Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thoracogenic scoliosis: a retrospective review of 129 pediatric patients with a mean follow-up of 10 years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the midterm outcome of lateral thoracotomy (LT) in skeletally immature patients concerning thoracogenic scoliosis development and lung parenchyma resection (LPR) extent.

Methods

In total, 129 children met the inclusion criteria: (1) LT during the study period; (2) skeletally immature at the time of LT; (3) clinical and radiographic follow-up of at least 3 years; and (4) no spinal or thoracic deformity on radiographs before LT. Patients were grouped according to their underlying disease, age at LT, and LPR extent. Radiographic parameters were assessed. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and univariate and multivariate analysis were performed.

Results

Of 129, 108 patients underwent pneumonectomy (9; 9.1%), lobectomy (79; 61.2%), segmentectomy (20; 15.5%) and 21 patients LT without LPR. The mean age at LT and at last radiological follow-up was 5.5 years (birth-17.8) and 15.2 years (3.4–33.2). The mean follow-up was 10 years (3–28.1). Scoliosis developed on average 5.3 years after LT. The mean Cobb angle was 22.1° (11–90°); > 10° in 37/129 patients (28.7%), of whom 5/129 (3.9%) had > 45°. The average vertebral rotation was 16.2° (2–43°; grade 0–II). RVAD was 26.5° (8°-33°) and 15.3° (2–43°) in patients with Cobb > 45° and ≤ 45°. Gender, age at surgery, and extent of LPR were not risk factors for post-thoracotomy scoliosis (p > 0.05), although younger patients developed a more severe deformity.

Conclusion

Although post-thoracotomy scoliosis is not associated with significant rotation, the risk of curve progression > 45° is relatively high. Regular follow-up is required as scoliosis may develop several years after LT with or without LPR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eby SF, Hilaire TS, Glotzbecker M et al (2018) Thoracogenic spinal deformity: a rare cause of early-onset scoliosis. J Neurosurg Spine 29(6):674–679. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.SPINE171389

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC et al (2008) idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371(9623):1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sung S, Chae HW, Lee HS et al (2021) Incidence and surgery rate of idiopathic scoliosis: a nationwide database study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(15):8152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18158152

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobsen S, Rosenklint A, Halkier E (1974) Post-pneumonectomy scoliosis. Acta Orthop Scand 45(6):867–872. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453677408989697

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaureguizar E, Vázquez J, Murcia J et al (1985) Morbid musculoskeletal sequelae of thoracotomy for tracheoesophageal fistula. J Pediatr Surg 20(5):511–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(85)80477-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wong-Chung J, France J, Gillespie R (1992) Scoliosis caused by rib fusion after thoracotomy for esophageal atresia. Report of a case and review of the literature. Spine 17:851–854. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199207000-00024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sistonen SJ, Helenius I, Peltonen J et al (2009) Natural history of spinal anomalies and scoliosis associated with esophageal atresia. Pediatrics 124(6):e1198–e1204. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-3704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shelton JE, Julian R, Walburgh E et al (1986) Functional scoliosis as a long-term complication of surgical ligation for patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants. J Pediatr Surg 21(10):855–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3468(86)80007-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bal S, Elshershari H, Celiker R et al (2003) Thoracic sequels after thoracotomies in children with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young 13(3):264–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Westfelt JN, Nordwall A (1991) Thoracotomy and scoliosis. Spine 16:1124–1125. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199109000-00019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mehta MH (1972) The rib-vertebra angle in the early diagnosis between resolving and progressive infantile scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54(2):230–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Canavese F, Turcot K, Holveck J et al (2011) Changes of concave and convex rib-vertebral angle, angle difference and angle ratio in patients with right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20(1):129–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1563-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nash CL Jr, Moe JH (1969) A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(2):223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mishra PR, Tinawi GK, Stringer MD (2020) Scoliosis after thoracotomy repair of esophageal atresia: a systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int 36(7):755–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04683-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang S, Andras LM, Redding GJ, Skaggs DL (2016) Early-onset scoliosis: a review of history, current treatment, and future directions. Pediatrics 137(1):10–1542. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cobb J (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr Course Lect 5:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lowe T (1987) Mortality-morbidity committee report. Scoliosis Research Society Meeting, Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lam GC, Hill DL, Le LH et al (2009) Vertebral rotation measurement: a summary and comparison of common radiographic and CT methods. Scoliosis 3:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-3-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Makita S, Kaneko K, Ono Y et al (2017) Risk factors for thoracic and spinal deformities following lung resection in neonates, infants, and children. Surg Today 47(7):810–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1434-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilsanz V, Boechat IM, Birnberg FA et al (1983) Scoliosis after thoracotomy for esophageal atresia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 141(3):457–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04683-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dimeglio A, Canavese F (2012) The growing spine: how spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth. Eur Spine J 21(1):64–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1983-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dimeglio A, Canavese F (2013) Progression or not progression? How to deal with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis during puberty. J Child Orthop 7(1):43–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0463-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Biezen FC, Bakx PA, De Villeneuve VH et al (1993) Scoliosis in children after thoracotomy for aortic coarctation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(4):514–518. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199304000-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lawal TA, Gosemann JH, Kuebler JF et al (2009) Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy improves midterm musculoskeletal status and cosmesis in infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg 87(1):224–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.069

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Durning RP, Scoles PV, Fox OD (1980) Scoliosis after thoracotomy in tracheoesophageal fistula patients. A follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62(7):1156–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roclawski M, Sabiniewicz R, Potaz P et al (2009) Scoliosis in patients with aortic coarctation and patent ductus arteriosus: does standard posterolateral thoracotomy play a role in the development of the lateral curve of the spine? Pediatr Cardiol 30(7):941–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-009-9469-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaito T, Shimada M, Ichikawa H et al (2018) Prevalence of and predictive factors for scoliosis after surgery for congenital heart disease in the first year of life. JB JS Open Access 3(1):e0045. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00045

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Dimeglio A, Canavese F (2020) The immature spine: growth and idiopathic scoliosis. Ann Transl Med 8(2):22. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2019.11.134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Professor Emmanuel Chazard for the statistical analysis. Université de Lille, CHU Lille, CERIM EA2694, F-59000 Lille, France.

Funding

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Riccardo Sacco and Federico Canavese. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Riccardo Sacco, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Canavese.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Jeanne de Flandre Hospital of Lille.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sacco, R., Bonnevalle, M., Nectoux, E. et al. Thoracogenic scoliosis: a retrospective review of 129 pediatric patients with a mean follow-up of 10 years. Eur Spine J 31, 2287–2294 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07242-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07242-7

Keywords

Navigation