Abstract
Purpose
Peri-implant fractures (PIFs) are a concept in evolution for which different diagnostic criteria have been proposed and modified over time. They have not been extensively reported. PIFs are usually located in the distal part of previous osteosynthesis, where fragile bone is in contact with the rigid implant and are a significant complication after orthopaedic surgery, which requires careful management and treatment. This clinical study presents findings from a retrospective analysis of PIF’s, providing description of characteristics and outcomes. They provide information about the associated risk factors and description of the effectiveness of various treatments.
Materials and methods
A retrospective analysis was performed in a clinical study involving patients with PIFs. Data from medical records, radiographic images, and surgical reports were collected and analyzed. The study included patients with refracture of pre-existing osteosynthesis admitted to the hospital between 2015 and 2022. Demographic information, fracture characteristics, surgical interventions, and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Each case was followed for a minimum of one year after surgery, and a critical analysis was performed by senior surgeons. Furthermore, the PIFs were classified according to the type of initial implant and the position of the new fracture in relation to the original implant.
Results
Between 2015 and 2022, out of 18,813 fractures treated at a Level 1 traumatology hospital, a total of 85 patients with PIF’s were identified. Fracture characteristics varied, including location, fracture pattern, and implant type. Most of the PIFs, 71 cases (83.53%), occurred in the femur. Additionally, there were seven cases (8.24%) involving the humerus, four cases (4.71%) affecting the tibia/fibula, two cases (2.35%) in the radius, and one case (1.18%) involving the clavicle. Surgical management was the primary attitude in treatment. Various techniques were used, including the use of longer and stronger implants to achieve high-quality fixation, facilitating early rehabilitation and return to previous activities. Postoperative complications after surgery for PIFs were observed in 16 cases (18.8%).
Conclusions
Peri-implant fractures (PIF) are a distinct topic and a challenging condition with a high rate of postoperative complications. Complications after the second surgery may be severe and life threatening in older patients. A classification can be useful to make decisions about the optimal treatment in different anatomic areas and type of implant used for primary osteosynthesis. Currently there are no standardized protocols for management, therefore each case should be carefully discussed and planned before surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Müller F, Galler M, Zellner M, Bäuml C, Marzouk A, Füchtmeier B (2016) Peri-implant femoral fractures: The risk is more than three times higher within PFN compared with DHS. Injury 47:2189–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.04.042
Bartl R, Bartl C (2019) Falls and Fall Prevention. The Osteoporosis Manual. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 263–263
Chan LWM, Gardner AW, Wong MK, Chua K, Kwek EBK (2018) Non-prosthetic peri-implant fractures: classification, management and outcomes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:791–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2905-1
Della Rocca GJ, Leung KS, Pape H-C (2011) Periprosthetic Fractures: Epidemiology and Future Projections. J Orthop Trauma 25:S66–S70. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31821b8c28
Ruchholtz S, El-Zayat B, Kreslo D, Bücking B, Lewan U, Krüger A, Zettl R (2013) Less invasive polyaxial locking plate fixation in periprosthetic and peri-implant fractures of the femur—A prospective study of 41 patients. Injury 44:239–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.10.035
Skála-Rosenbaum J, Džupa V, Bartoška R, Douša P, Waldauf P, Krbec M (2016) Distal locking in short hip nails: Cause or prevention of peri-implant fractures? Injury 47:887–892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.02.009
Jennison T, Yarlagadda R (2018) Mortality in patients sustaining a periprosthetic fracture following a previous extracapsular hip fracture fixation. Injury 49:702–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INJURY.2018.01.001
Koval KJ, Frankel VH, Kummer F, Green (1994) Complications of fracture fixation device. Epps CH (ed) Complications in Orthopaedics Surgery, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, pp 131–154
Perskin CR, Seetharam A, Mullis BH, Marcantonio AJ, Garfi J, Ment AJ, Egol KA (2022) Peri-implant fractures of the upper and lower extremities: a case series of 61 fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32:467–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03005-0
Egol KA, Carlock KD, Kelly EA, Seetharam A, Mullis BH, Marcantonio AJ, Bramlett KJ, Nchako CM, Watson JT, Cannada LK, Konda SR (2019) Previous Implant Fractures: A New Descriptive Classification System. J Orthop Trauma 33:423–427. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001499
Toro G, Moretti A, Ambrosio D, Pezzella R, De Cicco A, Landi G, Tammaro N, Florio P, Cecere AB, Braile A, Medici A, Siano A, Di Maggio B, Calabrò G, Gagliardo N, Di Fino C, Bruno G, Pellegrino A, Negri G, Monaco V, Gison M, Toro A, Schiavone Panni A, Tarantino U, Iolascon G (2021) Fractures around Trochanteric Nails: The “vergilius Classification System.” Adv Orthop 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7532583
Videla-Cés M, Romero-Pijoan E, Sales-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Navés R, Pallarés N, Videla S (2021) A pilot agreement study of a new classification system for Peri-implant femoral fractures. Injury 52:1908–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.021
Velasco BT, Briceño J, Miller CP, Ye MY, Savage-Elliott I, Ellington JK, Kwon JY (2020) Peri-implant fractures around hindfoot fusion nails: A systematic literature review and classification system. Injury 51:1497–1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.04.019
Goldberg VM, Figgie MP (1990) The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(08)80082-4
Brand S, Ettinger M, Omar M, Hawi N, Krettek C, Petri M (2015) Concepts and Potential Future Developments for Treatment of Periprosthetic Proximal Femoral Fractures. Open Orthop J 9:405–411. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010405
