Abstract
Purpose
To assess the correction effect of hemivertebra resection for unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae by measuring corresponding parameters in both coronal and sagittal planes on series posteroanterior and lateral radiographs and report the related complications.
Methods
Twelve children with unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae were operated on by hemivertebra resection through a combined anterior and posterior approach or a posterior-only procedure. Mean age at time of surgery was 9.8 years (range 2–14 years). They were retrospectively studied with a mean follow-up of 48.7 months (range 30–60 months).
Results
The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 65.3° (range 45°–92°) before surgery and 13.8° (range 4°–30°) at the last follow-up. The correction rate was 80.0 % (range 65.5–92.4 %). The compensatory cranial curve was corrected from 25.8° (range 5°–53°) to 11.7° (range 0°–34°) with a correction rate of 65.9 % (range 33.3–100 %), and the compensatory caudal curve was corrected from 32.4° (range 17°–57°) to 7.1° (range 0°–20°) with a correction rate of 81.4 % (range 53.1–100 %). The angle of segmental kyphosis was 41.3° (range 12°–76°) before surgery and 17.0° (range −12° to 45°) at the final follow-up. The coronal imbalance was −1.0 cm (range −3.5 to 3 cm) before surgery and 0.0 cm (range −1.0 to 1.5 cm) at the most recent follow-up. The sagittal imbalance was 0.9 cm (range −3.2 to 3 cm) before surgery and 0.6 cm (range −3.0 to 3.5 cm) at the most recent follow-up. Complications including pedicle fractures, and pseudarthrosis were found in two patients (20 %).
Conclusions
In the patients with unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae, hemivertebra resection allows for excellent correction in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and great care should be taken to reduce the rate of complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McMaster MJ, Ohtsuka K (1982) The natural history of congenital scoliosis. A study of two hundred and fifty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1128–1147
Nasca RJ, Stilling FH 3rd, Stell HH (1975) Progression of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebrae and hemivertebrae with bars. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:456–466
Marks DS, Qaimkhani SA (2009) The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1751–1755. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af1caf
Benli IT, Aydin E, Alanay A, Uzumcugil O, Buyukgullu O, Kis M (2006) Results of complete hemivertebra excision followed by circumferential fusion and anterior or posterior instrumentation in patients with type-IA formation defect. Eur Spine J 15:1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0039-y
Halm H (2011) Transpedicular hemivertebra resection and instrumented fusion for congenital scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20:993–994. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1806-6
Li X, Luo Z, Tao H, Du J, Wang Z (2008) Hemivertebra resection for the treatment of congenital lumbarspinal scoliosis with lateral-posterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2001–2006. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d1d29
Hedequist DJ, Hall JE, Emans JB (2005) Hemivertebra excision in children via simultaneous anterior and posterior exposures. J Pediatr Orthop 25:60–63 (00004694-200501000-00014)
Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Lumbosacral hemivertebrae resection by combined approach—medium- and long-term follow-up. Spine 31:1232–1239. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000217616.17692.a0
Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Thoracolumbar hemivertebrae resection by double approach in a single procedure—long-term follow-up. Spine 31:1745–1757. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000224176.40457.52
Bollini GR, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Lumbar hemivertebra resection. J Bone Joint Surg-Am 88A:1043–1052. doi:10.2106/Jbjs.E.00530
Xu WH, Yang SH, Wu XH, Claus C (2010) Hemivertebra excision with short-segment spinal fusion through combined anterior and posterior approaches for congenital spinal deformities in children. J Pediatr Orthop-Part B 19:545–550. doi:10.1097/Bpb.0b013e32833cb887
Mladenov K, Kunkel P, Stuecker R (2012) Hemivertebra resection in children, results after single posterior approach and after combined anterior and posterior approach: a comparative study. Eur Spine J 21:506–513. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2010-4
Jalanko T, Rintala R, Puisto V, Helenius I (2011) Hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis in young children comparison of clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life outcomes between the anteroposterior and posterolateral approaches. Spine 36:41–49. doi:10.1097/Brs.0b013e3181ccafd4
Yaszay B, O’Brien M, Shufflebarger HL, Betz RR, Lonner B, Shah SA, Boachie-Adjei O, Crawford A, Letko L, Harms J, Gupta MC, Sponseller PD, Abel MF, Flynn J, Macagno A, Newton PO (2011) Efficacy of hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis a multicenter retrospective comparison of three surgical techniques. Spine 36:2052–2060. doi:10.1097/Brs.0b013e318233f4bb
Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S, Yamano Y (2002) Single-stage excision of hemivertebrae via the posterior approach alone for congenital spine deformity—follow-up period longer than ten years. Spine 27:110–115. doi:10.1097/00007632-200201010-00026
Ruf M, Harms J (2003) Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation: early correction in children aged 1 to 6 years. Spine 28:2132–2138. doi:10.1097/01.Brs.0000084627.57308.4a
Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Hemivertebra resection by a posterior approach—innovative operative technique and first results. Spine 27:1116–1123. doi:10.1097/00007632-200205150-00020
Ruf M, Jensen R, Letko L, Harms J (2009) Hemivertebra resection and osteotomies in congenital spine deformity. Spine 34:1791–1799. doi:10.1097/Brs.0b013e3181ab6290
Peng XS, Chen LY, Zou XN (2011) Hemivertebra resection and scoliosis correction by a unilateral posterior approach using single rod and pedicle screw instrumentation in children under 5 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop-Part B 20:397–403. doi:10.1097/Bpb.0b013e3283492060
Aydogan M, Ozturk C, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Karatoprak O, Hamzaoglu A (2008) Posterior vertebrectomy in kyphosis, scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis due to hemivertebra. J Pediatr Orthop B 17:33–37. doi:10.1097/01.bpb.0000218031.75557.f0
Zhang J, Shengru W, Qiu G, Yu B, Yipeng W, Luk KD (2011) The efficacy and complications of posterior hemivertebra resection. Eur Spine J 20:1692–1702. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1710-0
Garrido E, Tome-Bermejo F, Tucker SK, Noordeen HN, Morley TR (2008) Short anterior instrumented fusion and posterior convex non-instrumented fusion of hemivertebra for congenital scoliosis in very young children. Eur Spine J 17:1507–1514. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0760-4
Hedequist D, Emans J, Proctor M (2009) Three rod technique facilitates hemivertebra wedge excision in young children through a posterior only approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E225–E229. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181997029
Jeszenszky D, Fekete TF, Kleinstueck FS, Haschtmann D, Bognar L (2012) Fusionless posterior hemivertebra resection in a 2-year-old child with 16 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 21:1471–1476. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2152-z
Winter RB, Lonstein JE (2010) Scoliosis secondary to a hemivertebra: seven patients with gradual improvement without treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E49–E52. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bad56e
Dimeglio A, Bonnel F (1989) Growth of the Spine. In: Raimondi AJ (ed) Principles of pediatric neurosurgery: the pediatric spine, development and the dysraphic stage. Springer, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhou, C., Liu, L., Song, Y. et al. Hemivertebrae resection for unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae: is it worth it?. Eur Spine J 23, 536–542 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3065-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3065-1