytic lesions developed quiescently and were difficult to detect precisely with only plain radiographs [8]. Surgeons need to remember that subsidence progress to impending implant failure even though the patients are asymptomatic; hence, careful follow-up is required [5, 7, 26].
This study had several limitations. First, as mentioned above, the average follow-up period was not long enough. We will continue to follow up with patients to clarify the actual contribution of duration after TAA to the development of osteolysis. Second, this was a retrospective study; and in the future, we will need to conduct a prospective study to reduce several biases. Third, this study did not assess the bone quality of the talus before surgery, such as BMD. Although a study concluded that low bone density around the ankle joint might not be associated with the development of osteolysis; our cohort could show different results due to the difference in patient demographic background and implant design [19]. Lastly, this study did not evaluate tibial component alignment and surrounding osteolysis. Earlier studies reported that malalignment between the talar and tibial components induced incongruency and high focal pressure resulting in polyethylene liner wear. Among five revision cases in this study, two cases received both tibial and talar components replacement. Therefore, the tibial component should be analyzed, as well as the talar component, in future studies to reduce the failure of the TAA prosthesis.
Conclusions
The number of patients who undergo TAA for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis has increased in the past decade. After surgery, osteolysis frequently developed around the implant without any symptoms. This osteolysis has been reported to cause implant subsidence, resulting in implant failure. This study showed a correlation between the amount of osteolysis and talar component subsidence. These results suggest that careful follow-up using images may enable surgeons to diagnose early and provide a clinical opportunity for limited revision surgery.
References
Clough TM, Alvi F, Majeed H (2018) Total ankle arthroplasty: what are the risks?: a guide to surgical consent and a review of the literature. Bone Joint J 100-b:1352–1358. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.100b10.bjj-2018-0180.r1
Cody EA, Scott DJ, Easley ME (2018) Total ankle arthroplasty: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev 6:e8. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00182
Raikin SM, Rasouli MR, Espandar R, Maltenfort MG (2014) Trends in treatment of advanced ankle arthropathy by total ankle replacement or ankle fusion. Foot Ankle Int 35:216–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713517101
Stavrakis AI, SooHoo NF (2016) Trends in complication rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1453–1458. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01341
Espinosa N, Klammer G, Wirth SH (2017) Osteolysis in total ankle replacement: how does it work? Foot Ankle Clin 22:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2017.01.001
Rodriguez D, Bevernage BD, Maldague P, Deleu PA, Tribak K, Leemrijse T (2010) Medium term follow-up of the AES ankle prosthesis: High rate of asymptomatic osteolysis. Foot Ankle Surg 16:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2009.05.013
Yoon HS, Lee J, Choi WJ, Lee JW (2014) Periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 35:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713509247
Kohonen I, Koivu H, Pudas T, Tiusanen H, Vahlberg T, Mattila K (2013) Does computed tomography add information on radiographic analysis in detecting periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty? Foot Ankle Int 34:180–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100712460224
Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Ohgushi H (2004) Ankle arthroplasty using three generations of metal and ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000131246.79993.ec
Niki H, Aoki H, Inokuchi S, Ozeki S, Kinoshita M, Kura H et al (2005) Development and reliability of a standard rating system for outcome measurement of foot and ankle disorders I: development of standard rating system. J Orthop Sci 10:457–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-005-0936-2
Besse JL, Brito N, Lienhart C (2009) Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 30:964–975. https://doi.org/10.3113/fai.2009.0964
Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K (2006) Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:909–913. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.88b7.17325
Frigg A, Germann U, Huber M, Horisberger M (2017) Survival of the Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR): results of ten to nineteen years follow-up. Int Orthop 41:2075–2082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3583-2
Raikin SM, Sandrowski K, Kane JM, Beck D, Winters BS (2017) Midterm outcome of the agility total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 38:662–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717701232
Stewart MG, Green CL, Adams SB Jr, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA 2nd (2017) Midterm results of the salto talaris total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 38:1215–1221. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717719756
Law TY, Sabeh KG, Rosas S, Hubbard Z, Altajar S, Roche MW (2018) Trends in total ankle arthroplasty and revisions in the Medicare database. Ann Transl Med 6:112. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.02.06
Hobson SA, Karantana A, Dhar S (2009) Total ankle replacement in patients with significant pre-operative deformity of the hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:481–486. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.91b4.20855
Mehta N, Serino J, Hur ES, Smith S, Hamid KS, Lee S et al (2021) Pathogenesis, evaluation, and management of osteolysis following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 42:230–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100720978426
Lee GW, Seo HY, Jung DM, Lee KB (2021) Comparison of preoperative bone density in patients with and without periprosthetic osteolysis following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 42:575–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100720976096
Harnroongroj T, Volpert LG, Ellis SJ, Sofka CM, Deland JT, Demetracopoulos CA (2019) Comparison of tibial and talar bone density in patients undergoing total ankle replacement vs non-ankle arthritis matched controls. Foot Ankle Int 40:1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719868496
Lee GW, Seon JK, Kim NS, Lee KB (2019) Comparison of intermediate-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 55 years. Foot Ankle Int 40:762–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719840816
Queen RM, Adams SB Jr, Viens NA, Friend JK, Easley ME, Deorio JK et al (2013) Differences in outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:1927–1934. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.l.00404
Najefi AA, Ghani Y, Goldberg AJ (2021) bone cysts and osteolysis in ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 42:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100720955155
Nunley JA, Adams SB, Easley ME, DeOrio JK (2019) Prospective randomized trial comparing mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 40:1239–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100719879680
Oliver SM, Coetzee JC, Nilsson LJ, Samuelson KM, Stone RM, Fritz JE et al (2016) Early patient satisfaction results on a modern generation fixed-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 37:938–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100716648736
Kohonen I, Koivu H, Tiusanen H, Kankare J, Vahlberg T, Mattila K (2017) Are periprosthetic osteolytic lesions in ankle worth bone grafting? Foot Ankle Surg 23:128–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.01.010
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Peter Mittwede MD, PhD, and Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Kobe University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: NK, TY; Methodology: NK, TY, TY, KN; Formal analysis and investigation: SK, DA; Writing—original draft preparation: SK; Writing—review and editing: KN, YH, TM; Supervision: RK, NK.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary Fig.1.
The images showed a total ankle arthroplasty procedure. a The operation was performed using an anterior approach to the ankle. b Osteotomy of the tibial plafond and medial malleolus was performed perpendicularly to the anatomical axis of the tibia using a cutting guide. c Secondly, an osteotomy of the trochlea of the talus is performed in a direction parallel to the plantar surface. d The peg hole for the talar component fin is created using the chisel. e An osteotomy of the convex portion of the tibial component on the proximal side is performed. f Comfirming if osteotomy was precisely performed. g After implanting the talar and tibial component, an AO mini screw was inserted from a screw hole on the front face of the tibial component towards the direction of the posterior cortex for initial fixation. h After the movements of both components have been checked and confirmed, the retinaculum and the skin were sutured carefully (PPTX 12887 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kihara, S., Kanzaki, N., Yamashita, T. et al. Talar component subsidence correlates with periprosthetic osteolysis after total ankle arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 2987–2993 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03519-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03519-9