Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Single balloon versus double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Kyphoplasty has been widely used to treat vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). In standard procedure of kyphoplasty, two balloons were inserted into the vertebral body through bipedicular and inflated simultaneously, while using a single balloon two times is also a common method in clinic to lessen the financial burden of patients. However, the effect and safety of single balloon versus double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty are still controversy.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, eligible studies were identified through a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane library EMBASE, Web of Science, Wanfang, CNKI, VIP and CBM until January 1, 2018. Results from individual studies were pooled using a random or fixed effects model.

Results

Seven articles were included in the systematic review and five studies were consisted in meta-analysis. We observed no significant difference between single balloon and double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty in visual analog scale (VAS), angle (kyphotic angle and Cobb angle), consumption (operation time, cement volume and volume of bleeding), vertebral height (anterior height, medium height and posterior height) and complications (cement leakage and new VCFs), while the cost of single balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty is lower than that of double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty. The results of our meta-analysis also demonstrated that single balloon can significantly improve the VAS, angle and vertebral height of patients suffering from VCFs.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis collectively concludes that single balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty is as effective as double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty in improving clinical symptoms, deformity and complications of VCFs but not so expensive.

Graphical Abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reginster JY, Burlet N (2006) Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone 38(2 Suppl 1):S4–S9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Strom O, Borgstrom F, Kanis JA, Compston J, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B (2011) Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 6:59–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-011-0060-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Amin S, Achenbach SJ, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S, Melton LJ 3rd (2014) Trends in fracture incidence: a population-based study over 20 years. J Bone Miner Res 29(3):581–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grover A, LeBoff MS (2000) Osteoporosis/vertebral compression fractures. In: De Groot LJ, Chrousos G, Dungan K et al (eds) Endotext. MDText.com Inc, South Dartmouth

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lukert BP (1994) Vertebral compression fractures: how to manage pain, avoid disability. Geriatrics 49(2):22–26

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheyerer MJ, Simmen HP, Wanner GA, Werner CM (2012) Osteoporotic fractures of axial skeleton. Praxis 101(16):1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-8157/a001022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8:136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-013-0136-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu JT, Liao WJ, Tan WC, Lee JK, Liu CH, Chen YH, Lin TB (2010) Balloon kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a prospective, comparative, and randomized clinical study. Osteoporos Int 21(2):359–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0952-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Strom O, Leonard C, Marsh D, Cooper C (2010) Cost-effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty in patients with symptomatic vertebral compression fractures in a UK setting. Osteoporos Int 21(9):1599–1608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-1096-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Boonen S, Ranstam J, Tillman JB, Wardlaw D (2013) A randomized trial of balloon kyphoplasty and nonsurgical management for treating acute vertebral compression fractures: vertebral body kyphosis correction and surgical parameters. Spine 38(12):971–983. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828e8e22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Alexandru D, So W (2012) Evaluation and management of vertebral compression fractures. Perm J 16(4):46–51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Buchbinder R, Golmohammadi K, Johnston RV, Owen RJ, Homik J, Jones A, Dhillon SS, Kallmes DF, Lambert RG (2015) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006349.pub2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandra RV, Yoo AJ, Hirsch JA (2013) Vertebral augmentation: update on safety, efficacy, cost effectiveness and increased survival? Pain Phys 16(4):309–320

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ploeg WT, Veldhuizen AG, The B, Sietsma MS (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty as a treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 15(12):1749–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0159-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Staples MP, Kallmes DF, Comstock BA, Jarvik JG, Osborne RH, Heagerty PJ, Buchbinder R (2011) Effectiveness of vertebroplasty using individual patient data from two randomised placebo controlled trials: meta-analysis. BMJ 343:d3952. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d3952

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo JB, Zhu Y, Chen BL, Xie B, Zhang WY, Yang YJ, Yue YS, Wang XQ (2015) Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for vertebral compression fracture with osteopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0127145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. McCarthy J, Davis A (2016) Diagnosis and management of vertebral compression fractures. Am Fam Phys 94(1):44–50

    Google Scholar 

  18. Malmivaara A, Hakkinen U, Aro T, Heinrichs ML, Koskenniemi L, Kuosma E, Lappi S, Paloheimo R, Servo C, Vaaranen V et al (1995) The treatment of acute low back pain–bed rest, exercises, or ordinary activity? N Engl J Med 332(6):351–355. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199502093320602

