Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A comparison between Boston brace and European braces in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients: a systematic review based on the standardised Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) inclusion criteria for brace treatment

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the Boston brace and European braces using a standardised Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) inclusion criteria for brace treatment as well as consensus recommendations for treatment outcome.

Methods

This was a systematic review that was carried out using MeSH terminology in our search protocol in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov and Web of Science database between 1976 and 29th of Jan 2023. All studies that were included in this review had applied fully/partially the SRS inclusion criteria for brace wear. Outcome measures were divided into primary and secondary outcome measures.

Results

3830 literatures were found in which 176 literatures were deemed relevant to the study once duplicates were removed and titles and abstracts were screened. Of these literatures, only 15 had fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. 8 of the studies were Level IV studies, 5 were Level III studies and 2 studies were Level I studies (1 prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) and 1 Quasi-RCT). The percentage of patients who avoided surgery for European braces ranged from 88 to 100%, whereas for Boston brace ranged from 70 to 94%. When treatment success was assessed based on the final Cobb angle > 45°, approximately 15% of patients treated with European braces had treatment failure. In contrast, 20–63% of patients treated with Boston brace had curves > 45° at skeletal maturity. The BrAIST study used a cut-off point of 50° to define failure of treatment and the rate of treatment failure was 28%. Curve correction was not achieved in most patients (24–51% of patients) who were treated with the Chêneau brace and its derivatives. However, none of the patients treated with Boston brace achieved curve correction.

Conclusion

Boston brace and European braces were effective in the prevention of surgery. In addition, curve stabilisation was achieved in most studies. Limitation in current literature included lack of studies providing high level of evidence and lack of standardisation in terms of compliance to brace as well as multidisciplinary management of brace wear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lenke L (2000) Terminology committee and working group on spinal classification revised glossary of terms. https://www.srs.org/professionals/online-education-and-resources/glossary/revised-glossary-of-terms. 2023

  2. Kleinberg S (1922) The operative treatment of scoliosis. Arch Surg 5:631–645. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1922.01110150184008%JArchivesofSurgery

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bunnell WP (1986) The natural history of idiopathic scoliosis before skeletal maturity. Spine 11:773–776. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198610000-00003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bunnell WP (2005) Selective screening for scoliosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 434:40–45. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000163242.92733.66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Rigo M, Zaina F (2009) Guidelines on “Standards of management of idiopathic scoliosis with corrective braces in everyday clinics and in clinical research”: SOSORT Consensus 2008. Scoliosis 4:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Wright JG, Dobbs MB (2013) Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. N Engl J Med 369:1512–1521. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Negrini S, Zaina F, Atanasio S (2008) BRACE MAP, a proposal for a new classification of braces. Stud Health Technol Inform 140:299–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Korbel K, Kozinoga M, Stoliński Ł, Kotwicki T (2014) Scoliosis research society (SRS) criteria and society of scoliosis orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment (SOSORT) 2008 guidelines in non-operative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Polish Orthop Traumatol 79:118–122

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richards BS, Bernstein RM, D’Amato CR, Thompson GH (2005) Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management. Spine 30:2068–2075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grivas T (2012) European braces for conservative scoliosis treatment. In: Goswami T (ed) Human musculoskeletal biomechanics. IntechOpen, London, pp 29–48

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zaina F, De Mauroy JC, Grivas T, Hresko MT, Kotwizki T, Maruyama T, Price N, Rigo M, Stikeleather L, Wynne J, Negrini S (2014) Bracing for scoliosis in 2014: state of the art. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 50:93–110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 34:1929–1941. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1c99f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Janicki JA, Poe-Kochert C, Armstrong DG, Thompson GH (2007) A comparison of the thoracolumbosacral orthoses and providence orthosis in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results using the new SRS inclusion and assessment criteria for bracing studies. J Pediatr Orthop 27:369–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Galli M, Perisano C, Falciglia F, Aulisa L (2009) Treatment of thoraco-lumbar curves in adolescent females affected by idiopathic scoliosis with a progressive action short brace (PASB): assessment of results according to the SRS committee on bracing and nonoperative management standardization criteria. Scoliosis 4:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-4-21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gammon SR, Mehlman CT, Chan W, Heifetz J, Durrett G, Wall EJ (2010) A comparison of thoracolumbosacral orthoses and SpineCor treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients using the scoliosis research society standardized criteria. J Pediatr Orthop 30:531–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Perisano C, Marzetti E, Falciglia F, Aulisa L (2012) Treatment of lumbar curves in scoliotic adolescent females with progressive action short brace: a case series based on the Scoliosis Research Society Committee Criteria. Spine 37:E786-791. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b547d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Falciglia F, Giordano M, Marzetti E, Aulisa L (2015) Lyon bracing in adolescent females with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study based on SRS and SOSORT criteria Orthopedics and biomechanics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:316

