Correction to: Can artificial intelligence support or even replace physicians in measuring sagittal balance? A validation study on preoperative and postoperative full spine images of 170 patients

Correction to: European Spine Journal (2022) 31:1943–1951

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07309-5

Space missing between the words “andagreement” in the first line of conclusion section of Abstract. The complete correct conclusion is given below.

Conclusion A new, fully automated algorithm that determines SB parameters has excellent reliability and agreement with human raters, particularly on preoperative full spine images. The presented solution will relieve physicians from time-consuming routine work of measuring SB parameters and allow the analysis of large databases efficiently.

In Table 1 and Table 2, the indexes 1, 2 and 3 are supposed to be superscripted but they have been published incorrectly in the original publication. The complete correct Tables 1 and 2 are given below.

Table 1 Intra-rater reliability of the manual measurements; rater 1a vs rater 1b; n = 170

Table 2 Inter-rater reliability of the manual measurements; rater 1a vs rater 2; rater 1b vs rater 2; n = 170