Skip to main content
Log in

Hemivertebrae resection for unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae: is it worth it?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the correction effect of hemivertebra resection for unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae by measuring corresponding parameters in both coronal and sagittal planes on series posteroanterior and lateral radiographs and report the related complications.

Methods

Twelve children with unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae were operated on by hemivertebra resection through a combined anterior and posterior approach or a posterior-only procedure. Mean age at time of surgery was 9.8 years (range 2–14 years). They were retrospectively studied with a mean follow-up of 48.7 months (range 30–60 months).

Results

The mean Cobb angle of the main curve was 65.3° (range 45°–92°) before surgery and 13.8° (range 4°–30°) at the last follow-up. The correction rate was 80.0 % (range 65.5–92.4 %). The compensatory cranial curve was corrected from 25.8° (range 5°–53°) to 11.7° (range 0°–34°) with a correction rate of 65.9 % (range 33.3–100 %), and the compensatory caudal curve was corrected from 32.4° (range 17°–57°) to 7.1° (range 0°–20°) with a correction rate of 81.4 % (range 53.1–100 %). The angle of segmental kyphosis was 41.3° (range 12°–76°) before surgery and 17.0° (range −12° to 45°) at the final follow-up. The coronal imbalance was −1.0 cm (range −3.5 to 3 cm) before surgery and 0.0 cm (range −1.0 to 1.5 cm) at the most recent follow-up. The sagittal imbalance was 0.9 cm (range −3.2 to 3 cm) before surgery and 0.6 cm (range −3.0 to 3.5 cm) at the most recent follow-up. Complications including pedicle fractures, and pseudarthrosis were found in two patients (20 %).

Conclusions

In the patients with unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae, hemivertebra resection allows for excellent correction in both the coronal and sagittal planes, and great care should be taken to reduce the rate of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McMaster MJ, Ohtsuka K (1982) The natural history of congenital scoliosis. A study of two hundred and fifty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1128–1147

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nasca RJ, Stilling FH 3rd, Stell HH (1975) Progression of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebrae and hemivertebrae with bars. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:456–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marks DS, Qaimkhani SA (2009) The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1751–1755. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af1caf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benli IT, Aydin E, Alanay A, Uzumcugil O, Buyukgullu O, Kis M (2006) Results of complete hemivertebra excision followed by circumferential fusion and anterior or posterior instrumentation in patients with type-IA formation defect. Eur Spine J 15:1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0039-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Halm H (2011) Transpedicular hemivertebra resection and instrumented fusion for congenital scoliosis. Eur Spine J 20:993–994. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1806-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li X, Luo Z, Tao H, Du J, Wang Z (2008) Hemivertebra resection for the treatment of congenital lumbarspinal scoliosis with lateral-posterior approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2001–2006. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817d1d29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedequist DJ, Hall JE, Emans JB (2005) Hemivertebra excision in children via simultaneous anterior and posterior exposures. J Pediatr Orthop 25:60–63 (00004694-200501000-00014)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Lumbosacral hemivertebrae resection by combined approach—medium- and long-term follow-up. Spine 31:1232–1239. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000217616.17692.a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Thoracolumbar hemivertebrae resection by double approach in a single procedure—long-term follow-up. Spine 31:1745–1757. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000224176.40457.52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bollini GR, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Lumbar hemivertebra resection. J Bone Joint Surg-Am 88A:1043–1052. doi:10.2106/Jbjs.E.00530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu WH, Yang SH, Wu XH, Claus C (2010) Hemivertebra excision with short-segment spinal fusion through combined anterior and posterior approaches for congenital spinal deformities in children. J Pediatr Orthop-Part B 19:545–550. doi:10.1097/Bpb.0b013e32833cb887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mladenov K, Kunkel P, Stuecker R (2012) Hemivertebra resection in children, results after single posterior approach and after combined anterior and posterior approach: a comparative study. Eur Spine J 21:506–513. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2010-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Jalanko T, Rintala R, Puisto V, Helenius I (2011) Hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis in young children comparison of clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life outcomes between the anteroposterior and posterolateral approaches. Spine 36:41–49. doi:10.1097/Brs.0b013e3181ccafd4

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yaszay B, O’Brien M, Shufflebarger HL, Betz RR, Lonner B, Shah SA, Boachie-Adjei O, Crawford A, Letko L, Harms J, Gupta MC, Sponseller PD, Abel MF, Flynn J, Macagno A, Newton PO (2011) Efficacy of hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis a multicenter retrospective comparison of three surgical techniques. Spine 36:2052–2060. doi:10.1097/Brs.0b013e318233f4bb

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S, Yamano Y (2002) Single-stage excision of hemivertebrae via the posterior approach alone for congenital spine deformity—follow-up period longer than ten years. Spine 27:110–115. doi:10.1097/00007632-200201010-00026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruf M, Harms J (2003) Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation: early correction in children aged 1 to 6 years. Spine 28:2132–2138. doi:10.1097/01.Brs.0000084627.57308.4a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Hemivertebra resection by a posterior approach—innovative operative technique and first results. Spine 27:1116–1123. doi:10.1097/00007632-200205150-00020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruf M, Jensen R, Letko L, Harms J (2009) Hemivertebra resection and osteotomies in congenital spine deformity. Spine 34:1791–1799. doi:10.1097/Brs.0b013e3181ab6290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Peng XS, Chen LY, Zou XN (2011) Hemivertebra resection and scoliosis correction by a unilateral posterior approach using single rod and pedicle screw instrumentation in children under 5 years of age. J Pediatr Orthop-Part B 20:397–403. doi:10.1097/Bpb.0b013e3283492060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aydogan M, Ozturk C, Tezer M, Mirzanli C, Karatoprak O, Hamzaoglu A (2008) Posterior vertebrectomy in kyphosis, scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis due to hemivertebra. J Pediatr Orthop B 17:33–37. doi:10.1097/01.bpb.0000218031.75557.f0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang J, Shengru W, Qiu G, Yu B, Yipeng W, Luk KD (2011) The efficacy and complications of posterior hemivertebra resection. Eur Spine J 20:1692–1702. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-1710-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Garrido E, Tome-Bermejo F, Tucker SK, Noordeen HN, Morley TR (2008) Short anterior instrumented fusion and posterior convex non-instrumented fusion of hemivertebra for congenital scoliosis in very young children. Eur Spine J 17:1507–1514. doi:10.1007/s00586-008-0760-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hedequist D, Emans J, Proctor M (2009) Three rod technique facilitates hemivertebra wedge excision in young children through a posterior only approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:E225–E229. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181997029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jeszenszky D, Fekete TF, Kleinstueck FS, Haschtmann D, Bognar L (2012) Fusionless posterior hemivertebra resection in a 2-year-old child with 16 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 21:1471–1476. doi:10.1007/s00586-012-2152-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Winter RB, Lonstein JE (2010) Scoliosis secondary to a hemivertebra: seven patients with gradual improvement without treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:E49–E52. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bad56e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dimeglio A, Bonnel F (1989) Growth of the Spine. In: Raimondi AJ (ed) Principles of pediatric neurosurgery: the pediatric spine, development and the dysraphic stage. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Limin Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, C., Liu, L., Song, Y. et al. Hemivertebrae resection for unbalanced multiple hemivertebrae: is it worth it?. Eur Spine J 23, 536–542 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3065-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3065-1

Keywords

Navigation