Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower extremities: a case series of 61 fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess outcomes for patients who sustained peri-implant fractures (PIFs).

Methods

Medical records of patients who sustained a PIF were reviewed for demographic, injury, outcome, and radiographic data. PIFs were classified using a reproducible system and stratified into cohorts based on fracture location. Clinical outcomes were evaluated for each cohort.

Results

Fifty-six patients with 61 PIFs with at least 6 months of follow-up were included. The mean age of the cohort was 60.4 ± 19.5 years. Twenty-two (36.1%) PIFs occurred in males, while 39 (63.9%) occurred in females. Fifty-two (85.2%) PIFs were sustained from a low-energy injury mechanism. PIFs were most often treated with plate/screw constructs (50.8%). Complications included: 6 (9.8%) nonunions, 5 of which were successfully treated to healing, 5 (8.2%) fracture related infections (FRI), and 1 (1.6%) hardware failure. Sixty (98.4%) PIFs ultimately demonstrated radiographic healing.

Conclusion

PIFs are usually treated surgically and have a relatively high incidence of complications, with nonunion in femoral PIFs being the greatest. Despite this, the rate of ultimate healing is quite high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Müller F, Galler M, Zellner M et al (2016) Peri-implant femoral fractures: the risk is more than three times higher within PFN compared with DHS. Injury 47(10):2189–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skála-Rosenbaum J, Džupa V, Bartoška R et al (2016) Distal locking in short hip nails: Cause or prevention of peri-implant fractures? Injury 47(4):887–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jennison T, Yarlagadda R (2018) Mortality in patients sustaining a periprosthetic fracture following a previous extracapsular hip fracture fixation. Injury 49(3):702–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.01.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Downey C, Kelly M, Quinlan JF (2019) Changing trends in the mortality rate at 1-year post hip fracture—A systematic review. World J Orthop 10(3):166–175. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i3.166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan LWM, Gardner AW, Wong MK et al (2018) Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures: classification, management and outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138(6):791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2905-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma CH, Chiu YC, Wu CH et al (2019) Plate-on-plate technique for treating peri-implant fractures of distal femoral locking plate: a retrospective study of 11 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139(9):1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03185-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2000) The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 15(1):59–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(00)91181-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rorabeck CH, Taylor JW (1999) Classification of periprosthetic fractures complicating total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 30(2):209–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70075-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdel MP, Cottino U, Mabry TM (2015) Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review. Int Orthop 39(10):2005–2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2979-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ebraheim NA, Kelley LH, Liu X, Thomas IS, Steiner RB, Liu J (2015) Periprosthetic distal femur fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 7(4):297–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12199

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruchholtz S, Tomás J, Gebhard F, Larsen MS (2013) Periprosthetic fractures around the knee-the best way of treatment. Eur Orthop Traumatol 4(2):93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12570-012-0130-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Videla-Cés M, Sales-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Navés R et al (2019) Proposal for the classification of peri-implant femoral fractures: retrospective cohort study. Injury 50(3):758–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Egol KA, Carlock KD, Kelly EA et al (2019) Previous implant fractures: a new descriptive classification system. J Orthop Trauma 33(9):423–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee JY, Soh T, Howe TS et al (2015) Bisphosphonate-associated peri-implant fractures: a new clinical entity? a series of 10 patients with 11 fractures. Acta Orthop 86(5):622–626. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1036339

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Dupaix JP, Opanova MI, Lee LSK et al (2019) Denosumab-associated peri-implant atypical femur fracture: a case report. Hawaii J Health Soc Welf 78(11 Suppl 2):47–51

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Park KC, Lim SJ, Song YS et al (2017) Factors affecting peri-implant fracture following locking plate for osteoporotic distal femur fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(8):1201–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2017.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zura R, Xiong Z, Einhorn T et al (2016) Epidemiology of fracture nonunion in 18 human bones. JAMA Surg 151(11):e162775. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lua J, Tan VH, Sivasubramanian H et al (2017) Complications of open tibial fracture management: risk factors and treatment. Malays Orthop J 11(1):18–22. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1703.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziran BH, Darowish M, Klatt BA et al (2004) Intramedullary nailing in open tibia fractures: a comparison of two techniques. Int Orthop 28(4):235–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-004-0567-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Karl JW, Olson PR, Rosenwasser MP (2015) The epidemiology of upper extremity fractures in the United States, 2009. J Orthop Trauma 29(8):e242–e244. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Clement ND, Yousif F, Duckworth AD et al (2012) Retention of forearm plates: risks and benefits in a paediatric population. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(1):134–137. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seigerman D, Lutsky K, Fletcher D et al (2019) Complications in the management of distal radius fractures: How do we avoid them? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12(2):204–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09544-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Calori GM, Colombo M, Bucci MS et al (2016) Complications in proximal humeral fractures. Injury 47(Suppl 4):S54–S58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.07.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Savvidou OD, Zampeli F, Koutsouradis P et al (2018) Complications of open reduction and internal fixation of distal humerus fractures. EFORT Open Rev 3(10):558–567. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.3.180009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth A. Egol.

Ethics declarations

Conflict interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This is an Institution Review Board approved study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perskin, C.R., Seetharam, A., Mullis, B.H. et al. Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower extremities: a case series of 61 fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32, 467–474 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03005-0

Keywords

Navigation