Abstract
Introduction and aim
In order to improve surgical planning of sagittal correction in AIS, we proposed a new sagittal classification—Abelin-Genevois et al. Eur Spine J (27(9):2192–2202, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5613-1). The main criticism is related to the fact that 2D lateral view results from the projection of the 3D deformity. The aim of this study is to show that the new sagittal classification system is a reliable system to describe the different sagittal scenarios that AIS could create both in 2D and 3D.
Methods
We performed retrospective radiograph analysis of prospectively collected data from 93 consecutive AIS patients who underwent an examination of the whole spine using the EOS® imaging system. 2D (Keops®) and 3D analyses (sterEOS®) provided frontal and sagittal spinal and spinopelvic parameters. In addition, 3D analysis provided apical vertebra rotation (AVR).
Results
Comparing 2D and 3D measurements for the general cohort, excellent correlation can be found for all parameters, but only fairly good for T10L2 and L1S1 angles. The highest variability was observed for T10L2, differences between 2D and 3D measurements being greater when the Cobb angle increased. AVR did not influence concordance between 2D and 3D measurements. Eighty-two percent were similarly classified in 2D and 3D according to the new classification. Misclassified patients were all AIS sagittal type 3 in 3D analysis, thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) lordosis being underestimated on 2D view.
Discussion
In conclusion, for the majority of cases (82%), 2D analysis may provide enough information for decision making when using a semi-automated 2D measurement system. However, in severe cases, especially when Cobb angle exceeds 55°, 3D analysis should be used to get a more accurate view on the thoracolumbar junction behavior.
Graphical abstract
These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Roaf R (1958) Rotation movements of the spine with special reference to scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 40-B(2):312–332
Somerville EW (1952) Rotational lordosis; the development of single curve. J Bone Joint Surg Br 34-B(3):421–427
Burton MS (2013) Diagnosis and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Pediatr Ann 42(11):224–228
Labelle H, Aubin C-E, Jackson R, Lenke L, Newton P, Parent S (2011) Seeing the spine in 3D: how will it change what we do? J Pediatr Orthop 31(1 Suppl):S37–S45
Rehm J, Germann T, Akbar M, Pepke W, Kauczor H-U, Weber M-A et al (2017) 3D-modeling of the spine using EOS imaging system: inter-reader reproducibility and reliability. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0171258
Tambe AD, Panikkar SJ, Millner PA, Tsirikos AI (2018) Current concepts in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Bone Jt J 100-B(4):415–424
Ferrero E, Mazda K, Simon A-L, Ilharreborde B (2018) Preliminary experience with SpineEOS, a new software for 3D planning in AIS surgery. Eur Spine J 27(9):2165–2174
Ponseti IV, Friedman B (1950) Prognosis in idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 32:381–395
King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65(9):1302–1313
Ovadia D (2013) Classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). J Child Orthop. 7(1):25–28
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(8):1169–1181
Bridwell KH, Dewald RL (eds) (2011) The textbook of spinal surgery, vol 2, 3rd edn. Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, Philadelphia
Illés T, Tunyogi-Csapó M, Somoskeöy S (2011) Breakthrough in three-dimensional scoliosis diagnosis: significance of horizontal plane view and vertebra vectors. Eur Spine J 20(1):135–143
Hong J-Y, Suh S-W, Easwar TR, Modi HN, Yang J-H, Park J-H (2011) Evaluation of the three-dimensional deformities in scoliosis surgery with computed tomography: efficacy and relationship with clinical outcomes. Spine 36(19):E1259–E1265
Melhem E, Assi A, El Rachkidi R, Ghanem I (2016) EOS® biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop 10(1):1–14
Kato S, Debaud C, Zeller RD (2017) Three-dimensional EOS analysis of apical vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 37(8):e543–e547. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0000000000000776
Kadoury S, Labelle H (2012) Classification of three-dimensional thoracic deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from a multivariate analysis. Eur Spine J 21(1):40–49
Thong W, Parent S, Wu J, Aubin C-E, Labelle H, Kadoury S (2016) Three-dimensional morphology study of surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patient from encoded geometric models. Eur Spine J 25(10):3104–3113
Abelin-Genevois K, Sassi D, Verdun S, Roussouly P (2018) Sagittal classification in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis : original description and therapeutic implications. Eur Spine J 27(9):2192–2202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5613-1
Abelin-Genevois K, Idjerouidene A, Roussouly P, Vital JM, Garin C (2014) Cervical spine alignment in the pediatric population: a radiographic normative study of 150 asymptomatic patients. Eur Spine J 23(7):1442–1448
Newton PO, Fujimori T, Doan J, Reighard FG, Bastrom TP, Misaghi A (2015) Defining the “Three-Dimensional Sagittal Plane” in Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(20):1694–1701
Ilharreborde B, Sebag G, Skalli W, Mazda K (2013) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system. Eur Spine J 22(11):2382
Humbert L, De Guise JA, Aubert B, Godbout B, Skalli W (2009) 3D reconstruction of the spine from biplanar X-rays using parametric models based on transversal and longitudinal inferences. Med Eng Phys 31(6):681–687
Somoskeoy S, Tunyogi-Csapo M, Bogyo C, Illes T (2012) Accuracy and reliability of and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system. Spine J 12(11):1052–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.002
Carreau JH, Bastrom T, Petcharaporn M, Schulte C, Marks M, Illés T et al (2014) Computer-generated, three-dimensional spine model from biplanar radiographs: a validity study in idiopathic scoliosis curves greater than 50 degrees. Spine Deform 2(2):81–88
Pasha S, Cahill PJ, Dormans JP, Flynn JM (2016) Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25(10):3137–3145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This paper is the result of the Masters of Science project conducted by Mareille Post under the responsibility of Pr Barend Van Royen, MD, PhD and under the supervision of Dr Kariman Abelin-Genevois, MD, PhD. The authors acknowledge Pr Barend Van Royen, MD, PhD for his support and supervision of Mareille Post, MSc, in the achievement of her scientific work, as a collaboration between the research group of Orthopedic Department of the Centre Medico Chirurgical des Massues Croix Rouge Francaise and the Medical Science School of VU Amsterdam. KAG and MP designed and wrote the manuscript. KAG conceived the study and the cohort. KAG, PR and MP collected the patients' data. SV was in charge of the methodology of the study and analyzed the data, and as biostatician was entirely and independently in charge of the statistical analysis. KAG, MP and SV reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have conflict of interest, except Pierre Roussouly as shareholder of Keops(R), Smaio, France.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Post, M., Verdun, S., Roussouly, P. et al. New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization. Eur Spine J 28, 551–558 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5819-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5819-2