Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The geriatric distal femur fracture: nail, plate or both?

  • General Review
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surgical fixation of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients is an evolving topic. Unlike hip fractures, treatment strategies for distal femur fractures are ill-defined and lack substantive high-quality evidence. With an increasing incidence and an association with significant morbidity and mortality, it is essential to understand existing treatment options and their supporting evidence. Current fixation methods include the use of either retrograde intramedullary nails, or plate and screw constructs. Due to the variability in fracture patterns, the unique anatomy of the distal femur, and the presence or absence or pre-existing implants, decision-making as to which method to use can be challenging. Recent literature has sought to describe the advantages and disadvantages of each, however, there is currently no consensus on a standard of care, and little randomized evidence is available that directly compares intramedullary nails with plating. Future randomized studies comparing intramedullary nails with plating constructs are necessary in order to develop a standard of care based on injury characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jahangir AA, Cross WW, Schmidt AH (2010) Current management of distal femoral fractures. Curr Orthop Practice 21(2):193–197. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0b013e3181bd6174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Myers P, Laboe P, Johnson KJ, Fredericks PD, Crichlow RJ, Maar DC et al (2018) Patient mortality in geriatric distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 32(3):111–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elsoe R, Ceccotti AA, Larsen P (2018) Population-based epidemiology and incidence of distal femur fractures. Int Orthop 42(1):191–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3665-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape HC (2011) Periprosthetic fractures: epidemiology and future projections. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 2):S66-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Streubel PN, Ricci WM, Wong A, Gardner MJ (2011) Mortality after distal femur fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(4):1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1530-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kammerlander C, Riedmüller P, Gosch M, Zegg M, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Schmid R et al (2012) Functional outcome and mortality in geriatric distal femoral fractures. Injury 43(7):1096–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.02.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hake ME, Davis ME, Perdue AM, Goulet JA (2019) Modern implant options for the treatment of distal femur fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 27(19):e867–e875. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Green SA (1988) Distal intramedullary fixation of supracondylar fractures of the femur. Tech Orthop 3(3):71–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Griffin XL, Costa ML, Phelps E, Parsons N, Dritsaki M, Achten J et al (2019) Intramedullary nails versus distal locking plates for fracture of the distal femur: results from the Trial of Acute Femoral Fracture Fixation (TrAFFix) randomised feasibility study and process evaluation. BMJ Open 9(5):e026810. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026810

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffin XL, Parsons N, Zbaeda MM, McArthur J (2015) Interventions for treating fractures of the distal femur in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010606.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Pekmezci M, McDonald E, Buckley J, Kandemir U (2014) Retrograde intramedullary nails with distal screws locked to the nail have higher fatigue strength than locking plates in the treatment of supracondylar femoral fractures: a cadaver-based laboratory investigation. Bone Joint J 96(1):114–21. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B1.31135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Giddie J, Sawalha S, Parker M (2015) Retrograde nailing for distal femur fractures in the elderly. SICOT J 1:31. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zlowodzki M, Williamson S, Cole PA, Zardiackas LD, Kregor PJ (2004) Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system, angled blade plate, and retrograde intramedullary nail for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18(8):494–502. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200409000-00004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heiney JP, Barnett MD, Vrabec GA, Schoenfeld AJ, Baji A, Njus GO (2009) Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate. J Trauma 66(2):443–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31815edeb8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Beltran MJ, Gary JL, Collinge CA (2015) Management of distal femur fractures with modern plates and nails: state of the art. J Orthop Trauma 29(4):165–172. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DePhillipo NN, Lebus GF, Cinque ME, Kennedy NI, Chahla J, LaPrade RF (2017) Iatrogenic trochlear chondral defects after anterolateral placement of retrograde femoral nails. Arthroscopy 33(9):1727–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Canton G, Giraldi G, Dussi M, Ratti C, Murena L (2019) Osteoporotic distal femur fractures in the elderly: peculiarities and treatment strategies. Acta Biomed 90(12):25–32. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8958

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Carmack DB, Moed BR, Kingston C, Zmurko M, Watson JT, Richardson M (2003) Identification of the optimal intercondylar starting point for retrograde femoral nailing: an anatomic study. J Trauma 55(4):692–695. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000088857.47194.7E

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loosen A, Fritz Y, Dietrich M (2019) Surgical treatment of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 10:2151459319860723. https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459319860723

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nauth A, Ristevski B, Bégué T, Schemitsch EH (2011) Periprosthetic distal femur fractures: current concepts. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 2):S82–S85. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8a09

