Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Bilateral Rib-Based Distraction to the Pelvis for the Management of Congenital Gibbus Deformity in the Growing Child With Myelodysplasia

  • Published:
Spine Deformity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Congenital gibbus deformity of the spine associated with myelodysplasia is a challenging problem in the growing child and is commonly associated with skin breakdown and chronic infection. Surgical solutions including kyphectomy, flap closure of the skin, and early spinal fusion are associated with a high rate of complications and, ultimately, a short trunk due to stoppage of spinal growth. The purpose of this article is to describe our early results in using a rib-based distraction to the pelvis without vertebral resection and fusion to manage this deformity.

Methods

This is an IRB-approved retrospective study of a consecutive single-surgeon series of using the rib-to-pelvis distraction technique in congenital gibbus deformity. There were four patients (two males, two females) with an average age of 20 months (16–25 months). The diagnosis was myelomeningocele (n = 2), congenital kyphosis (n = 1), and congenital kyphoscoliosis (n = 1). All patients were managed with bilateral rib-to-pelvis distraction using the Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib (VEPTR) device.

Results

The average preoperative gibbus deformity measured 114 degrees (range = 108–154). The average postoperative gibbus measured 52 degrees (range = 36–80). The average length of postoperative follow-up is 66 months (range = 48–84 months). There were 10 complications; a dural leak during device expansion, rib hook migrations and postoperative infections after initial implant that resolved with irrigation, debridement, and intravenous antibiotics. One patient had skin expanders placed preoperatively to facilitate skin coverage. No patient has required vertebral resection to achieve correction of the deformity. No patient has had subsequent skin breakdown over the residual gibbus.

Discussion

This minimally invasive technique effectively corrects gibbus deformity in the growing child without early vertebral column resection and fusion. Our practice is to intervene early while the gibbus is flexible and prior to skin breakdown over the deformity. These early results are encouraging, but further long-term follow-up is needed to confirm the benefits of this technique over traditional methods.

Level of Evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carstens C, Koch H, Brocai DR, Niethard FU. Development of pathological lumbar kyphosis in myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:945–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoppenfeld S. Congenital kyphosis in myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967;49:276–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindseth RE, Stelzer Jr L. Vertebral excision for kyphosis in children with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:699–704.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin Jr J, Kumar SJ, Guille JT, et al. Congenital kyphosis in myelomeningocele: results following operative and nonoperative treatment. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:323–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banta JV, Hamada JS. Natural history of the kyphotic deformity in myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58-A:279.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heydemann JS, Gillespie R. Management of myelomeningocele kyphosis in the older child by kyphectomy and segmental spinal instrumentation. Spine 1987;12:37–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leatherman KD, Dickson RA. Congenital kyphosis in myelomeningocele. Vertebral body resection and posterior spine fusion. Spine 1978;3:222–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lintner SA, Lindseth RE. Kyphotic deformity in patients who have a myelomeningocele. Operative treatment and long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:1301–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mintz LJ, Sarwark JF, Dias LS, Schafer ME The natural history of congenital kyphosis in myelomeningocele. A review of 51 children. Spine 1991;16(8 suppl):S348–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharrard WJ. Spinal osteotomy for congenital kyphosis in myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968;50:466–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Akbar M, Bremer R, Thomsen M, et al. Kyphectomy in children with myelodysplasia: results 1994–2004. Spine 2006;31:1007–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Allen Jr BL, Ferguson RL. The operative treatment of myelomeningocele spinal deformity—1979. Orthop Clin North Am 1979;10:845–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Christofersen MR, Brooks AL. Excision and wire fixation of rigid myelomeningocele kyphosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1985;5:691–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Crawford AH, Strub WM, Lewis R, et al. Neonatal kyphectomy in the patient with myelomeningocele. Spine 2003;28:260–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eckstein HB, Vora RM. Spinal osteotomy for severe kyphosis in children with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972;54:328–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall JE, Poitras B. The management of kyphosis in patients with myelomeningocele. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;128:33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karlin LI. Kyphectomy for myelodysplasia. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2007;18:357–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ko AL, Song K, Ellenbogen RG, Avellino AM. Retrospective review of multilevel spinal fusion combined with spinal cord transection for treatment of kyphoscoliosis in pediatric myelomeningocele patients. Spine 2007;32:2493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lowe GP, Menelaus MB. The surgical management of kyphosis in older children with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978;60:40–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Miyamoto K, Shimizu K, Nozawa S, et al. Kyphectomy using a surgical threadwire (T-saw) for kyphotic deformity in a child with myelomeningocele. Spine 2003;28:E187–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nolden MT, Sarwark JF, Vora A, Grayhack JJ. A kyphectomy technique with reduced perioperative morbidity for myelomeningocele kyphosis. Spine 2002;27:1807–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Campbell Jr RM, Smith MD, Mayes TC, et al. The effect of opening wedge thoracostomy on thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A: 1659–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith JT. The use of growth-sparing instrumentation in pediatric spinal deformity. Orthop Clin North Am 2007;38:547–52. vii.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hell AK, Campbell RM, Hefti E The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib implant for the treatment of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with congenital and neuromuscular scoliosis in young children. J Pediatr Orthop B 2005;14:287–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Campbell Jr RM, Smith MD. Thoracic insufficiency syndrome and exotic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89(suppl 1): 108–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith JT, Novias E. Treatment of Gibbus deformity associated with myelomeningocele in the young child with the use of the vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (VEPTR): a case report. J Bone Joint Surg 2010;92:2211–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Doers T, Walker JL, van den Brink K, et al. The progression of untreated lumbar kyphosis and the compensatory thoracic lordosis in myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997;39:326–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharrard WJ, Drennan JC. Osteotomy-excision of the spine for lumbar kyphosis in older children with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972;54:50–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Banta JV, Park SM. Improvement in pulmonary function in patients having combined anterior and posterior spine fusion for myelomeningocele scoliosis. Spine 1983;8:765–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fromm B, Carstens C, Niethard FU, Lang R. Aortography in children with myelomeningocele and lumbar kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:691–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. McMaster MJ. The long-term results of kyphectomy and spinal stabilization in children with myelomeningocele. Spine 1988;13:417–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Niall DM, Dowling FE, Fogarty EE, et al. Kyphectomy in children with myelomeningocele: a long-term outcome study. J Pediatr Orthop 2004;24:37–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kocaoglu B, Erol B, Akgulle H, et al. Combination of luque instrumentation with polyaxial screws in the treatment of myelomeningocele kyphosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008;21:199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Smith MD.

Additional information

Author disclosures: JTS (reports other from DePuy Synthes, other from Spine Guard, other from Ellipse Technologies, other from Children’s Spine Registry and Foundation, outside the submitted work).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, J.T. Bilateral Rib-Based Distraction to the Pelvis for the Management of Congenital Gibbus Deformity in the Growing Child With Myelodysplasia. Spine Deform 4, 70–77 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.07.004

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.07.004

Keywords

Navigation