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH, Hooper M, Roux C, Brandi ML, Lund B, Ethgen D, Pack S, Roumagnac I, Eastell R (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) study group. Osteoporos Int 11(1):83–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boonen S, Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Cummings SR, Ranstam J, Tillman JB, Eastell R, Talmadge K, Wardlaw D (2011) Balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of acute vertebral compression fractures: 2-year results from a randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res 26(7):1627–1637. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bouza C, Lopez-Cuadrado T, Almendro N, Amate JM (2015) Safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in Europe: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J 24(4):715–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3581-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Taylor RS, Fritzell P, Taylor RJ (2007) Balloon kyphoplasty in the management of vertebral compression fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 16(8):1085–1100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-007-0308-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu CH, Li QP, Wang C, Liu QP, Long HG (2016) [Analysis of clinical effects of three operative methods for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture]. Zhongguo gu shang = China. Zhongguo Gu Shang 29(7):619–624. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papanastassiou ID, Phillips FM, Van Meirhaeghe J, Berenson JR, Andersson GB, Chung G, Small BJ, Aghayev K, Vrionis FD (2012) Comparing effects of kyphoplasty, vertebroplasty, and non-surgical management in a systematic review of randomized and non-randomized controlled studies. Eur Spine J 21(9):1826–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2314-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Y, Shi L, Tang P (2017) Comparison of the efficacy between two micro-operative therapies of old patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a network meta-analysis. J Cell Biochem 118(10):3205–3212. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.25966

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lovi A, Teli M, Ortolina A, Costa F, Fornari M, Brayda-Bruno M (2009) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: complementary techniques for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. A prospective non-randomised study on 154 patients. Eur Spine J 18(1):95–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0986-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma XL, Xing D, Ma JX, Xu WG, Wang J, Chen Y (2012) Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 21(9):1844–1859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2441-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang H, Sribastav SS, Ye F, Yang C, Wang J, Liu H, Zheng Z (2015) Comparison of percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of single level vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature. Pain Phys 18(3):209–222

    Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng X, Long HQ, Xu JH, Huang YL, Li FB (2016) Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 25(11):3439–3449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang Z, Wan S, Ning L, Han S (2014) Is unilateral kyphoplasty as effective and safe as bilateral kyphoplasties for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures? A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(9):2833–2842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3745-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Chang W, Zhang XY, Jiao N, Yuwen PZ, Zhu YB, Zhang F, Chen W (2017) Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000006738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Feng H, Huang P, Zhang X, Zheng G, Wang Y (2015) Unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. J Orthop Res 33(11):1713–1723. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang S, Chen C, Wang H, Wu Z, Liu L (2017) A systematic review of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty/percutaneous kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 51(4):290–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2017.05.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jing Z, Sun Q, Dong J, Meng F, Song Y, Xia T, Luo J, Li Y, Nan F (2017) Is it beneficial to reuse the balloon in percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of non-neoplastic vertebral compression fractures? Med Sci Monit 23:5907–5915

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu Y, Han J, Yin Z, Wang W, Zhou H (2016) Exploration of the effects of kyphoplasty through single balloon and double balloon in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Modern Instruments 22(4):97–99. https://doi.org/10.11876/mimt201604037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang H, Sun Z, Wang Z, Jiang W (2015) Single-balloon versus double-balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Clin Neurosci 22(4):680–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.10.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Z, Ding P, Wang Y, Chen L, Yao Y (2013) Comparison of clinical effect of percutaneous kyphoplasty with one balloon alternating expansion and two balloons meanwhile expansion in treating osteoporotic vertebral compressive fractures. J Clin Orthop 6:621–623. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-0287.2013.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang B, Yang Q, Wu C, Ma K, Liu Y, Wang H, Zhang R (2012) Percntaneous kyphoplasty with double or single balloon in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in elderly patients: a clinical controlled study. Chin J Mult Organ Disord Elder 11(10):761–764

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sun G, Jin P, Hao RS, Liu XW, Xie ZY, Li FD, Yi YH, Zhang XP (2008) Percutaneous kyphoplasty with double or single balloon in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compressive fracture: a clinical controlled study. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi 88(3):149–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yang HL, Niu GQ, Liang DC, Wang GL, Meng B, Chen L, Lu J, Zhou Y, Mao HQ, Zhao LJ, Liu XY, Gu XH, Ni CF, Tang TS (2004) The contrast study between single and double balloon bilateral dilatation of kyphoplasty. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chin J Surg] 42(21):1299–1302

