Abstract
Background
A worldwide consensus for timing and criteria for return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is lacking. The aim of the study was to survey among the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) members in order to evaluate their approaches to the return to sport after ACL reconstruction regarding timing and criteria.
Methods
A web survey among the SIGASCOT members was performed, including 14 questions regarding technical and graft preferences, timing for return to training and competitive activity for contact and non-contact sports and criteria to allow return to sport.
Results
Totally, 123 members completed the questionnaire. Return to training sports was allowed within 6 month by 87 % for non-contact sports and by 53 % for contact sports. Return to competitive activity was allowed within 6 months by 48 % for non-contact sports and by 13 % for contact sports. Full ROM (77 %), Lachman test (65 %) and Pivot-Shift test (65 %) were the most used criteria to allow return to sport. The 90 % used at least one clinical score.
Conclusion
The SIGASCOT members showed various approaches in the return to sport after ACL reconstruction, with differences between return to training or competitive activity, and between contact and non-contact sports. Six months was generally considered adequate by most of the members for the most demanding activities. The most used criteria to allow return to sport were manual testing. A clear definition of sport activities and more objective criteria for the return to sport are needed.
Level of evidence
Level V, expert opinion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zaffagnini S, Grassi A, Serra M, Marcacci M (2015) Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence. Joints 3:25–30
Grassi A, Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Neri MP, Della Villa S, Marcacci M (2015) After revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, who returns to sport? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 49:1295–1304
Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2014) Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med 48:1543–1552
Shelbourne KD, Nitz P (1990) Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 18:292–299
Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR (2011) Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:1697–1705
Hildebrandt C, Müller L, Zisch B, Huber R, Fink C, Raschner C (2015) Functional assessments for decision-making regarding return to sports following ACL reconstruction. Part I: development of a new test battery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1273–1281
Herbst E, Hoser C, Hildebrandt C, Raschner C, Hepperger C, Pointner H, Fink C (2015) Functional assessments for decision-making regarding return to sports following ACL reconstruction. Part II: clinical application of a new test battery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1283–1291
Ma Y, Murawski CD, Rahnemai-Azar AA, Maldjian C, Lynch AD, Fu FH (2015) Graft maturity of the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament 6 months postoperatively: a magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of quadriceps tendon with bone block and hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:661–668
Petersen W, Zantop T (2013) Return to play following ACL reconstruction: survey among experienced arthroscopic surgeons (AGA instructors). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:969–977
Feller JA, Cooper R, Webster KE (2002) Current Australian trends in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 9:121–126
Farber J, Harris JD, Kolstad K, McCulloch PC (2014) Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries by Major League Soccer Team Physicians. Orthop J Sports Med 24:2325967114559892. doi:10.1177/2325967114559892
Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Fillingham YA, Frank RM, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr, Cole BJ, Verma NN (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy 30:731–738
Arundale A, Silvers H, Logerstedt D, Rojas J, Snyder-Mackler L (2015) An interval kicking progression for return to soccer following lower extremity injury. Int J Sports Phys Ther 10:114–127
Astur DC, Batista RF, Gustavo A, Cohen M (2013) Trends in treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee in the public and private healthcare systems of Brazil. Sao Paulo Med J 131:257–263
Coşkunsu D, Bayrakcı Tunay V, Akgün I (2010) Current trends in reconstruction surgery and rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament in Turkey. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44:458–463
McRae SM, Chahal J, Leiter JR, Marx RG, Macdonald PB (2011) Survey study of members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association on the natural history and treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Clin J Sport Med 21:249–258
Mahnik A, Mahnik S, Dimnjakovic D, Curic S, Smoljanovic T, Bojanic I (2013) Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Croatia. World J Orthop 4:309–315
Zaffagnini S, Grassi A, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Tsapralis K, Ricci M, Bragonzoni L, Della Villa S, Marcacci M (2014) Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in professional soccer players. Knee 21:731–735
Janssen RP, Scheffler SU (2014) Intra-articular remodelling of hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2102–2108
Weiler A, Peine R, Pashmineh-Azar A, Abel C, Südkamp NP, Hoffmann RF (2002) Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part I: biomechanical results after biodegradable interference fit fixation in a model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in sheep. Arthroscopy 18:113–123
Duquin TR, Wind WM, Fineberg MS, Smolinski RJ, Buyea CM (2009) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22:7–12
Di Stasi SL, Logerstedt D, Gardinier ES, Snyder-Mackler L (2013) Gait patterns differ between ACL-reconstructed athletes who pass return-to-sport criteria and those who fail. Am J Sports Med 41:1310–1318
Gardinier ES, Di Stasi S, Manal K, Buchanan TS, Snyder-Mackler L (2014) Knee contact force asymmetries in patients who failed return-to-sport readiness criteria 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:2917–2925
Biercevicz AM, Akelman MR, Fadale PD, Hulstyn MJ, Shalvoy RM, Badger GJ, Tung GA, Oksendahl HL, Fleming BC (2015) MRI volume and signal intensity of ACL graft predict clinical, functional, and patient-oriented outcome measures after ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 43:693–699
Lynch AD, Logerstedt DS, Grindem H, Eitzen I, Hicks GE, Axe MJ, Engebretsen L, Risberg MA, Snyder-Mackler L (2015) Consensus criteria for defining ‘successful outcome’ after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med 49:335–342
Moksnes H, Engebretsen L, Seil R (2015) The ESSKA paediatric anterior cruciate ligament monitoring initiative. DOI, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-015-3746-x
Friederich N, Verdonk R (2008) The use of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery for total knee replacement in daily practice: a survey among ESSKA/SGO-SSO members. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:536–543
Bradley JP, Klimkiewicz JJ, Rytel MJ, Powell JW (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the National Football League: epidemiology and current treatment trends among team physicians. Arthroscopy 18:502–509
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 1.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grassi, A., Vascellari, A., Combi, A. et al. Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: a survey between the Italian Society of Knee, Arthroscopy, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies (SIGASCOT) members. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26, 509–516 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1756-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1756-0