Skip to main content
Log in

Hemivertebra resection in children, results after single posterior approach and after combined anterior and posterior approach: a comparative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the results after hemivertebra resection through a single posterior approach and through a combined anterior and posterior approach.

Methods

This is a retrospective study on patients treated by hemivertebra resection with monosegmental instrumentation for congenital scoliosis at a single institution. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach. Both groups were compared for curve correction, complication rate and perioperative data. Paired samples T test was used for statistical evaluation.

Results

Twenty-five consecutive patients were included. In 12 cases the hemivertebra resection was performed through a single posterior approach (SPA) and in 13 via a combined anterior and posterior approach (CAPA). Curve correction was similar in both groups (59 vs. 55%, p > 0.05). Duration of surgery (272 vs. 319 min) and postoperative mechanical ventilation were shorter in the SPA group (5 vs. 30 h), but did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Significant blood loss necessitating blood transfusion was observed in six patients operated through an SPA and in 8 patients operated through a CAPA. The duration of the ICU management (1 vs. 3 days) and the hospital stay (12 vs. 19 days) were significantly shorter in the SPA group (p < 0.05). Less surgery related general complications were observed in the SPA group (0 vs. 38%).

Conclusions

Similar correction of the main and the compensatory curves can be achieved with single posterior and combined anterior and posterior hemivertebra resection. Benefits of the SPA are lower complication rate and shorter recovery period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winter RB, Moe JH, Eilers VE (1968) Congenital scoliosis: a study of 234 patients treated and untreated: Part I: natural history. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marks DS, Qaimkhani SA (2009) The natural history of congenital scoliosis and kyphosis. Spine 34(17):1751–1755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nasca RJ, Stelling FH, Steel HH (1975) Progression of congenital scoliosis due to hemivertebrae and hemivertebrae with bars. J Bone Joint Surg Am 57:456–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McMaster MJ, Ohtsuka K (1982) The natural history of congenital scoliosis. A study of two hundred and fifty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1128–1147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Royle ND (1928) Operative removal of an accessory vertebrae. Med J Aust 1:467–468, 387–391

    Google Scholar 

  6. Von Lackum HL, Smith AD (1933) Removal vertebral bodies in the treatment of scoliosis. Surg Gyn Obstet 57:250–256

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wiles P (1951) Resection of dorsal vertebrae in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 33:151–154

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leatherman KD, Dickson RA (1979) Two-stage corrective surgery for congenital deformities of the spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61:324–328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergoin M, Bollini G, Taibi L et al (1986) Excision of hemivertebrae in children with congenital scoliosis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 12:179–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bradford DS, Boachie-Adjei O (1990) One-stage anterior and posterior hemivertebral resection and arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:536–540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lazar R, Hall J (1999) Simultaneous anterior, posterior hemivertebra excision. Clin Orthop 363:76–84

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Thoracolumbar hemivertebrae resection by double approach in a single procedure: long-term follow-up. Spine 31(15):1745–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bollini G, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Launay F, Jouve JL (2006) Lumbar hemivertebra resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(5):1043–1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hall JE, Herndon WA, Levine CR (1981) Surgical treatment of congenital scoliosis with or without Harrington instrumentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:608–619

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedequist DJ, Hall JE, Emans JB (2004) The safety and efficacy of spinal instrumentation in children with congenital spine deformities. Spine 29:2081–2086 discussion 2087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Grossfeld S, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Leonard A, Johnson L (1997) Complications of anterior spinal surgery in children. J Pediatr Orthop 17(1):89–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ruf M, Harms J (2002) Hemivertebra resection by a posterior approach: innovative operative technique and first results. Spine 27(10):1116–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruf M, Harms J (2003) Posterior hemivertebra resection with transpedicular instrumentation: early correction in children aged 1 to 6 years. Spine 28:2132–2138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shono Y, Abumi K, Kaneda K (2001) One-stage posterior hemivertebra resection and correction using segmental posterior instrumentation. Spine 26(7):752–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nakamura H, Matsuda H, Konishi S, Yamano Y (2002) Single-stage excision of hemivertebrae via the posterior approach alone for congenital spine deformity: follow-up period longer than ten years. Spine 27(1):110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Callahan BC, Georgopoulos G, Eilert RE (1997) Hemivertebral excision for congenital scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 17:96–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Winter RB, Moe JH, Lonstein JE (1984) Posterior spinal arthrodesis for congenital scoliosis, an analysis of the cases of two hundred and ninety patients: 2 to 19 years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1188–1197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Slabaugh PB, Winter RB, Lonstein JE et al (1980) Lumbosacral hemivertebrae: a review of twenty-four patients with excision in eight. Spine 5:234–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jalanko T, Rintala R, Puisto V, Helenius I (2011) hemivertebra resection for congenital scoliosis in young children: comparison of clinical, radiographic, and health-related quality of life outcomes between the anteroposterior and posterolateral approaches. Spine 36(1):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  25. Winter RB (1976) Congenital kyphoscoliosis with paralysis following hemivertebra excision. Clin Orthop 119:116–125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Holte DC, Winter RB, Lonstein JE et al (1995) Excision of hemivertebrae and wedge resection in the treatment of congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:159–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwartz DM, Auerbach JP, Dormans JP et al (2007) Detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2440–2449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiril Mladenov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mladenov, K., Kunkel, P. & Stuecker, R. Hemivertebra resection in children, results after single posterior approach and after combined anterior and posterior approach: a comparative study. Eur Spine J 21, 506–513 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2010-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2010-4

Keywords

Navigation