To investigate the innervation pattern of the sacroiliac region, especially with regard to the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). Dorsal SIJ innervation was analyzed and described. Our main hypothesis was that nerves reach the SIJ dorsally, passing ligamental compartments, as this would explain dorsal SIJ pain.
To examine sacroiliac innervation, we followed the nerves in over 50 specimens over several years. Plastinated slices were evaluated, nerves in the region were stained histologically, and the data were summarized as 3D models.
The Rami communicans and posterior branches of the spinal nerves and their branches that form a dorsal sacral plexus and communicating branches, together with corresponding vessels, were observed to form neurovascular bundles embedded by tiny fatty connectives in gaps and tunnels. Branches of L5-S1 pass the inner sacroiliac ligaments (the interosseous sacroiliac ligament and axial interosseous ligament). The outer sacroiliac ligaments (posterior sacroiliac ligaments, long posterior sacroiliac ligament, sacrotuberal ligament, thoracolumbar fascia) are passed by the S1-S4 branches. However, although the paths of these nerves are in the direction of the SIJ, they do not reach it. It is possible that impingement of the neurovascular bundles may result in pain. Moreover, the gaps and tunnels connect to the open dorsal SIJ.
Our findings suggest that Bogduk’s term “sacroiliac pain” correlates to “sacroiliac innervation”, which consists of “inner-” and “outer sacroiliac ligament innervation”, and to ventral “SIJ pain”. The watery gaps and tunnels observed could play a significant role in innervation and thus in the origins of SIJ pain.
Level of evidence
Individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
The clinical entity “sacroiliac (SI) pain” may involve a yet unknown innervation pattern of the SI region, and especially of the dorsal SI joint (SIJ). To date, it is not known whether the SIJ is dorsally innervated, although it is accepted that the dorsal SIJ may be innervated due to clinical experience with anesthesia, because if nerves may not reach the SIJ, another explanation must be found for “SI pain”.
Innervation (and thus pain) should be related in general to spinal nerves, each of which divides into an anterior branch, a meningeal branch, and a posterior branch of the spinal nerve (PBSN) . Some anterior branches are described to reach the ventral SIJ [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]; however, clinical and textbook opinion is that the SIJ is reached dorsally also, by PBSNs from L5 or L4 together with sacral PBSNs from the assumed S1-S3 segments .
PBSNs are thought to innervate muscles segmentally, not forming plexus. For the sacral muscles, this is textbook knowledge . Several groups have described that lumbar PBSNs form plexuses [9,10,11]. Based on such contrary findings, there is still considerable debate regarding the innervation pattern of the sacral region . Anatomical textbook knowledge often does not fit with the experiences of clinicians, leading them to ask which PBSNs may reach the dorsal SIJ, which dorsal SI ligaments they may pass, and why segmental pain is not seen in patients.
In a major study on sacral PBSNs conducted 20 years ago , Fortin et al. proposed an anatomical explanation for SI pain based on a dorsal SIJ innervation using clinical experiments, histological probes and fluoroscopically guided SIJ arthrography [14, 15], later followed by anatomical findings [16,17,18]. This aspect supports our hypothesis that nerves (and vessels) pass through gaps or tunnels inside dorsal ligaments, and that this may be of clinical importance for innervation, and thus for pain.
In this study, we investigated which branches of the PBSNs may play a role in this regard, which ligaments behind the SIJ they may reach or pass, and whether the SIJ itself is reached by any RCs or PBSN branches, all of which are aspects that have rarely been discussed in the literature.
A further question of this work is to think about the loose connective tissues and fluids in the gaps and tunnels behind the SIJ as described by Fortin, to find a possible explanation of why the application of anesthetics in these gaps is effective as a clinical treatment for “SIJ pain” [14, 15, 19].
Material and methods
51 human bodies were dissected either with a ventral or dorsal approach, at the University of Leipzig and the University of Tokyo. Online Resource 1 shows specific data of the body donors (e.g., age, weight). While alive, the donor had given consent for the use of body parts for scientific purposes at the respected Institute of Anatomy.
Dissection in the ventral approach
In total, 48 human specimens were dissected in ventral approach (Fig. 1; Online Resource 1). Forty-three fixed German human specimens (Institute of Anatomy, of Leipzig University; nine alcohol fixed [20, 21], 25 fixed using 1.85% aqueous formalin solution) and five formaldehyde-fixed Japanese human specimens (Department of anatomy, University Tokyo; all fixed using 1.85% aqueous formalin solution) were dissected to locate the PBSNs from the root to the periphery (Online Resource 1: number L1–L43 and T1–T5). 10 cases were dissected in the fresh post mortem situation, and one case after Thiel’s fixation . After opening the spinal canal, the fourth and fifth vertebral body and the sacral bone were removed until the branching PBSNs were found. Following these branches, the bone was consequently removed, and the posterior and interosseous sacroiliac ligaments (ISLs) were cut when necessary to follow the nerves, their connections, and further branching.
Dissection in dorsal approach
Having identified the location of the nerves, we dissected six specimens dorsally in order to validate our findings (Fig. 2; Online Resource 1). This included two unfixed, two Thiel-fixed , and two alcohol-fixed [20, 21] specimens. The long posterior sacroiliac ligament (L-PSIL) proved to be a key structure in quickly finding the PBSNs and their branches.