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Klazen CA, Lohle PN, de Vries J, Jansen FH, Tielbeek AV, Blonk MC, Venmans A, van Rooij WJ, Schoemaker MC, Juttmann JR, Lo TH, Verhaar HJ, van der Graaf Y, van Everdingen KJ, Muller AF, Elgersma OE, Halkema DR, Fransen H, Janssens X, Buskens E, Mali WP (2010) Vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment in acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (Vertos II): an open-label randomised trial. Lancet 376(9746):1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60954-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rousing R, Andersen MO, Jespersen SM, Thomsen K (2009) Percutaneous vertebroplasty with only few complications: a retrospective study. Ugeskr Laeger 171(39):2808–2811

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kobayashi N, Numaguchi Y, Fuwa S, Uemura A, Matsusako M, Okajima Y, Ishiyama M, Takahashi O (2009) Prophylactic vertebroplasty: cement injection into non-fractured vertebral bodies during percutaneous vertebroplasty. Acad Radiol 16(2):136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Frankel BM, Monroe T, Wang C (2007) Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: an elevation in adjacent-level fracture risk in kyphoplasty as compared with vertebroplasty. Spine J 7(5):575–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2006.10.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rollinghoff M, Zarghooni K, Zeh A, Wohlrab D, Delank KS (2013) Is there a stable vertebral height restoration with the new radiofrequency kyphoplasty? A clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23(5):507–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1026-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361(6):557–568. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Peh WC, Munk PL, Rashid F, Gilula LA (2008) Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty and skyphoplasty. Radiol Clin North Am 46(3):611–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2008.05.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Runge M, Bonneville JF (2007) Balloon assisted kyphoplasty: new technique for treatment of vertebral compression fractures. J Radiol 88(9 Pt 1):1200–1202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Santiago FR, Abela AP, Alvarez LG, Osuna RM, Garcia Mdel M (2010) Pain and functional outcome after vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. A comparative study. Eur J Radiol 75(2):e108–e113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kumar K, Nguyen R, Bishop S (2010) A comparative analysis of the results of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Oper Neurosurg 67(3):171–188. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000380936.00143.11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Eck JC, Nachtigall D, Humphreys SC, Hodges SD (2008) Comparison of vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a meta-analysis of the literature. Spine J 8(3):488–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2007.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Parreira PCS, Maher CG, Megale RZ, March L, Ferreira ML (2017) An overview of clinical guidelines for the management of vertebral compression fracture: a systematic review. Spine J 17(12):1932–1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bouza C, Lopez T, Magro A, Navalpotro L, Amate JM (2006) Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 15(7):1050–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0048-x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Kim Y, Kim YW, Choi IJ, Cho JY, Kim JH, Kwon JW, Lee JY, Lee NR, Seol SY (2015) Cost comparison between surgical treatments and endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric cancer in Korea. Gut Liver 9(2):174–180. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl13299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Powe NR, Griffiths RI (1995) The clinical-economic trial: promise, problems, and challenges. Control Clin Trials 16(6):377–394

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. van Baal PH, Feenstra TL, Hoogenveen RT, de Wit GA, Brouwer WB (2007) Unrelated medical care in life years gained and the cost utility of primary prevention: in search of a ‘perfect’ cost-utility ratio. Health Econ 16(4):421–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bae EY (2008) Guidelines for economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health 41(2):80–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cartwright WS (1999) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. By Michael F. Drummond, Bernie O’Brien, Greg L. Stoddart, George W. Torrance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. J Ment Health Policy Econ 2(1):43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Laupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX (1992) How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. Can Med Assoc J 146(4):473–481

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Liu K, Sun W, Lu Q, Chen J, Tang J (2017) A cost-utility analysis of Dynesys dynamic stabilization versus instrumented fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases. J Orthop Sci 22(6):982–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2017.07.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zehao Jing and Jianli Dong contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Spine Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No. 467, Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning, China

    Zehao Jing, Zhengwei Li & Feng Nan

  2. Department of Joint Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, No. 467, Zhongshan Road, Shahekou District, Dalian, Liaoning, China

    Jianli Dong

Authors
  1. Zehao Jing
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jianli Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhengwei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Feng Nan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhengwei Li or Feng Nan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 537 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jing, Z., Dong, J., Li, Z. et al. Single balloon versus double balloon bipedicular kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 27, 2550–2564 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5631-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5631-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation