Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance assessment and external validation of specific thresholds of total psoas muscle cross-sectional area as predictors of mortality in oncologic spine surgery for spinal metastases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of low muscle mass (LMM) in predicting 90-day and 12-month mortality after spinal tumor surgery.

Methods

We identified 115 patients operated on for spinal metastases between April 2012 and August 2022 who had available perioperative abdominal or lumbar spine CT scans and minimum 90-day follow-up. LMM was defined as a total psoas muscle cross-sectional area (TPA) at the L4 pedicle level less than 10.5 cm2 for men and less than 7.2 cm2 for women based on previously reported thresholds. A secondary analysis was performed by analyzing TPA as a continuous variable. The primary endpoint was 90-day mortality, and the secondary endpoint was 12-month mortality. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

Results

The 90-day mortality was 19% for patients without and 42% for patients with LMM (p = 0.010). After multivariate analysis, LMM was not independently associated with increased odds of 90-day mortality (odds ratio 2.16 [95% confidence interval 0.62 to 7.50]; p = 0.223). The 12-month mortality was 45% for patients without and 71% for patients with LMM (p = 0.024). After multivariate analysis, LMM was not independently associated with increased odds of 12-month mortality (OR 1.64 [95% CI 0.46 to 5.86]; p = 0.442). The secondary analysis showed no independent association between TPA and 90-day or 12-month mortality.

Conclusion

Patients with LMM had higher rates of 90-day and 12-month mortality in our study, but this was not independent of other parameters such as performance status, hypoalbuminemia, or primary cancer type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Yes.

References

  1. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T, Yoshida A, Murakami H, Akamaru T (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:298–306. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200102010-00016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed AK, Goodwin CR, Heravi A, Kim R, Abu-Bonsrah N, Sankey E, Kerekes D, De la Garza RR, Schwab J, Sciubba DM (2018) Predicting survival for metastatic spine disease: a comparison of nine scoring systems. Spine J 18:1804–1814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2018.03.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bauer HC, Wedin R (1995) Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 66:143–146. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679508995508

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karhade AV, Thio Q, Ogink PT, Bono CM, Ferrone ML, Oh KS, Saylor PJ, Schoenfeld AJ, Shin JH, Harris MB, Schwab JH (2019) Predicting 90-day and 1-year mortality in spinal metastatic disease: development and internal validation. Neurosurgery 85:E671–E681. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katagiri H, Takahashi M, Wakai K, Sugiura H, Kataoka T, Nakanishi K (2005) Prognostic factors and a scoring system for patients with skeletal metastasis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:698–703. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Paulino Pereira NR, McLaughlin L, Janssen SJ, van Dijk CN, Bramer JAM, Laufer I, Bilsky MH, Schwab JH (2017) The SORG nomogram accurately predicts 3-and 12-months survival for operable spine metastatic disease: external validation. J Surg Oncol 115:1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Linden YM, Dijkstra SP, Vonk EJ, Marijnen CA, Leer JW, Dutch Bone Metastasis Study G (2005) Prediction of survival in patients with metastases in the spinal column: results based on a randomized trial of radiotherapy. Cancer 103:320–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Oshima M, Ryu J (2005) A revised scoring system for preoperative evaluation of metastatic spine tumor prognosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:2186–2191. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000180401.06919.a5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Choi D, Ricciardi F, Arts M, Buchowski JM, Bunger C, Chung CK, Coppes M, Depreitere B, Fehlings M, Kawahara N, Leung Y, Martin-Benlloch A, Massicotte E, Mazel C, Meyer B, Oner C, Peul W, Quraishi N, Tokuhashi Y, Tomita K, Ulbricht C, Verlaan JJ, Wang M, Crockard A (2018) Prediction accuracy of common prognostic scoring systems for metastatic spine disease: results of a prospective international multicentre study of 1469 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43:1678–1684. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tabouret E, Cauvin C, Fuentes S, Esterni B, Adetchessi T, Salem N, Madroszyk A, Goncalves A, Casalonga F, Gravis G (2015) Reassessment of scoring systems and prognostic factors for metastatic spinal cord compression. Spine J 15:944–950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.036