Plastination and histology
To ensure that the structures identified as communicating nerves per layout were actually nerves, we also evaluated them histologically. After treatment with alcohol and paraffin, the slices were stained for neurofilament (MAB 5262, Merck; 1:500) following standard procedures as HE and connective staining techniques (Online Resource 1). The slices were examined using a Zeiss AxioPhot 5 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Case L51 was an SIJ evaluation in a previous study  where PAS reaction was used . For case 52, additional oblique slices were cut from a plastination block using metachromatic dye staining . The serial sections of L51-L52 were evaluated macroscopically using polarized light microscopy (Zeiss AxioPhot) and scanned (Epson V750 pro, Epson, Seiko Epson Corp. 3-3-5 Owa, Suwa-shi, Nagano, Japan; Figs. 3 and 4).
For creating a 3D-model, CT images of cases L13, L24 and L51 were used for the segmentation of the pelvic ring and lower lumbar spine bones using the Materialise Mimics software (Materialise HQ, Technologielaan Belgium). Plastinated specimen were used for the spatial orientation (cases L50 and L52), as an MRI/CT/Plastinaton case (L51; Fig. 5; Online Resource 1). We introduced the data to Mimics as recently described [26, 27]. To create a virtual model of the dissected nerves, we chose five specimens representing the courses of nerves and their main variations (L18, L25, L29, L30, and L31) and measured the nerve branch lengths, the distances between branches as well as those between nerve connections and key structures. Using dissection images and the software’s immediate 3D-preview in correlation to the plastinated specimen, we added the nerve structures to the CT slices.
Based on the dissection, plastinated slices, histology, and the resulting models, we observed that the PBSNs and RCs spread in the direction of the SIJ, but do not reach it. Moreover, their paths perforate the SI ligaments.
Dissection in the ventral approach
All sacral spinal nerves could be followed in all cases except in cases L13 and T1 (2 of 48 cases; Fig. 1a, b; Online Resource 1). In this process, watery soft connective tissue and smaller accompanying vessels had to be removed. In all cases, RCs were revealed (Fig. 1b-d). The sacral PBSNs passes through the posterior sacral foramina and caudally reaches a fatty layer. Each PBSN was found to be connected by an RC to the lower segment PBSN, after another connective removal. The caudal RC of PBSN L5 to S1 pass from the L5 root at the intervertebral foramen L5/S1 to attach to PBSN S1 (Fig. 1a and b).
Thick aponeurotic lamellas arise cranially from the dorsal sacrum, where muscle fibers of the erector find these lamellas, seen ventrally after bone removal (Fig. 1c and d). Each periosteal layer gives root for a vertically aligned layer of the erector. On the cranial path, a RC has to encompass an aponeurotic layer laterally. The paths of the RCs result in a medial open concave arch (Fig. 5; Online Figure).
The gap for an RC is formed cranially open, caudally closed, open laterally for the downwards oriented part of the SIJ, and open medially for the emerging SIJ. Branches spread out laterally toward the SIJ; however, the joint itself was never observed to be reached by any nerve.
Dissections in the dorsal approach
After removing the covering of the thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) and muscle fibers of the erector, followed by the cutting of the longer and shorter dorsal SI ligaments, a PBSN and its RC become obvious, with further branches (Fig. 2).
These are seen perforating the layers of the short posterior sacroiliac ligaments and the long ligament (L-PSIL; Fig. 2a). To observe this, the L-PSIL has to be cut. The RC and plexus-like connections of the RC and the PBSN were observed in all cases. In the dorsal approach, the root of the medial cluneal nerves could be assumed as a result of plexus formation (Fig. 2b). Branches to the sacrotuberous ligament (STL) and the coccygeum were visible and passed through lamellas. Even after detachment of the gluteus maximus from the ligament, it was not clear if the branches of the PBSN reach this muscle’s ventral surface. However, there are different layers or lamellas below the sub-gluteal gliding space, which may have layers covering the STL, and a lateral cranial fascial layer, which connects cranially to the gluteus medius. The nerves passing in these spaces with vessels reached from segment PBSNs S2 and S3 (Fig. 2b). They cross each other, S2 more superficially.
Distinguishing the L-PSIL from the TLF is not easy, because both rise together from the lateral sacral crest, deeper ligaments and the posterior inferior iliac spine (Fig. 2a). The RC branches, however, merge to this region, forming a plexus.
Using plastination (3 cases; Fig. 3) compared to dissection data (49 cases Leipzig, 5 cases Tokyo = 54 cases; Figs. 1 and 2), the nerve branch pathways could be traced by looking for the always accompanying blood vessels. Nerves are visible as lesser brown structures and are distinguishable due to their higher refractive index (Fig. 3a). The vessels and the anticipated nerves pass in the gap between the ilium and the sacrum near the periosteum and in between the gaps of the periosteal layers and ligaments (Fig. 3a and b). Although the inner gaps seem to be empty at first, they are filled with looser connectives and fat (Fig. 3a, right bottom; Fig. 3b, artificial space between the STL and L-PSIL).
