Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intraoperative spine ultrasound: application and benefits

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 31 August 2016

Abstract

Purpose

Intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) has been described in numerous papers as an effective tool for spinal tumor resection, degenerative lesions and Chiari malformation surgery, but has not been routinely adopted by spine surgeons. We herein describe our experience with routine IUS application.

Methods

In 2011, the authors began to use Aloka Prosound Alpha 7 at the Sheba Medical Center during neurosurgical spinal tumor resection, thoracic disc herniation and Chiari malformation. In this paper, we retrospectively evaluated the volume of usage and the extent of intraoperative modification resulting from the use of IUS.

Results

During 2011–2013 we identified 131 cases that IUS could be of assistance. IUS was used in 78 cases (59.5 %); 37.5 % in 2011, 65 % in 2012 and 71 % in 2013. IUS was routinely performed after exposure of the dura and repeated at surgeon’s request. As a whole, IUS changed the course of surgery in 63 % of the cases.

Conclusion

IUS is safe and easy to use after a short learning curve. When used in indicated cases, it can replace cumbersome fluoroscopy, reduce the incision dimension and laminectomy levels, and demonstrate the extent of decompression. Incorporating IUS in spinal surgery education programs is warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montalvo BM, Quencer RM (1986) Intraoperative sonography in spinal surgery: current state of the art. Neuroradiology 28:551–590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mimatsu K, Kawakami N, Kato F, Saito H, Sato K (1992) Intraoperative ultrasonography of extramedullary spinal tumours. Neuroradiology 34:440–443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsuzaki H, Tokuhashi Y, Wakabayashi K, Ishihara K, Iwahashi M (1998) Differences on intraoperative ultrasonography between meningioma and neurilemmoma. Neuroradiology 40:40–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Milhorat TH, Bolognese PA (2003) Tailored operative technique for Chiari type I malformation using intraoperative color Doppler ultrasonography. Neurosurgery 53:899–905 (discussion 905–906)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Regelsberger J, Fritzsche E, Langer N, Westphal M (2005) Intraoperative sonography of intra- and extramedullary tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol 31:593–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yeh DD, Koch B, Crone KR (2006) Intraoperative ultrasonography used to determine the extent of surgery necessary during posterior fossa decompression in children with Chiari malformation type I. J Neurosurg 105:26–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McGirt MJ, Attenello FJ, Datoo G, Gathinji M, Atiba A, Weingart JD, Carson B, Jallo GI (2008) Intraoperative ultrasonography as a guide to patient selection for duraplasty after suboccipital decompression in children with Chiari malformation Type I. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2:52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou H, Miller D, Schulte DM, Benes L, Bozinov O, Sure U, Bertalanffy H (2011) Intraoperative ultrasound assistance in treatment of intradural spinal tumours. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113:531–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura A, Seichi A, Inoue H, Endo T, Sato M, Higashi T, Hoshino Y (2012) Ultrasonographic quantification of spinal cord and dural pulsations during cervical laminoplasty in patients with compressive myelopathy. Eur Spine J 21:2450–2455

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kern SJ, Smith RS, Fry WR, Helmer SD, Reed JA, Chang FC (1997) Sonographic examination of abdominal trauma by senior surgical residents. Am Surg 63:669–674

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mandavia DP, Aragona J, Chan L, Chan D, Henderson SO (2000) Ultrasound training for emergency physicians—a prospective study. Acad Emerg Med 7:1008–1014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jang T, Aubin C, Naunheim R (2004) Minimum training for right upper quadrant ultrasonography. Am J Emerg Med 22:439–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kristensen MS, Teoh WH, Graumann O, Laursen CB (2014) Ultrasonography for clinical decision-making and intervention in airway management: from the mouth to the lungs and pleurae. Insights Imaging 5:253–279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Konge L, Annema J, Vilmann P, Clementsen P, Ringsted C (2013) Transesophageal ultrasonography for lung cancer staging: learning curves of pulmonologists. J Thorac Oncol 8:1402–1408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Niazi AU, Tait G, Carvalho JC, Chan VW (2013) The use of an online three-dimensional model improves performance in ultrasound scanning of the spine: a randomized trial. Can J Anaesth 60:458–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vezzani A, Manca T, Vercelli A, Braghieri A, Magnacavallo A (2013) Ultrasonography as a guide during vascular access procedures and in the diagnosis of complications. J Ultrasound 16:161–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang T, Sineff S, Naunheim R, Aubin C (2004) Residents should not independently perform focused abdominal sonography for trauma after 10 training examinations. J Ultrasound Med 23:793–797

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. American College of Emergency Physicians (2009) Emergency ultrasound guidelines. Ann Emerg Med 53:550–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fritz T, Klein A, Krieglstein C, Mattern R, Kallieris D, Meeder PJ (2000) Teaching model for intraoperative spinal sonography in spinal fractures. An experimental study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:183–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ran Harel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. There are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harel, R., Knoller, N. Intraoperative spine ultrasound: application and benefits. Eur Spine J 25, 865–869 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4222-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4222-5

Keywords

Navigation