Skip to main content
Log in

Defining threshold for sagittal correction in lumbar fractures

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical indications for thoraco-lumbar fractures are driven both by neurological status, fractures instability and kyphotic deformity. Regarding kyphotic deformity, an angulation superior to 20° is considered by many surgeons as a surgical indication to reduce the disability induced by post-traumatic kyphosis. However, there is a lack of data reporting the ideal or theoretical lordosis that one must have in a particular lumbar segment on CT-scan. The main goal of this study was to determine the mean value for segmental lumbar lordosis according to pelvic incidence (PI) on a cohort of normal subjects.

Methods

The consecutive CT-scan of 171 normal adult subjects were retrospectively analyzed. The PI and the segmental lordosis (L4S1, L3L5, L2L4, L3L1, L2T12 and T11-L1) were measured on all CT-scan. The mean values were calculated for the global cohort and a sub-group analysis according to IP ranges (< 45°, 45 < IP < 60° and > 60°) was performed.

Results

The mean angular values for the whole cohort were IP: 54, 9°; L4S1: − 38, 1°; L3L5: − 30, 6°; L2L4: − 14, 1°; L1L3: − 4, 9°; T12L2: + 1, 9° and T11L1: + 5, 4°. The segmental values vary significatively with PI ranges, as for L3L5: − 26, 8° (PI < 45°); − 30° (45 < PI < 60°) and − 35, 1° (PI > 60°).

Conclusion

These results provide a referential of theoretical values of segmental lordosis according to PI. This abacus may help spinal surgeon in their decision-making process regarding lumbar fractures, to determine the amount of sagittal correction needed, according to the PI range, to be adapted to the sagittal morphology of the patient.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The anonymous data are available from the corresponding authors at the editor request.

References

  1. Oner C, Rajasekaran S, Chapman JR et al (2017) Spine trauma-what are the current controversies? J Orthop Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Li S, Li Z, Hua W et al (2017) Clinical outcome and surgical strategies for late post-traumatic kyphosis after failed thoracolumbar fracture operation: case report and literature review. Medicine (United States). https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008770

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu W, Wang B, Run H et al (2016) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy and disc resection with cage placement in post-traumatic thoracolumbar kyphosis, a retrospective study. J Orthop Surg Res 11:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-016-0447-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hashimura T, Onishi E, Ota S et al (2023) Correction loss following short-segment posterior fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures related to endplate and intervertebral disc destruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24:174. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06288-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lainé G, Mezjan I, Masson D et al (2023) Risk factors for kyphosis recurrence after implant removal in percutaneous osteosynthesis for post-traumatic thoracolumbar fracture. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07895-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guigui P, Levassor N, Rillardon L et al (2003) Physiological value of pelvic and spinal parameters of sagital balance: analysis of 250 healthy volunteers. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 89(6):496–506

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scheer JK, Lafage R, Schwab FJ et al (2018) Under correction of sagittal deformities based on age-adjusted alignment thresholds leads to worse health-related quality of life whereas over correction provides no additional benefit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer M, Ortmaier R, Koller H et al (2017) Impact of sagittal balance on clinical outcomes in surgically treated T12 and L1 burst fractures: analysis of long-term outcomes after posterior-only and combined posteroanterior treatment. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1568258

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y et al (2019) Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 28:1889–1905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallager DW, Hansen LV, Dragsted CR et al (2016) A comprehensive analysis of the SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification and confounding variables. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinhold M, Knop C, Beisse R et al (2010) Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, internet-based multicenter study of the spine study group of the German association of trauma surgery. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1451-5

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Laouissat F, Sebaaly A, Gehrchen M, Roussouly P (2018) Classification of normal sagittal spine alignment: refounding the Roussouly classification. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5111-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Celestre PC, Dimar JR, Glassman SD (2018) Spinopelvic parameters: lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope: what does a spine surgeon need to know to plan a lumbar deformity correction? Neurosurg Clin N Am. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hyun SJ, Han S, Kim YB et al (2019) Predictive formula of ideal lumbar lordosis and lower lumbar lordosis determined by individual pelvic incidence in asymptomatic elderly population. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05955-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Baker JF, Don AS, Robertson PA (2020) Pelvic incidence: computed tomography study evaluating correlation with sagittal sacropelvic parameters. Clin Anat. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee CM, Liu RW (2022) Comparison of pelvic incidence measurement using lateral x-ray, standard ct versus ct with 3d reconstruction. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07024-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pesenti S, Lafage R, Stein D et al (2018) The amount of proximal lumbar lordosis is related to pelvic incidence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000380

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Roscop C, Mathio P, Gajny L et al (2021) Analysis of apex and transitional vertebra of the spine according to pelvic incidence using orientation and position parameters. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06908-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ulmar B, Brunner A, Gühring M et al (2010) Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the vertebral, local and segmental kyphosis in 120 traumatic lumbar and thoracic burst fractures: evaluation in lateral X-rays and sagittal computed tomographies. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1231-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Munting E (2010) Surgical treatment of post-traumatic kyphosis in the thoracolumbar spine: indications and technical aspects. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1117-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lafage R, Schwab F, Challier V et al (2016) Defining spino-pelvic alignment thresholds should operative goals in adult spinal deformity surgery account for age? Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001171

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Alzakri A, Boissière L, Cawley DT et al (2018) L5 pedicle subtraction osteotomy: indication, surgical technique and specificities. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5403-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barut N, Marie-Hardy L, Bonaccorsi R et al (2019) Immediate and late discal lesions on MRI in Magerl A thoracolumbar fracture: analysis of 76 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu X, Zhu Z, Pan J et al (2022) Traumatic vertebra and endplate fractures promote adjacent disc degeneration: evidence from a clinical MR follow-up study. Skeletal Radiol 51:1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03846-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chevillotte T, Coudert P, Cawley D et al (2018) Influence of posture on relationships between pelvic parameters and lumbar lordosis: comparison of the standing, seated, and supine positions. A preliminary study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:565–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jing Z, Dong J, Li Z, Nan F (2018) Single balloon versus double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27:2550–2564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5631-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Marie-Hardy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

This study received IRB approval, under the number: 20220630143858. This study has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 193 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marie-Hardy, L., Mohsinaly, Y., Pietton, R. et al. Defining threshold for sagittal correction in lumbar fractures. Eur Spine J 33, 1550–1555 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08138-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08138-4

Keywords

Navigation