Abstract
Objective
This is a prospective case series study, which was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of posterior percutaneous plating of the humerus.
Materials and methods
From the year 2010 to 2011, 37 patients with middle and distal third humeral fractures who met the inclusion criteria were surgically treated by minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis through posterior approach. Their age ranged from 19 to 43 with an average of 27.8 years. Type of fractures varied from B to C, and all of them were traumatic.
Results
Patients were followed up for a period varied from 12 to 24 months with an average of 18. There were no cases of intraoperative complications, infection or metal failure. Union was achieved in all of them within 16–21 weeks with an average of 18. Iatrogenic postoperative temporary neuropraxia of the radial nerve palsy was observed in two patients. All patients achieved normal range of shoulder and elbow motion within 3 months after surgery. The average Quick DASH score at 12-month follow-up was 30. According to patient’s satisfaction, all of them returned to the usual pre-injury activity level within 6 months.
Conclusions
This study suggests that the principles of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis can be applied safely through posterior approach of the humerus to treat middle and distal third humeral fractures. This approach has the advantage of preserving the triceps anatomy and function facilitating rapid postoperative rehabilitation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Camden P, Nade S (1992) Fracture bracing of the humerus. Injury 23:245–248
Hunter SG (1982) The closed treatment of fractures of the humeral shaft. Clin Orthop 164:192–198
Koch PP, Gross DF, Gerber C (2002) The results of functional (Sarmiento) bracing of humeral shaft fractures. J Shoulder Elbow 11(2):143–150
Ruedi T, Moshfegh A, Pfeiffer KM, Allgower M (1974) Fresh fractures of the shaft of the humerus. Conservative or operative treatment? Reconstr Surg Traumatol 14:65–74
Sarmiento A, Kinman PB, Galvin EG, Schmitt RH, Phillips JG (1977) Functional bracing of fractures of the shaft of the humerus. JBJS (AM) 59(5):596–601
Chao TC, Chou WY, Chung JC, Hsu CJ (2005) Humeral shaft fractures treated by dynamic compression plates, Ender nails and interlocking nails. Int Orthop 29(2):88–91
Crates J, Whittle AP (1998) Antegrade interlocking nailing of acute humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:40–50
Lin J, Hou SM (1999) Antegrade locked nailing for humeral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:201–210
Ajmal M, O’Sullivan M, McCabe J, Curtin W (2001) Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Injury 32(9):692–694
Petsatodes G, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos P, Christoforides J, Gigis J, Pournaras J (2004) Antegrade interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Sci 9(3):247–252
Collinge C, Sanders R, DiPasquale T (2000) Treatment of complex tibial periarticular fractures using percutaneous techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 375:69–77
Leunig M, Hertel R, Siebenrock KA, Ballmer FT, Mast JW, Ganz R (2000) The evolution of indirect reduction techniques for the treatment of fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 375:7–14
Apivathakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S (2005) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture. Is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury 36:530–538
Gardner MJ, Griffith MH, Lorich DG (2005) Helical plating of the proximal humerus. Injury 36:1197–1200
Helfet DL, Shonnard PY, Levine D, Borrelli J Jr (1997) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia. Injury 28(Suppl 1):42–48
Apivatthakakul T, Arpornchayanon O, Bavornratanavech S (2005) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of the humeral shaft fracture: is it possible? A cadaveric study and preliminary report. Injury 36(Issue 4):530–538
Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Miclau T, Tscherne H (1997) Minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO)using the DCS in the proximal and distal femoral fractures. Injury 28(Suppl 1):A20–A30
Livani B, Belangero WD (2003) Bridging plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures. J Trauma 54:943–949
Jiang R, Luo CF, Zeng BF et al (2007) Minimally invasive plating for complex humeral shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(7):531–555
Zhiquan A, Bingfang Z, Yeming W, Chi Z, Peiyan H (2007) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) of middle and distal third humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 21(9):628–633
Foster RJ, Dixon GL Jr, Bach AW, Appleyard RW, Green TM (1985) Internal fixation of fractures and non-unions of the humeral shaft. Indications and results in a multi-center study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(6):857–864
McKee MD, Seiler J, Jupiter JB (1995) The application of the limited contact dynamic compression plate in the upper extremity: an analysis of 114 cases. Injury 26:661
Vander Griend RA, Tomasin J, Ward EF (1986) Open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures: results using AO plating techniques. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 68:430
Bell MJ, Beauchamp CG, Kellam JK, Mc Martry RY (1985) The results of plating humeral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries: the Sunnybrook experience. J Bone Joint Surg 67B(2):293–296
Tingstad EM, Wolinsky PR, Shyr Y, Johnson KD (2000) Effect of immediate weight bearing on plated fractures of the humeral shaft. J Trauma 49(2):278–280
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balam, K.M., Zahrany, A.S. Posterior percutaneous plating of the humerus. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24, 763–768 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1355-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1355-2