Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of three different fixation methods on femoral tunnel widening in ACL reconstructed patients evaluated using computed tomography (CT) scan

  • Original Article • KNEE - ARTHROPLASTY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate femoral tunnel widening in young and active patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring graft with fixation on tibial side performed with a Bioscrew while femoral fixation performed with either a Tight rope Reverse Threaded (RT) or Transfix or another Bioscrew using CT scan.

Material and method

A total of 100 consecutive patients underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction from January 2008 to March 2012. Eighty-six out of these were available with us till the final follow-up. Only 20–40-year-old males with unilateral ACL rupture less than a year old, diagnosed clinically and confirmed radiologically by magnetic resonance imaging, were selected for the study. All patients were evaluated clinically as well as radiologically at follow-up of 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and every 6 months thereafter. CT scans were performed at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. The data acquired at the second week were considered as baseline data and were used for comparison with the data acquired at 6 months and 1 year.

Results

The dilatation at the aperture was significantly more in the Tight rope RT group as compared to the other two groups (p value 0.019 and 0.021 for sagittal and coronal images, respectively).

Conclusion

There is no significant difference between the three different fixation modes in context of tunnel enlargement except with Tight rope RT device which leads to statistically significant dilatation at aperture. Future studies with longer follow-up are required to evaluate its clinical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giron F, Losco M, Giannini L, Buzzi R (2013) Femoral tunnel in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Joints 1(3):126–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoher J, Moller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:231–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson TC, Kantaras A, Atay A, Johnson DL (2004) Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Am J Sports Med 32:543–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fahey M, Indelicato PA (1994) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament replacement. Am J Sports Med 22:410–414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Merchant MF, Willimon SC, Vinson E, Pietrobon R, Garrett WE, Higgins LD (2010) Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1059–1064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nebelung W, Becker R, Merkel M, Ropke M (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon using Endobutton fixation on the femoral side. Arthroscopy 14:810–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jackson DW, Windler GE, Simon TM (1990) Intra articular reaction associated with the use of freeze dried, ethylene oxide sterilized bone patellar tendon- bone allografts in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 18(1):1–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD (1997) Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5(4):234–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fukubayashi T, Ikeda K (2000) Follow-up study of Gore-Tex artificial ligament: special emphasis of tunnel osteolysis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 10(4):267–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Iorio Raffaele, Vadalà Antonio, Argento Giuseppe, Di Sanzo Vincenzo, Ferretti Andrea (2007) Bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons: a CT study. Int Orthop (SICOT) 31:49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Simonian PT, Erickson MS, Larson RV, O’Kane JW (2000) Tunnel expansion after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 1-incision EndoButton femoral fixation. Arthroscopy 16:707–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Baumfeld JA, Diduch DR, Rubino LJ et al (2008) Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1108–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J, Karjalainen PT, Aronen HJ, Tallroth K (1999) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and EndoButton fixation technique: a clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:290–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Holden JP, Grood ES, Butler DL et al (1988) Biomechanics of fascia lata ligament replacement: early postoperative changes in the goat. J Orthop Res 6:639–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fauno P, Kaalund S (2005) Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 21:1337–1341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Clatworthy MG, Annear P, Bulow JU, Bartlett RJ (1999) Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:138–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:86–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dyer CR, Elrod BF (1995) Tibial and femoral bone tunnel enlargement following allograft replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy 11:353–354

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fink C, Zapp M, Benedetto KP, Hackl W, Hoser C, Rieger M (2001) Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 17:138–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Peyrache MD, Djian P, Christel P, Wisvoct J (1996) Tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4:2–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Buelow JU, Seibolt R, Ellermann A (2002) A prospective evaluation of tunnel enlargement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings: extracortical versus anatomical fixation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10:80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giron F, Aglietti P, Cuomo P, Mondanelli N, Ciardullo A (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis tendon directly fixed to cortical bone: 5 year results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. To JT, Howell SM, Hull ML (1999) Contributions of femoral fixation methods to the stiffness of anterior cruciate ligament replacement at implantation. Arthroscopy 15:379–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sabat D, Kundu K, Arora S, Kumar V (2011) Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography—based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg 27(6):776–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weiler A, Richtr CM, Schmidmaier G, Kandziora F, Sudkamp NP (2001) The endopearl device increases fixation strength and eliminates construct slippage of hamstring tendon grafts with interference screw fixation. Arthroscopy 17:353–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheung Philip (2010) Femoral tunnel widening was greater in femoral cross pin fixation, compared to bioabsorbable screw fixation. J Orthop Surg 18(2):198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Klein JP, Lintner DM, Downs D, Vavrenka K (2003) The incidence and significance of femoral tunnel widening after quadrupled hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using femoral cross pin fixation. Arthroscopy 19:470–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divyanshu Goyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lamoria, R., Sharma, A., Goyal, D. et al. Influence of three different fixation methods on femoral tunnel widening in ACL reconstructed patients evaluated using computed tomography (CT) scan. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 30, 411–417 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02585-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02585-2

Keywords

Navigation