Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominal aortic calcification is independently associated with increased atrophy and fatty infiltration of the lumbar paraspinal muscles: a retrospective cross-sectional study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Aortic abdominal calcification (AAC) is associated with spine-related conditions, such as lower back pain and reduced bone mineral density. Similar to peripheral vascular disease, AAC possibly reduces blood flow to the lumbar posterior paraspinal muscles (PPM) which may lead to atrophy and increased fatty infiltration.

Methods

Imaging of patients with lower back pain was analyzed. AAC was assessed on lateral lumbar radiographs according to the Kauppila classification. The cross-sectional area of the PPM was measured on a T2-weighted axial MRI sequence and the functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) and fatty infiltration (FI) were calculated with custom software. The association of AAC and FI as well as AAC and fCSA was assessed by multivariable linear regression, adjusted for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, and smoking.

Results

Two hundred and thirty patients (47.8% female) with a median age of 60 years (IQR 48–68) were analyzed. In patients, without AAC the median FI of the PPM was 33.3% (IQR 29.1–37.6%), compared to 44.6% (IQR 38.5–54.3%) in patients with AAC (p < 0.001). In the multivariable linear regression, both fCSA and FI of the PPM were significantly and independently associated with the degree of AAC (p = 0.037 and p = 0.015, respectively).

Conclusions

This is the first study to demonstrate a significant and independent association between AAC and PPM morphology. The results of this study improve our understanding of the interaction between AAC and spinal musculature, with AAC being a reason for atrophy of the PPM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Boukhris R, Becker KL (1972) Calcification of the aorta and osteoporosis. A roentgenographic study. JAMA 219(10):1307–1311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kauppila LI et al (1997) Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(14): 1642–1647; discussion 1648–1649.

  3. Estublier C, Chapurlat R, Szulc P (2015) Association of severe disc degeneration with all-cause mortality and abdominal aortic calcification assessed prospectively in older men: findings of a single-center prospective study of osteoporosis in men. Arthritis Rheumatol 67(5):1295–1304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kauppila LI (2009) Atherosclerosis and disc degeneration/low-back pain—a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 37(6):661–670

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakaura H et al (2019) Abdominal aortic calcification is a significant poor prognostic factor for clinical outcomes after decompressive laminotomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Global Spine J 9(7):724–728

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Sakaura H et al (2021) Does atherosclerosis have negative impacts on early adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion? Global Spine J 11(5):674–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Szulc P (2016) Abdominal aortic calcification: a reappraisal of epidemiological and pathophysiological data. Bone 84:25–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sfyri P, Matsakas A (2017) Crossroads between peripheral atherosclerosis, western-type diet and skeletal muscle pathophysiology: emphasis on apolipoprotein E deficiency and peripheral arterial disease. J Biomed Sci 24(1):42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cholewicki J, McGill SM (1996) Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 11(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Panjabi MM (1992) The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement. J Spinal Disord 5(4):383–389; discussion 397.

  11. Cramer GD (2014) Chapter 7—the lumbar region. In: Cramer GD, Darby SA (eds) Clinical anatomy of the spine, spinal cord, and ans, 3rd edn. Mosby, Saint Louis, pp 246–311

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamrick MW, McGee-Lawrence ME, Frechette DM (2016) Fatty infiltration of skeletal muscle: mechanisms and comparisons with bone marrow adiposity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 7:69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ranger TA et al (2019) Paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area predicts low back disability but not pain intensity. Spine J 19(5):862–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Noonan AM, Brown SHM (2021) Paraspinal muscle pathophysiology associated with low back pain and spine degenerative disorders. JOR Spine 4(3):e1171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shi L et al (2022) Correlation between the fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles and disc degeneration and the underlying mechanism. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23(1):509

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McDermott MM et al (2020) Skeletal muscle pathology in peripheral artery disease: a brief review. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 40(11):2577–2585

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Cuschieri S (2019) The STROBE guidelines. Saudi J Anaesth 13(Suppl 1):S31–S34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Faron A et al (2019) Quantification of fat and skeletal muscle tissue at abdominal computed tomography: associations between single-slice measurements and total compartment volumes. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44(5):1907–1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chiapparelli E et al (2022) The association between lumbar paraspinal muscle functional cross-sectional area on MRI and regional volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography. Osteoporos Int 33(12):2537–2545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kauppila LI et al (1997) New indices to classify location, severity and progression of calcific lesions in the abdominal aorta: a 25-year follow-up study. Atherosclerosis 132(2):245–250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15(2):155–163

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang S et al (2021) The effects of paraspinal muscle volume on physiological load on the lumbar vertebral column: a finite-element study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46(19): E1015–E1021.