Zak L, Tiefenboeck TM, Wozasek GE (2019) Traumatic periimplant fracture after nail arthrodesis of the knee in a limb reconstruction case. Trauma Case Rep 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100173
Stramazzo L, Cioffi A, Rovere G, Vigni GE, Galvano N, Sallì M, D'Arienzo A, Camarda L, D'Arienzo M (2021) A rare case of peri-implant distal radius fracture. Trauma Case Rep 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2020.100387
Kanji R, Nutt J, Stavropoulos S, Elmorsy A, Schneider HJ (2017) Distal radius re-fracture with bending of implant and neurovascular compromise. J Clin Orthop Trauma 8:S40–S42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.08.009
Barrera-Ochoa S, Nuñez JH, Mir X (2018) Peri-implant radial and ulnar shaft fractures after volar locking plate fixation of the distal radius. The Journal of hand surgery, European 43:209–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193417709988
Mounasamy V, Desai P (2013) Peri-implant fracture of the distal tibia after intra-medullary nailing of a tibial fracture: a report of two cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23 Suppl 2: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00590-012-1066-0
Vieira Lima G, Sousa Santos Filho N, Pimentel Furlan CA, Murachovsky J, La Banca V, Ikemoto RY (2021) Peri-implant distal clavicle fracture: Case report (overlaying plate fixation: Solution for peri-implant clavicle fractures). Int J Surg Case Rep 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106411
Hackl M, Wegmann K, Taibah S, Burkhart KJ, Scaal M, Müller LP (2015) Peri-implant failure in dual plating of the distal humerus - A biomechanical analysis with regard to screw and plate positioning. Injury 46:2142–2145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.08.015
Halonen LM, Stenroos A, Vasara H, Kosola J (2022) Peri-implant fracture: a rare complication after intramedullary fixation of trochanteric femoral fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142:3715–3720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04193-4
Bidolegui F, Pereira S, Munera MA, Garabano G, Pesciallo CA, Pires RE, Giordano V (2022) Peri-implant femoral fractures: Challenges, outcomes and proposal of a treatment algorithm. Chin J Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.10.001
Ma CH, Chiu YC, Wu CH, Tsai KL, Wen TK, Jou IM, Tu YK (2019) Plate-on-plate technique for treating peri-implant fractures of distal femoral locking plate: a retrospective study of 11 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03185-9
Butt MS, Krikler SJ, Nafie S, Ali MS (1995) Comparison of dynamic hip screw and gamma nail: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Injury 26:615–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)00126-T
Li X, Zhang L, Hou Z, Meng Z, Chen W, Wang P, Zhang Y (2015) Distal locked and unlocked nailing for perthrochanteric fractures—a prospective comparative randomized study. Int Orthop 39:1645–1652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2771-1
Radford P, Needoff M, Webb J (1993) A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75-B:789–793. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.75B5.8376441
de Lucas P, Seral B, Beano Á, Almodóvar JA, Domínguez I, Rodríguez J, Moro E (2005) Fractures of the Proximal Femur. The Gamma Nail versus Plate. Osteosynthesis Trauma Care 13:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-836371
Videla-Cés M, Sales-Pérez JM, Sánchez-Navés R, Romero-Pijoan E, Videla S (2019) Proposal for the classification of peri-implant femoral fractures: Retrospective cohort study. Injury 50:758–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.042
Lua J, Tan VH, Sivasubramanian H, Kwek E (2017) Complications of Open Tibial Fracture Management: Risk Factors and Treatment. Malaysian Orthop J 11:18–22. https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1703.006
Clement ND, Yousif F, Duckworth AD, Teoh KH, Porter DE (2012) Retention of forearm plates: risks and benefits in a paediatric population. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94:134–137. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27155
Yamamoto N, Tomita Y, Noda T, Inoue T, Mochizuki Y, Ozaki T (2021) Reduction quality and nail fixation ratio as bone-implant stability factors associated with reoperation for trochanteric fractures. Injury 52:1813–1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.04.048
Marmor M, Guenthner G, Rezaei A, Saam M, Matityahu A (2021) Reporting on quality of reduction and fixation of intertrochanteric fractures-A systematic review. Injury 52:324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.014
Yang S, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2014) Association between hypertension and fragility fracture: A longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 25:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2457-8
Kelly RR, Sidles SJ, LaRue AC (2020) Effects of Neurological Disorders on Bone Health. Front Psychol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.612366
Sharda N, Colón-Emeric C (2022) Falls and fracture risk assessment-The role of osteoporosis, obesity, and sarcopenia. In: Osteosarcopenia. Elsevier, pp 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820088-9.00004-4
Funding
The authors confirm that this manuscript was prepared without the benefit of any funds, grants, or additional forms of support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors played a role in conceiving and designing the study. The tasks of preparing materials, collecting data, and analyzing the results were undertaken by all. The initial draft of the manuscript was composed by MP, and every author provided comments on earlier drafts. The final manuscript was read and approved by all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was performed in accordance with the approval of the Ethics Committee of 'Sf. Spiridon's County Emergency Hospital, Iasi, Romania. Furthermore, each individual participant involved in the study provided their informed consent to participate in the study and the publication of the images.
Conflict of Interest
The authors affirm that they have no financial or non-financial conflicts of interest to report.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Poroh, M., Puha, B., Gheorghevici, T.S. et al. A Retrospective analysis of peri-implant fractures: insights from a large volume clinical Study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 47, 2859–2868 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05939-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05939-y