The RC of the sacral PBSN and their branching in between the sacral erector origins (Online Resource 1, Fig. 5).
In 27 of 57 cases (47%), in ventral approach 22 of 48 cases (52%), dorsal 2 of 6 (33%), seen in all plastinations. No doubled RCs.
Landmark PBSN L5: dorsocaudally, lateral to the superior articular processes of the sacral bone passing the iliolumbar ligament (not shown). Horizontal distance to the median line: 3–3.5 cm. RC to S1: directly caudolateral to the first posterior sacral foramen, 2.5–3 cm to the median line toward the SIJ passing the interosseous sacroiliac ligament (ISL) and reaching the axial interosseous ligament (AIL).
52 of 57 cases (91%), ventral approach 45 of 48 (94%), dorsal approach 4 of 6 (67%; L44, L46, L47, L49), seen in all plastinates. A second (parallel) connection was seen in 13 of 54 dissections (24%; Fig. 2a).
Landmark PBSN S1: 2–5 mm caudal of the caudal parts of the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) at height of posterior sacral foramen II, ventral to the L-PSIL. Spread some millimeters caudally, 1 cm caudal to the most caudal part of the PSIS, ventral of the L-PSIL, approximately 1 cm caudal to the posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS). Looping to the STL. The most lateral part is on a vertical line from PIIS to 1 cm lateral. Distance to the PSIS: 4–5 cm. Connection to RC S1 mostly caudal of the medial border of the L-PSIL, rarely laterally.
41 of 57 cases (72%), ventral approach 37 of 48 (77%), dorsal 4 of 6 (67%; L44, L45, L48, L49), seen in all plastinates. Parallel connection: 5 of 54 cases (9%).
Landmark PBSN S2: Divides early inside the 2nd posterior sacral foramen. RC S2/S3: 3rd posterior sacral foramen laterocranially, medial to the L-PSIL. Crossing RC S2 to RC S3: a field 2–3 cm caudal to the PIIS, i.e., 4–6 cm laterocaudal to the caudal parts of the PSIS (in two cases at PIIS height). Looping first medially, then dorsally toward the STL, level 5th sacral vertebra and coccygeum.
32 of 57 cases (56%), ventral approach 29 of 48 (60%) dorsal 3 of 6 (50%; L45, L46 and L48), in all plastinates. Three parallel aligned RC (6%).
Landmark PBSN S3: Divides inside the 3rd posterior sacral foramen ventrally to the L-PSIL and to the more superficial ligaments, crossing other nerves, dorsal near to the origin of the STL (Fig. 2b, Online Resource 2).
29 of 57 cases (51%), ventral approach 23 (48%) dorsal 3 (50%; L46, L48, and L49), in all plastinates. Small branches, thicker accompanying vessels. RC at a line 4th, 1 cm laterocaudally to the 3rd foramen.
Landmark PBSN S4: 3rd and 4th foramina vertically 2–2.5 cm to the median line. Branches superficially crossed by branches and plexuses from upper segments.
11 of 57 cases (19%), ventrally 9 (19%) dorsally one case (17%; L44), once seen in the plastinates (L56, Fig. 3a). Thin branch, thick vessels.
Landmark RBSN S5: 5th posterior sacral foramen al line 1.5 cm to median. Branches crossed by upper segments. Run caudally along the coccygeum.
Ramifications of the RC/PBSN
Further distal spreading seen in between the periosteal layers or ligaments, in gaps (Fig. 1b). There are ligamentous compartments (Fig. 1c, d) behind the SIJ that are in contact with the connectives in the wide gaps and thus indirectly with the nerve branches and accompanying vessels within. These are the AIL and ISL, reached by the RC/PBSN branches from L5-S1, in terms of an upward orientation of the branches perhaps coming from S2 (Fig. 3, Online Resource 2).
Other branches (S1-S4/5) pass from the gaps to tunnels which perforate the L-PSIL, posterior sacroiliac ligaments (PSILs), breves et longi, the TLF, and final layers of the STL (Fig. 1c). From these, the nerves spread out distally and form other nerves, e.g., the medial cluneal nerves (Fig. 2b).
To validate the dissection- and plastination-based findings, crossing branches of RCs were dissected and removed (Fig. 4a, b), and HE and immunostaining (Fig. 4c). We did not see cells at the PBSN/RC intersection. Immunostaining for neurofilament revealed the nerves (Fig. 4d). In slices, nerves are indirectly verified by their analog layout in dissections, and by their accompanying vessels, as seen sub-macroscopically (Fig. 3) or macroscopically (Figs. 1c, 2 and 3). Vessels accompany the RCs in spaces with looser connectives (Fig. 4e), connected by collagenous structures revealed by the auto-fluorescence of the outer looser connectives (Fig. 4f). The nerves were never free of vessels; neurovascular bundles were formed by such loose connectives in wider spaces (Fig. 4e, f, g). These bundles pass fatty connectives (Fig. 4c, e–g) that are structured, as the neurovascular bundles curve lateral to such connective lamella which are all embedded in fat (Fig. 4g).
The findings were summarized in the form of a 3D model (Fig. 5).
