Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Difference in tapered wedge stem alignment between supine and lateral position in cementless total hip arthroplasty via modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Whether different body positions during surgery affect postoperative stem alignment in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify differences in tapered wedge stem alignment between supine and lateral positions in THA under the modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach.

Methods

We reviewed 242 consecutive, primary cementless THAs performed with ceramic-on-cross-linked polyethylene via the modified Watson-Jones approach in either supine or lateral positions between 2009 and 2015 (supine group: 113 cases; lateral group: 129 cases). No specific reasons to select supine or lateral positions for the surgery were given during the study period. Computed tomography was performed pre- and postoperatively to measure preoperative femoral anteversion and postoperative stem anteversion, respectively. Stem alignment in coronal and sagittal planes was also evaluated.

Results

Mean difference in stem anteversion and femoral anteversion was 8.6 ± 9.4 in the supine position and 13.0 ± 11.4 in the lateral position (p = 0.0013). Although no significant difference was seen between groups for stem alignment in the coronal plane, flexed implantation was more likely in the supine group (46/113, 40.7%) than in the lateral group (20/129, 15.5%). A significant correlation was found between femoral anteversion and stem anteversion in both the supine and lateral groups (r = 0.68, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.52, p < 0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion

Although stem anteversion was more strongly correlated with femoral anteversion in the supine position than in the lateral position, neutral position in the sagittal plane was more likely to be found with the lateral position than with the supine position. Surgeons can achieve ideal stem positioning by considering these results in the modified Watson-Jones approach in both the supine and lateral positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fessy MH, Putman S, Viste A, Isida R, Ramdane N, Ferreira A et al (2017) What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? a multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(5):663–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Takada R, Jinno T, Miyatake K, Hirao M, Yagishita K, Yoshii T et al (2019) Supine versus lateral position for accurate positioning of acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty using the modified Watson-Jones approach: a randomized single-blind controlled trial. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(5):915–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reina N, Putman S, Desmarchelier R, Sari Ali E, Chiron P, Ollivier M et al (2017) Can a target zone safer than Lewinnek’s safe zone be defined to prevent instability of total hip arthroplasties? case-control study of 56 dislocated THA and 93 matched controls. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 103(5):657–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugano N, Nishii T, Miki H, Yoshikawa H, Sato Y, Tamura S (2007) Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89(4):455–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beckmann J, Lüring C, Tingart M, Anders S, Grifka J, Köck FX (2009) Cup positioning in THA: current status and pitfalls. a systematic evaluation of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(7):863–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Taniguchi N, Jinno T, Koga D, Ochiai S, Okawa A, Haro H (2019) Comparative study of stem anteversion using a cementless tapered wedge stem in dysplastic hips between the posterolateral and anterolateral approaches. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105(7):1271–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taniguchi N, Jinno T, Koga D, Hagino T, Okawa A, Haro H (2016) Cementless hip stem anteversion in the dysplastic hip: a comparison of tapered wedge versus metaphyseal filling. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 32(5):1547–1552

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kawarai Y, Iida S, Nakamura J, Shinada Y, Suzuki C, Ohtori S (2017) Does the surgical approach influence the implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty? comparative study between the direct anterior and the anterolateral approaches in the supine position. Int Orthop 41(12):2487–2493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abe H, Sakai T, Takao M, Nishii T, Nakamura N, Sugano N (2015) Difference in stem alignment between the direct anterior approach and the posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 30(10):1761–1766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshitani J (2018) The effect of flexion alignment in total hip arthroplasty with a cementless tapered-wedge femoral stem. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28(8):1625–1632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Takada R, Jinno T, Miyatake K, Hirao M, Kimura A, Koga D et al (2018) Direct anterior versus anterolateral approach in one-stage supine total hip arthroplasty. focused on nerve injury: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Sci 23(5):783–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kishimura Y, Minoda Y, Mizokawa S, Sugama R, Ohta Y, Nakamura H (2019) Cup alignment in total hip arthroplasty using the muscle-sparing modified Watson-Jones approach-comparison between lateral and supine positions. Int Orthop 43(11):2477–2483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bertin KC, Röttinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Takada R, Jinno T, Miyatake K, Hirao M, Yoshii T, Okawa A (2020) Incidence of tensor fascia lata muscle atrophy after using the modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31(3):533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee YK, Kim JW, Kim TY, Ha YC, Koo KH (2018) Validity of the intra-operative measurement of stem anteversion and factors for the erroneous estimation in cementless total hip arthroplasty using postero-lateral approach. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104(3):341–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryohei Takada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takada, R., Jinno, T., Miyatake, K. et al. Difference in tapered wedge stem alignment between supine and lateral position in cementless total hip arthroplasty via modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32, 497–503 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03001-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-03001-4

Keywords

Navigation