Skip to main content
Log in

Bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons: a CT study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate prospectively the increase in the size of the tibial and femoral bone tunnel following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadrupled-hamstring autograft. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with quadrupled-hamstring autograft. Preoperative clinical evaluation was performed using the Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and International Knee Documentation Committee forms and a KT-1000 arthrometer (side to side). Computed tomography (CT) of the femoral and tibial tunnel was performed on the day after operation in all cases and at mean follow-up of 10 months (range 9–11 months).Results: All of the clinical evaluation scales performed showed an overall improvement. The postoperative anterior laxity difference was <3 mm in 16 patients (70%) and 3–5 mm in seven patients (30%). The mean average femoral tunnel diameter increased significantly (3%) from 9.04±0.05 mm postoperatively to 9.3±0.8 mm at 10 months; tibial tunnel increased significantly (11%) from 9.03±0.04 mm to 10±0.8 mm. There were no statistically significant differences between tunnel enlargement, clinical results, and arthrometer evaluation. Conclusions: The rate of tunnel widening observed in this study seems to be lower than that reported in previous studies that used different techniques. We conclude that an anatomical surgical technique and a less aggressive rehabilitation process influenced the amount of tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction with doubled hamstrings.

Résumé

But: Évaluer prospectivement l’augmentation de taille des tunnels osseux après reconstruction arthroscopique du LCA par les ischio-jambiers. Méthode: 25 patients avaient été opérés. L’évaluation pré-opératoire avait été faite avec le score de Lysholm, les critères IKDC et de niveau d’activité Tegner et la mesure bilatérale avec l’arthromètre KT-1000. Un scanner des tunnels était réalisé dans tous les cas le jour suivant la chirurgie et à un suivi moyen de 10 mois (9–11). Résultats: Tous les scores cliniques montraint une amélioration globale. La différence de laxité antérieure après l’intervention était de moins de 3mm pour 16 patients (70%) et de 3 à 5 mm pour 7 (30%). Le diamètre moyen du tunnel fémoral augmentait significativement (3%) de 9,04±0,05 mm en post-opératoire à 9,3±0,8 mm à 10 mois ; le tunnel tibial augmentait (11%) de 9,03±0,004 à 10±0,8 mm. Il n’y avait pas de corrélation significative entre l’élargissement des tunnels, les résultats cliniques et les mesures à l’arthromètre. Conclusions: La proportion d’élargissement des tunnels observée dans cette étude semble plus faible rapportées avec des techniques différentes. Nous pensons qu’une technique très anatomique et une rééducation peu agressive influence l’élargissement des tunnels dans la reconstruction du LCA par les ischio-jambiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aglietti P, Zaccherotti G, Simeone AJ, Buzzi R (1998) Anatomic versus nonanatomic tibial fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6 (Suppl 1):S43–S48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown CH, Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Morelli F et al (2001) Biomechanics of the swing-bridge technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Eur J Sports Traum Rel Res 23 (2):69–73

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clatworthy MG, Annear P, Bulow JU et al (1999) Tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective evaluation of hamstring and patella tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(3):138–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clatworthy MG, Bartelett J, Howell S et al (1999) The effect of graft fixation techniques on tunnel widening in hamstring ACL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 15(Suppl):5

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fahey M, Indelicato PA (1994) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament replacement. Am J Sports Med 22(3):410–414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Labianca L et al (2005) Evolgate fixation of doubled flexor graft in ACL reconstruction: biomechanical evaluation with cyclic loading. Am J Sports Med 33(4):574–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferretti A, Conteduca F, Morelli F et al (2003) The Evolgate, a method to improve the pull-out strength of interference screws in tibial fixation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with doubled gracilis and semitendinosus tendons. Arthroscopy 19(9):936–940

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fink C, Zapp M, Benedetto KP et al (2001) Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 17(2):138–143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fukubayashi T, Ikeda K (2000) Follow-up study of Gore-Tex artificial ligament: special emphasis of tunnel osteolysis. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 10(4):267–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fules PJ, Madhav RT, Goddard RK et al (2003) Evaluation of tibial bone tunnel enlargement using MRI scan cross-sectional area measurement after autologous hamstring tendon ACL. Knee 10 (1):87–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hantes ME, Mastrokalos DS, Yu J, Paessler HH (2004) The effect of early motion on tibial tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament replacement using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 20 (6):572–580

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris NL, Indelicato PA, Bloomberg MS et al (2002) Radiographic and histologic analysis of the tibial tunnel after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in goats. Am J Sports Med 30(3):368–373

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hersekli MA, Akpinar S, Ozalay M et al (2004) Tunnel enlargement after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring autografts. Adv Ther 21(2):123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogervorst T, van der Hart CP, Pels Rijcken TH, Taconis WK (2000) Abnormal bone scans of the tibial tunnel 2 years after patella ligament anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: correlation with tunnel enlargement and tibial graft length. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(6):322–338

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoher J, Moller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel and enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6(4):231–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson DW, Windler GE, Simon TM (1990) Intraarticular reaction associated with the use of freeze-fried, ethylene-oxide sterilized bone patella tendon—bone allografts in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 18(1):1–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jansson KA, Harilainen A, Sandelin J et al (1999) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the hamstring autograft and endobutton fixation technique: a clinical, radiographic and magnetic resonance imaging study with 2 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7(5):290–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jo H, Jun DS, Lee DY et al (2004) Tibial tunnel area changes following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with autogenous patellar tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12 (4):311–316

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. L’Insalata JC, Klatt B, Fu FH, Harner CD (1997) Tunnel expansion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5(4):234–238

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Linn RM, Fischer DA, Smith JP et al (1993) Achilles tendon allograft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 21 (6):825–831

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murty AN, el Zebdeh MY, Ireland J (2001) Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate reconstruction: does post-operative immobilisation make a difference? Knee 8 (1):39–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nebelung W, Becker R, Merkel M et al (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with semitendinous tendon using Endobutton fixation on the femoral side. Arthroscopy 14(8):810–815

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Otsuka H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Sasaki K et al (2003) Comparison of three techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: differences in anterior tibial translation and tunnel enlargement with each technique. Am J Sports Med 31(2):282–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Peyrache MD, Dijan P, Christel P, Witvoet J (1996) Tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by autogenous bone-patellar-tendon bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 4(1):2–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Romano VM, Graf BK, Keene JS et al (1993) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the effect of tibial tunnel placement on range of motion. Am J Sports Med 21(3):415–418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakai H, Yajima H, Hiraoka H, Fukuda A et al (2004) The influence of tibial fixation on tunnel enlargement after hamstring tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12 (5):364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schulte K, Majewski M, Irrgang JJ et al (1995) Radiographic tunnel changes following arthroscopical reconstruction: autograft versus allograft. Arthroscopy 11:372–373

    Google Scholar 

  28. Segawa H, Omori G, Tomita S, Koga Y (2001)Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(4):206–210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sgaglione NA, Douglas JA (2004) Allograft bone augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 20 (Suppl 2):171–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Simonian PT, Erickson MS, Larson RV et al (2000) Tunnel expansion after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with 1-incision endobutton femoral fixation. Arthroscopy 16(7):707–714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(2):86–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yu JK, Paessler HH (2005) Relationship between tunnel widening and different rehabilitation procedure after cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendons. Chin Med J (Engl) 118(4):320–326

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zijl JA, Kleipool AE, Willems WJ (2000) Comparison of tibial tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon autograft or allograft. Am J Sports Med 28 (4):547–551

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Ferretti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iorio, R., Vadalà, A., Argento, G. et al. Bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons: a CT study. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 49–55 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0118-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0118-7

Keywords

Navigation