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ricci WM (2015) Periprosthetic femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 29(3):130–137. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ristevski B, Nauth A, Williams DS, Hall JA, Whelan DB, Bhandari M et al (2014) Systematic review of the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 28(5):307–312. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SS, Lim SJ, Moon YW, Seo JG (2014) Outcomes of long retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(1):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1890-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ebraheim NA, Kelley LH, Liu X, Thomas IS, Steiner RB, Liu J (2015) Periprosthetic distal femur fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 7(4):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Henderson CE, Kuhl LL, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL (2011) Locking plates for distal femur fractures: is there a problem with fracture healing? J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 1):S8-14. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182070127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moloney GB, Pan T, Van Eck CF, Patel D, Tarkin I (2016) Geriatric distal femur fracture: are we underestimating the rate of local and systemic complications? Injury 47(8):1732–1736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.05.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ehlinger M, Ducrot G, Adam P, Bonnomet F (2013) Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(3):353–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.10.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Consigliere P, Iliopoulos E, Ads T, Trompeter A (2019) Early versus delayed weight bearing after surgical fixation of distal femur fractures: a non-randomized comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29(8):1789–1794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02486-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, Egol K (2007) Management of periprosthetic femur fractures with a first generation locking plate. Injury 38(8):965–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bottlang M, Feist F (2011) Biomechanics of far cortical locking. J Orthop Trauma 25(Suppl 1):S21–S28. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318207885b

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Mau-Moeller A, Behrens M, Felser S, Bruhn S, Mittelmeier W, Bader R et al (2015) Modulation and predictors of periprosthetic bone mineral density following total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int 2015:418168. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/418168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ries Z, Hansen K, Bottlang M, Madey S, Fitzpatrick D, Marsh JL (2013) Healing results of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with far cortical locking technology: a preliminary retrospective study. Iowa Orthop J 33:7–11

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mirick Mueller GE (2019) Nail-plate constructs for periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Knee Surg 32(5):403–406. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schemitsch E, McKee M, Nauth A (2021) Treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a randomized controlled trial of locking plate osteosynthesis versus retrograde nailing. clinicaltrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01973712. Accessed 25 Feb 2022

  35. Shah JK, Szukics P, Gianakos AL, Liporace FA, Yoon RS (2020) Equivalent union rates between intramedullary nail and locked plate fixation for distal femur periprosthetic fractures-a systematic review. Injury 51(4):1062–1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Magill H, Ponugoti N, Selim A, Platt J (2021) Locked compression plating versus retrograde intramedullary nailing in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar knee fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02222-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Liporace FA, Yoon RS (2019) Nail plate combination technique for native and periprosthetic distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 33(2):e64–e68. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoskins W, Sheehy R, Edwards ER, Hau RC, Bucknill A, Parsons N et al (2016) Nails or plates for fracture of the distal femur? data from the victoria orthopaedic trauma outcomes registry. Bone Joint J 98(6):846–50. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Parsons N, Griffin XL, Achten J, Costa ML (2014) Outcome assessment after hip fracture: is EQ-5D the answer? Bone Joint Res 3(3):69–75. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.33.2000250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Thomson AB, Driver R, Kregor PJ, Obremskey WT (2008) Long-term functional outcomes after intra-articular distal femur fractures: ORIF versus retrograde intramedullary nailing. Orthopedics 31(8):748–750. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20080801-33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Gao K, Gao W, Huang J, Li H, Li F, Tao J et al (2013) Retrograde nailing versus locked plating of extra-articular distal femoral fractures: comparison of 36 cases. Med Princ Pract 22(2):161–166. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lujan TJ, Henderson CE, Madey SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Bottlang M (2010) Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation. J Orthop Trauma 24(3):156–162. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181be6720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Henderson CE, Lujan TJ, Kuhl LL, Bottlang M, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL (2011) 2010 mid-America Orthopaedic Association Physician in Training Award: healing complications are common after locked plating for distal femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(6):1757–1765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1870-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Gill S, Mittal A, Raj M, Singh P, Singh J, Kumar S (2017) Extra articular supracondylar femur fractures managed with locked distal femoral plate or supracondylar nailing: a comparative outcome study. J Clin Diagn Res 11(5):RC19–RC23. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/25062.9936

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenna L. Wilson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, J.L., Squires, M., McHugh, M. et al. The geriatric distal femur fracture: nail, plate or both?. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 1485–1493 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03337-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-022-03337-5

Keywords

Navigation