We follow Bogduk’s clinical experience and his reasoning regarding the two entities that explain pain and innervation of the sacral region: “SIJ pain”, and “ligament (lumbosacral) pain” . Bogduk stated that “sacroiliac pain” encompasses both terms, an insight he gained from observations regarding anesthesia:” Lateral branch blocks relieve pain from the posterior ligaments; they cannot block pain from the sacroiliac joint. Intra-articular blocks relieve joint pain; they do not relieve ligament pain” .
We see the anatomical background for such clinical phenomenon in the form of gaps through which the nerves pass. More knowledge on what “SI innervation” means anatomically would allow clinicians to understand normal (painless) function. This was the intention of this study—to enable clinicians to address anatomical structures during their treatment.
However, for definitive proof of the term “SIJ innervation”, it must be shown that nerve endings or synapses reach the joint, and this must also be true for a final proof of “SI ligament innervation”. However, as in previous studies, this was not observed.
For the ventral parts of the SIJ, the term “innervation” is conducted by the research of Szadek’s group [5, 6]. Their term “SIJ innervation” may be correct for the ventral side of the SIJ, despite even Szadek’s experiments failed to demonstrate free nerve endings or synapses.
For the dorsal side of the SIJ, however, we refer here in regards to “innervation” to the viewpoint that the nerves and the structures they pass are not related to each other, since they are separated by connectives or fat (Figs. 1d and 2b), i.e., by the “empty” spaces observed histologically (Fig. 4f-d) or in plastinated specimen (Fig. 3). In this study, we found these spaces surrounding each branch, accompanied by vessels, thus forming neurovascular bundles. This is, thus, the anatomically “healthy” situation. The nerves pass in the gaps and tunnels, and may end there: The SIJ itself is not reached.
In dorsolateral approach, Fortin macroscopically observed branches of a communicating branch RC and of PBSN S1 to S4 . These observations were already published [1, 29]. In our opinion, compared to the ventral approach (Fig. 1), the dorsolateral approach used by Fortin (Fig. 2) showed the nerve from the origin to the periphery, approaching dorsolaterally but not reaching the SIJ. By following the nerves, we can determine their relation to the ligaments in the 57 dissected cases using different approaches and in three serial plastination sectioning (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5).
Existence of the sacral RC
We observed the RC in the sacral region as Fortin and others reported [1, 13, 29]. Despite high topographical variation (Fig. 5b), the general layout was consistent in all cases (Figs. 1, 2 and 3; Online Resource 2). In 30 cases, we could not see the RC L5/S1 (Online Resource 1). The sacral RCs are, however, continuations of the described lumbar RC [1, 9, 11, 12, 29]. The RC L5/S1 was not in main focus here and may be an anatomical structure like the sacral and lumbar RCs. We also have hints for RCs connecting the PBSN in coccygeal region (11 of 57 cases, 19%).
Segmental (autochthonic) innervation is unlikely in the sacral region
The lumbar PBSN have recently been described to form a plexus [10, 11, 30]. In the sacral region, we also observed the RC/PBSN branches forming a plexus and connecting to the coccygeal branches (Figs. 1, 2, 4a, 5; Online Resource 2). Consequently, distinct segmental innervation of the dorsal sacral region also seems unlikely. The lumbo-sacral musculature of the erector, the ligaments seen here, and the skin can rarely be described as segmentally arranged (i.e., strictly “autochthonic” innervation).
Hungerfold’s group reported delayed erector onset in patients with pain in the SIJ and muscles such as the gluteus maximus , and give a biomechanical explanation for this reactive onset.
We observed gaps of the erector (Figs. 1c, 3a) and layers of gluteal aponeurosis, as McGrath also have noticed , embedded in tunnels (Figs. 2b and 3b). Hungerfold’s onset can be seen as a reactive change of the erector resulting in pressing or narrowing of the gaps seen here (Fig. 3b) resulting in a kind of entrapment. Interestingly, any widening of these gaps may be helpful, as yoga may help in SI pain .
Branches of RC/PBSN directing to the SIJ passing ligaments
A continuous gap without any capsule was observed dorsal to the joint cartilage and ventral to the axial interosseous ligament (AIL; Fig. 3). Fortin et al. described tunnel-like gap connections as follows: “Dissections revealed nerve branches derived from the loops connecting S1 to S4 dorsal rami to the dorsal ligaments” . They did not observe branches to the joint, but to the ligaments; however, based on these data and the literature, the authors concluded that “... the SIJ…is innervated [dorsally, HS]” .
Our macroscopic findings cannot exclude dorsal innervation of the joint by branches of the S2 or S3; our data on the path of the sacral RC branches also leave open the question of whether smaller S2 and S3 branches may reach the joint cartilage. The RC S1/S2 and RC S2/S3 were observed in 52 and 41 of the 57 cases, respectively, not ending to the SIJ (Online Resource 1).
Branches of RC/PBSN to “inner SI ligaments” ISL and AIL: segments L5-S1
Japanese literature describes a branch from the lumbar PBSN L4 and L5, a branch reaching the SIJ region cranially, quoted, but not seen by Fortin . We observed the L5 branch connecting to S1 in approximately half of the cases (47%, Fig. 1b, Online Resource 1; ). This branch passes the iliolumbar ligament , before possibly branching elsewhere near to the cranial SIJ. Dorsal of the joint, we see smaller nerves of RC/PBSN segments L5 and S1 passing the interosseous sacroiliac ligament (ISL) and targeting the AIL (Fig. 3). Based on our dissections, compared to the plastinated specimen (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5), we underline Fortin’s description of these RC branches reaching the AIL, a relatively weak and small part of the ISL near the joint [13, 35]. The nerve fibers in the gaps could explain ISL/AIL pain due to L5 and S1, referred as sciatic pain, and not “innervation of the SIJ” as Vilensky and Fortin claim [16, 17]. Our findings provide however a hint for “inner SI ligament innervation” of the region near the joint cartilage, as of the ISL and AIL; arguments for “ligament innervation” with referred sciatic pain as an anatomical explanation for Bogduk’s clinical term “ligament pain” .
Branches of RC/PBSN directing “outer SI ligaments” L-PSIL, the PSILs, TLF, and STL: segments S1-S4
Neurovascular bundles are seen passing through fat-filled flat tunnels inside the voluminous ligamentous complex behind the SIJ and medial to the long posterior sacro iliac ligament (L-PSIL), grouped together to form the shorter ligaments, PSIL (Figs. 1c, 2, 3, 4a, 5; ).
McGrath’s group reported that these nerves run from gaps to small holes that perforate the PSIL and branch to the L-PSIL . We also observed PBSN/RC S1, S2, and S3 branches that perforate the L-PSIL laterally (Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 5).
The L-PSIL as part of the PSIL  has been proposed as pain generator [7, 32]. As McGrath et al. described three layers , we see these main layers with their neurovascular bundles passing in small fatty gaps in between the L-PSIL/PSIL compartment, identifiable by their accompanying vessels (Figs. 1c, d, 2, and 3).
The neurovascular bundles cross and twist (Fig. 2b, Online Resource 2). We have reported that the sacrotuberous ligament STL twists for some functional reasons . However, both the twisted nerves arise earlier from the plexus, which makes more precise segmental assignment very difficult, except for the general statement of their main origin from S1-S4 and their targeting of such “outer” SI ligaments”.
“SIJ innervation” and “SI ligament innervation” correlates to “SIJ pain” and “SI ligament pain”
Ventral branches of the SIJ are emphasized to reach and thus innerve the ventral SIJ, i.e., the ventral capsule, near the cartilage, along with branches of the anterior branch of the spinal nerve S2 [1, 6, 17, 36]. Cranially, the joint may be reached by PBSN L5 [1, 9, 10, 12, 13].
When nerves may not reach the dorsal SIJ, as we describe here, pain described by Bogduk as “ligament pain” could arise from ligaments or from the nearby connectives. These connectives are initially seen as to be “filling” the ligament gaps, due to the gliding and rotational movements involving the ISL, L-PSIL, and PSIL [28, 37, 38]. During these movements (of less than 0.5 mm and 1°, respectively), the RC passes in a nearly motionless region medial to the L-PSIL under normal conditions (Figs. 1c, d; 3).
The neurovascular bundles are located like an eye of cyclone inside these loaded ligaments. The arising medial cluneal nerves, for example, could become entrapped as they pass through the ISL/AIL compartments, as described by Konno et al., resulting in multiple type of pain (Fig. 1c) .
Also the SIJ itself is described to be a main pain generator [19, 40]. The data from the literature and our research suggest that not only the (ventral and cranial) joint itself, but also the dorsal compartments of the SI region seen here could be such generators, as McGrath, Vleeming, and others have suggested for the L-PSIL [7, 32]. We think that the inner and outer ligaments may be considered as dorsal parts of the SI region, due to the open dorsal anatomy; there is no dorsal synovial ending of the joint.
Neurovascular bundles in the gaps and tunnels behind the SIJ
A correlation between the width of the gaps and adequate anesthesia has already been established . Thus, the gap itself may provide information about the fat-embedded PBSN/RC branches (Fig. 4d). Comparable nerve entrapment syndromes are thought to occur for the medianus and ulnar nerves, as well as for nerves of the size seen here, perforating the abdominal wall [42, 43].
Ischemic endoneural vascularity damage may also apply to the nerves seen here, passing the “inner” and “outer SI ligaments”.
The RC/PBSN branches with their vessels and loose connectives are surrounded by thicker masses of collagen (Figs. 3a, 4f; Online Resource 2) [23, 44, 45]. We know that collagen induces piezoelectrical potentials , and that collagen consists mainly water, not protein—a tendon consists of 62% water . Highly structured water may explain this piezoelectric effect of collagen, which may have an impact on the RC/PBSN (Fig. 3). In the healthy anatomical state, no pain is induced because the bundles are freely embedded.
These structural masses of collagen surrounding the RC/PBSN bundles have another general but unexplained property. Ott’s group, and others, have shown that a “dead”, watery, cell-free collagenous matrix can be made functional by foreign blood [48, 49]. This “matrix” has a defined anatomy, which we see here poor in cell number (bradytrophic) surrounding and even building the RC/PBSN bundles with collagen, fat, and (synovial) water (Figs. 3a, 4). With Ott’s experiments in the background of our thinking, the collagen, and water (which synovia and collagen mainly consists of) should be considered regarding “SI innervation” [48, 49].
If we are correct, the synovial milieu—the soft, fluid matter surrounding the PBSN/RC near the “inner ligaments”—plays a role in joint homeostasis and resultant symptoms (Fig. 3a). This has recently been discussed for the hip—synovial change is an early sign for hip pain . Comparatively, changes to the open gaps behind the SIJ may be predictive of “SIJ pain” or more specifically, “inner SI ligament pain”. This has been demonstrated daily for 30 years with the clinical application of anesthetics to neurovascular bundles in the gaps, to inner ligaments, and also to the SIJ (Figs. 2a, 3a) [14, 15, 28, 41, 51].
Involvement of watery fluids in SI pain (or “SIJ pain”) is also suggested by Weber’s group . Background noise on MRI is seen as early evidence of SIJ disease beneath the joint in elite athletes. Fittingly, we see the RC/PBSN nerves very near to the sacral bone (Fig. 3).
Further proof regarding the possible importance of the watery gaps seen here could be the higher substance P content, which for the hip has been measured in patients with pain , although there appears to be no such study regarding the SIJ.
A main conclusion of our research would be to bring these watery gaps of the SIJ region to clinical thinking on what is “SI innervation” and thus what “SI pain” may be related to. Any hypothetical change of fluids, generally, and in the gaps surrounding the nerves seen here, in our case, may explain, why sacroiliitis (and pain) is related to signs of (painful) ankylosing spondylitis and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, and also to diseases distant from the SI region, such as arthritis, enthesitis, and dactylitis and extra-articular diseases such as uveitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease—topics on which Winter et al. recently performed an interesting meta-analysis .
Conversely, asymptomatic radiological involvement of the SIJ is reported to occur in up to 50% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease .
Bogduk stated the term “SI pain” to be either “ligament pain” or “SIJ pain” . Based on our data, we suggest that “SI innervation” involves “inner SI ligament innervation” and “outer SI ligament innervation”. In conclusion, while ventral and cranial “SIJ innervation” has been discussed [12, 13], dorsal SIJ innervation, i.e., innervation of the joint’s cartilage, remains unproven.
BIAS and outlook
Possible autonomic involvement by the periarterial plexus of the vessels in the gaps behind the SIJ was not investigated, as anticipated by Fortin . Our description of the RCs/PBSNs and their branches passing in gaps behind the SIJ could be pathological to some extent due to the advanced age of the subjects dissected (median age, 81 years). 61% of German adults have had “back pain” one year ago, of which 15% had chronic pain . Whether the gaps observed are also present in the younger population needs to be reviewed in future studies.
Clara M (ed) (1953) Das Nervensystem des Menschen. Ein Lehrbuch für Studierende und Ärzte, 2, verbesserte edn. Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag, Leipzig
Ikeda R (1991) Innervation of the sacroiliac joint. Macroscopical and histological studies. Nihon Ika Daigaku Zasshi 58(5):587–596
Fortin JD, Washington WJ, Falco FJ (1999) Three pathways between the sacroiliac joint and neural structures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20(8):1429–1434
Willard FH, Carreiro JE, Manko W (1998) Third interdisciplinary world congress on low back and pelvic pain. Vienna, Austria: 207–209
Szadek KM, Hoogland PV, Zuurmond WW, de Lange JJ, Perez RS (2008) Nociceptive nerve fibers in the sacroiliac joint in humans. Reg Anesth Pain Med 33(1):36–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2007.07.011
Szadek KM, Hoogland PVJM, Zuurmond WWA, de Lange JJ, Perez RSGM (2010) Possible nociceptive structures in the sacroiliac joint cartilage: an immunohistochemical study. Clin Anat 23(2):192–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20908
Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH (2012) The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat 221(6):537–567
Tubbs RS (ed) (2015) Nerves and Nerve Injuries. Vol. 1: History, Embryology, Anatomy, Imaging, and Diagnostics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo
Bogduk N (1983) The innervation of the lumbar spine. Spine 8(3):286–293
Saito T, Steinke H, Miyaki T, Nawa S, Umemoto K, Miyakawa K, Wakao N, Asamoto K, Nakano T (2013) Analysis of the posterior ramus of the lumbar spinal nerve: the structure of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve. Anesthesiology 118(1):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318272f40a
Saito T, Steinke H (2015) The dorsal rootlets, ventral rootlets, spinal nerve, and rami. In: Tubbs RS (ed) Nerves and Nerve Injuries, vol 1. History, Embryology, Anatomy, Imaging, and Diagnostics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston, Heidelberg, London, New York, Oxford, Paris, San Diego, San Francisco, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, pp 451–469
Steinke H, Saito T, Miyaki T, Oi Y, Itoh M, Spanel-Borowski K (2009) Anatomy of the human thoracolumbar Rami dorsales nervi spinalis. Ann Anat 191(4):408–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2009.04.002
Fortin JD, Kissling RO, O’Connor BL, Vilensky JA (1999) Sacroiliac joint innervation and pain. Am J Orthop 28(12):687–690
