Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient-specific 3D printing to replace components of a rib-to pelvis “Eiffel Tower” vertebral expanding prosthetic titanium rib system in an infant: a case report

  • Case Report
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To address the anatomical challenges facing complex and revision spinal surgery, patient-specific 3D-printed models (3D-PMs) have received growing attention worldwide, primarily in adults. We report the use of a 3D-PM in the treatment of a case of wound breakdown over a component of a VEPTR (Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib; DePuy-Synthes) system, requiring replacement of Dunn-McCarthy hook and sleeve with components contoured to a patient-specific 3D-PM of the spine.

Method

A two-year-old born with myelomeningocele (MMC), repaired at birth, developed progressive MMC-associated kyphoscoliosis. Elective insertion of a rib-to-pelvis ‘Eiffel Tower’ bilateral VEPTR growing rods construct was performed without initial complication. Prominence of the right VEPTR sleeve and Dunn-McCarthy hook side-to-side connector resulted in breakdown of overlying poor-quality soft tissues, necessitating washout, partial implant removal, intravenous antibiotic therapy and delayed primary wound closure. A patient-specific 3D-PM, utilising pre-operative CT spine and pelvis 3D-reconstructions, allowed pre-operative formation of a contoured implant, which was inserted without need for further revision.

Results

The patient underwent further VEPTR lengthening without recurrent infection, wound breakdown or implant failure at 24-month follow-up. Satisfactory control of the deformity has been achieved with continued improvement in sitting height and radiographic indices.

Conclusion

This case illustrates the possibility, in certain cases, of using 3D-PM to develop complex components of spinal implant systems pre-operatively, removing the time and difficulty of intra-operative contouring. Consequently, custom-contoured implants may be produced, sterilised and implanted. This technique may be an option, in infants, including MMC-associated kyphoscoliosis, where midline fixation is not possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figs. 1, 2
Figs. 3, 4
Figs. 5, 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Figs. 12, 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang M, Li C, Li Y, Zhao Y, Wei X, Zhang G, Fan J, Ni H, Chen Z, Bai Y, Li M (2015) Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 94(8):e582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pijpker P, Kuijlen J, Kraeima J, Faber C (2018) Three-dimensional planning and use of individualized osteotomy-guiding templates for surgical correction of kyphoscoliosis: a technical case report. World Neurosurg 119:113–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Citak M, Kochsiek L, Gehrke T, Haasper C, Suero E, Mau H (2017) Preliminary results of a 3D-printed acetabular component in the management of extensive defects. Hip Int 28(3):266–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zampelis V, Flivik G (2021) Custom-made 3D-printed cup-cage implants for complex acetabular revisions: evaluation of pre-planned versus achieved positioning and 1-year migration data in 10 patients. Acta Orthop 92(1):23–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Girolami M, Boriani S, Bandiera S, Barbanti-Bródano G, Ghermandi R, Terzi S, Tedesco G, Evangelisti G, Pipola V, Gasbarrini A (2018) Biomimetic 3D-printed custom-made prosthesis for anterior column reconstruction in the thoracolumbar spine: a tailored option following en bloc resection for spinal tumors: Preliminary results of a case-series of 13 patients. Eur Spine J 27(12):3073–3083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mobbs R, Coughlan M, Thompson R, Sutterlin C, Phan K (2017) The utility of 3D printing for surgical planning and patient-specific implant design for complex spinal pathologies: case report. J Neurosurg Spine 26(4):513–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thayaparan G, Owbridge M, Thompson R, D’Urso P (2019) Designing patient-specific solutions using biomodelling and 3D-printing for revision lumbar spine surgery. Eur Spine J 28(Suppl 2):S18–S24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Redaelli D, Abbate V, Storm F, Ronca A, Sorrentino A, De Capitani C, Biffi E, Ambrosio L, Colombo G, Fraschini P (2020) 3D printing orthopedic scoliosis braces: a test comparing FDM with thermoforming. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:1707–1720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tu Q, Chen H, Ding H, Yu G, Miao Q, Shen J, Huang X, Tang Y, Xia H, Xu J (2021) Three-dimensional printing technology for surgical correction of congenital scoliosis caused by hemivertebrae. World Neurosurg. 27:S1878-8750(21)00094-2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Senkoylu A, Cetinkaya M, Daldal I, Necefov E, Eren A, Samartzis D (2020) Personalized three-dimensional printing pedicle screw guide innovation for the surgical management of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg 144:e513–e522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cecchinato R, Berjano P, Zerbi A, Damilano M, Redaelli A, Lamartina C (2019) Pedicle screw insertion with patient-specific 3D-printed guides based on low-dose CT scan is more accurate than free-hand technique in spine deformity patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Eur Spine J 28(7):1712–1723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Waldhausen J, Redding G, White K, Song K (2016) Complications in using the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) in children. J Pediatr Surg 51(11):1747–1750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Y, Yang X, Yan B, Zeng T, Qiu Y, Chen S (2016) Clinical application of three-dimensional printing in the personalized treatment of complex spinal disorders. Chin J Traumatol 19(1):31–34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Crews J, Mina M, Johnson E, Guillen J, Simmons J, Joshi A (2018) Risk factors for surgical site infections following vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) surgery in children. Spine Deform 6(6):791–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garg S, LaGreca J, Hilaire St T, Gao D, Glotzbecker M, Li Y, Smith J, Flynn J (2014) Wound complications of vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib incisions. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(13):E777–E781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Murphy RF, Moisan A, Kelly DM, Warner WC Jr, Jones TL, Sawyer JR (2016) Use of vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR) in the treatment of congenital scoliosis without fused ribs. J Pediatr Orthop 36(4):329–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gill R, Kinsella C Jr, Lin A, Grunwaldt L, Jiang S, Deeney V, Losee J (1976) (2011) Acellular dermal matrix in the treatment and prevention of exposed vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15;36(8):E563–E567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Burnard J, Parr W, Choy W, Walsh W, Mobbs R (2020) 3D-printed spine surgery implants: a systematic review of the efficacy and clinical safety profile of patient-specific and off-the-shelf devices. Eur Spine J 29(6):1248–1260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pijpker P, Kuijlen J, Kaptein B, Pondaag W (2021) Three-dimensional-printed drill guides for occiptothoracic fusion in a pediatric patient with occipitocervical instability. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 21(1):27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Salazar D, Huff T, Cramer J, WongLinke LG, Zuniga J (2020) Use of a three-dimensional printed anatomical model for tumor management in a pediatric patient. SAGE Open Med Case Rep 2020:8

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sakai T, Tezuka F, Abe M, Yamashita K, Takata Y, Higashino K, Nagamuchi A, Sairyo K (2017) Pediatric patient with incidental Os odontoideum safely treated with posterior fixation using rod-hook system and preoperative planning using 3d printer: a case report. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 78(03):306–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Consent for publications

Written consent was obtained from the legal guardians of the patient prior to publication of this case report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Alhani, B., Newton-Ede, M. et al. Patient-specific 3D printing to replace components of a rib-to pelvis “Eiffel Tower” vertebral expanding prosthetic titanium rib system in an infant: a case report. Eur Spine J 32, 2607–2614 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07460-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07460-z

Keywords

Navigation