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bollen L, Jacobs WCH, Van der Linden YM, Van der Hel O, Taal W, Dijkstra PDS (2018) A systematic review of prognostic factors predicting survival in patients with spinal bone metastases. Eur Spine J 27:799–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5320-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zakaria HM, Wilkinson BM, Pennington Z, Saadeh YS, Lau D, Chandra A, Ahmed AK, Macki M, Anand SK, Abouelleil MA, Fateh JA, Rick JW, Morshed RA, Deng H, Chen KY, Robin A, Lee IY, Kalkanis S, Chou D, Park P, Sciubba DM, Chang V (2020) Sarcopenia as a prognostic factor for 90-day and overall mortality in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic tumors: a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Neurosurgery 87:1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rier HN, Jager A, Sleijfer S, Maier AB, Levin MD (2016) The prevalence and prognostic value of low muscle mass in cancer patients: a review of the literature. Oncologist 21:1396–1409. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Horii N, Kosaka T, Fujiwara R, Sato S, Akiyama H, Kunisaki C, Endo I (2022) Psoas muscle depletion during preoperative chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer has a negative impact on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 18:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.13514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yao H, Dohzono S, Sasaoka R, Takamatsu K, Nakamura H (2022) Prognostic value of psoas major muscle density in patients with breast cancer metastases to bone: a retrospective single-center cohort study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 52:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyab166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hou GM, Jiang C, Du JP, Yuan KF (2022) Sarcopenia predicts an adverse prognosis in patients with combined hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma after surgery. Cancer Med 11:317–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horie K, Matsuda T, Yamashita K, Hasegawa H, Utsumi M, Urakawa N, Kanaji S, Oshikiri T, Kakeji Y (2021) Sarcopenia assessed by skeletal muscle mass volume is a prognostic factor for oncological outcomes of rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tan H, Gao X, Li X, Huang Y, Cao Q, Wan T (2022) Sarcopenia in patients with spinal metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies. Front Oncol 12:864501. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.864501

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahern E, Brown TE, Campbell L, Hughes BGM, Banks MD, Lin CY, Kenny LM, Bauer JD (2022) Impact of sarcopenia and myosteatosis on survival outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer undergoing curative-intent treatment. Br J Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114522000435

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ricciardolo AA, De Ruvo N, Serra F, Prampolini F, Solaini L, Battisti S, Missori G, Fenocchi S, Rossi EG, Sorrentino L, Salati M, Spallanzani A, Cautero N, Pecchi A, Ercolani G, Gelmini R (2022) Strong impact of sarcopenia as a risk factor of survival in resected gastric cancer patients: first Italian report of a Bicentric study. Updates Surg 74:283–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01175-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang H, Yang R, Xu J, Fang K, Abdelrahim M, Chang L (2021) Sarcopenia as a predictor of postoperative risk of complications, mortality and length of stay following gastrointestinal oncological surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 103:630–637. https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2021.0082

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tagliafico AS, Bignotti B, Torri L, Rossi F (2022) Sarcopenia: how to measure, when and why. Radiol Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01450-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hussain AK, Cheung ZB, Vig KS, Phan K, Lima MC, Kim JS, Di Capua J, Kaji DA, Arvind V, Cho SK (2019) Hypoalbuminemia as an independent risk factor for perioperative complications following surgical decompression of spinal metastases. Global Spine J 9:321–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218797095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De la Garza RR, Benton JA, Gelfand Y, Echt M, Hamad MK, Kinon MD, Yanamadala V, Yassari R (2021) A novel clinical scoring system for perioperative morbidity in metastatic spinal tumor surgery: the spine oncology morbidity assessment score. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46:E161–E166. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gelfand Y, De la Garza RR, Nakhla JP, Echt M, Yanamadala V, Yassari R (2021) Predictive value of hypoalbuminemia and severe hypoalbuminemia in oncologic spine surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 210:107009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Soeters PB, Wolfe RR, Shenkin A (2019) Hypoalbuminemia: pathogenesis and Clinical Significance. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 43:181–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpen.1451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M, European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older P (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 39:412–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Repetto L, Fratino L, Audisio RA, Venturino A, Gianni W, Vercelli M, Parodi S, Dal Lago D, Gioia F, Monfardini S, Aapro MS, Serraino D, Zagonel V (2002) Comprehensive geriatric assessment adds information to Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status in elderly cancer patients: an Italian group for geriatric oncology study. J Clin Oncol 20:494–502. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2002.20.2.494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael De la Garza Ramos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing financial or non-financial interests that are related to this work. The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De la Garza Ramos, R., Ryvlin, J., Hamad, M.K. et al. Performance assessment and external validation of specific thresholds of total psoas muscle cross-sectional area as predictors of mortality in oncologic spine surgery for spinal metastases. Eur Spine J 32, 1003–1009 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07517-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07517-z

Keywords

Navigation