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Maruyama T, Kobayashi Y, Miura M, Nakao Y (2015) Effectiveness of brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 10:S12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Gutman G, Benoit M, Joncas J, Beauséjour M, Barchi S, Labelle H, Parent S, Mac-Thiong JM (2016) The effectiveness of the SpineCor brace for the conservative treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Comparison with the Boston brace. Spine J 16:626–631

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pasquini G, Cecchi F, Bini C, Molino-Lova R, Vannetti F, Castagnoli C, Paperini A, Boni R, Macchi C, Crusco B, Ceppatelli S, Corigliano A (2016) The outcome of a modified version of the Cheneau brace in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a retrospective study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 52:618–629

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Minsk MK, Venuti KD, Daumit GL, Sponseller PD (2017) Effectiveness of the Rigo Chêneau versus Boston-style orthoses for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohrt-Nissen S, Lastikka M, Andersen TB, Helenius I, Gehrchen M (2019) Conservative treatment of main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: full-time or nighttime bracing? J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 27:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weniger CD, Fujak A, Hofner B, Fuchs M, Forst R, Richter RH (2019) Long-term results of conservative therapy of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the cheneau brace. Klin Padiatr 231:248–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. De Giorgi S, Piazzolla A, Tafuri S, Borracci C, Martucci A, De Giorgi G (2013) Chêneau brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term results. Can it prevent surgery? Eur Spine J 22:S815–S822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Guo J, Lam TP, Wong MS, Ng BK, Lee KM, Liu KL, Hung LH, Lau AH, Sin SW, Kwok WK, Yu FW, Qiu Y, Cheng JC (2014) A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardised criteria. Eur Spine J 23:2650–2657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3146-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ovadia D, Eylon S, Mashiah A, Wientroub S, Lebel ED (2012) Factors associated with the success of the Rigo System Chêneau brace in treating mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 6:327–331

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. SRS Bracing Manual (2023) http://www.srs.org/professionals/online-education-and-resources/srs-bracing-manual

  29. Negrini S, Minozzi S, Bettany-Saltikov J, Chockalingam N, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Romano M, Zaina F (2016) Braces for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Spine 41:1813–1825. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang Y, Li X (2019) Treatment of bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 28:2012–2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06075-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nachemson AL, Peterson LE (1995) Effectiveness of treatment with a brace in girls who have adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A prospective, controlled study based on data from the Brace Study of the Scoliosis research society. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:815–822. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199506000-00001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Périé D, Aubin CE, Petit Y, Beauséjour M, Dansereau J, Labelle H (2003) Boston brace correction in idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical study. Spine 28:1672–1677. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Brs.0000083165.93936.6d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rigo M, Weiss HR (2008) The Chêneau concept of bracing–biomechanical aspects. Stud Health Technol Inform 135:303–319

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy JC, Diers H, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Lebel A, Marti C, Maruyama T, O’Brien J, Price N, Parent E, Rigo M, Romano M, Stikeleather L, Wynne J, Zaina F (2018) 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 13:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Roye BD, Simhon ME, Matsumoto H, Bakarania P, Berdishevsky H, Dolan LA, Grimes K, Grivas TB, Hresko MT, Karol LA, Lonner BS, Mendelow M, Negrini S, Newton PO, Parent EC, Rigo M, Strikeleather L, Tunney J, Weinstein SL, Wood G, Vitale MG (2020) Establishing consensus on the best practice guidelines for the use of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 8:597–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00060-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yu Jie Lee and Wee Jieh Wang these authors have contributed equally to this work, thus sharing the co-first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Orthopaedic Centre of Excellence for Research and Learning (NOCERAL), Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Yu Jie Lee, Wee Jieh Wang, Siti Mariam Mohamad, Josephine Rebecca Chandren, Siti Mariam Abd Gani, Weng Hong Chung, Chee Kidd Chiu & Chris Yin Wei Chan

Authors
  1. Yu Jie Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wee Jieh Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Siti Mariam Mohamad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Josephine Rebecca Chandren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Siti Mariam Abd Gani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Weng Hong Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chee Kidd Chiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chris Yin Wei Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Yin Wei Chan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y.J., Wang, W.J., Mohamad, S.M. et al. A comparison between Boston brace and European braces in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients: a systematic review based on the standardised Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) inclusion criteria for brace treatment. Eur Spine J 33, 630–645 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08007-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08007-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation