Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anterior plate fixation with unicortical screw purchase does not involve the risk of posterior cortex penetration and possible injuries of the spinal cord. However, there are very few biomechanical data about the immediate stability of non-locking plate fixation with unicortical or bicortical screw placement. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the immediate biomechanical properties in terms of flexibility of a non-locking anterior plate system with 4.5-mm screw fixation and unicortical or bicortical screw purchase applied to a single destabilized cervical spine motion segment. Using fresh cadaveric cervical spine specimens C3-C7, multidirectional flexibility was measured at the level C4-C5 before and after destabilization and fixation with an anterior plate with either unicortical or bicortical screw purchase. The results showed that fixed cervical spine segments with anterior plate and bicortical screw purchase were more rigid than intact specimens in all modes of testing. The difference was statistically significant for flexion and extension (P<0.001). Plate fixation with unicortical screw purchase had statistically significant decreased ranges of motion compared to the intact specimen only in extension. Neither unicortical nor bicortical screw purchase decreased the range of motion significantly in axial rotation compared to the intact specimens. This in vitro study documented that neither unicortical nor bicortical screw purchase with non-locking plate fixation can increase stability in all modes of testing, in axial rotation in particular. Direct comparison between the group with uni- and that with bicortical screw fixation did not reveal significant differences, and therefore no advantage was shown for either type of screw fixation. Therefore, we demonstrated that both uni- and bicortical screw purchase with non-locking plate fixation can decrease immediate flexibility of the tested motion segment, with better results for bicortical purchase. No significant differences were found comparing the two groups of screw fixation. These data suggest that unicortical screw fixation can be used for anterior plate fixation with a comparable immediate stability to bicortical screw fixation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aebi M, Zuber K, Marchesi D (1991) Treatment of cervical spine injuries with anterior plating. Indications, techniques, and results. Spine 16:S38–S45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berven S, Pedlow F (1999) A review of recent literature on the biomechanics of spinal instrumentation. Curr Opin Orthop 10:142–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blauth M, Schmidt U, Dienst M, Knop C, Lobenhoffer P, Tscherne H (1996) Long-term outcome of 57 patients after ventral interbody spondylodesis of the lower cervical spine (in German). Unfallchirurg 99:925–939

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blauth M, Knop C, Bastian L, Lobenhoffer P (1997) New developments in surgery of the injured spine (in German). Orthopade 26:437–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Böhler J (1971) Operative Behandlung von Halswirbelsäulenverletzungen. Hefte Unfallheilkd 108:132–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohler J, Gaudernak T (1980) Anterior plate stabilization for fracture-dislocations of the lower cervical spine. J Trauma 20:203–205

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown JA, Havel P, Ebraheim N, Greenblatt SH, Jackson WT (1988) Cervical stabilization by plate and bone fusion. Spine 13:236–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cabanela ME, Ebersold MJ (1988) Anterior plate stabilization for bursting teardrop fractures of the cervical spine. Spine 13:888–891

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Caspar W, Barbier DD, Klara PM (1989) Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma. Neurosurgery 25:491–502

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clausen JD, Ryken TC, Traynelis VC, Sawin PD, Dexter F, Goel VK (1996) Biomechanical evaluation of Caspar and Cervical Spine Locking plate systems in a cadaveric model. J Neurosurg 84:1039–1045

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Coe JD, Warden KE, Sutterlin CE III, McAfee PC (1989) Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model. Spine 14:1122–1131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Oliveira JC (1987) Anterior plate fixation of traumatic lesions of the lower cervical spine. Spine 12:324–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Do KY, Lim TH, Won YJ, Eck J, An HS (2001) A biomechanical comparison of modern anterior and posterior plate fixation of the cervical spine. Spine 26:15–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gallagher MR, Maiman DJ, Reinartz J, Pintar F, Yoganandan N (1993) Biomechanical evaluation of Caspar cervical screws: comparative stability under cyclical loading. Neurosurgery 33:1045–1050

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Garvey TA, Eismont FJ, Roberti LJ (1992) Anterior decompression, structural bone grafting, and Caspar plate stabilization for unstable cervical spine fractures and/or dislocations. Spine 17:S431–S435

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Plets C (1995) Long-term results after anterior cervical fusion and osteosynthetic stabilization for fractures and/or dislocations of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord 8:500–508

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Grubb MR, Currier BL, Shih JS, Bonin V, Grabowski JJ, Chao EY (1998) Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cervical spine stabilization. Spine 23:886–892

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffmann R, McKellop HA, Sarmiento A, Lu B, Ebramzadeh E (1991) Three-dimensional measurement of fracture gap motion. Biomechanical study of experimental tibial fractures with anterior clasp fixator and ring fixator (in German). Unfallchirurg 94:395–400

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Orozco DR, Llovet-Tapies J (1970) Osteosintesis en las fractures de raquis cervical. Rev Orthop Traumatol 14:285–288

    Google Scholar 

  20. Panjabi MM (1988) Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices. I. A conceptual framework. Spine 13:1129–1134

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Panjabi MM (1998) Cervical spine models for biomechanical research. Spine 23:2684–2700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pitzen T, Wilke HJ, Caspar W, Claes L, Steudel WI (1999) Evaluation of a new monocortical screw for anterior cervical fusion and plating by a combined biomechanical and clinical study. Eur Spine J 8:382–387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pitzen T, Barbier D, Tintinger F, Steudel WI, Strowitzki M (2002) Screw fixation to the posterior cortical shell does not influence peak torque and pullout in anterior cervical plating. Eur Spine J 11:494–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Richman JD, Daniel TE, Anderson DD, Miller PL, Douglas RA (1995) Biomechanical evaluation of cervical spine stabilization methods using a porcine model. Spine 20:2192–2197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Richter M, Wilke HJ, Kluger P, Claes L, Puhl W (1999) Biomechanical evaluation of a newly developed monocortical expansion screw for use in anterior internal fixation of the cervical spine. In vitro comparison with two established internal fixation systems. Spine 24:207–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ripa DR, Kowall MG, Meyer PR Jr, Rusin JJ (1991) Series of ninety-two traumatic cervical spine injuries stabilized with anterior ASIF plate fusion technique. Spine 16:S46–S55

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ryken TC, Goel VK, Clausen JD, Traynelis VC (1995) Assessment of unicortical and bicortical fixation in a quasistatic cadaveric model. Role of bone mineral density and screw torque. Spine 20:1861–1867

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smith SA, Lindsey RW, Doherty BJ, Alexander J, Dickson JH (1995) An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of the Orosco and AO locking plates for anterior cervical spine fixation. J Spinal Disord 8:220–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Spivak JM, Chen D, Kummer FJ (1999) The effect of locking fixation screws on the stability of anterior cervical plating. Spine 24:334–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sutterlin CE III, McAfee PC, Warden KE, Rey RM Jr, Farey ID (1988) A biomechanical evaluation of cervical spinal stabilization methods in a bovine model. Static and cyclical loading. Spine 13:795–802

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tscherne H, Hiebler G, Muhr G (1971) Zur operativen Behandlung von Frakturen und Luxationen der Halswirbelsäule. Hefte Unfallheilkd142–144

  32. Ulrich C, Worsdorfer O, Claes L, Magerl F (1987) Comparative study of the stability of anterior and posterior cervical spine fixation procedures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 106:226–231

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. White AA, Panjabi MM (1990) Clinical biomechanics of the spine. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia

  34. Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L (1998) Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7:148–154

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yamamoto I, Panjabi MM, Crisco T, Oxland T (1989) Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint. Spine 14:1256–1260

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Wolfgang Lehmann

    Present address: Department of Trauma Surgery, Hamburg University School of Medicine, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

  2. Michael Blauth

    Present address: Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Trauma Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

    Wolfgang Lehmann, Michael Blauth, Daniel Briem &  Ulf Schmidt

  2. Department of Trauma Surgery, Hamburg University School of Medicine, Hamburg, Germany

    Daniel Briem

Authors
  1. Wolfgang Lehmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Blauth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Briem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ulf Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Schmidt.

Additional information

Supported by the German Research Foundation, DFG, Bonn, Germany

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lehmann, W., Blauth, M., Briem, D. et al. Biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical spine plate fixation systems with unicortical and bicortical screw purchase. Eur Spine J 13, 69–75 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0578-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0578-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation