Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk assessment of vertebral artery injury in anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) surgery: a cadaveric and radiologic study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We have introduced a novel surgery technique named anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. As reported, the satisfactory postoperative outcome can be attributed to the larger decompression width. However, it may associate with high prevalence of vertebral artery injury (VAI) theoretically. Thus, assessment of the vulnerability of vertebral artery in ACAF is of great importance.

Methods

Computed tomographic scan data of 28 patients were retrospectively studied. Seven radiographic parameters were evaluated: uncinate process (UP) tips distance, transverse foramen (TF)-UP tips distance, TF-LWL (the ipsilateral limited wedging line) distance, the limited distance of lateral decompression, the maximum oblique angle of LWL, TF-LWG (the lateral wall of groove) distance, and width of groove. Eleven fresh cadaveric spines undergoing ACAF surgery were also studied. Two anatomic parameters were evaluated: width of groove and LWG-TF distance.

Results

The UP tips distance increased from C3 to C6 and tended to be larger in males. The UP tip-TF distance and LWL-TF distance were smallest at C4, but both were larger than 2 mm. Maximum oblique angle decreased from C3 to C6. Postoperatively, both radiographic and cadaveric measurements showed the width of groove was larger than UP tips distance, but LWG-TF distance was larger than 2 mm in all levels.

Conclusion

UP can be used as anatomical landmarks to avoid VAI during ACAF surgery. Radiographic and cadaveric measurements verified the safety of ACAF surgery, even for those cases with wedging and lateral slotting.

Graphic abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harel R, Stylianou P, Knoller N (2016) Cervical spine surgery: approach related complications. World Neurosurg 94:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pitzen TR, Chrobok J, Tulik J, Ruffing S, Drumm J, Sova L et al (2009) Implant complications, fusion, loss of lordosis, and outcome after anterior cervical plating with dynamic or rigid plates. Spine 34(7):641–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tetreault L, Ibrahim A, Côté P, Singh A, Fehlings MG (2015) A systematic review of clinical and surgical predictors of complications following surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 24(1):77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lunardini DJ, Eskander MS, Even JL, Dunlap JT, Chen AF, Lee JY et al (2014) Vertebral artery injuries in cervical spine surgery. Spine J 14(8):1520–1525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peng CW, Chou BT, Bendo JA, Spivak JM (2009) Vertebral artery injury in cervical spine surgery: anatomical considerations, management, and preventive measures. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 9(1):70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Miyata M, Takemoto M, Nakamura T (2008) Vertebral artery injury during cervical spine surgery: a survey of more than 5600 operations. Spine 33(7):779–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burke JP, Gerszten PC, Welch WC (2005) Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine J 5(5):508–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith MD, Emery S, Dudley A, Murray K, Leventhal M (1993) Vertebral artery injury during anterior decompression of the cervical spine. A retrospective review of ten patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75-B(3):410–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Epstein N (2002) Diagnosis and surgical management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 2(6):436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Edwards C, Heller JG, Murakami H (2002) Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine 27(11):1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng F, Ruan W, Liu Z, Li Y, Cai L (2016) Anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of cervical compressive myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 27:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sun J, Shi J, Xu X, Yang Y, Wang Y, Kong Q et al (2017) Anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion surgery for the treatment of multilevel severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy: preliminary clinical results of a novel technique. Eur Spine J 27(6):1469–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang H, Sun J, Shi J, Shi G, Guo Y, Yang Y (2018) Anterior controllable antedisplacement fusion (acaf) for severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: comparison with anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion (accf). World Neurosurg 115:e428–e436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun JC, Yang HS, Shi J (2018) Morphometric analysis of uncinate process as a landmark for anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion surgery a study of radiological anatomy. World Neurosurg 113:e101–e107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsunaga S, Sakou T (2012) Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine-etiology and natural history. Spine 37(5):309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Güvencer M, Men S, Naderi S, Kiray A, Tetik S (2006) The V2 segment of the vertebral artery in anterior and anterolateral cervical spinal surgery: a cadaver angiographic study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 108(5):440–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee TH, Kim SJ, Chung IH (2012) Morphometrical study of uncinate processes and vertebral body of cervical spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 51(5):247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim SH, Lee JH, Kim JH, Chun KS, Chang JC (2012) Anatomical morphometric study of the cervical uncinate process and surrounding structures. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52(4):300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ebraheim N, Lu J, Brown JA, Biyani A, Yeasting RA (1996) Vulnerability of vertebral artery in anterolateral decompression for cervical spondylosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 322(322):146–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pait TG, Killefer JA, Arnautovic KI (1996) Surgical anatomy of the anterior cervical spine: the disc space, vertebral artery, and associated bony structures. Neurosurgery 39(4):769–776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Russo VM, Graziano F, Peris-Celda M, Russo A, Ulm AJ (2011) The V(2) segment of the vertebral artery: anatomical considerations and surgical implications. J Neurosurg Spine 15(6):610–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Malla HP, Kim SB, Won JS, Choi MK (2018) Study of the transverse foramen in the subaxial cervical spine in Korean patients with degenerative changes: an anatomical note. Neurospine 15(2):163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malik SW, Stemper BD, Metkar U, Yoganandan N, Shender BS, Rao RD (2010) Location of the transverse foramen in the subaxial cervical spine in a young asymptomatic population. Spine 35(12):E514–E519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Curylo LJ, Mason HC, Bohlman HH, Yoo JU (2000) Tortuous course of the vertebral artery and anterior cervical decompression. Spine 25(22):2860–2864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Choi JW, Lee JK, Moon KS, Kim YS, Kwak HJ, Joo SP et al (2006) Endovascular embolization of iatrogenic vertebral artery injury during anterior cervical spine surgery: report of two cases and review of the literature. Spine 31(23):891–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller PR, Fabian TC, Croce MA, Cagiannos C, Williams JS, Vang M et al (2002) Prospective screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries: analysis of diagnostic modalities and outcomes. Ann Surg 236(3):386–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khan SA, Coulter I, Marks SM (2014) Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury secondary to vessel tortuosity in a grossly degenerate cervical spine. Br J Neurosurg 28(3):423–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Uğur HC, Uz A, Attar A, Tekdemir I, Egemen N, Elhan A (2000) Anatomical projection of the cervical uncinate process in ventral, ventrolateral, and posterior decompressive surgery. J Neurosurg 93(2 suppl):248

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81650031).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuan Wang or Jian-Gang Shi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no potential conflicts of interest in this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 1690 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kong, QJ., Sun, XF., Wang, Y. et al. Risk assessment of vertebral artery injury in anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) surgery: a cadaveric and radiologic study. Eur Spine J 28, 2417–2424 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06111-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06111-0

Keywords

Navigation