Abstract
Purpose
Unicompartmental knee replacement preserves uninvolved osteocartilaginous and soft tissue structures, thereby allowing a more physiological and early clinical and functional recovery. The aim of this study was to report the results of ZUK unicompartmental fixed metal-back prosthesis and how these results change over time.
Methods
Between 2005 and 2007, 80 ZUK prostheses were implanted in 80 patients for unicompartmental osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis. Patients were clinically assessed using the International Knee Society scores. Postoperative values of mechanical axis were calculated 12 months after surgery and compared to the preoperative ones.
Results
The mean International Knee Society knee and function scores improved, respectively, from 46 ± 9 and 54 ± 8 preoperatively to 82 ± 5 and 94 ± 3 at the last follow-up (P < 0.001). Average flexion increased from 110° ± 9° to 127° ± 8° (P < 0.01). Patients with unicompartmental knee reached good clinical outcome very early and remained at the same level. Age did not significantly influence clinical and functional scores.
Conclusions
High success rates of the modern unicompartmental knee implants depend on the materials and design evolution, improvement of the surgical technique, and the strong restriction of indications.
Level of evidence
Prospective non-randomized case-series study, Level IV.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aly T, Mousa W, El-Sallakh S (2010) The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: midterm follow-up. Curr Orthop Pract 21:187–189
Amin AK, Patton JT, Cook RE et al (2006) Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty? Results from a matched study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 451:101–106
Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2235–2239
Argenson JN, Parratte S (2006) The unicompartmental knee. Design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:137–142
Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S et al (2007) Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1602–1607
Bonutti PM, Dethmers DA (2008) Contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Fixed vs mobile bearing. J Arthroplasty 23(7 Suppl 1):24–27
Bruni D, Iacono F, Russo A et al (2010) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:710–717
Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Cerveri P, De Momi E (2009) Bi-unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty: a matched paired study with early clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:1157–1163
Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Montironi F et al (2008) Tissue sparing surgery in knee reconstruction: unicompartmental (UKA), patellofemoral (PFA), UKA + PFA, bi-unicompartmental (Bi-UKA) arthroplasties. J Orthop Traumatol 9:171–177
Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Oxford prosthesis in patients with medial compartment arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:118–122
Engh GA, Ammeen D (2004) Is an intact anterior cruciate ligament needed in order to have a well-functioning unicondylar knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:170–173
Felts E, Parratte S, Pauly V et al (2010) Function and quality of life following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or younger. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96:861–867
Gulati A, Pandit H, Jenkins C et al (2009) The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:469–474
Keene G, Simpson D, Kalairajah Y (2006) Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:44–48
Koeck FX, Luring C, Handel M et al (2011) Prospective single-arm, multi-center trial of a patient-specific interpositional knee implant: early clinical results. Open Orthop J 9(5):37–43
Newman J, Pydisetty RV, Ackroyd C (2009) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement. The 15-year results of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:52–57
Outerbridge RE (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:752–757
Parratte S, Argenson JN, Dumas J et al (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for avascular osteonecrosi. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:37–42
Parratte S, Argenson JN, Pearce O et al (2009) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement in the under-50 s. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:351–356
Price AJ, Dodd CAF, Svard UGC, Murray DW (2005) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1488–1492
Scott RD (2003) Unicondylar arthroplasty: redefinig itself. Orthopedics 26:951–952
Springer BD, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (2006) Conversion of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:214–220
Tria AJ (2002) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Tech Knee Surg 1:60–71
Wood JE (2006) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Curr Opin Orthop 17:139–144
Zhang Q, Guo W, Zhang Q et al (2010) Comparison of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis. Curr Orthop Pract 21:497–503
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panni, A.S., Vasso, M., Cerciello, S. et al. Unicompartmental knee replacement provides early clinical and functional improvement stabilizing over time. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 579–585 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1613-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1613-y