Fortin JD, Aprill CN, Ponthieux B, Pier J (1994) Sacroiliac joint. Pain referral maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part II: clinical evaluation. Spine 19(13):1483–1489
Fortin JD, Dwyer AP, West S, Pier J (1994) Sacroiliac joint. Pain referral maps upon applying a new injection/arthrography technique. Part I: asymptomatic volunteers. Spine 19(13):1475–1482
Vilensky JA, O’Connor BL, Fortin JD, Merkel GJ, Jimenez AM, Scofield BA, Kleiner JB (2002) Histologic analysis of neural elements in the human sacroiliac joint. Spine 27(11):1202–1207
Fortin JD, Vilensky JA, Merkel GJ (2003) Can the sacroiliac joint cause sciatica? Pain Physician 6(3):269–271
Forst SL, Wheeler MT, Fortin JD, Vilensky JA (2006) The sacroiliac joint: anatomy, physiology and clinical significance. Pain Physician 9(1):61–67
Vleeming A, Stoeckart R, Volkers AC, Snijders CJ (1990) Relation between form and function in the sacroiliac joint. Part I: Clin Anat Aspects Spine 15(2):130–132
Hammer N, Löffler S, Feja C, Sandrock M, Schmidt W, Bechmann I, Steinke H (2012) Ethanol-glycerin fixation with thymol conservation: a potential alternative to formaldehyde and phenol embalming. Anat Sci Educ 5(4):225–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1270
Hammer N, Löffler S, Feja C, Bechmann I, Steinke H (2011) Substitution of formaldehyde in gross anatomy is possible. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(7):610–611. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr035
Hammer N, Löffler S, Bechmann I, Steinke H, Hädrich C, Feja C (2015) Comparison of modified thiel embalming and ethanol-glycerin fixation in an anatomy environment: potentials and limitations of two complementary techniques. Anat Sci Educ 8(1):74–85
Wiersbicki D, Völker A, Heyde C-E, Steinke H (2019) Ligamental compartments and their relation to the passing spinal nerves are detectable with MRI inside the lumbar neural foramina. Eur Spine J 28(8):1811–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06024-y
Steinke H, Wiersbicki D, Speckert M-L, Merkwitz C, Wolfskämpf T, Wolf B (2018) Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) reaction and plastination in whole body slices. A novel technique to identify fascial tissue structures. Ann of Anat—Anatomischer Anzeiger 216:29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.10.001
Kürtül I, Hammer N, Rabi S, Saito T, Böhme J, Steinke H (2012) Oblique sectional planes of block plastinates eased by Sac Plastination. Ann Anat 194(4):404–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2011.11.006
Hammer N, Steinke H, Slowik V, Josten C, Stadler J, Böhme J, Spanel-Borowski K (2009) The sacrotuberous and the sacrospinous ligament–a virtual reconstruction. Ann Anat—Anatomischer Anzeiger 191(4):417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2009.03.001
Steinke H, Hammer N, Slowik V, Stadler J, Josten C, Bohme J, Spanel-Borowski K (2010) Novel insights into the sacroiliac joint ligaments. Spine 35(3):257–263. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b7c675 (Phila Pa 1976)
Bogduk N (2017) A commentary on appropriate use criteria for sacroiliac pain. Pain Med 18(11):2055–2057
Pernkopf E (1943) Bauch, Becken und Beckengliedmaße. Urban und Schwarzenberg, Berlin, Wien
Saito T, Yoshimoto M, Yamamoto Y, Miyaki T, Itoh M, Shimizu S, Oi Y, Schmidt W, Steinke H (2006) The medial branch of the lateral branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 28(3):228–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0090-3
Hungerford B, Gilleard W, Hodges P (2003) Evidence of altered lumbopelvic muscle recruitment in the presence of sacroiliac joint pain. Spine 28(14):1593–1600
McGrath C, Nicholson H, Hurst P (2009) The long posterior sacroiliac ligament. A histological study of morphological relations in the posterior sacroiliac region. Joint Bone Spine 76(1):57–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.02.015
Anheyer D, Haller H, Lauche R, Dobos G, Cramer H (2021) Yoga for treating low back pain. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002416
Hammer N, Steinke H, Bohme J, Stadler J, Josten C, Spanel-Borowski K (2010) Description of the iliolumbar ligament for computer-assisted reconstruction. Ann Anat 192(3):162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2010.02.003
Bechtel R (2001) Physical characteristics of the axial interosseous ligament of the human sacroiliac joint. Spine J 1(4):255–259
Cox M, Ng G, Mashriqi F, Iwanaga J, Alonso F, Tubbs K, Loukas M, Oskouian RJ, Tubbs RS (2017) Innervation of the anterior sacroiliac joint. World Neurosurg 107:750–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.062
Kibsgård TJ, Röhrl SM, Røise O, Sturesson B, Stuge B (2017) Movement of the sacroiliac joint during the Active Straight Leg Raise test in patients with long-lasting severe sacroiliac joint pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 47:40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.05.014
Hammer N, Scholze M, Kibsgård T, Klima S, Schleifenbaum S, Seidel T, Werner M, Grunert R (2019) Physiological in vitro sacroiliac joint motion. A study on three-dimensional posterior pelvic ring kinematics. J Anat 234(3):346–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12924
Konno T, Aota Y, Saito T, Qu N, Hayashi S, Kawata S, Itoh M (2017) Anatomical study of middle cluneal nerve entrapment. J Pain Res 10:1431–1435. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S135382