  23. Lim WS et al (2022) Singapore clinical practice guidelines for sarcopenia: screening, diagnosis, management and prevention. J Frailty Aging 11(4):348–369

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li S et al (2020) Relationship of volumetric bone mineral density by quantitative computed tomography with abdominal aortic calcification. Bone 133:115226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mandelli F et al (2021) Assessing fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: goutallier classification and quantitative MRI measurements. Front Neurol 12:656487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors report no conflicts of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LS: conceptualization, methodology, statistical analysis, investigation, writing-original draft, visualization, MM: conceptualization, methodology, writing—review& editing, TC: investigation, writing—review & editing, ST: writing—review & editing, GCW: writing—review & editing, JZ: formal analysis, investigation, validation, writing—review& editing, HH: writing—review & editing, PS: investigation, writing—review, AA: investigation, data curation, writing—review& editing, EC: investigation, data curation, writing—review& editing, KA: investigation, data curation, writing—review& editing, M.M.: investigation, data curation, writing—review & editing, JS: data curation, writing—review& editing, project administration, ET: methodology; writing—review& editing, JAC: methodology, project administration, writing—review& editing, AAS: project administration, writing—review& editing, FPC: project administration, writing—review& editing, APH: project administration, writing—review& editing; supervision, conceptualization, methodology.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander P. Hughes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest concerning materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

Disclosure

Dr. Sama reports royalties from Ortho Development, Corp.; private investments for Vestia Ventures MiRUS Investment, LLC, ISPH II, LLC, ISPH 3, LLC, and VBros Venture Partners X Centinel Spine; consulting fee from Clariance, Inc., Kuros Biosciences AG, and Medical Device Business Service, Inc.; speaking and teaching arrangements of DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.; membership of the scientific advisory board of Clariance, Inc., and Kuros Biosciences AG; and trips/travel of Medical Device Business research support from Spinal Kinetics, Inc., outside the submitted work. Dr. Cammisa reports royalties from NuVasive, Inc.; private investments for 4WEB Medical/4WEB, Inc., Bonovo Orthopedics, Inc., Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP, ISPH II, LLC, ISPH 3 Holdings, LLC, Ivy Healthcare Capital Partners, LLC, Medical Device Partners II, LLC, Medical Device Partners III, LLC, Orthobond Corporation, Spine Biopharma, LLC, Synexis, LLC, Tissue Differentiation Intelligence, LLC, VBVP VI, LLC, VBVP X, LLC (Centinel) and Woven Orthopedics Technologies; consulting fees from 4WEB Medical/4WEB, Inc., DePuy Synthes Spine, NuVasive, Inc., Spine Biopharma, LLC, and Synexis, LLC; membership of scientific advisory board/other offices of Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP, Medical Device Partners III, LLC, Orthobond Corporation, Spine Biopharma, LLC, Synexis, LLC, and Woven Orthopedic Technologies; and research support from 4WEB Medical/4WEB, Inc., Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Camber Spine, and Centinel Spine, outside the submitted work. Dr. Girardi reports royalties from Lanx, Inc., and Ortho Development Corp.; private investments for Centinel Spine, and BCMID; stock ownership of Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP; and consulting fees from NuVasive, Inc., and DePuy Synthes Spine, outside the submitted work. Dr. Hughes reports research support from NuVasive, Inc. and Kuros Biosciences AG; and fellowship support from NuVasive, Inc. and Kuros Biosciences AG, outside the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The work was performed at Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, NY, USA. The institutional review board of Hospital for Special Surgery approved this study.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schönnagel, L., Muellner, M., Caffard, T. et al. Abdominal aortic calcification is independently associated with increased atrophy and fatty infiltration of the lumbar paraspinal muscles: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Eur Spine J 32, 3002–3008 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07783-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-07783-5

Keywords

Navigation