Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Return to sports after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with concomitant patella-femoral osteoarthritis: multicenter retrospective cohort study with minimum 5-year follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of our study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and return to sports after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in middle-aged active patients with concomitant patella-femoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis at time of surgery.

Methods

One-hundred and fifty-one patients who underwent medial fixed-bearing cemented UKA, between 2012 and 2015, for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis of the knee, were retrospectively reviewed with a minimum 5-year follow-up. The mean age at surgery was 54.3 years (range 47 to 60 years). Radiological evaluation of patella-femoral joint (PFJ) osteoarthritis was performed according to Sperner classification to select a control-group (< grade III) and case-group (≥ grade III). The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and Knee Society score (KSS) was used to evaluate preoperative and final outcomes. Physical activity level before and after the surgery was assessed by the use of UCLA score.

Results

One-hundred and thirty-seven patients (89 males and 48 females) were available at last follow-up. The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (range 5.2 to 7.5 years). At last follow-up improvements of VAS and KSS scores revealed not significant correlation with PFJ osteoarthritis. The majority of patients (87.7%) returned to their sports activity after UKA surgery.

Conclusions

Improved quality of life and sports activity level resulted in middle-aged, active patients after UKAs. PFJ osteoarthritis showed no significant correlation with poorer outcomes at 5-year follow-up.

Level of Evidence

III, multicenter retrospective cohort study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanssen AD, Stuart MJ, Scott RD, Scuderi GR (2001) Surgical options for the middle-aged patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Instr Course Lect 50:499–511. https://doi.org/10.2016/00004623-200109000-00025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pennington DW, Swienchowski JJ, Lutes WB, Drake GN (2003) Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 85(A):1968–1973. https://doi.org/10.2016/00004623-200409001-00004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Price AJ, Dodd CA, Svard UG, Murray DW (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87(B):1488–1492. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X-87B11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emerson RH, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 90(A):118–122. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Panni AS, Vasso M, Cerciello S, Felici A (2012) Unicompartmental knee replacement provides early clinical and functional improvement stabilizing over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:579–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1613-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mathieu PA, Marcheix PS, Dalmay F, Mabit C (2012) Comparison of valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in medial femorotibial osteoarthritis. Comparative study of 57 HTOs versus 41 UKAs at more than 5-years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:553–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 71(A):145–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN (1993) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kang SN, Smith TO, Sprenger De Rover WB, Walton NP (2011) Pre-operative patellofemoral degenerative changes do not affect the outcome after medial Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a report from an independent centre. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93(4):476–478. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X-93B4.25562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Song EK, Park JK, Park CH (2016) No difference in anterior knee pain after media unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with or without patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(1):208–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3367-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Adams AJ, Kazarian GS, Lonner JH (2017) Preoperative patellofemoral chondromalacia is not a contraindication for fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(6):1786–1791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.01.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopper GP, Leach WJ (2008) Participation in sporting activities following knee replacement: total versus unicompartmental. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(10):973–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0596-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Felts E, Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN (2010) Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:861–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.05.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietschmann MF, Wohlleb L, Weber P, Schmidutz F, Ficklscherer A, Gülecyüz MF, Safi E, Niethammer TR, Jansson V, Müller PE (2013) Sports activities after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty Oxford III-What can we aspect? Int Orthop 37:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-012-1710-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Waldstein W, Kolbitsch P, Koller U, Boettner F, Windhager R (2017) Sport and physical activity following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:717–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4167-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.16.4.494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sperner G, Wanitschek P, Benedetto KP, Glotzer W (1990) Late results in patellar fracture. Actuelle Traumatol 20(1):24–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 248:13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dahm DL, Barnes SA, Harrington JR, Sayeed SA, Berry DJ (2008) Patient-reported activity level after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23(3):401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz JN (2011) The Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction Scale for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Arthritis. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/591253

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Deshmukh RV, Scott RD (2002) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view. Clin Orthop 404:108–112. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200211000-00019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kievit AJ, Kuijer PPFM, de Haan LJ, Koenraadt KLM, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Schafroth MU, van Geenen RCI (2019) Patients return to work sooner after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty than after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05667-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ho JC, Stitzlein RN, Charles J, Green TS, Froimson MI (2016) Return to sports activity following UKA and TKA. J Knee Surg 29:254–259. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1551835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim MS, Koh IJ, Sohn S, Jeong JH, In Y (2019) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy in pos-operative recovery and participation in recreational and sports activities. Int Orthop 43(11):2493–2501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4272-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krych AJ, Reardon P, Sousa P, Pareek A, Stuart M, Pagnano M (2017) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides higher activity and durability than valgus-producing proximal tibial osteotomy at 5 to 7 years. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 99(2):113–122. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Hollinghurst D, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2007) The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89(12):1597–1601. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.19259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher N, Agarwal M, Reuben SF, Johnson DS, Turner PG (2006) Sporting and physical activity following Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(4):296–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.03.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Heyse TH, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P (2012) Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee 19(5):585–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Walker T, Hetto P, Bruckner T, Gotterbarm T, Merle C, Panzram B, Innmann MM, Moradi B (2019) Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ensures excellent functional outcome and high survivorship in the long term. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1658–1664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-05299-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Crawford DA, Adams JB, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR (2019) Activity level does not affect survivorship of unicondylar knee arthroplasty at 5-Year. J Arthroplasty 34(7):1364–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jacquet C, Firat G, Schmidt A, Anirudda P, Parratte S, Argenson JN, Ollivier M (2020) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy allows better outcomes than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients expecting to return to impact sports. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(12):3849–3857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-05857-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Maria Lanzetti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. All the authors declare that have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carlo, M., Eduardo, C., Attilio, B. et al. Return to sports after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with concomitant patella-femoral osteoarthritis: multicenter retrospective cohort study with minimum 5-year follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32, 55–61 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02925-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-021-02925-1

Keywords

Navigation