Foley BS, Buschbacher RM (2006) Sacroiliac joint pain. Anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85(12):997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000247633.68694.c1
Vandervennet W, van Boxem K, Peene L, Mesotten D, Buyse K, Devooght P, Mestrum R, Puylaert M, Vanlantschoot A, Vanneste T, van Zundert J (2021) Does the presence of cranial contrast spread during a sacroiliac joint injection predict short-term outcome? Reg Anesth Pain Med 46(3):217–221. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2020-101673
Applegate WV, Buckwalter NR (1997) Microanatomy of the structures contributing to abdominal cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome. J Am Board Fam Pract 10(5):329–332
Messina A, Messina JC (1995) Transposition of the ulnar nerve and its vascular bundle for the entrapment syndrome at the elbow. J Hand Surg 20(5):638–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-7681(05)80126-3
Steinke H, Rabi S, Saito T (2008) Staining body slices before and after plastination. Europ J Anat 12(1):51–55
Gartenberg A, Nessim A, Cho W (2021) Sacroiliac joint dysfunction Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur Spine J 30(10):2936–2943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06927-9
Fukada E, Ueda H, Rinaldi R (1976) Piezoelectric and related properties of hydrated collagen. Biophys J 16(8):911–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(76)85741-4
Fullerton GD, Amurao MR (2006) Evidence that collagen and tendon have monolayer water coverage in the native state. Cell Biol Int 30(1):56–65
Gerli MFM, Guyette JP, Evangelista-Leite D, Ghoshhajra BB, Ott HC (2018) Perfusion decellularization of a human limb: a novel platform for composite tissue engineering and reconstructive surgery. PLoS ONE 13(1):e0191497
Ott HC, Clippinger B, Conrad C, Schuetz C, Pomerantseva I, Ikonomou L, Kotton D, Vacanti JP (2010) Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nat Med 16(8):927–933
Mayes S, Ferris A-R, Smith P, Cook J (2020) Hip joint effusion-synovitis is associated with hip pain and sports/recreation function in female professional ballet dancers. Clin J Sport Med : Official J Canadian Acad Sport Med 30(4):341–347. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000000595
Vleeming A, Albert HB, Ostgaard HC, Sturesson B, Stuge B (2008) European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. Eur Spine J 17(6):794–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0602-4
Weber U, Jurik AG, Zejden A, Larsen E, Jørgensen SH, Rufibach K, Schioldan C, Schmidt-Olsen S (2018) Frequency and anatomic distribution of magnetic resonance imaging features in the sacroiliac joints of young athletes. Exploring “Background Noise” toward a data-driven definition of sacroiliitis in early spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 70(5):736–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40429
Wang H, Zheng X-F, Zhang X, Li Z, Shen C, Zhu J-F, Cui Y-M, Chen X-D (2014) Increasing substance P levels in serum and synovial tissues from patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15(1):1–8
de Winter JJ, van Mens LJ, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Baeten DL (2016) Prevalence of peripheral and extra-articular disease in ankylosing spondylitis versus non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. A Meta-Analysis Arthritis Res Therapy 18:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1093-z
Salvarani C, Fries W (2009) Clinical features and epidemiology of spondyloarthritides associated with inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 15(20):2449–2455. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.2449
von der Lippe E, Krause L, Prost M, Wengler A, Leddin J, Müller A, Zeisler M-L, Anton A, Rommel A (2021) Prävalenz von rücken-und nackenschmerzen in deutschland. J Health Monit. https://doi.org/10.25646/7854
We thank Angela Ehrlich for her help in histology. Matthias Oehme, Katja Schmidt and Elisa Schubert helped in organizing the cases. Figure 3a is a scan of PAS serial sections by Dina Wiersbicki’s work  which we thank for allowance of evaluating the CT and MRI data (Case L51). Case L1 was dissected together with Niels Hammer 2004, further cases with other students. Thomas Wolfskämpf plastinated. Charlotte Kulow proofread the manuscript. The Leipzig and Tokyo body donors were convinced of the importance of anatomy in lifetime: They gave us their bodies. Their trust in our work is the greatest justification for our gratitude and respect. From their decision, we have freedom of our anatomical research. Thank you.
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The study was partially funded by Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V. (grant number P425-A687).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
This study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Medical Faculty at the University of Leipzig, Germany (approval number 398/171-ek) and was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to participate
While alive, the donors had given consent for the use of their body parts for scientific purposes at the Department of Anatomy of the Tokyo Medical University, and at the Institute of Anatomy, University of Leipzig in accordance with the.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Steinke, H., Saito, T., Kuehner, J. et al. Sacroiliac innervation. Eur Spine J 31, 2831–2843 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07353-1
- Sacroiliac joint
- Sacroiliac pain
- Ligament pain